iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Marriage-Income Link: Adults With Good Income, College Education More Likely To Marry

First Posted: 11/18/10 06:45 AM ET Updated: 11/17/11 09:02 AM ET

Marriage Income

A new "marriage gap" in the United States is increasingly aligned with a growing income gap.

Marriage, while declining among all groups, remains the norm for adults with a college education and good income but is now markedly less prevalent among those with less income and education, according to a new Pew Research Center study. The report is based on a new nationwide survey, conducted in association with TIME, and complemented by an analysis of demographic and economic data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

The survey finds that those who are less well-off are as likely as others to want to marry, but they place a higher premium on economic security as a condition for marriage. And this is a bar that many may not meet.

The survey also finds that Americans are both accepting and uneasy about the transformative trends of the past 50 years that have led to a sharp decline in marriage and a rise of new family forms, from single parenthood to blended families.

Against a backdrop of declining marriage rates, the survey finds that nearly four in 10 Americans say marriage is becoming obsolete. But even as marriage shrinks, family -- in all its emerging varieties -- remains resilient. The survey finds that Americans have an expansive definition of what constitutes a family. And the vast majority of adults consider their own family to be the most important, most satisfying element of their lives.

Key findings include:

  • The Class-Based Decline in Marriage. About half (52 percent) of all adults in this country were married in 2008; back in 1960, seven in 10 (72 percent) were. This decline has occurred along class lines. In 2008, there was a 16-percentage-point gap in marriage rates between college graduates (64 percent) and those with a high school diploma or less (48 percent). In 1960, this gap had been just four percentage points (76 percent vs. 72 percent). The survey finds that those with a high school diploma or less are just as likely as those with a college degree to say they want to marry, but they place a higher premium than college graduates (38 percent versus 21 percent) on financial stability as a very important reason to marry.
  • Is Marriage Becoming Obsolete? Nearly four in 10 survey respondents (39 percent) say that it is; in 1978, when Time magazine posed this question to registered voters, just 28 percent agreed. Those most likely to agree include those who are a part of the phenomenon (62 percent of cohabiting parents) as well as those most likely to be troubled by it (42 percent of self-described conservatives). Despite these growing uncertainties, Americans are more upbeat about the future of marriage and family (67 percent say they are optimistic) than about the future of the country's educational system (50 percent optimistic), its economic system (46 percent optimistic) or its morals and ethics (41 percent optimistic).
  • An Ambivalent Public. The public's response to changing marital norms and family forms reflects a mix of acceptance and unease. On the troubled side of the ledger: Seven in 10 (69 percent) say the trend toward more single women having children is bad for society, and 61 percent say that a child needs both a mother and father to grow up happily. On the more accepting side, only a minority say the trends toward more cohabitation without marriage (43 percent), more unmarried couples raising children (43 percent), more gay couples raising children (43 percent) and more people of different races marrying (14 percent) are bad for society. Relatively few say any of these trends are good for society, but many say they make little difference.
  • Group Differences. Where people stand on the various changes in marriage and family life depends to some degree on who they are and how they live. The young are more accepting than the old of the emerging arrangements; the secular are more accepting than the religious; liberals are more accepting than conservatives; the unmarried are more accepting than the married; and, in most cases, blacks are more accepting than whites. The net result of all these group differences is a nearly even three-way split among the full public. A third (34 percent) say the growing variety of family arrangements is a good thing; 29 percent say it is a bad thing and 32 percent say it makes little or no difference.
  • The Resilience of Families. The decline of marriage has not knocked family life off its pedestal. Three-quarters of all adults (76 percent) say their family is the most important element of their life; 75 percent say they are "very satisfied" with their family life, and more than eight in 10 say the family they live in now is as close as (45 percent) or closer than (40 percent) the family in which they grew up. However, on all of these questions, married adults give more positive responses than do unmarried adults.
  • The Definition of Family. By emphatic margins, the public does not see marriage as the only path to family formation. Fully 86 percent say a single parent and child constitute a family; nearly as many (80 percent) say an unmarried couple living together with a child is a family; and 63 percent say a gay or lesbian couple raising a child is a family. The presence of children clearly matters in these definitions. If a cohabiting couple has no children, a majority of the public says they are not a family. Marriage matters, too. If a childless couple is married, 88 percent consider them to be a family.
  • The Ties that Bind. In response to a question about whom they would assist with money or caregiving in a time of need, Americans express a greater sense of obligation toward relatives -- including relatives by way of fractured marriages -- than toward best friends. The ranking of relatives aligns in a predictable hierarchy. More survey respondents express an obligation to help out a parent (83 percent would feel very obligated) or grown child (77 percent) than say the same about a stepparent (55 percent) or a step or half sibling (43 percent). But when asked about one's best friend, just 39 percent say they would feel a similar sense of obligation.


The survey was conducted from Oct.1-21, 2010, on landlines and cell phones with a nationally representative sample of 2,691 adults 18 and older. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.6 percentage points for the full sample. Interviews were done in English and Spanish by Princeton Survey Research Associates International.

___

Online:

http://pewsocialtrends.org/2010/11/18/the-decline-of-marriage-and-rise-of-new-families/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

A new "marriage gap" in the United States is increasingly aligned with a growing income gap. Marriage, while declining among all groups, remains the norm for adults with a college education and good ...
A new "marriage gap" in the United States is increasingly aligned with a growing income gap. Marriage, while declining among all groups, remains the norm for adults with a college education and good ...
Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:12 AM on 11/23/2010
As societies evolve old rules often become obsolete and new rules, forms and customs need to adjust to the changing circumstances. Since marriage can be either a heaven or a hell or a mixture of both, about half end in divorce which is almost always a gut wrenching hellish experience. Maybe it time to rethink marriage. Perhaps a contract for a specified period of time might be an answer. At the end of the contract period, the two could agree to a renewal for another specified period or do nothing and the union desolves with each going their separate way. Issues such as property division and child custody could be worked out in advance and made a part of the original contract. This seem like a reasonable way to end an unpleasant relationship without the hellish, not to mention, expensive experience of a divorce.
10:28 PM on 11/20/2010
Is it also possible that society teaches a need for the man to be major bread winner in the family; leaving less educated members a feeling of inadequacy for making the marital leap?
photo
GEM-592
Edit your micro-bio.
08:09 PM on 11/19/2010
... and then their real education begins.
01:59 PM on 11/19/2010
The main reason to marry is to ensure the inheritance rights of the children born into the marriage. That's why the folks always comment on how much the baby has the daddy's features. Think about it!
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
05:37 PM on 11/19/2010
Yes I agree that with a formal marriage contract, you define inheritance but you also define property rights--particularly important upon dissolution of the union. However, I think a formalized marriage also serves a societal purpose in that it define, or at least helps to define the parentage of the offspring (at least the maternal side--you always know the mother while fatherhood is only know with tests). This at least is an attempt of preventing intermarriage between two half-related offspring.
11:46 PM on 11/19/2010
Kind of a silly comment, actually. Rather outdated. Where is it written or required that children born into a marriage must get inheritance from their biological parents? Parents have no obligation to leave any of their assets to their children at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nopinky
04:12 PM on 11/20/2010
Probate law in every state grants first priority, and often the largest share of an estate, to children. It's not an obligation to leave anything, it's an obligation by the state to disburse anything you DO leave to your children first if there's no valid will or some portion of the estate is not accounted for. Fortunately most states have eliminated the "legitimate child" discrepancies (which often refuse inheritance entirely to children born out of wedlock or not formally adopted), but some still have the distinction, cutting out "illegitimate" children or reducing their probate share.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
10:49 AM on 11/19/2010
A quaint alternate term for 'marrying' is to 'start a household". That term gives the institution more of an economic turn-of-phrase than the romance behind the word 'marriage'. In 19th century England a man was not expected to marry until he was able to demonstrate he could provide a suitable household for his family. Fast-forward to 2010 U.S.A.  Can you really expect all those underemployed 26 year olds who work nights stacking boxes at Walmart and sleep in their mom's furnished basement to be able to provide a household for a family?
 
The implication of all these studies and surveys on marriage seems to be that a slippage in morality is degradig the institution. But how many people dream of starting a household but simply can't afford it? The decay of marriage  - if such a trend exists - is an economic trend.
11:48 PM on 11/19/2010
And 19th century women rarely worked outside the home for pay. Fast forward to 2010. Many many women work and make good salaries. Many women are more educated and make more than men do. We don't all expect to quit working when we marry and have the husband be the sole financial support for the household. That notion is a bit outdated.
01:05 PM on 11/22/2010
I don't agree that the "decay of marriage...is an economic trend." It seems you're confusing cause and effect. The lack of "affordability" doesn't keep "underemployed 26 year olds" from impregnating unmarried women and then abandoning them and their offspring. Look at the extraordinary increase in out-of-wedlock births, particularly among blacks (70+%). The decline of the unitary family is a cultural issue that is manifested in all sorts of negative ways.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
08:21 AM on 11/19/2010
A similarly nutty commentary on how married people seemed to have higher incomes was posted a while back. This is just a backwards read back of the same dubious material.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
07:44 PM on 11/18/2010
A good and interesting study, but not brand new this week

" Adults With Good Income, College Education More Likely To Marry"
SOUNDS LIKE THE GAYS.................. OH, WAIT!
Perhaps Gay folks would be happier, contribute even more to society, as well as enjoying equal rights, equal taxation, inheritance, medical insurance, and so on
IF THE MEANSPIRITED "CHURCHES" DID NOT REACH ACROSS STATE LINES
to control others' behavior http://nomexposed.org/

WHAT IF SOME BIG RELIGIONS GAVE UP TRYING TO STOP THE TIDE... and let alternate forms have their place in society? It does not take a genius to observe that their purpose is to control and keep their OWN members, using Gays as a convenient target.

WHAT IF EVERYONE COULD SMILE TO THINK OF ALL THOSE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
GOING TO FEED KIDS AND HELP POOR FAMILIES STAY TOGETHER?

Oh, no! It's better to pretend that Jesus finds the love in Gay peoples' hearts to be sinful and shameful.
MY Jesus does not judge or exclude, and knows that love comes from God.
04:02 PM on 11/18/2010
How sad that class and money are now determining who people can and can't fall in love with these days :(
05:03 PM on 11/18/2010
Way to miss the entire point of the article. "The survey finds that those who are less well-off are as likely as others to want to marry, but they place a higher premium on economic security as a condition for marriage. And this is a bar that many may not meet. "

Reading comprehension: try it some time!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Kellerman
Let's have more sanity toward each other
07:46 PM on 11/18/2010
Irony, look it up some time!
(although I personally think the irony fell flat)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Militant Leftist
American seditionist
12:28 PM on 11/19/2010
Pretentious - go look in the mirror.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbishop76
Left of liberal Texan.
11:15 AM on 11/18/2010
Children need people who love them, children need to feel secure in their environment, children need to know that their basic needs of food, shelter and clothing are met, children need to have people who are vested in their well-being and their education. Divorce does not necessarily hurt children; the acrimony surrounding divorce hurts children. When parents compete for kids' attention or when parents feel that a new step-parent is somehow going to "replace" them, that's when kids gets messed up.

As a child my worst nightmare was being in a room with all the people who were "supposed" to love me, but made my life so miserable when they were around each other I avoided it at all costs. Contrast that to my kids, who feel confident in inviting both their parents and both their step-parents to events and actually take pride in that fact that they have families with an abundance of love and support.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Militant Leftist
American seditionist
12:30 PM on 11/19/2010
Well said, and I applaud you for overcoming the wrongdoings of your past, by setting a correct example for your children.
11:44 PM on 11/19/2010
"Children need people who love them, children need to feel secure in their environment, children need to knowhat their basic needs of food, shelter and clothing are met, children need to have people who are vested in their well-being and their education."

Yes, yes, yes. And it really does not matter if the people raising them are a man and a woman, two men, two women, or one man or one woman (although you're unlikely to hear me advocating single parent hood as a choice - I believe it's a 2 person job). Stability and security and love can be provided by anyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
03:47 PM on 11/22/2010
Fanned and faved. Beautifully-put.
11:02 AM on 11/18/2010
Ha, fooled you all! A wonderful woman married this dumb blue collar worker.
How does one make a raspberry sound in writing?
11:41 AM on 11/18/2010
PBTHTHTHTHHTHT
01:45 PM on 11/18/2010
Hee hee
PBTHTHTHTHTHTH!
Thanks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Militant Leftist
American seditionist
12:32 PM on 11/19/2010
Well, real love isn't based on one's title, prestigious position, or amount in their bank account. Sounds like you hit the jackpot.
10:55 AM on 11/18/2010
Studies also show that people who are married live longer.
11:43 AM on 11/18/2010
and in great MISERY.
10:53 AM on 11/18/2010
Children like the security of marriage....they like to know there are two people who are working together for their interest.  Yes, there are couple who are separated that do a fine job raising children but that is where both parents have a 50/50 physical custody of the child so they are both fully vested in the child's life.  In situations where the child does not live with a parent, the parents seems to drift away from the life of the child and stops contributing both emotionally and monetarily.  Yes there are exceptions but in general physical custody is the key to good parenting and being there all the time is the best thing for a child.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
foolchild0
10:45 AM on 11/18/2010
Water with hydrogen, oxygen atoms more likely to be wet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBiggs
10:58 AM on 11/18/2010
?
09:59 AM on 11/18/2010
Marriage would mean commitment if people don't get divorces, but that happens about half of the time. The other reason why I marry is because I want to provide a stable home for my kids, or at least the feeling of stability which is very important. If you don't want to have kids then there is little reason to get married.
photo
STL Jess
I love Cardinal baseball.
10:51 AM on 11/18/2010
However, it should be noted that the divorce rate drops dramatically when both spouses have a college education, no prior marriages, and wait until they've reached their mid-late 20s, at least. I'm not sure, but I think just the college degree factor cuts it to 25%.
11:54 PM on 11/19/2010
There are a number of silly comments on this thread, and here's another:

"If you don't want to have kids then there is little reason to get married."

Says you. But there are plenty of people who get married with no intention of having kids, and who go through married life quite happily. I know a number of married couples in this situation.

Marriage is no longer a something to promote procreation. Marriage is for love and commitment and companionship. If those wants and needs don't exist, why get married?

So the only reason you got married was for stability? Was there no love involved?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cookerman45
I love my wife!
09:55 AM on 11/18/2010
wow that was useful.........da.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
10:02 AM on 11/18/2010
Probably federally funded, too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cranmer1549
Always bet on black.
10:06 AM on 11/18/2010
I was going to say that. How much money was wasted on this crap?