iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Senate Reaches Agreement On Food Safety Bill To Exempt Small Farms

MARY CLARE JALONICK   11/19/10 12:16 AM ET   AP

Food Safety Bill Senate Small Farms Exemption
AP

WASHINGTON — Some small farms would be exempt from government efforts to prevent foodborne illness under a Senate agreement on food safety legislation announced Thursday.

The food safety bill now pending in the Senate would give the Food and Drug Administration more authority to recall tainted products, increase inspections of food processors and require producers to follow stricter standards for keeping food safe. Operators of smaller farms and advocates for locally produced food have worried that the bill's requirements could force small farms out of business.

An agreement brokered by Democratic Sen. Jon Tester of Montana would attempt to allay those concerns, allowing farmers who make less than $500,000 a year in revenue and sell directly to consumers, restaurants or grocery stores within their states or within 275 miles of their farms to avoid expensive food safety plans required of larger operations. State and local authorities would still have oversight over those farms.

Food safety advocates have objected to the exemptions, saying Tester's concerns are overblown and the size of the farm is not as important as the safety of the food. But many of those groups signed off on the Tester amendment after it was narrowed and language was added to allow the FDA to revoke exemptions for operations that have been involved in an outbreak.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the Senate will vote on the bill after Congress returns from a one-week Thanksgiving recess. Reid said senators will vote on several amendments, including two sponsored by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

Coburn had threatened to hold up the bill unless the Senate voted on the amendments. The first would place a moratorium on spending for "earmarks," pet projects in lawmakers' states and districts, while the second is a separate amendment that is a substitute for the food safety bill.

The Senate voted 74-25 to proceed with the bill on Wednesday after Coburn had objected earlier, saying the legislation's $1.4 billion cost isn't paid for.

The House passed similar legislation over a year ago. Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee and the lead sponsor of the bill, said Thursday that he had an agreement from House members that they would take up the Senate bill if the Senate passes it.

Supporters of the bill say it is crucial in the wake of large outbreaks of contaminated peanuts, eggs and produce that have sickened hundreds.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

WASHINGTON — Some small farms would be exempt from government efforts to prevent foodborne illness under a Senate agreement on food safety legislation announced Thursday. The food safety bill n...
WASHINGTON — Some small farms would be exempt from government efforts to prevent foodborne illness under a Senate agreement on food safety legislation announced Thursday. The food safety bill n...
Filed by Colin Sterling  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 167
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bllnsinchnge
peace, markets, freedom
03:28 PM on 11/29/2010
500k a year for an exemption rules out almost everyone. I would rather see an exemption of the 1.4 billion in taxes and 275 million in higher food prices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
02:37 PM on 11/27/2010
One of my fears, were not 'small farmers' exempt is that certain activist groups who oppose various types of farming would be using their 'war chest' to drag small farmers who's crops they don't like into court repeatedly for 'violating the act'. We all know of groups who's biggest nightmare is sustainable agriculture because it offers a 3rd alternative to their lifestyle or industrial farm products.
photo
Mr Hankey
Kucinich / Sanders (Democratic Socialist)
09:27 PM on 11/22/2010
Give consumers the choice to take a chance if they want to.

I'd prefer to take a chance with REAL organic, free range chicken eggs and REAL milk (raw) than to eat and drink government approved food - but that's me.
http://realmilk.com/

I also support those consumers who want a government stamp on their food if they think that is important to them.

Why can't this "safety" measure work like the organic classification works?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
09:17 PM on 11/22/2010
Here's what RepubliCorp is doing in Ohio...The newly elected RepubliCorp Governor has appointed a chicken farmer to review an agreement signed by the outgoing governor that :
==================================================================
"The agreement calls for banning certain crates and cages and strangulation as a form of euthanasia for sick or injured animals."
==================================================================
Read the story here...This is John Boehner's district...a place where I lived for almost 30 yrs...the farmers are going to love this one...

New Ohio Ag Director Will Review Animal Care Deal
http://www.whiotv.com/news/25880500/detail.html
02:31 AM on 11/22/2010
If a factory farm has a problem with animal waste, all their fresh produce is then irradiated to kill bacteria that may have contaminated the produce. Radiation destroys vital enzymes in fresh food. Those fresh, crispy peppers are less healthy than canned. Should your neighbors have to have all their garden fresh lettuce irratidated before they can be given to you or sold at the farmer's market? If seeds are saved from one harvest got the next crop, should that farmer's land be confiscated and given to Monsanto? Even if they weren't Monsanto's seeds, the farmer's bank account can be frozen if he is only accused of this crime. A crime with 10 years of jailtime attached to it. And if you give your friend noni or elderberry or apples from the tree in your back yard, and the government decides it is "misbranding" to use this plant as a medicine, you can go to prison for 10 years. The corporate court that sent you have no recourse via our constitutional court system. The corporate court is set up by the coporations who say they've been harmed by your use of medicinal herbs, or by your crops of nonapproved broccoli plants that supposedly help prevent cancer. They will say you are only allowed to grow and eat approved plants, ones that have only the vitamins they believe you need. This is a dangerous world people. We need to be standing up for our freedoms or they will soon be gone!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
probo
fear is a waste of my time
12:51 PM on 11/22/2010
agreed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 PM on 11/22/2010
You forgot to mention FEMA camps and black helicopters.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aznurse
02:08 AM on 11/26/2010
that what I thought until I saw "Food Inc"
02:38 PM on 11/21/2010
Where did I hear about Walmart goin' local. (smaller stores with some "organic" food)? Does that have anything to do with this bill S510? Just saying.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
10:34 PM on 11/20/2010
language was added to allow the FDA to revoke exemptions for operations that have been involved in an outbreak.
 
After the outbreak?  Like after the worse "oil spill" in the history of the world?
04:12 AM on 11/23/2010
But more importantly, a local business involved in a food-borne illness outbreak will be out of business pretty fast because the distribution trail does not protect them from public backlash. If I eat a burger at BK an get sick, I could spend years trying to find out which farms the 300 different cows in that burger came from. If I eat a burger from one of my local farms and I get sick, they are one newspaper article away from going out of business, even if the regulatory agencies don't do what they should.
07:04 PM on 11/20/2010
Big government want to control my collard greens and watermelon.
01:34 PM on 11/20/2010
Interesting that this bill - introduce in 2009 - still generated fears of the take over of individual gardens by the feds.

In any case, there is nothing to worry about - see Snopes
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/organic.asp
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amber15
10:12 PM on 11/20/2010
For the past few years www.snopes.com has postioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell all final word' on any comment, claim and email.
But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have
a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticims - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong.

A few years ago they posted a 'de-bunking' I knew was wrong and alerted them, they responded with a very vitriol response indicating absolutely no interest in the facts....
maxfax
Taa - dah!
10:36 PM on 11/20/2010
Your experience is very unfortunate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
right Alice
01:28 PM on 11/20/2010
WHY IN THE HAIL was this bill unanimously passed??
Home gardens now fall under Homeland Security?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWSSfPesnmA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlackYowe
I am a classical- liberal woman and a Jeweler.
03:51 AM on 11/20/2010
I am so glad small farms are exempt I was really worried.
03:56 PM on 11/20/2010
This article is very misleading. They have just postponed the vote for 10 days. This bill will do nothing to make food safer. It is about CONTROL. This is a heinous bill that will not rein in big agribusiness, and will start the harassment of small farmers and gardeners. Follow www.ftcldf.org for updated info as well as the Cornucopia Institute. Monsanto and Rosa DeLauro and her Monsanto husband are still writing these horrendous food bills. I have been watching this descent into idiocy for Three years now, with one bill more ridiculous than the next. It is obvious that people are becoming much better informed about the organic movement and are upset about the government's efforts on behalf of huge agribusiness, to force GMO food and antibiotics on the US population. They want to control ALL food, from farm to table, even gardeners. It is absurd and dangerous. Good health is impossible without good food.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlackYowe
I am a classical- liberal woman and a Jeweler.
04:07 PM on 11/20/2010
Thank you for telling the truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GordonNYC
Not for Sale
04:22 PM on 11/20/2010
100 % spot on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Js420
Another beautiful sunny day!
10:29 PM on 11/19/2010
the begining to the end of factory farming? i hope so
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eggsackley
Organic gardener & growers marketer.
09:39 PM on 11/19/2010
$500,000 a year in revenue is a big farm. But as I see it the direct sales provision is the most important qualification. I am a gardener not a farmer, but I sell organic produce at the local grower's market. Our industrial agricultural system produces lots of cheap food, but that does not take into account the environmental damage. This exemption is very important to encourage the growth of of sustainable local food production. We really need to encourage the growth of small farms. To Jefferson the democratic ideal was a nation of small farmer. Let's eliminate agricultural subsidies which are basically welfare for rich industrial farmers. When a large industrial farm goes under, the government should buy the land and and promote homesteading on small farms.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
10:13 PM on 11/19/2010
Couple of points: soil erodes off organic farms at a higher rate than modern farms which have GM crops using no-till, no plowing methods. Organic farms use plows and endless trips with cultivators to get rid of weeds. Those tractor trips also spew CO2 into the atmosphere at higher rates too. So who's damaging the environment the most?

You can go do farmwork today yourself you know.... You don't have to wait for some "industrial" farm to go under with "homesteaders" settling the land (homesteaders? is it still 1862?). Go ahead....farm the land. What are you waiting for? There are many abandoned farmsites around the midwest you can buy. Oh wait..the full time farm labor is 'always' for someone else to do isn't it?
09:05 AM on 11/20/2010
HazelpethigFan - Wait, what? Where do you get that information from? Modern farms are *experimenting* with no till. It certainly isn't the standard and they got the idea FROM organic farmers. We most certainly do not use plows and cultivate endlessly. That is just bizarre.
Homesteading today is in reference to families healing and utilizing farmland in a more ecologically mindful way. The misconception that there are *so many* abandoned farmsites in the midwest is almost laughable if it weren't so sad. The truth is, the houses and outbuildings are falling down and wasted, but the land is certainly being used. It has been purchased by industrial farming businesses. They simply plant all around the rotting buildings. If you dont believe me, just check out the prices of one of these so called abandoned sites, that is if you can find one.
I also agree with Eggsackley, $500,000 is a LOT of money! That is a darn big farm.
06:39 PM on 11/19/2010
I agree that the size of the farm doesn't necessarily matter with respect to food safety, but I also disagree with the entire thrust of this bill, because more inspection is not a cure for inherently unsafe production methods, and this bill does not attempt to regulate production methods.

The bill is essentially based on the faulty premise that better sanitation and more thorough inspection can mitigate the safety problems associated with high-density confinement and questionable feed ingredients.  It fights the symptoms rather than the disease and reaffirms risky production methods.

The argument from small farmers manifests as complaints about the prohibitive costs of inspection and documentation, but the underlying frustration is less about size than about standards: why should farms that give their animals plenty of space and quality food be punished for the problems with farms that keep their animals in cages and feed them animal byproducts from their own species?

These rules are not designed for farms that raise their animals responsibly.  They're designed as an excuse for wretched CAFOs to continue their morally bankrupt and biologically hazardous ways.
photo
Iam12Vote
Now With MORE Micro Bio!
08:56 PM on 11/19/2010
Bingo. Fanned
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
elcerritan
My bio is not micro
04:17 AM on 11/21/2010
Thank you. I'd fan you again if I could.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejwingsfan
05:07 PM on 11/19/2010
It looks like Sen. Tom Harkin and his Manager’s Amendment, which will replace S. 510 does not include the language from Sen. Leahy’s bill. Neither the bill nor its language can be considered without another unanimous consent vote by the entire Senate.