iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NJ Lawmakers Approve Nation's Toughest Law To Fight School Bullying

New Jersey Bullying Law

GEOFF MULVIHILL   11/22/10 08:10 PM ET   AP

TRENTON, N.J. — A law against bullying in schools, which advocates call the nation's toughest because it requires schools to develop anti-harassment programs, was approved Monday in New Jersey.

The state General Assembly and Senate both passed the bill overwhelmingly and sent it to the desk of Republican Gov. Chris Christie. He said Monday night that he hadn't read the bill but that the state's lawyers have raised concerns over whether its provisions infringe on constitutional rights. He did not say whether he would sign it.

The bill would require anti-bullying programs in public schools and language in college codes of conduct to address bullying. Schools would have to form teams to shape policies and review how bullying is handled.

The bill had been in the works for 10 months but gained attention after the high-profile suicide of Rutgers University freshman Tyler Clementi in September. He killed himself after his roommate allegedly spied on his liaison with a man on a webcam. Clementi's family said in a statement that it welcomed the bill.

Many of the same measures are suggested, but not required, under a state anti-bullying that's been on the books since 2002.

Lawmakers say it quickly became apparent that the original bill wasn't doing enough to stop bullying, which is increasingly seen as a major problem for young people, especially online, where it's harder for the victims to get away from harassment.

Bullying of gay youth has gotten a lot of attention, but the bill pertains to students picked on for a number of reasons.

"My vote today was for any child who has gone home in tears because he or she was bullied," said state Sen. Diane Allen, a Republican from Edgewater Park, "and every parent who didn't know what to do or who to contact."

Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle, a Democrat from Englewood, said she hopes the law will prevent suicides committed by bullying victims.

Sixteen-year-old Matthew Zimmer, of Ridgewood, who says he's been bullied because he's gay, testified before a legislative committee about the bill and was there Monday to see it pass.

"It means so much to me," he said afterward. "I endured bullying by students as well as administrative bullying by the school. It is looking up."

Groups of social conservatives spoke out against the bill, which got only one vote against it in either chamber. Some fear that the education provisions will legitimize gay marriage – which New Jersey doesn't recognize – and force children to be taught about homosexuality in school.

Public-interest law firms want to challenge the law if the governor signs it, said Greg Quinlan of the New Jersey Family Policy Council.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

TRENTON, N.J. — A law against bullying in schools, which advocates call the nation's toughest because it requires schools to develop anti-harassment programs, was approved Monday in New Jersey. ...
TRENTON, N.J. — A law against bullying in schools, which advocates call the nation's toughest because it requires schools to develop anti-harassment programs, was approved Monday in New Jersey. ...
Filed by Erica Liepmann  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:14 AM on 11/26/2010
Interesting, especially when considering the irony of New Jersey having an awful, despot/ governor who is the poster boy for bullying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrMJG
Working towards a better world
06:07 PM on 11/23/2010
Zero tolerance programs often make it difficult for administrators and teachers to educate the kid toward better behavior and are more designed to make it "easier" to avoid doing anything. There are times when we can teach more when we show some nuance.

As a teacher, however, I want a primary result be to have kids know that there WILL be repercussions for illegal and unacceptable behavior. Kids may need to know there are legal consequences for harassment, libel and slander, physical abuse, fighting, stealing and the rest, If not, they may somehow accept bad behavior is ok as long as they can wiggle out of it. And, I am sorry to say, police are needed in some schools. I saw a teacher beaten to the point of requiring life saving medical attention because he dared try to stop a fight of two girls fighting over a boy. They HAD to face the law, don't you think?

We need to make greater use of suspension and required parent meeting and then followed up by required and monitored action to change the behavior. Any repeated bad behavior MUST be dealt with strongly. And, BOTH the parents and the child need to be responsible. Yes, we may need to force some parents to take responsibility to be parents.

But then again, we cannot keep expecting or demanding our teachers to do it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andman0121
05:37 PM on 11/23/2010
We dont need all this! Just give us teachers more power to boot the bullies out of school for extended suspensions and even expulsions! The problem is that these kids are getting slapped on the wrists!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ivoteforsmartpeople
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!
05:32 PM on 11/23/2010
YES! It is time for this s#it to STOP!!!

I am amazed at the h8ful comments!

What FAMILY Value includes it being OK to Harass a KID TO DEATH???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
10:06 AM on 11/23/2010
"Some fear that the education provisions will legitimize gay marriage – which New Jersey doesn't recognize – and force children to be taught about homosexuality in school."

What kind of parent hasn't taught their kids about gay people before they're in high school?
What kind of idiots think that it'd bad for kids to learn about different people?
Why does anybody think we should cater to the lowest elements of the human species? The anti-gay bigots deserve no say whatsoever in anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jdaddy1951
09:16 AM on 11/23/2010
Great. A Republican hems and haws over the rights of school bullies. This will go nowehere.
10:34 PM on 11/22/2010
Am I the first one defending this bill? People complaining that will at least do something to stop the bullying in schools?

For those who think it's just easy to leave school and get away from it: It's called the internet. People can follow you everywhere and bully you 24/7/365, not like it used to be. And don't say they could just not use the internet, that's a stupid way of dealing with a problem.

Punching someone who is bullying you will get you in just as much trouble as they would for hitting you. Plus, don't we teach our children NOT to attack other people?

How exactly is it the parents' responsibility to stop bullying? I believe if parents get involved, it justs gets a TON worse for the student in the school.

And it's even worse if you're not straight. To think that people here (or anywhere for that matter) think that it's ok for someone to be bothered because of who they are is horrible. I'm sure people don't constantly harass you for being straight or for being white.

If students feel that killing themselves is the only way to escape bullying or if it hurts them that bad, then I think it's time something's done about it.
12:02 AM on 11/24/2010
"And don't say they could just not use the internet, that's a stupid way of dealing with a problem"

Alas, that is exactly what I say. My child does not use the internet at home. At school I have little or no control. So far as I know nothing actually stops a bully, but you CAN persuade the bully to pursue easier targets.
07:27 PM on 11/22/2010
I got bullied once when I was a kid, I got my dad's advice, and broke the nose of the person who was bothering me. Check mate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
10:06 AM on 11/23/2010
Likely story.
11:13 AM on 11/23/2010
It works, if someone pushes you, push back, its easy.
12:04 AM on 11/24/2010
"Likely story. "

Indeed, very likely. Bullies are narcissists. Quite often they actually do not believe they are doing anything wrong. The mistake most educators make (IMO) is to appeal to the "better nature" of a person that doesn't have a better nature.

So you go for the mental calculus -- risk versus benefits. You reduce the benefits (teach your child not to react immediately, burst into tears or other entertaining effects), and increase the cost (fight back).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h23154
06:51 PM on 11/22/2010
One more job that parents get to pass off to the teachers and schools they think are incompetent. But it makes good press. How about when some kid gets a second warning about bullying you start requiring the parents to attend meetings at the school during working hours? That will give them a reason to rein in little Johnny their perfect angel who never does anything bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Naithom
Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me vide
10:34 PM on 11/22/2010
Something tells me that you have no children in a large school right now.

When your child comes home bruised because some punk decides they need to prove their manhood by beating a disabled child, you have to go through the school system just to identify the perp. Without their videos, you'd have no proof of the assault. That's not passing the job off, it's utilizing assistance that's on hand where the assault occurred.

And as for parents of bullies being required to attend, it's not a bad idea but I tend to think required family counselling and DHS investigation might better serve the bullies. Often these kids learned violence at home.

While I was initially very angry towards the bully that attacked my son but I discovered that while keeping my son safe, I could also work with the school system to get this kid the help he needs before we all end up paying for his incarceration.
12:07 AM on 11/24/2010
"How about when some kid gets a second warning about bullying you start requiring the parents to attend meetings at the school during working hours? "

There's a big fat non-starter for a variety of reasons. First and most obvious, parents are not going to quit work just to sit in a school. Second, many of these parents are not going to see that what their child is doing is wrong, being themselves bullies OR victims of bullies and see their child as seeking revenge (misguided obviously).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:32 PM on 11/22/2010
If the nation's school systems are somehow stopped from producing bullies, who are we going to hire to work in the TSA?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:12 PM on 11/22/2010
Oh please. And who gets to decide what is or isn't "bullying". Another law criminalizing our children. Student code of conducts read like a book of penal codes. Stay on school grounds after 3:30, loitering! Get fresh with a boy/girl, criminal sexual assault. And just to make sure everything a kid does can be turned into a criminal offense as quickly and opportunely as possible, install police "liaisons" [insert cop here] in all of the school buildings. So now, we are going to have one more law for stupid school administrators to take over the top just to be sure the school district doesn't get sued by another parent. So what if you get felony charges slapped on half your student population for being kids and doing stupid stuff. People shouldn't bully, but I sure don't trust schools to implement this law with any more common sense than they do "zero tolerance". Government needs to get off our backs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h23154
06:55 PM on 11/22/2010
Zero tolerance policies were adopted to make it unnecessary for them to use common sense. So you get kids suspended for having an aspirin, a wooden stick to eat a cheese package, a five year old suspended for sex harassment because he kissed a girl on the cheek, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:23 AM on 11/23/2010
Exactly. Thanks for getting the point. They have totally robbed our kids of the opportunity to be kids and of their civil rights. I wish the ACLU or a group of attorney's would take on this zero tolerance BS. If they start slapping law suits against the schools for indiscriminate and mindless persecution of kids, they'll start watching their backs and the kids rights a lot more. If I was a lawyer, I'd dedicate myself to it. Nothing makes me angrier than adults holding children to a higher standard than they can muster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Naithom
Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me vide
11:05 PM on 11/22/2010
Tell me, have you ever had to crouch in a classroom with students while a kid with a firearm roamed the halls? I have. You may blow off the idea liaison officers but if it was you or a loved on in that school, you'd be screaming if they didn't have one.

Ever have your disabled child come home after having been beaten because some little punk decides that in order to prove his manhood he has to beat a child up who is completely incapable to protecting himself from physical assault? Yes, once again, I have had that privilege just within the last month. I have really appreciated my son's administrative and teaching team in working to make sure that he stays safe and feels safe at school and that the perp is able to get his education while learning that assault is a crime. Hopefully by getting the help he needs now this kid won't have to learn that what he used to do for fun in school will get him arrested as an adult.

It's easy to figure out what is bullying - if an adult would be taken to court for it, it's considered bullying. Assault, sexual harassment, cyber-harassment, stalking, hate crimes, intimidation, theft all would constitute bullying.

Keep in mind, those who start asschool bullies often become bullies in work-place situation. If the behavior is dealt with in childhood, you might keep many of them out of jail down the line.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:20 AM on 11/23/2010
Nobody is suggesting that kids should get shot. Zero tolerance is about the kid who gets permanently expelled because they brought a plastic knife to school to cut their fruit. Afterall, a knife is a knife; and the law is quite clear in making NO distinction. If you think anybody in this country is going to administer a bullying law with any amount of common sense, I have swamp land to sell you. You can fling labels around all you want, but it won't stop some dumb @ss bureaucrat from turning a good idea into another mindless criminal prosecution of our children.
photo
darquelourd
You Get What You Play For
05:08 PM on 11/22/2010
wow I hope this isn't too late to save New Jersey from itself
05:05 PM on 11/22/2010
Meanwhile the US Gov't continues to bully the rest of planet into serving america's agenda
04:22 PM on 11/22/2010
And yet no programs to educate the parents...hmm.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:13 PM on 11/22/2010
Heck no! They would much rather arrest and prosecute your kid. It's the American way. They slap kids with felonies and let torturers and banksters go free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joyf1
Glad I live on an island.
06:39 PM on 11/22/2010
What if parents were responsible for their child's behavior?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Naithom
Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me vide
11:10 PM on 11/22/2010
It's not uncommon to find that the bullies come from homes full of violence and intimidation. If a child is identified as a bully, it's probably a good idea that the family be placed in counselling. That said, if the child's bullying has become violent, the child does need to face the consequences of his actions. Assault is assault. Those who merely call it rough-housing don't know what they are talking about. If one of their co-workers, or a perfect stranger came up to them in their workplace and attacked them, they'd be calling the police, not claiming the person was just rough-housing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:16 PM on 11/22/2010
If this is so I think Chris Christie will be in jail soon.