iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Korea Attack: Yeonpyeong Island Shelled By North Korea (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

AP/The Huffington Post     First Posted: 11/23/10 01:55 AM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

INCHEON, South Korea — North and South Korea exchanged artillery fire Tuesday after the North shelled an island near their disputed sea border, killing at least two South Korean marines, setting dozens of buildings ablaze and sending civilians fleeing for shelter.

The clash, which put South Korea's military on high alert, was one of the rivals' most dramatic confrontations since the Korean War ended, and one of the few to put civilians at risk, though no nonmilitary deaths were immediately reported. Sixteen South Korean soldiers and three civilians were injured and the extent of casualties on the northern side was unknown. (Scroll down for video.)

The skirmish began when Pyongyang warned the South to halt military drills in the area, according to South Korean officials. When Seoul refused and began firing artillery into disputed waters, albeit away from the North Korean shore, the North retaliated by bombarding the small island of Yeonpyeong, which houses South Korean military installations and a small civilian population.

"I thought I would die," said Lee Chun-ok, 54, an islander who said she was watching TV in her home when the shelling began. Suddenly, a wall and door collapsed.

1 of 15
Smoke is seen at Yeonpyeong island near the border against North Korea, in South Korea.
Total comments: 14149 | Post a Comment
1 of 15

"I was really, really terrified," she told The Associated Press after being evacuated to the port city of Incheon, west of Seoul, "and I'm still terrified."

South Korea responded by firing K-9 155mm self-propelled howitzers and dispatching fighter jets. Officials in Seoul said there could be considerable North Korean casualties. The entire skirmish lasted about an hour.

Each side has threatened the other against another attack.

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who convened an emergency security meeting shortly after the initial bombardment, said that an "indiscriminate attack on civilians can never be tolerated."

"Enormous retaliation should be made to the extent that (North Korea) cannot make provocations again," he said.

Meanwhile, the supreme military command in Pyongyang threatened more strikes if the South crossed their maritime border by "even 0.001 millimeter," according to the North's official Korean Central News Agency.

A statement from the North said it was merely "reacting to the military provocation of the puppet group with a prompt powerful physical strike," and accused Seoul of starting the skirmish with its "reckless military provocation as firing dozens of shells inside the territorial waters of the" North.

Government officials in Seoul called the bombardments "inhumane atrocities" that violated the 1953 armistice halting the Korean War. The two sides technically remain at war because a peace treaty was never signed, and nearly 2 million troops – including tens of thousands from the U.S. – are positioned on both sides the world's most heavily militarized border.

The exchange represents a sharp escalation of the skirmishes that flare up along the disputed border from time to time. It also comes amid high tensions over the north's apparent progress in its quest for nuclear weapons – Pyongyang claims it has a new uranium enrichment facility – and six weeks after North Korean leader Kim Jong Il anointed his youngest son, Kim Jong Un, as the heir apparent.

"It brings us one step closer to the brink of war," said Peter Beck, a research fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, "because I don't think the North would seek war by intention, but war by accident, something spiraling out of control has always been my fear."

Columns of thick black smoke could be seen rising from homes on the island, footage aired by YTN cable television showed. Screams and shouts filled the air as shells rained down on the island just south of the disputed sea border.

Yeonpyeong lies a mere seven miles (11 kilometers) from – and within sight of – the North Korean mainland.

The United States, which has more than 28,000 troops stationed in South Korea, condemned the attack. In Washington, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called on North Korea to "halt its belligerent action," and said the U.S. is committed to South Korea's defense.

China, the North's economic and political benefactor, which also maintains close commercial ties to the South, appealed to both sides to remain calm and "to do more to contribute to peace and stability on the peninsula," Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said.

Stephen Bosworth, the Obama administration's special envoy to North Korea, said he discussed the clash with the Chinese foreign minister and that they agreed both sides should show restraint. He reiterated that the U.S. stands firmly with its ally, South Korea.

Yeonpyeong, famous for its crabbing industry and home to about 1,700 civilians as well as South Korean military installations. There are about 30 other small islands nearby.

North Korea fired dozens of rounds of artillery in three separate barrages that began in the mid-afternoon, while South Korea returned fire with about 80 rounds, South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff said.

Two South Korean marines were killed and 16 injured, it said. Island residents escaped to some 20 shelters on the island and sporadic shelling ended after about an hour, according to the military.

The Koreas' 1950s war ended in a truce, but North Korea does not recognize the western maritime border drawn unilaterally by the United Nations at the close of the conflict, and the Koreas have fought three bloody skirmishes there in recent years.

South Korea holds military exercises off the west coast like Tuesday's about every three months.

In March, a South Korean warship went down in the waters while on a routine patrolling mission. Forty-six sailors were killed in what South Korea calls the worst military attack on the country since the war.

Seoul blamed a North Korean torpedo, but Pyongyang denied responsibility.

___

Kwang-Tae Kim reported from Seoul. AP writers Seulki Kim, Kelly Olsen and Foster Klug in Seoul contributed to this report.

(This version CORRECTS that three civilians were injured.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

INCHEON, South Korea — North and South Korea exchanged artillery fire Tuesday after the North shelled an island near their disputed sea border, killing at least two South Korean marines, setting...
INCHEON, South Korea — North and South Korea exchanged artillery fire Tuesday after the North shelled an island near their disputed sea border, killing at least two South Korean marines, setting...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14,149
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (186 total)
03:20 AM on 12/27/2010
Leader of north Korea Kim Jong-il and his sons: Succession speech

http://olderime.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/leader-of-north-korea-kim-jong-il-and-his-sons-succession-speech/
05:46 AM on 12/14/2010
The Truth Will Set You Free! Knowledge is freedom! Looks like they want to do to North Korea like they want to do to wiki-leaks... ...I don't know about you but if I had someone setting off bombs off the coast of my country, I'd tell them not to do that as well. Nobody ever listens, or maybe they heard them – they just can’t go against the hand that feeds them. In other words, maybe it was more beneficial to the men in the real positions of power to have the South Koreans continue their military drills in the area (firing artillery into disputed waters.) The North Koreans retaliated by bombarding the small island of Yeonpyeong, which houses South Korean military installations and a small civilian population. Easy on the Chinese…
12:25 AM on 11/29/2010
Here is a clear and somewhat different analysis that might be of interest http://ofthisandthat.org/LettertoPresident.html
photo
tribalogical
FANTASYLAND is over there, on the right.
01:36 PM on 11/28/2010
North Korea pretty much defines the term "loose cannon"…

I do feel for the people there. It's like a cult that's gone national, and there's no getting out of it. In fact, most of the people there don't want to leave, they THINK it's "normal", and they're all in it together…

One of the methods their govt. uses rings a bit familiar. They use fear. On a constant basis. They keep hammering it home to the population that "right over that horizon" is an aggressive, hell-bent enemy (the U.S.), perpetually readying for an all-out attack on their homeland… that it's only their strength of arms, and unity that prevents an unwarranted attack…

Apparently, according to the regimes there, the U.S. wants to invade, and will do so at the drop of a pin….

I'd say nuclear tests, rockets launched over Japan, and this island shelling are some pretty huge pin drops… at what point does it all just start appearing bellicose and meaningless?

If ever a country needed "regime change" it's this one… unfortunately, the head sits on military shoulders, and if it were removed, we'd be dealing solely with a heavily armed, insanely xenophobic crowd of generals…..

Not an easy situation…...
07:30 PM on 11/27/2010
I mean, don't get me wrong--North Korea is a helluva miserable place with a dictator who is brutal, idiotic, and seemingly insane; I don't excuse them for a moment. But this is one of the first accounts I've seen that actually details what provoked the attacks. It is absolutely true that it is generally understood that to conduct military exercises in a disputed territory close to a national border is a provocative act. The truth of this situation probably is more complex than the corporate media here will give you. Seems to me both sides had something to gain by posturing after Obama stopped by.
06:44 PM on 11/26/2010
Down with Lee Myung-bak group! Support the DPRK!

http://blog.qooza.hk/chaoxian
07:06 PM on 11/27/2010
Support the DPRK, yes! Especially in their revolt against the North Korean government!
05:57 PM on 11/28/2010
they cannot revolt! they will be executed.
Do not forget, they have no freedom of opinion.
11:30 PM on 11/25/2010
Quote:
"Government officials in Seoul called the bombardments "inhumane atrocities" that violated the 1953 armistice halting the Korean War. The two sides technically remain at war because a peace treaty was never signed, and nearly 2 million troops – including tens of thousands from the U.S. – are positioned on both sides the world's most heavily militarized border."
Unquote.
'2 million troops – including tens of thousands from the U.S.' that's a lot!
'Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea' by Barbara Demick is truly an eye-opener:
http://amzn.to/ezdXoK
As Barbara Demick says in her epilogue, North Korea is something of a mystery. How has it avoided the collapse that experts have been predicting for 15 or more years? How has it been so successful at keeping citizens ignorant of the outside world and the outside world ignorant of its machinations? And, because of these successes at insulation, is it even possible to understand what life is like in North Korea? The answer is Yes and her book explains it well!
Luckily most of us know about North Korea only from:
'Die Another Day' by Pierce Brosnan & Halle Berry
http://amzn.to/f9Twkk
11:26 PM on 11/25/2010
I'm a Chinese, my English isn't very well, I just wanna post a joke which is popular in Chinese here.
USA: I'll hit everyone as I like;
UK: I'll hit anyone that the USA has hit;
Japana: I'll hit anyone that the USA ask me to hit;
France: I'll hit anyone who hit me;
Russia: I'll hit anyone who abuse me;
Chinese: I'll abuse anyone who hit me;
South Korea: if anyone hit me, I'll make a sham battle with the USA;
North Korea: if anyone abuse me, I'll hit South Korea.
07:10 PM on 11/27/2010
The list is funny but it would be funnier if the following changes were made:

Russia: If anybody hits me, I'll abuse the USA
China: I'll hit and abuse anybody who I think has hit and abused me
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith E
Earth Warrior
06:58 PM on 11/25/2010
2 million troops at Korean borders is what caught my attention in this article.

That is pretty scary. I never realized the scale of the conflict. Its a bit like in the board game Risk when the final players beef up their borders for the inevitable battle ahead.

The thing I fear most is the north launching their nukes and the aftermath.
10:08 PM on 11/25/2010
Not that easy, they need to keep a balance of opinions.
I dont think their leaders are stupid. NUKE WAR makes no winner.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PJ Parker
DC is Wall St's Customer Service Department
05:31 PM on 11/27/2010
Not so samiuku. North Korea's leader is the son of a madman.
06:14 AM on 12/14/2010
Yeah and there's more to it than meets the eye. I heard that the North Koreans have some pretty conclusive video evidence of some South Korean dissidents performing some pretty indecent sex acts...
...and if North Korea was as rich and powerful as US they think that they really could have licked um with the help of the UN and interpol (of course.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:17 PM on 11/25/2010
with the us tied up in two other conflicts, i suspect the calculation is the USA does not have the resources for a third war. A risky calculation and one they could plunge the world into crisis. I do not think China is willing to risk the growth and prosperity for North Korea. Someone made a poor calculation I suspect it is the USA. By being in two conflicts we can not find an exit for, we have left our friends exposed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bushitbrain
02:20 AM on 11/25/2010
I'm takin bets we won't be occupying Afghanistan or Iraq much longer, & so much for that invasion of Iran.....
If N.& S. Korea go to war, it will be the end of civilization as we know it, & of course, the end of the western economy, so highly dependent upon S.Korea.
02:14 AM on 11/25/2010
Nuk'em... nuk'em all
03:05 AM on 11/25/2010
ye
03:06 AM on 11/25/2010
nuke you too ye
01:04 AM on 11/25/2010
The present S. Korean President and his right wing ideology must take most of the blame. He has reneged on past agreements; his rhetoric is bellicose; and his actions provocative. Pity, Obama did not take him to task earlier. Why do we continue to follow the Bush line?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:44 AM on 11/25/2010
The attack from NK is in NO way proportionate to anything the S. Korean President may have said or done. For such a 'bellicose' individual, he sure has stayed his hand remarkably well in the face of an attack on S Korean sovereignty and citizens. I just hope this goes no further and it simmers down. I am sure the S Koreans are making preparations for further attacks - and should N Korea foolishly escalate by striking Seoul. then NK leadership has sealed its fate. It can't win. S Korea will end up looking after the basket case of the giant Gulag that is NK. German reunification will not be an apt comparison to the scale of the task S Korea will face. That is if they won't somehow try to abrogate it.
06:30 PM on 11/26/2010
Idiot! South Korea admitted its first military artillery fire. North Korea's counter-attack was justified!
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
07:27 PM on 11/25/2010
That's it, blame the victim for the acts of the aggressor. And if you want to talk about reneged on agreements, you better start with the North.
06:24 PM on 12/08/2010
You do realize that their are Americans with North Korean ancestory and some of use may find your talk a little offensive. And thats putting in nicely.
11:41 PM on 11/24/2010
Old Asian Proverb goes like this: Better to turn cheek, than take it between both cheeks..
06:06 PM on 11/24/2010
South Korea has an amazing amount of constraint. If something had happened to us we would have acted a lot differently. It is too bad we didn't finish the Korean War 60 years ago. I think South Korea has had more than enough time to prepare itself for a North Korean attack. We should have nothing to do with any future conflict there.
11:32 PM on 11/24/2010
I think South Korea has had more than enough time to prepare itself for a North Korean attack. We should have nothing to do with any future conflict there. --austerlitz1805

I think if you completely ignore China and it's history with North Korea, that would be true.
07:44 PM on 11/26/2010
austerlitz1805 --"There is truth to what you say. Its just that South Korea has one of the top economies in the world. They should (if they are not already) be investing in all kinds of crazy weapons and military technology to prepare themselves. Just my thoughts :)"

For some reason your comment isn't showing on the page. I can't imagine why it would have been booted, but anyway..

Part of the reason for not preparing any more than they have, is due to political posturing. The Korean war was a horrible event that nobody wants to relive, at least nobody sane does. So with that perspective in mind, military advancements and deployments have been intentionally throttled back over the years in hopes of preventing another outbreak.

Considering it's the most fortified border on Earth, it's hard to see that. But compared to what both sides and their allies are capable of, it's been treated with kid gloves. As you know, they've even attempted some version of normalcy between countries with visits between family members, etc.

But N. Korea is still crazy. And if it has nobody else who loves it outside of maybe Tehran, it's got China. Chances are China uses N. Korea as a diplomatic tool, not unlike a mad dog on a leash. But China is still there, and still supportive.

The other facet is that S. Korea HAS been successful, and they enjoy that success. They're not looking for a war to screw that up.
11:53 PM on 11/26/2010
I hear what you are saying and I know you are right but now if there is a continuation of the Korean War, I don't think we can afford it. I read somewhere that in that event, most of the fighting would be done by South Korean soldiers. Do you think that is true? F&F by the way.

Also, I've been thinking that maybe the reason the Korean War is called the forgotten war is because of how horrible it was. We lost a lot of soldiers over a relatively short time period.