iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rand Paul Compared Obama's Rise To Power To Hitler's In 2009 (VIDEO)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/23/10 08:37 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Rand Paul

Soon-to-be-Kentucky Senator Rand Paul once appeared to express anxiety that the state of affairs in America was opening a path for President Obama to grow into a Hitler-like leader who would snatch up civil liberties in the name of security.

Speaking in 2009 in an interview that was released by conservative radio show host and 9/11 truther Alex Jones last week, Paul drew parallels between the rise of Obama and that of Adolf Hitler.

Here's the crux of Paul's argument, from ThinkProgress:

"I think times of crisis is when we have to worry the most about things. You know, Rahm Emanuel, who's chief adviser to President Obama, said 'let no good crisis go past without allowing government to grow, these are our chances for government to grow stronger and for more security at the expense of liberty.' And it's happened before. When you have severe crisis, that's when sometimes strong leaders arise. You had the money destroyed in Germany in 1923 and out of that chaos came Hitler who promised that these awful people were the ones doing this to you and we need to round them up and put them in camps. And the liberties just went out the window. But people actually democratically voted in a Hitler. And I worry about that again in our country. If the money is destroyed in our country, could we get a time where a strong leader comes forward and says 'we just need security, I'll make you safe but just give me your liberty.'"

Paul's fear didn't subside there, as his interviewer can be heard asking him about "tattle" crews who were supposedly dispatched to report instances of people badmouthing President Obama.

"Do they have brown shirts on? Is there a youth patrol talking about hate speech?" Paul asked. "Criticism of a political figure and they're gonna call it hate speech? That's a dangerous sign that freedom of speech may be under attack next if we have to be careful about what we say."

This is far from the first time that Rand Paul has perpetuated fears of a Nazi-like takeover of the United States.

Dating back to 2007, Talking Points Memo pulled a compilation of at least six instances in which the then-Senate candidate had invoked Hitler on the campaign trail and in other appearances, not including a speech in which Paul claimed that economic worries could catalyze some sort of Obama-to-Hitler transformation.

Such hyperbolic and controversial rhetoric might not have seemed entirely out of the realm of possibility in the days following Rand Paul's primary victory, when he went on a media tour and effectively struck out, dominating the news cycle with statements criticizing the 1964 Civil Rights movement, defending BP from Obama's allegations of negligence, and then shortly thereafter becoming the third guest in 62 years to cancel on "Meet the Press." After his first foray into the public eye produced those results, subsequent reports found Rand Paul's history rife with similarly contentious points of view.

But, as ThinkProgress points out, this all took place before Paul's "contorting into an electable candidate," a reconfiguration that allowed him to insulate himself from tough questioning, deny past positions, and ultimately become Kentucky's next senator.

WATCH:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Soon-to-be-Kentucky Senator Rand Paul once appeared to express anxiety that the state of affairs in America was opening a path for President Obama to grow into a Hitler-like leader who would snatch up...
Soon-to-be-Kentucky Senator Rand Paul once appeared to express anxiety that the state of affairs in America was opening a path for President Obama to grow into a Hitler-like leader who would snatch up...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,620
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (142 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
02:37 PM on 11/28/2010
Rand Paul Explains His Support For Plutocracy: ‘There Are No Poor…We All Work For Rich People’:
Paul has fashioned himself a protector of the privileged class, for instance arguing repeatedly against regulating BP in the wake of its oil disaster. But an honest look at American society reveals a world divorced from Paul’s rhetoric. Many of America’s most profitable corporations, including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and ExxonMobil, paid essentially nothing in corporate taxes in all of 2009. In 2007, the latest year for which figures are available from the Federal Reserve Board, the “richest 1% of U.S. households owned 33.8% of the nation’s private wealth.
Paul has cloaked his greed and support for the privileged class in a thin veneer he calls “libertarianism” or “constitutional conservatism.” But as he assails programs to help working Americans as “socialism,” he has opposed any cuts to doctors like himself through Medicare.”
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/11/03/rand-paul-plutocracy/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
06:46 PM on 11/28/2010
While many corporations pay little if any tax, those that do, combined with the upper wage earners in the US, pay the bulk of income tax collected in the US. Which is as it should be, as long as they're also responsible for depriving tens of millions of people of incomes decent enough to qualify for taxation.
01:24 PM on 11/28/2010
We have to remember that when Republicans use the Hitler analogy, it is justified and just the GOP doing it for comparison purposes

When Democrats use it, HOW DARE THEY INSULT WWII VETS! Shows how UnAmerican these people are!
11:47 AM on 11/26/2010
Rand Paul has two interesting points. When in times of crisis, the government takes advantage by taking liberties to give security. After the attack on 9/11, our government systematically carried out full-fledged privacy searches of ordinary American citizens of their telephone, emails, and financial records in the name of security without having a presiding judge to decide if such actions were warranted under our constitutional rights. Another example would be the Columbine shooting, when many legislators took the stand that gun rights should be taken away to prevent such events from happening again. The other underlying point of this article is the six instances where Rand Paul references Hitler. If you read these references, his main idea is trying the convey the declining value of money during the rise of Hitler. Rand Paul like his father Ron Paul, see the parallels between Germany's experience with printing money and our country's experience. Although, Germany's declining money was drastic and immediate, our trend of the declining value of money has been steadily eroding which was caused by the same reason of printing money to pay off debt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldBear
We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us.
04:26 PM on 12/09/2010
Send to Rand Pauls office, it just what they need to have him make any sense at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonCosenza
01:27 AM on 11/25/2010
The Nazis never had a democratically-elected majority. This goes to show you how credible Rand Paul's blathering is if he's relying on old, disproven factoids on matters easy enough to fact-check with a trip to Wikipedia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
05:18 PM on 11/25/2010
Exactly. Rand Paul doesn't know history (no surprise)--Hitler ran against Hindenburg, but lost with only 35% of the vote, less than many Tea Party candidates got in the 2010 elections. Later, through wheeling and dealing, Hitler managed to convince Hindenburg to appoint him chancellor, a position which allowed Hitler to gain power.
photo
phread
antiFA and proud of it
01:39 PM on 11/26/2010
nay... hitler was aided by capitalists to get power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:20 AM on 11/25/2010
So the only sentiment Rand Paul attempts to evoke in the Deep South is hatred?
05:25 PM on 11/25/2010
Kentucky is not in the deep south and was never a part of the confederacy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:13 PM on 12/03/2010
"brother against brother". you're right it isn't. Thanks for making that point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldBear
We Have Met The Enemy and He Is Us.
04:32 PM on 12/09/2010
The Commonwealth was part of Virginia until 1790's. Lovely area but very conservative at a lot of levels.
10:33 PM on 11/24/2010
Where was Rand Paul when the Bush administration was busy taking away our rights. Remember the gay-prost-itute Jeff Gannon that posed as a White House reporter with the full knowledge of the Bush administration. He would throw out softball questions to Bush. Now that stuff is scary.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14148-2005Feb10.html

Secondly, Rand Paul talks about people needing to careful what they say. Well, making people afraid to say stuff was the policy of the Bush administration. After Bill Maher's comments about 9/11, Ari Fleischer, Bush's press secretary at the time said "People need to watch what they say." Could you imagine if Obama or someone is his administration said this? The far-right would have a field day about their rights being taken away.

Thirdly, it was the Bush administration that took away our right to Habeas Corpus, trial by jury. Under Bush, anyone, US citizen or not, could simply be declared an en-emy comb-atant and be shipped off to Guantan-amo Bay. In fact, this policy was so egregious that the Supreme Court was forced to strike it down. See this article.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/819243/supreme_court_rules_against_bush_administration.html?cat=17
photo
phread
antiFA and proud of it
10:04 PM on 11/24/2010
Once lead people into war, and they’ll forget there ever was such a thing as tolerance. To fight you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into every fiber of our national life, infecting Congress, the courts, the policemen on the beat, the man in the street.
Frank L. Cobb of the New York World, 1917
photo
phread
antiFA and proud of it
10:01 PM on 11/24/2010
The commercial press, in another of its brazen hypocritical proclamations, points with pride to the fact that it is free because it upholds a free system in which there are two political parties. But there is probably not one member of the A.N.P.A. (American Newspaper Publishers Association) who does not know that the Republican and Democratic parties both feed out of the same bag provided by the monied system, and that the same persons frequently subscribe funds to both major parties … They know this very well, and they also know very well that the press has never given honest news coverage to the formation, platform and campaign of any third party which was independent enough not to feed on the same money.
George Seldes, Facts and Fascism, 1943
photo
WorldisMorphing
Jaded Iconoclast ...
09:50 PM on 11/24/2010
Rand Paul and his father call themselves libertarian but what they are has more to do with social-Darwinist fascism. For them :
--The construct of many centuries which our society is, has no relevant incidence on their success. I own all that I am and all that I have to nobody and nothing, other than myself.
--The markets are suitable to valuate all things, all services and all human beings.....but not money. Ironically, the Paul's don't trust markets to valuate currencies....they prefer gold !(...as if it were more pertinent ...)
--To implement the cuts he would like to impose on government, he would have to cut defense (good idea, I'll give him that,,,neo-cons will have a lot of fun with him..)...but he'll cut everything else too...and probably respond "can't make an omelette without breaking eggs".
Trouble is, he has a fetish for the "Constitution"...oblivious to the fact that:
1. It's an imperfect document and a very imperfectly interpreted one ....
2. It's a creation constructed on the foundation of the Rule of Law, which implies necessarily the concept of social contract. However, money being a quantified amount of power and freedom, you wind up with liberty as a commodity in his vision of the world.
photo
WorldisMorphing
Jaded Iconoclast ...
09:55 PM on 11/24/2010
So what we basically have here is a guy trying to mud-sling his way up to power by
accusing the opponent of tyranny akin to that of Hitler...[with whom he would tend to share a common cut-throat social-Darwinian view through his phantasmagorical free market ideology...]--hoping it will stick...

...and so from an informed and therefore incredulous perspective, the whole thing seems all the more pathetic and lame...
05:34 PM on 11/25/2010
Wrong - Ron Paul does want the markets to determine the currency, what he has fought for 30 years is the Fed and there currency printing and dollar destruction policies.

He would like a competing currency to be able to compete with the dollar and for those Americans who would like to opt out of the dollar into it could. I know if there was a currency here that was backed by gold I would get rid of every dollar I had, as I would imagine others would as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eptjevi
08:17 PM on 11/24/2010
Yes, Rand you GOP, jokers were abused by the Illunminati Handlers,...via the Vatican... lil bunions delivered to priest in the shallow halls of some seedy dorm..
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Khirad
06:57 PM on 11/24/2010
Oh, he was on Alex Jones.

Well, doesn't that really say it all?

Great timing finding this clip, too. *eyeroll*

Not like it would have hurt him in Kentucky...

Meanwhile, Stormfront who supported Paul is laughing all the way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rosalee Harris
06:21 PM on 11/24/2010
Keep crying wolf when the real facism comes cause its coming no one is going to believe you and thats why they are going to slip right past.
photo
phread
antiFA and proud of it
06:45 PM on 11/24/2010
its here and its been here longer than people realize...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cailleach Echo
07:30 PM on 11/24/2010
Oh please.

I wish people would look up the meaning of the words they toss around so authoritatively. Educate yourself. If you really want to see fascism, check out the Repub party. That is exactly what they're aiming for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
democratsaint
The GOP-The Humpty Dumpty of economics
09:12 PM on 11/24/2010
funny thing every single talk show host ie conservetive ,support in some form a way to restrict the right to vote. every single one of them. that is called a DICTATORSHIP.these are the people you worship. nazi in buissness suits
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rosalee Harris
06:18 PM on 11/24/2010
Keep compairng Obama to Hitler cause America may get a real Hitler and I gurantee you when he comes we will ALL KNOW IT
05:55 PM on 11/24/2010
In Paul's own argument is the very contradiction that shows how bizarre this comparison is. He says that Hitler was the one talking about "those people" destroying the money. And yet, Paul blames Obama for destroying the money. Soo...who's Hitler in this scenario?
photo
kennethhdeome
Why can't both sides be wrong?
05:49 PM on 11/24/2010
The start of the conversation is here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/ghee99/rand-paul-obama-hitler_n_787184_68496085.html

This type of exchange is why I’m on this site.
__________

Yet the tea party is just classic conservatism on steroids, so how can they speak against the status quo, other than to denounce any involvement in the political process by any other view?

Which by the way would mean the progressive movement is hyper-liberal, which we can deduce wants no part of conservative policy.

If the tea party is so different, why are they in any way, shape or form associating with the GOP, let alone running on the conservative ticket?

Lots of us so-called liberals on this site would like to see a viable, meaning different, third party emerge.

Moving further away from the middle doesn't make you less a part of the problem, since the problem is the divisiveness of the status quo.

This idea that it has to be one way or the other—the literal "yes or no" legal question or "us or them" group question—is what is tearing the country apart politically.

We all know what the wealthy want, and that they're willing to twist things to their favor in order to get it.

[continued]