iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Maxine Waters Ethics Case: Email Doesn't Appear To Provide Link To Alleged Conflict

LARRY MARGASAK   11/26/10 02:35 AM ET   AP

Maxine Waters Ethics Email
FILE - In this Aug. 13, 2010 file photo, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif. gestures during her news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. Waters' ethics trial centers on an e-mail written by her chief of staff _ who's also her grandson _ at the height of the 2008 financial crisis. Rather than offering a smoking gun in the case, the e-mail raised new questions about an investigatory panel's conclusions that Waters improperly tried to steer federal bailout aid to a minority-owned bank to prevent he

WASHINGTON — A recently discovered e-mail, which forced postponement of Rep. Maxine Waters' ethics trial, appears to bring the House ethics committee no closer to proving she tried to obtain a U.S. bailout – during the financial crisis – for a bank where her husband owns stock.

Waters, a California Democrat and a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee, was to go on trial Monday before an ethics panel of eight congressional colleagues. She has maintained her innocence, and has been demanding for months that the trial be held.

The new evidence is an e-mail written by her chief of staff Mikael Moore, who also is Waters' grandson. It said Waters was closely watching the writing of bailout legislation that included a provision to help minority-owned banks. But OneUnited Bank – where Waters' husband is a stockholder – wasn't mentioned, even though it was among the institutions that could have benefited from the provision.

A key question is whether Waters instructed Moore to get assistance for OneUnited, when her husband's investment in the Boston-based institution was in danger of becoming worthless during the near-financial collapse of late 2008.

Waters has contended she was simply trying to help all minority banks in trouble – and specifically those, like OneUnited, that were hurt by their investments in the then-collapsing mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

In its public document that charged Waters earlier this year with three ethics violations, and now in the staff chief's e-mail, the ethics committee has so far failed to establish that Waters' efforts were for OneUnited rather than a larger group of banks.

Ethics trials are rare. Last week, the ethics committee recommended that the House publicly censure 20-term Rep. Charles Rangel of New York for fundraising and financial conduct that violated congressional rules. It was only the second House trial proceeding in the past two decades.

The chief of staff's e-mail was written by Moore on Sept. 28, 2008, to Financial Services Committee aides writing what became the Bush administration's controversial $700 billion TARP – Troubled Asset Relief Program – bailout for banks, insurance companies, auto companies and other financial institutions

Moore's memo was general rather than specific, saying the congresswoman was "under the explicit impression" that provisions affecting small and minority-owned banks were still in the bailout bill.

"If there is any material or technical changes to the language as last agreed upon, please alert me as soon as possible so that Rep. Waters has an opportunity to weigh in," Moore wrote.

OneUnited did end up receiving $12 million in bailout money, in December 2008. But Treasury Department officials have told House investigators that Waters was not involved in that decision.

House investigators have not revealed a direct link between Waters' conduct and the dispatch of bailout funds to OneUnited. And the ethics committee's case is not helped by survey responses from 28 banks which said they were in similar circumstances as OneUnited.

The survey was conducted by the Independent Community Bankers of America, which represents smaller banks across the country. The banks responding to the survey are institutions that could have benefited from the provision that Waters – according to her chief of staff's e-mail – was closely monitoring in the writing of the bailout bill.

Paul Merski, chief economist for the independent bankers, said the real number of banks in similar circumstances could be as high as 300, because only a fraction of the group's members responded.

"This was for more banks than just one bank," he said in an interview.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the Financial Services Committee, said in an interview that he inserted the provision for minority banks to protect OneUnited – because it is based in his state.

But he said of Waters, "I did not know she was watching" the drafting of the section. "We never discussed it," he said. "I heard from people in Massachusetts."

The provision sought by Waters – and inserted by Frank – told the Treasury Department that it should consider – for bailout money – banks that had an asset size of $1 billion or less, and whose size dropped to a lower range because they owned devalued, preferred stock in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Asset size is the total dollar amount of everything a bank owns or controls, including loans, real estate holdings, securities and office equipment.

Another difficulty in proving the violations: the provision by itself did not qualify any bank for bailout money.

All banks applying for bailout funds had to meet a number of Treasury thresholds to get the assistance. The Fannie-Freddie section merely instructed Treasury not to overlook banks that lost money due to their investments in the mortgage companies. Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were taken over by the government.

Waters has acknowledged that in early September 2008, she asked then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to arrange a meeting between Treasury officials and a trade group of minority-owned banks. The purpose was to assist institutions harmed by the devalued Fannie and Freddie stock, she said.

While Waters did not attend, the two representatives of the National Bankers Association at the meeting were OneUnited's chief executive officer and its senior counsel – who also was chairman-elect of the association. No other bank was represented.

Waters has contended that she was acting solely on the request of the association, and argued that she never made any request to Paulson on what should be done.

According to the ethics committee charges, Waters' husband, Sidney Williams, had an investment in OneUnited that was valued at more than $351,000 on June 20, 2008. It had dwindled to $175,000 by Sept. 30, 2008, the time period when Waters was monitoring the TARP legislation.

If OneUnited had not received federal financial help, the charges said, the investment could have become worthless.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A recently discovered e-mail, which forced postponement of Rep. Maxine Waters' ethics trial, appears to bring the House ethics committee no closer to proving she tried to obtain a U...
WASHINGTON — A recently discovered e-mail, which forced postponement of Rep. Maxine Waters' ethics trial, appears to bring the House ethics committee no closer to proving she tried to obtain a U...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 118
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:17 AM on 11/26/2010
This was a days before election stunt to make Democrats look bad.Its getting hard to get Americans to play fair.For anybody that need a reality check they are still calling BASEBALL,FOOTBALL,HOCKEY AND BASKETBALL games fairly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
09:37 AM on 11/26/2010
it's the gophers.they're out to get all blacks.specially a black caliberal.when they can't get anything on the browns, they lit out after the blacks.we will call for Dr. Buzzard to work more roots.One of his roots got Delay indicted.another root stopped Cheney's ticker.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
bubbuh
09:10 AM on 11/26/2010
It was always unlikely that Congresspeep Waters did anything unethical. It's well known that she is kind of straight-laced. It's just too bad her hearing could not have been held in August.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LeftLeanWing
Ah.. I said..Ah Said I said... Proceed Guv'nah
09:01 AM on 11/26/2010
So There's No There There.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsheeran
Beware them both, and all of their degree
09:54 AM on 11/26/2010
Right. It's no Delay that's for sure
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sharin
severely liberal and proud of it
08:58 AM on 11/26/2010
Ms Waters was doing her job and looking out for the people she represents - smaller community banks, generally owned by people rather than corporate - nonentity - entitities. So what does she get for this - a partisan inspired witch hunt.
this is disgusting - stop wasting time and tax payer dollars on these senseless investigations. How about investigating things like Baucus undermining single payer with his gang-of-6 - baucus being the recipients of the most funding from the health industry
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
freedomsxm
08:52 AM on 11/26/2010
The Ethics Committee needs to look at Congressmen Eric Cantor and his wife who is an official with Bank of Amercia?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:00 AM on 11/26/2010
She is with New York Private Bank and Trust .Diana Cantor runs the Virginia branch of Emigrant's wealth-management division, called Virginia Private Bank & Trust, which targets an ultra-rich clientele.
---
They received 200 million and have yet to pay back any of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:07 AM on 11/26/2010
The auto industry received more than $100 billion and has yet to repay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sharin
severely liberal and proud of it
09:00 AM on 11/26/2010
Evan Byah is likewise married to a banking exec whose employer benefited from the bailout - in a VERY big way.
maybe that is the real reason that he is retiring
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:56 AM on 11/26/2010
What an embarrassment to his father, one of our GREAT liberal Senators.

Birch Bayh gave us two Amendments to the Constiution #25 and #26.

I don't think Evan ever authored one bill.
08:52 AM on 11/26/2010
The ethics committee is not very ethical, this is nothing more than a big ole "get Maxine". They don't like Ms. Waters, and will do anything they can to quiet her. They should be going after the corruption on Wall Street, that is the cancer that's destroying this country, not the small community banks, most of them are sound. But unfortunately that won't happen, they don't dare bite the hand that's feeding their ravenous, greedy, unethical appetites.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:54 AM on 11/26/2010
Wasn't Maxine Waters complicit in the meltdown at Fannie Mae?

Thanking you in advance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dollyllama10
me
09:15 AM on 11/26/2010
No.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sharin
severely liberal and proud of it
09:43 AM on 11/26/2010
npe - but your good buddies on wallstreet were
08:48 AM on 11/26/2010
She is one ugly woman that's for sure. I do hope she gets convicted of these charges like Rangel. Just fired these puppets & put in some new ppl darn it!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 AM on 11/26/2010
Advocating an innocent gets convicted ?

Are you from Texas ?
11:47 AM on 11/30/2010
No sir, I am originally from Peru & lived in South Carolina for twenty years. What about you? A crazy liberal like yourself believing Obama will save the world, are you from California of the Los Angeles/San Francisco districts???

Why don't you open your eyes and see Waters and her husband are not innocent?
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
08:44 AM on 11/26/2010
The Pity is that the narrative has been stolen on this site and is under the control of ptrolls. Hence, The President and Rush is put side by side and the first Lady is pictured beside Palin.
The coded message is, Rush and the President are equal, as is Palin and the First Lady. Then further, Palin is pictured next to the President.

If fact, they are not equal in any manner, shape or form.

I am posting this here because in all likelihood, this thread would not be monitored as hicks are given free reign in threads pertaining to Democrats in general but the Speaker in particular.

Threads pertaining to Palin, Rush etc, are more controlled than using a cell phone in court.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:57 AM on 11/26/2010
Fantastic! I was wondering if this GREAT POST would make it through...

Fanned #403.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
09:43 AM on 11/26/2010
i am sick and tired of palin's face on every article on this forum.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:01 AM on 11/26/2010
One thing that Rush has that BHO lacks: a clue.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:17 AM on 11/26/2010
a clue?

Is that what they call street dr ugs now a days ?

Hey, cleaning lady....can you go cop me a couple dozen clues ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dollyllama10
me
08:32 AM on 11/26/2010
Out of curiosity, is the ethics committee going to go after ALL of the African-American congresspeople?

Why haven't we gone after real criminals like GoldmanSacks, AIG, Paulson? Why not go after war criminals like Bush/Cheney?

No, let's waste time and money on a non-issue.
08:50 AM on 11/26/2010
That seems to be their plan. Look at Ensign, gave money to his honey's husband from his campaign funds. But the Lord looks down on him and all his C Street buddies. What a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
bubbuh
08:54 AM on 11/26/2010
Ensign is a Senator
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:50 AM on 11/26/2010
For Politico - "Not a single white lawmaker is currently the subject of a full-scale ethics committee probe."

This, in itself, is QUITE CURIOUS. Not ONE? They find Black Politicians who, at the very best, had done things any regular American has done - bad finanical recordkeeping, etc.

This, while legislators who have WAY MORE INFLUENCE on the laws that were passed, have no ethics scruntity?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:20 AM on 11/26/2010
The two that were...Massa and Nathan Deal resign so they wouldn't have to face the Committee.

I am ashamed to say that my State, GA. Just elected Deal as our new Governor even though he will most likely be indicted before he even takes the oath. (wishful hoping)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:22 AM on 11/26/2010
I said this before - I KNOW REP. MAXINE WATERS.

These charges are completely false and baseless. Another attempt of the Rove machine to discredit African American politicians and keep the Black vote as small as possible.

I wonder if all the people who have called her every name under the sun for this will apologize? There has been many who have posted here on HuffPost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dollyllama10
me
08:33 AM on 11/26/2010
I was wondering if she would get an apology too, seems highly unlikely at any level.
08:34 AM on 11/26/2010
Yeah.......................it's all about race................................sigh...............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:46 AM on 11/26/2010
Unfortunately, people forget that race relations in America is still VERY NEW. Seperate but Equal was struck done only fifty years ago - thats only ONE lifetime. Many of the people who believe in that philsophy are still alive and preaching it (covertly).

I know that one day, maybe over the next few lifetimes, more people will be born into an America where such ideologies will be archaic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:21 AM on 11/26/2010
She is not guilty of anything.

Oh wait..yes she is. Guilty of helping minorities. We can't have that going on in Amerika !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:26 AM on 11/26/2010
Amen to that! Fanned 1172
08:33 AM on 11/26/2010
Why should help minorities MORE than anyone else?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dollyllama10
me
08:40 AM on 11/26/2010
Who said anyone was helping them MORE than anyone else?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hansy Peguero
08:45 AM on 11/26/2010
Maybe because of the history of this country??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Krow
08:19 AM on 11/26/2010
I have followed this case for awhile. Bank United didn't get into trouble making bad loans. they were heavily invested in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and the dwindling stock values of those investments caused the bank to fall below the capital requirements. Her husband only lost half of his investment, some enrichment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:27 AM on 11/26/2010
Totally correct! I wish more people had their facts right and not counting on FOX.

Fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
08:15 AM on 11/26/2010
Waters hasn't violated ANYTHING. The case has fallen apart. What she did was so generic - the idea that she is Charlie Rangel -like is hilarious. The trial is a waste of time and she will be found innocent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Ochs
ribald raconteur
08:13 AM on 11/26/2010
DeLay - guilty
Rangle- Guilty
Waters - Not Guilty

Why does the last one surprise me the most? I thought all politicians stole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
08:24 AM on 11/26/2010
Exactly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
lizmckenzie55
Don't suffocate on your own hate ...
09:07 AM on 11/26/2010
Well, you thought wrong.

I have a problem with putting literally thousands of people (from all walks of life with very different upbringings) in one single category (thieves) .... you are essentially saying that although many had high morals in the past, once becoming a politician completely changes their moral fiber. Nah ... don't buy that ... fame and power can change some people but it does not change all.

Besides, Delay did not steal anything ... he laundered money which is quite different.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
09:51 AM on 11/26/2010
delay was allways a rat , regardless