iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Administration Will Spend Just $12 Billion Of The $50 Billion Promised To Help Homeowners Avoid Foreclosure, CBO Says

Obama Housing

First Posted: 11/29/10 11:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

The Obama administration will spend less than a quarter of the $50 billion it promised to help homeowners facing foreclosure, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a report Monday.

The CBO projection raises fresh questions about the success of the administration's foreclosure-prevention efforts and its commitment to helping homeowners, even as unemployment hovers near 10 percent. Corporations and large banks appear to be in full-fledged recovery -- last quarter, corporate profits reached an all-time high of $1.66 trillion on an annual basis -- but households and small businesses seem to have been left out.

Washington policymakers talk constantly about helping "Main Street" recover from the steepest downturn since the Great Depression. Spending less than a quarter of the money promised to help residents of "Main Street" keep their homes may not seem in line with that goal.

President Barack Obama and his top aides, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, have made numerous pledges to the ever-increasing number of homeowners faced with foreclosure, declines in home value and reductions in equity. The administration's programs, announced by Obama in a Mesa, Ariz. high school just four weeks after he took office, originally aimed to "enable as many as 3 to 4 million homeowners to modify the terms of their mortgages to avoid foreclosure."

Using $50 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the bailout fund also known as TARP, the Obama Treasury Department would pay banks, investors and homeowners for every home loan modification that saved a borrower from foreclosure.

To say the program has made a meaningful impact in ameliorating the housing crisis would be an overstatement.

Through October, about 483,000 distressed homeowners were making reduced monthly payments thanks to the administration's plan -- barely 16 percent of Obama's most conservative estimate. More than 755,000 borrowers have been tossed, due either to failure to keep up with the reduced payments, issues with documentation, such as proof of income, or bank blunders. The Treasury Department, which is overseeing the program, has not punished a single mortgage company for failing to comply with its directives, despite anecdotal evidence that homeowners are routinely misled or taken advantage of by their mortgage servicers. Treasury has spent just $710 million of that $50 billion through the end of last month.

Meanwhile, home prices, which had stabilized, have begun to fall. The Federal Housing Finance Agency, a government watchdog, said last week that house prices have declined 3.2 percent nationwide during the past year. Moody's Investors Service forecasts home prices to fall an additional 5 percent from their current values. FHFA predicts that home values won't reach their June 2010 level until December 2013.

The Federal Reserve expects 6.5 million home foreclosure filings this year through 2012, Fed Governor Elizabeth Duke said Nov. 18 in testimony to the House Financial Services Committee. Nearly one-quarter of homeowners with a mortgage owe more on that debt than their home is worth, putting them "underwater," according to CoreLogic, a Santa Ana, Calif.-based data provider.

The White House's programs, while not meant to solve all of the nation's housing woes, were supposed to make things better. Strapped homeowners would get a fresh shot at keeping their homes, the theory went, while banks and investors would face less losses from a reworked mortgage than a failed one. In turn, foreclosures would wane, putting fewer distressed homes on the market. Home prices would eventually rebound.

That's not happening.

Instead, "the expected participation in the Treasury's mortgage programs declined," CBO wrote in its report. In March, when the budget office predicted that the administration would spend just $22 billion of the $50 billion it had allocated, or $10 billion more than it's now predicting, it wrote that the difference stemmed "primarily from disparate outlooks on the number of eligible households and the participation rate among those households."

On Monday, CBO noted that it further "reduced its estimate of how many homeowners will receive aid under the Treasury's mortgage initiatives.

"Accordingly, CBO reduced the total expected expenditure of such programs from $22 billion to $12 billion," it wrote.

The White House's Office of Management and Budget estimates that Treasury will spend $46 billion of TARP funds on its anti-foreclosure efforts.

Last month, former Sen. Ted Kaufman, the head of the Congressional Oversight Panel -- another bailout watchdog -- said of Obama's initial promise that "[a]t the time, our economy was on track to experience more than eight million foreclosures, so the goal was always modest compared to the scale of the problem.

"Certainly it was modest compared to the boldness shown in rescuing AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bank of America, Citigroup, and the auto companies," added Kaufman, a Delaware Democrat. "Yet now, two years later, we can see that even this modest goal will not be met."

In its most recent quarterly report to Congress, the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program wrote that "the most specific of TARP's Main Street goals, 'preserving homeownership,' has so far fallen woefully short." SIGTARP's chief, Neil M. Barofsky, has been especially critical of the administration's approach to helping homeowners.

The bright spot in the budget office's report was its forecast that TARP would cost the federal government just $25 billion.

"Clearly, it was not apparent when the TARP was created two years ago that the cost would turn out to be this low," the CBO report's authors wrote.

"While we are pleased that CBO recognizes that the overall costs of TARP are likely to be less than 5 percent of the original $700B authorized, we are working to ensure that our efforts to prevent foreclosures is as robust as possible," Treasury spokesman Mark Paustenbach wrote in an e-mailed statement.

The law authorizing the bailout gave the White House $700 billion to stabilize the financial system in a manner that "protects home values," "preserves homeownership," and "promotes jobs and economic growth," among other responsibilities.

Some may argue that the stabilization of Wall Street will be its sole accomplishment.

*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The Obama administration will spend less than a quarter of the $50 billion it promised to help homeowners facing foreclosure, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a report Monday. Th...
The Obama administration will spend less than a quarter of the $50 billion it promised to help homeowners facing foreclosure, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a report Monday. Th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,605
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (65 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rory talbot
Former Dem but they r now wing of Corp. party
08:57 PM on 12/19/2010
HP monitors? Really? I can't even say HP monitors?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
12:41 PM on 12/04/2010
If I recall correctly, it was back in Nineteen hundred and eighty something when the coal mines closed down in southern Illinois and thousands who depended on the mines were left jobless. Many were losing their homes back then, and a trend started that I thought would have started up again these days. Homes were mysteriously burning to the ground faster than the banks could take them away. It wasnt to collect the insurance as much revenge on the banks I guess you could say. And considering the banks dont care if they get the house or the insurance money, I guess it wouldn't really matter either. I just remember all the homes burnt to the ground when they were in tough times, like many are now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
03:18 PM on 12/03/2010
If the government helped the Bankers ... then the government had to help the homeowners­­­.

If the government would have let the Bankers go out of business ... then the government could have let the people lose their homes to foreclosur­­­e.

But the government can't use taxpayer money to save the very people that caused this crisis ... and not help the taxpayers.

This position is indefensib­­­le.

The people are smart ... they know they have been sold out ... they know they have been used ... and they know they have been abandoned by our government­.

And that includes Barack Obama.

There are 20,000,000 potential families facing foreclosur­­­e across this nation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
12:43 PM on 12/04/2010
well they did, they are, and its still happening. So what do you mean by " they cant" when they did?
01:23 AM on 12/02/2010
I voted for him for President of the United States of America........now he couldn't sell me a used car.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KennyFox
So whatchya sayin'?
10:51 PM on 12/01/2010
Wheres George Soros when you need him...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zoiebear
10:42 PM on 12/01/2010
Unfortunately Obama is just a puppet. The right wing is running everything!!! God help us all!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USNDC
Smartest President ever ? ... not even close.
03:17 PM on 12/03/2010
Oh, I see ... this way you never have to hold Obama accountable for anything ... how convenient.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
12:44 PM on 12/04/2010
worked for the republicans during the bush years..
02:42 PM on 12/01/2010
He'll use the rest of the money after he closes GITMO during his first year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
10:07 PM on 12/01/2010
Little did he know the Gangesters there before him had broken so many laws GITMO can never be closed !!!!!!
02:23 PM on 12/01/2010
They need it to bail out Wall Street.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
12:49 PM on 12/04/2010
yes your right. We must take care of the elitist who care for us first. We should sell everything we own, clear out or bank accounts, savings, whatever we have left. Sell our kids toys and maybe even our own kidneys and a lung from each family member so we can give all the money and wealth within the borders of the USA to the Ivy greed capitalist who have made America into the great and prosperous country that it is today! All hail the Ivy Greed Capitalist, for they are the only ones who know best what we should do, and it is because of their great wisdom that we should allow them to have all the money there is, because we surly are not capable of stewardship of such responsibilities. Please, give! cant you see a Billionaire is wasting away while we eat crackers and Romain noodles once a week? I beg of you, its the only way to get everyone back to work and America on track again. Only they have the knowledge and the power to do it. We must!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Kimiko Austin-Rijs
American/European
01:54 PM on 12/01/2010
My disappointment with the adminstration that I had so much hope for is growing. Hopefully he will just be a one term president and we get someone better suited for the job. I HIGHLY doubt it but this is not much better than what Bush did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KennyFox
So whatchya sayin'?
10:53 PM on 12/01/2010
I have decided to never vote at the federal level again. Local only. DC is for pigs. I voted for Obama. I wont vote for him again in 2012. There is one thing politicians hate...not getting your vote. We should all just not vote, right and left. Liberals are foolish if they think base Republican values voters and small gov voters have ever gotten what they voted for.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
12:51 PM on 12/04/2010
You speak of one term. There is one Term that has become almost an embarasment to the country since the days of Reagan, more so with Bush [W] and continuing on now. And that is the Term " President"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fb0252
12:17 PM on 12/01/2010
always glad to hear. wife no pay mortgage. obama fault.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
06:23 AM on 12/01/2010
"Some may argue that the stabilization of Wall Street will be its sole accomplishment."

Anything else was just chronic fabrications and politicizing. Great job POTUS. How many times do we have to be lied to?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
10:04 PM on 12/01/2010
Banks are still trying to cover up Fraud in the mortages !!!
Why do you think they wanted no one to look at the orginal loans !!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Sta
06:15 AM on 12/01/2010
Great place to reduce spending. As if Obama could do ANY LESS to combat the housing crisis.

Foreclosures are destroying whats left of the economy, HOUSING is the key, with Obamas non-involvement policy, it will take a decade to recover. Nothing more than a shill for big banks, is Obama now a Republican?? Hard to tell.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
10:03 PM on 12/01/2010
Did you forget that the Republicans had STRIPPED AWAY the U.S. Banking Regulation back in 1999 with a 2 am Bill sneaked into a larger bill ?
They even changed 50 year old Banking Committee Rules so only 3 Memeber could pass a bill out of committee.

They hide is well at 2am and Clinton signed it . Clinton loses either way. I f he said he did not read all of the bill he singed he loses if he said he read it and knew it he loses . Had to frame a Dem.

Why did they not give it to Reagan to sign he would have signed it openly while he was being lead around by the Goldman Sach Vice President .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
11:48 PM on 11/30/2010
Bank fought this all the way afraid of the amount of Fraud in the loans if it was uncovered during a refiance .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Cantor
I am a human being descended from a small group of
08:40 PM on 12/01/2010
yep
photo
Hoodoo X
tanstaafl
09:57 PM on 11/30/2010
For those of you looking for fun Christmas gifts, let me suggest this one.  Look up their  charity score.
I give chickens to lucky h po folks. Last year is was Rina, and PeaceKitten. 
The site:
ttps://secure2.convio.net/ori/site/Ecommerce?store_id=2421&VIEW_HOMEPAGE=true&FOLDER=0&TYPE=&NAME=&JServSessionIdr004=g81gvo56r3.app201b
The charity score
http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=5350
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]