iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unemployment Extension: Senate Democrats Introduce Yearlong Reauthorization Of Extended Jobless Aid

First Posted: 11/29/10 08:20 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Unemployment Extension

Senate Democrats introduced a bill Monday evening that would reauthorize extended unemployment aid for a full year, setting up a symbolic showdown on jobless benefits one day before they are set to expire.

"Unemployment benefits are the only lifeline many workers in Montana and across the nation have left in this tough economy," said Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who introduced the bill. "These benefits help millions of Americans put food on the table and roofs over their heads -- pumping money into our economy and helping to create jobs. Continuing the program for a year will provide the certainty our economy and these Americans looking for work need."

The cost of the legislation is not "offset" with spending cuts, meaning it likely faces insurmountable opposition from Republicans and conservative Democrats opposed to deficit spending. Republicans may offer a reauthorization that is "paid for" with spending cuts, though Democrats are unlikely to support such a measure, having dug in on the historical record of deficit spending to cover such emergency measures.

The cost of federally-funded extended benefits during past recessions has never been fully offset with spending cuts. Congress did not use deficit spending to accommodate extended benefits in 1991, but the cost was offset with tax hikes instead.

Without a reauthorization, the Labor Department estimates that 2 million Americans will lose their benefits over the course of December, with 800,000 facing a cutoff this week alone.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Sunday that Democrats may try to use unemployment benefits as part of a bargain reauthorizing soon-to-expire tax cuts for the rich.

The progressive Economic Policy Institute estimates that reauthorizing the benefits through 2011 would cost $65 billion. That's about 1.7 percent of the White House's projected 2011 budget.

"Democrats are eager to fight to extend unemployment insurance in any way that they can," said one Democratic Senate aide.

A group of 29 senators sent a letter to Reid urging a quick full-year reauthorization.

"For the past six decades, Congress has provided federally funded unemployment insurance benefits during every recession," the letter said. "Further, federal unemployment insurance benefits have always been provided until the economy was on a stable path of growth. In fact, the highest unemployment rate at which federally funded unemployment benefits were not extended was 7.2 percent."

The legislation under discussion will not create additional weeks of benefits; it only preserves the existing 73 weeks of federally-funded aid that kick in after a layoff victim exhausts 26 weeks of state benefits.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Senate Democrats introduced a bill Monday evening that would reauthorize extended unemployment aid for a full year, setting up a symbolic showdown on jobless benefits one day before they are set to ex...
Senate Democrats introduced a bill Monday evening that would reauthorize extended unemployment aid for a full year, setting up a symbolic showdown on jobless benefits one day before they are set to ex...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,140
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
03:53 AM on 12/05/2010
I just hope they remember the 99ers, I am at the end of my 4th tier and these bills in Congress they mention besides S.3706 only allows those to apply for 1-4 tier, not extend weeks. I am hoping I am wrong. They make it sound so promising, but I am afraid many will be without. If the Republicans want 700b for the wealthy then there should be unemployment for everyone for an additional 26 weeks. This is just too stressful & depressing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RyanC1384
07:54 PM on 12/01/2010
I lost my job just after memorial day...I am about to lose my benefits just before Christmas.

This is the story I wrote just days following being let go :

http://www.doubledutchpolitics.com/2010/06/i-never-thought-it-would-happen-to-me/
12:53 PM on 12/01/2010
How simple it was to grant $750 billion in tax payer dollars to bail out the very corporations that have crashed this economy to then find it so difficult to bail out the very tax payers that foot the initial bailout bill. We spend $65 billion in 2 months while we fight in Afhganistan. Perhaps a revolution is in order afterall. It was good enough for our founding pops, it's good enough for moi.
03:14 PM on 12/02/2010
was just thinking a few moments ago as to whether or not the wars are now being paid for as they go, or are they still being charged on the credit card, such as was done during the glossy admin of W -- and wasn't it Thomas Jefferson who commented once upon a time that a country needs a good revolution about every 20 years? do think that the US is way behind in the count....
03:08 AM on 12/01/2010
Just an idea. If they wanted to pass the bill and were skeptical of people taking advantage of the next tier, they should consider a more extensive approval of benefits for the next tier to keep it. By percentage of unemployed people in each State a certain amount of months would be allowed under the circumstances that #1 you continue to show all the jobs that you have applied for and #2 to make an effort to visit the 1 stop center for updates on your job search. Therefore, it will show the nay sayer's that we are living up to the expectations that they are looking from us. After the tier has been exhausted, the DOL would look at your records to see if you have seriously been looking and contributing, therefore adding extra month or months to each person. It might be complex, but spreading out the funding sparingly and smart would help everyone. It would be a win/win situation. I do not see why Congress wants to see American's struggle at such times. We fund many Countries why don't we help our own??
04:00 AM on 12/05/2010
the DOL would look at your records

Unfortunately their are not that many at the DOL to look at 2 million unemployed records. In Washington State on the last tier - you have to list 4 employers, names, addresses, job applied for and results.
I am with you on the fact that we can fund many countries, but turn a blind eye on our own. It really is shameful how Congress is treating us.
08:56 PM on 11/30/2010
I was SO sure the Republicans would be voted out of office after the unemployment fiasco of this summer. It is really disheartening that Americans would vote for people who could care less about us. I'm sad but not surprised. I just hope we find out something either way. The waiting is unbearable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bnshwarmr
09:34 AM on 12/01/2010
Thr people in this country are very politically ignorant, with faux news 24/7. They seem to enjoy being uniformed. The Democrats are the peoples' party, and get no backup.
08:45 PM on 11/30/2010
The unemployment compensation is all many people have and forcing these people onto the street is not very smart. Street people are unemployable people because you can’t call someone to go back to work that is sleeping under a bridge. They don’t have the clothes or transportation to go to work. Homeless people use local social services, food stamps and emergency care. Forcing the unemployed on to the street is not a solution to the problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:52 PM on 11/30/2010
More than 200,000 apartment evictions occurred in 1930 in New York City. Seven large, highly organized rent strikes occurred there during the last nine months of 1931 alone, largest was in 1932.

It was the US Communist Party that organized eviction resistance and rent strikes and worked to establish a moratorium on evictions. They formed Unemployment Councils./ Women armed with sticks battled police attempting to evict tenants. Long story short that work eventually led to the creation of the U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Development

Might be a good time to read about the success of some heroes of The Great Depression. I could use a lift.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Bostontru2u
Keep on Moving...The Left Way.
05:33 PM on 12/01/2010
This information is one of the reasons they are changing and rewriting the History books in Texas, and why "Fake News" is dumbing down the people who watch them.And why they are trying to destroy HUD, Mortgages, Housing, Banks,and Education. US History will tell us where we've been, in order to understand where we must go.
03:17 AM on 12/01/2010
I agree to this because I was homeless at one time and couldnt even get a job at a card store. When its Christmas Eve and you are standing in the snow, looking at the sky. No one to call out to for help. No family. That was the time I ever felt so hopeless, so distraught. I went to the ferry terminal to sleep. I went to the social services I was given fare to get on the train. They were dressed in nice suits and clean. I just wished and prayed I had somewhere to go. No food to eat. I was so embarrassed to beg for money so I would ask people if they had a quarter for a phone call. At the end of the night I was able to buy myself some rice from the Chinese restaurant. It was the only thing I could afford. My family finally came to save me and I was able to find employment. Then I was let go due to lack of funds in the company. I never want to go back to the streets. Id rather take a bottle of drugs and die in my sleep before going through that. Its no picnic. Im not crying for a pity party, but rather sharing an experience how this post here related to me at one time.
01:01 PM on 12/01/2010
It would be a travesty to lose you twice. If you survived the first experience, there is a purpose for you. Keep searching it out. I personally would hate to know that one more person was so fed up and overwhelmed witht he threat of total loss that they took the only way out controllable...problem is, you have no control once you have taken that step. Everything including us is temperary. Nothing can sustain itself and we have to find a way to change the course of where this country is headed. I would rather fight than switch...and old Lucky Strike commercial slogan, but it is relevant to the day. Keep moving and don't let this economy kill you. That would be worse than the closing of a million banks and 25% national unemployment. No pity party here...just letting you know that your value exceeds the market's...you are invaluable.
02:33 PM on 11/30/2010
Billions of aid to foreign countries, bailouts for wall street and the banks yet we cannot help our own doesn't make sense at all.
01:45 PM on 11/30/2010
We must have a Tier 5! We are desperate for jobs! No jobs & no hope thru no fault of our own. Show us you care President Obama! We would like to be able to keep our place to live!! We would like to be able to eat and keep our families together till we can find jobs!!!
01:42 PM on 11/30/2010
Broke American Middle Class Worker
01:41 PM on 11/30/2010
Greed is a beautiful thing, corporations just reported record profits...so where are the jobs? Now the elected lapdogs of corporate America want to continue the punish the unemployed and reward the rich with tax cuts. Ah, the compassion is overwhelming and at that time of the year when all those sweet things are said about our fellow man. Good will to who?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeachesinBoston
I'm a conservative liberal. Beat that!
06:14 PM on 12/06/2010
REPOST from another blog I 'guest' commented on: The people yelling 'socialism' will never have to understand because most of them feed off the labor of us peons. Their healthy salaries will ALWAYS be there with job security because they know how to work the system...greedily & by all means necessary. Wall Street CEOs make more than 833 times of the average minimum wage worker. They are FAR removed for us little guys that do well overall, but wind up closer to the bottom of the income rung. See, if ever they were threatened...the Federal government will bail them out. So why would they fret? Or be sensitive?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
01:27 PM on 11/30/2010
Boehner, McConnell and Blunt are charlatans and big business lackeys. Obama is not advocating a government takeover; instead, he wants to institute regulatory safeguards to protect working-class Americans from unscrupulous fat cats. Republicans defend big business and that’s how they will govern—tax breaks for the wealthy, no protections for working-class Americans. From 2000 to 2008, Bush created less than 2 million private sector jobs (in comparison, Clinton created 22 million), but enacted $1.4 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthy with no offsets (i.e., reductions in other areas to pay for tax cuts), which increased our long-term deficit by more than $4 trillion. During the decade republicans controlled congress and the presidency, they were never concerned with deficit reduction, as evidenced by the Prescription Drug Bill, a $1 trillion give-away to Big Pharma, and the Bush Wars, which were unfunded and led to $1 trillion in no-bid contracts going to Cheney cronies (Halliburton, KBR and Blackwater). Without offsets, fiscally irresponsible republicans baulked at extending unemployment benefits (which they did 3 times under Bush with no offsets), causing thousands of families to be evicted. Recently, republicans voted against tax cuts for small businesses and extending healthcare benefits for 9/11 responders. Evidently, republicans do not represent the interests of working-class Americans. Rather, their mission is to protect big business and win midterm seats by using lies to tarnish Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BCP72
Cambridge, Ma
01:48 PM on 11/30/2010
Well said and Well written!! AMEN.. btw you have a new fan!!
09:45 PM on 11/30/2010
And another..!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 PM on 11/30/2010
I was unemployed for 3 years- worked my butt off to find partial employment during that period. I only had 26 weeks- and food stamps. I also had a $1000 a month child support payment to keep up with.

Long story short- I lost my house, did a chapter 13 have 3.5 years left to pay off that debt (750 a month) and will be free when I am 56.

I did it- so can they. I am all for keeping benefits through the winter- after that they are on their own
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggerchick
if your view is myopic, go get Lasik
01:49 PM on 11/30/2010
You had to have had monthly income to end up in a CH13. And since your DMI was calculated to be $750/monthly, it's a pretty decent monthly income. For those not well-versed in bankruptcy statutes, DMI is disposable monthly income AFTER all of your expenses are removed from your income. They include everything - your payroll taxes, your health insurance premiums, rent/mortgage, home insurance, telephone, groceries, utilities, car payment, gas, etc. And a CH13 will usually allow you to keep your home unless the payments are simply not maintainable. You didn't exactly lose a $50,000/annual gross job, methinks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 PM on 11/30/2010
Also child support payments can be suspended due to unemployment. If teut had the means to pay the $1000/mo support then teut's eligibility for food stamps disappears. When employment changes drastically the courts generally approve an appeal to lower support payments.

Either teut is mistaken about his information or got very, very bad advice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:35 PM on 11/30/2010
You are misrepresenting yourself. Why?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rosalee Harris
12:55 PM on 11/30/2010
So if you worked and never collected unemployment can someone tell me where does that money go?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eminence Front 2011
01:06 PM on 11/30/2010
In your unemployment account, should you ever need it;
But your employer is the one who pays to that account!!
03:39 PM on 11/30/2010
Yes....the employer pays into the account, but it is from the earnings you accrued from hours and salary your earned working for the employer.You make it sound like people are just getting unemployment benefits from the employee out of there good sense of decency. The reality is people who work pay into the system, and the company then uses those earnings to pay for your unemployment benefits if you become unemployed. Your cause and effect logic is misleading.
12:22 PM on 11/30/2010
How are the 99 ers supposed to survive? For many of us our savings are gone. There are no jobs. I'm glad to see something being done for some of the unemployed, but how about the rest of us? I guess we just don't count. Millions of us have fallen through the cracks. Because we no longer show up on the rolls we don't exist in the minds of these fools that we have in Congress. All we did was work and pay our taxes, pay into the system and through no fault of our own find ourselves in a position that we could have never imagined. For those who think this is a ploy on our part to simply game the system I pray that you never have to be in this position. I expected more from this government that I have always supported. I expected respect for the citizens when they need it most. Funny how we as a nation can blow trillions in Iraq rebuilding a nation that we should have never attacked. But we can't seem to find the money to help our fellow citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eminence Front 2011
12:26 PM on 11/30/2010
Amen @#64!!!!!!!!

Exactly!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eminence Front 2011
12:21 PM on 11/30/2010
99'er not discussed/included again.

ALL will be here, sooner than later; or the repug's plan = ALL will be slave labor!!