iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks' Online Presence Imperiled By Attacks

Wikileaks Server

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 12/03/10 02:27 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

You can currently access the WikiLeaks website here.

--

LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks struggled to stay online Friday as governments and hackers hounded the organization across the Internet, trying to deprive it of a direct line to the public.

Like a fugitive moving from house to house, WikiLeaks was forced to change the name of its Web site after a U.S. company stopped directing traffic to wikileaks.org. French officials then moved to oust it from its new home. "The first serious infowar is now engaged. The field of battle is WikiLeaks. You are the troops," tweeted John Perry Barlow, co-founder of the online free-speech advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation. His message was reposted by WikiLeaks to its 300,000-odd followers.

Legal pressure increased on Wikileaks founder Julian Assange after Swedish authorities cleared an obstacle to his arrest by revising an arrest warrant in response to procedural questions from British officials.

Assange's lawyer said that he is in the U.K. but she hadn't received a warrant by Friday afternoon.

He is sought over allegations of rape and other sex crimes that emerged after a trip to Sweden in August. Swedish officials issued a Europe-wide arrest warrant for Assange this week but British officials put any action against him on hold and asked the Swedes to revise it, adding fuller information on the penalties Assange could face.

Assange said that his arrest would do nothing to halt the flow of American diplomatic cables being released by his group and newspapers in several countries, and threatened to escalate the rush of information if he was taken into custody.

Hundreds of cables have been published in redacted form this week by Wikileaks and several newspaper in recent days. Assange said that all of the cables had already been distributed in a heavily encrypted form to tens of thousands of people.

If something happened to him, he suggested, then the password needed to decrypt the data would be released and all the secrets would go out at once.

"History will win," Assange said in a web chat with readers of The Guardian newspaper, one of the media organizations helping to coordinate the documents' publication. "The world will be elevated to a better place. Will we survive? That depends on you."

WikiLeaks doesn't depend entirely on its website for disseminating secret documents – the nationless organization could still communicate directly with media outlets, as it had been doing before the release of cables on Sunday. But the site provides a direct line to the public, fulfilling the organization's stated goal of maximum distribution for the secret documents it receives from mainly anonymous contributors.

In an online chat with readers of The Guardian, Assange on Friday promised to improve the availability of the website as soon as possible.

"Rest assured I am deeply unhappy that the three-and-a-half years of my work and others is not easily available or searchable by the general public," Assange said.

Manchester, New Hampshire-based company EveryDNS, which had been directing traffic to the website wikileaks.org – stopped doing so late Thursday after cyber attacks threatened the rest of its network. WikiLeaks responded by moving to a Swiss domain name, wikileaks.ch – and calling on activists for support.

The loss of support from EveryDNS just a minor annoyance because the site can leap from one name to the next, said Fraser Howard, a researcher with Internet security firm Sophos.

"The whack-a-mole analogy is fairly good," he said.

The Swiss address directs traffic to servers in France, where Industry Minister Eric Besson called it unacceptable to host a site that "violates the secret of diplomatic relations and puts people protected by diplomatic secret in danger."

The general manager of French web hosting company OVH, Octave Klaba, confirmed that it had been hosting WikiLeaks since early Thursday, after a client asked for a "dedicated server with ... protection against attacks."

He said the company has asked a judge to decide on legality of hosting the site on French soil.

"It is not up to the political realm or to OVH to request or decide the closure of a site, but rather up to the courts," Klaba said.

Wikileaks has been brought down numerous times this week by what appear to be denial-of-service attacks. In a typical such attack, remote computers commandeered by rogue programs bombard a website with so many data packets that it becomes overwhelmed and unavailable to visitors. Pinpointing the culprits is difficult. The attacks are relatively easy to mount, and can be performed by amateurs.

The attacks started Sunday, just before WikiLeaks released the diplomatic cables. To deal with the flood of traffic, WikiLeaks moved to Amazon.com Inc.'s Web hosting facility, which has vast numbers of servers that can be rented at need to meet surges.

Amazon booted the site on Wednesday after U.S. Congressional staffers started asking the company about its relationship to WikiLeaks. The company later said it ousted WikiLeaks because WikiLeaks doesn't own its content and Amazon claimed it could be endangering innocent people by publishing unredacted material.

The United States has what Attorney General Eric Holder calls "an active, ongoing, criminal investigation" into WikiLeaks' release of the diplomatic cables. Holder said this week that the release jeopardized national security, diplomatic efforts and U.S. relationships around the world.

In Washington, the lawmaker expected to take over the House Judiciary Committee in January, Republican Lamar Smith of Texas, said he plans to conduct oversight hearings in the matter.

Sen. John Ensign of Nevada introduced a bill to amend the U.S. Espionage Act that would give government prosecutors more flexibility to pursue a criminal case against Assange and his organization, but there was little chance of passing a new law in the remaining weeks of the congressional session.

Assange also risks legal action in his homeland, where Australia says it would detain Assange if possible in response to the warrant filed in the Swedish case by Interpol.

British authorities delayed acting on that warrant after the Swedes specified the maximum possible sentence for only one the most serious charge.

Wikileaks.ch, is owned by the Swiss Pirate Party, formed two years ago to campaign for freedom of information. Its officials said they had met with WikiLeaks Assange and provided him with information about how to seek asylum in Switzerland.

___

Svensson reported from New York. Louise Nordstrom reported from Stockholm, Jenny Barchfield from Paris, Holly Ramer from Manchester, New Hampshire, John Heilprin from Geneva and Larry Margasak from Washington D.C.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

You can currently access the WikiLeaks website here. -- LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks struggled to stay online Friday as governments and hackers hounded the organization across the Internet, trying...
You can currently access the WikiLeaks website here. -- LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks struggled to stay online Friday as governments and hackers hounded the organization across the Internet, trying...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10,182
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (176 total)
01:20 PM on 12/06/2010
Assange has triggered a healthy debate about whether a democracy should conduct a secret foreign policy.

The state department leaks pose different issues from the military leaks. The military operational information might well pose a direct threat to US efforts to prosecute the war. Whether you agree or disagree with the current war effort, leaking the military documents is good ol' treason, plain and simple, and Assange's role in it as a foreigner aiding and abetting an American traitor certainly seems to make him the kind of person that any government would seek to kill, imprison, or both, although it may take awhile to to figure out what American law he actually violated, other than "Don't tug on Superman's cape".

On the other hand, the state department documents plainly reveal a government that is conducting a secretive foreign policy that the American public would be unlikely to support if it understood what was actually going on. Especially the counterproductive support of corrupt regimes in Pakistan and Afghanistan that undoubtedly is killing the very American soldiers in combat we Americans all want to protect.

So, while Assange, an enemy of the United States, has no one to blame but himself if he wakes up, or fails to wake up, one day, with a bullet in his brain, a posthumous thank you would be highly appropriate for all of the useful information he has supplied to the people of the United States regarding the duplicitous operation of the Clinton-Obama State Dept.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
watching you...
03:54 PM on 12/07/2010
interesting points.
you say that the US is supporting corrupt regimes in pakistan and afghanistan and yet from the comments I have read a lot of people think the US is a corrupt regime
i get the impression that a lot of people here on HP have reasonably good lives. They have internet access and from that I will also assume food, clothing, shelter, safety from fear and harm. The same cannot be said about people who live in many countries around the world.
Every person has their good and bad qualities. You can draw up a list of US Presidents and people will tick both sides. I wonder is it unfair to state that only Pakistani Afghani leaders are corrupt. For those that live in that region there are things they have to deal with that Americans never have to fear. Their leaders' jobs are all the more complicated because of it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbmetzger
01:16 PM on 12/06/2010
latest update from the CBC
Wikileaks: Saudi Arabia Useless Ally to United States
The United States believes Saudi Arabia is ineffective at stopping terrorist fundraising in its own country, according to a U.S. cables obtained by WikiLeaks. http://www.newslook.com/videos/271918-wikileaks-saudi-arabia-useless-ally-to-united-states?autoplay=true
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
12:52 PM on 12/06/2010
When Wikileaks puts your credit card numbers, bank accounts and Social Security numbers on line, will you still defend it as free speech?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pesfb
il cane pazzo
05:35 PM on 12/06/2010
Hey, since you clearly have the inside knowledge of Wikileaks intention and motivation, how about putting it all into an internet dump instead of doing piecemeal? You know like Assange might do.

Then, you can go back into hiding. It'd be much appreciated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soma99
12:44 PM on 12/06/2010
http://www.juancole.com/2010/12/is-aipac-a-wikileaks-operation.html
Rosen has now launched a $20 million wrongful termination suit against AIPAC. He maintains that his action of delivering the classified document to the Israeli embassy was standard operating procedure in AIPAC, ***and that he did nothing out of the ordinary***, and that he should not have been fired. He is also threatening to name details of this routine spying.

http://mondoweiss.net/2010/12/israel-supporters-using-wikileaks-to-promote-attack-on-iran-are-ignoring-arab-public-opinion.html
Israel supporters using Wikileaks to promote attack on Iran
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pesfb
il cane pazzo
12:10 PM on 12/06/2010
The headline on this article is already outdated and incorrect. Thanks to freedom of information supporters across the internet there are already hundreds of wiki mirror sites established and more to come.
05:47 AM on 12/06/2010
Any U.S. legislation created to apprehend Assange (who's not in the US, nor a US citizen) will only surve to hurt us who are US citizens living here in the US! Why can't anyone see that this will end up giving the government MORE power like 9/11 did. This is just another 9/11! Once passed they can frame anyone who releases any information the government deems secret (even if it harms us, or is not in our best interest) for espionage. What if you stumbled on proof that an official did something illegal, and then they kidnap and detain you, then try you for treason? Wow, 1984 really is going to arrive... Only 25 years later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pesfb
il cane pazzo
05:50 PM on 12/06/2010
Under US law for someone who is not a government employee to receive classified documents from a third party is not illegal, nor is sharing them with others once they have been received.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:17 AM on 12/06/2010
It's not wrong to lie, cheat, steal, corrupt, and torture. It's wrong to let people know about it.
~ @cyberyan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
12:46 PM on 12/06/2010
So it's not wrong to mark individuals for killing?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Butterfly M
06:49 PM on 12/05/2010
http://wikileaks.nl/
06:37 PM on 12/05/2010
How corrupt is our government? Just look at their response to the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
12:46 PM on 12/06/2010
Espionage is not free speech.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pesfb
il cane pazzo
05:51 PM on 12/06/2010
Free speech is not espionage.

Under current US law for someone who is not a government employee to receive classified documents from a third party is not illegal, nor is sharing them with others once they have been received.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
04:16 PM on 12/05/2010
Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and now the mother of all cover ups has swung into action..

Had the WikiLeaks expose shown our glorious leaders in a positive light that would be fine and dandy, but because it exposes the true face and intent of diplomats that's bad for business.
Now the expose of banking may very well result in high level corruption charges, and this they hope to prevent, but, like presents wars, this one too is not winnable, they have lost already!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JLRoberson
Acclaimed cartoonist/writer
03:29 PM on 12/05/2010
Well, I guess it's a good thing you can get the whole of it as a torrent now, making Assange irrelevant­.
http://88.­80.16.63/t­orrent/cab­legate/cab­legate-201­012051016.­7z.torrent
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:28 AM on 12/06/2010
A hero is never irrelevant. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
12:46 PM on 12/06/2010
A spy is not a hero.
02:40 PM on 12/05/2010
I have no problem with Wikileaks for the most part. Politicans are just made they can't get away with there lies and inefficient foreign aid. I wonder how much could be paid for by the billions of dollars we waste on foreign aid?
photo
LogicalMathMan
Math, Finance, English, Business Instructor
02:26 PM on 12/05/2010
When notoriety creates a cult following!!! Wikileaks and Assange will emerge stronger and more powerful than they were.

Nothing denigrates honor more than exposing the shameful acts of those we consider noble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wishfulslinker
12:35 PM on 12/05/2010
Extremely disturbing release of intelligence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pesfb
il cane pazzo
05:55 PM on 12/06/2010
If you truly can call it "intelligence". But in either regard, not disturbing at all except to those corrupt officials whose pettiness has been exposed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wishfulslinker
05:57 PM on 12/07/2010
The innumerab;e military tapes will only harm the men still fighting. You lack the ability to understand "intelligence".
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
12:13 PM on 12/05/2010
wikileaks no longer available via the dns. put the ip address in the url window at the top of your
browser:

88.80.13.1­60

and go to wikileaks.­org