iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Columbia University Walks Back Anti-WikiLeaks Advice

First Posted: 12/06/10 02:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

Columbia

WASHINGTON -- Days after Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) sparked national ire by advising students not to discuss WikiLeaks on Facebook or Twitter, the school is walking back its remarks and embracing free speech.

In an email to students last week, SIPA's Office of Career Services warned students that tweeting or posting about WikiLeaks on Facebook could endanger their job prospects with the federal government, according to an alumnus working at the U.S. State Department.

"[The alumnus] recommends that you DO NOT post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter," the Office of Career Services advised students in an email obtained last week by The Huffington Post. "Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government."

Indignant Americans took to Twitter last week to air their reactions to the prestigious institution's chilling warning.

Over at the State Department, spokesman Philip Crowley has denied any federal involvement in the school's guidance.

"This is not true," he wrote in an email. "We have instructed State Department employees not to access the WikiLeaks site and download posted documents using an unclassified network since these documents are still classified. We condemn what Mr. Assange is doing, but have given no advice to anyone beyond the State Department to my knowledge."

Now Wired's Sam Gustin reports that SIPA's Dean, John H. Coatsworth, is reversing the advice issued to students last week, reaffirming the school's commitment to freedom of speech.

"Freedom of information and expression is a core value of our institution. Thus, SIPA's position is that students have a right to discuss and debate any information in the public arena that they deem relevant to their studies or to their roles as global citizens, and to do so without fear of adverse consequences," he said in an email obtained by HuffPost.

Though the disclosure of 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables detailing some of the country's most closely guarded secrets has received a mixed response, the move to silence public debate on the issue represents uncharted new territory in the federal government's effort to put a stop to the leaks.

Douglas Almond, an associate professor of International and Public Affairs and Economics, told HuffPost that while students should not be discriminated against for following the WikiLeak conversation, aspiring diplomats may appreciate being notified about the issue.

"If I were a SIPA student considering a career in government, as many are, I'd want to to be made aware of this potential issue," said Almond, who's currently on leave at Cornell University. "That said, in my opinion it would be silly for the government to screen future job applicants based on whether they had read these leaked cables or their summaries in the press."

Read the original email from SIPA's Office of Career Services.

From: Office of Career Services Date: Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:26 PM Subject: Wikileaks - Advice from an alum To: "Office of Career Services (OCS)"

Hi students,

We received a call today from a SIPA alumnus who is working at the State Department. He asked us to pass along the following information to anyone who will be applying for jobs in the federal government, since all would require a background investigation and in some instances a security clearance.

The documents released during the past few months through Wikileaks are still considered classified documents. He recommends that you DO NOT post links to these documents nor make comments on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter. Engaging in these activities would call into question your ability to deal with confidential information, which is part of most positions with the federal government.

Regards,
Office of Career Services

Below is the response from SIPA's dean, reversing the school's position:

Here is Coatsworth's more recent

December 6, 2010

Dear SIPA Community,

Last Tuesday, SIPA's Office of Career Services received a call from a former student currently employed by the U.S. Department of State who pointed out that the U.S. government documents released during the past few months through WikiLeaks are still considered classified. The caller suggested that students who will be applying for federal jobs that require background checks avoid posting links to these documents or making comments about them on social media sites such as Facebook or through Twitter.

OCS emailed this cautionary suggestion to students, as it has done many times with other information that could be helpful in seeking employment after graduation. We know that many students today share a great deal about their lives online and that employers may use that information when evaluating their candidacy. Subsequent news stories have indicated that the Department of State has issued guidelines for its own employees, but has not issued any guidelines for prospective employees.

Freedom of information and expression is a core value of our institution. Thus, SIPA's position is that students have a right to discuss and debate any information in the public arena that they deem relevant to their studies or to their roles as global citizens, and to do so without fear of adverse consequences. The WikiLeaks documents are accessible to SIPA students (and everyone else) from a wide variety of respected sources, as are multiple means of discussion and debate both in and outside of the classroom.

Should the U.S. Department of State issue any guidelines relating to the WikiLeaks documents for prospective employees, SIPA will make them available immediately.

Sincerely,
John H. Coatsworth
Dean

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

WASHINGTON -- Days after Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) sparked national ire by advising students not to discuss WikiLeaks on Facebook or Twitter, the school i...
WASHINGTON -- Days after Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) sparked national ire by advising students not to discuss WikiLeaks on Facebook or Twitter, the school i...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,216
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (42 total)
04:27 PM on 12/08/2010
This is so ridiculously overblown. I think it's common sense to avoid divulging anything the government could consider to be secret if you want to work for them. I don't see why that's such a big deal. The real problem here is how stupid SIPA seems to think their students are.
10:14 PM on 12/07/2010
So basically this is putting everyone on notice that anyone who applies for a government job or contract will most certainly have their Facebook and Twitter history thoroughly researched by the Thought Police for evidence of non-conformist postings, and their suitability for the job based on those findings.

Now the fun will begin when a person is turned down for a job and they take the USG to court for discrimination based on political views- and it will be even more interesting if the person in question had their Twitter account locked out to visitors and their FB account blocked to all but trusted friends... how did the USG obtain their information? (hint: Hillary probably got it, one way or another)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
murmur55
02:19 PM on 12/07/2010
Dear Office of Career Services:

One of your graduates and present professors, Paul S. Appelbaum M.D., violently battered and stalked me over whistleblowing against him and others who engaged in violent abuse of women and even children.

I lost my career. And other things...
09:22 AM on 12/07/2010
Who would want to work for a government that doesn't find it even more suspicious if you don't appear to have any views at all, or only the "right" views? You'd be spending hours every day working with completely mindless and clueless individuals. Well, them and the terrorists and spies who got their job by appearing to be mindless and clueless. Sounds like a nightmare, if you ask me.

And it's not the idea of being surrounded by terrorists and spies that I find most scary; at least, for better or worse, they have minds!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:13 AM on 12/07/2010
This is one of the most chilling and scary stories I've read yet regarding Wikileaks. Columbia University reacting to the advice of an anonymous alumni working at the State Dept. puts out such a warning? My God, what times we are living in! Freedom of information and expression being suppressed at a university with one of the most prestigious journalism departments? Cautionary suggestion? What kind of language is this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:22 AM on 12/07/2010
Indescribably ridiculous! Anyone applying for any job, be it in government or private business, should know the ins and outs of that government or business and its practices. How else to make an informed decision on a potential position?
07:30 AM on 12/07/2010
Regardless of all the controversy, I would still advise young people who hope to be hired into a responsible job, in government or otherwise, to avoid posting anything online that may divulge their political or religious beliefs. Especially these days, lots and lots of people are out there competing for the few positions that open up, and all it takes to get rejected is for one person, or maybe even just a computer program, to cast your resume aside in the serial screening process that takes place before someone with the actual hiring authority gets to read it..
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
beingthebest
try as I might, I'm only human
08:13 AM on 12/07/2010
Regardless of the risks, I would still advise young people who hope to be contributing members of society who can use their brains and critical thinking skills to read every possible thing they can. Inform yourselves with knowledge.

Not having a job is a b1tch. Becoming an obedient robot is means your life has become a waste.

Why has the the U.S. become a third world country. Because we advise our young not to think
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:24 AM on 12/07/2010
fanned - no questions, no investigation - just toe the line.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whitewater
06:17 AM on 12/07/2010
It's too late. You have already been pegged by Big Brother. Do you really believe there are not some out there who have captured your comments?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
08:29 AM on 12/07/2010
Fear of retaliation is one reason many do not email, call, write or fax our government departments. As a 73-year old great-granmother, I am probably now on a "terrorist watch list" and "do not fly list" because of my emails and calls to the administration, the DoJ, the State Department, DHS and others since those emails and calls are critical of their actions (or inaction).

But I grew up in a time when we could criticize, condemn, question the leaders of our country even when we were at war. And, surprisingly, my questions were answered many times - unlike today where we are now considered nothing more than servants to our government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sleepers Awake
Google this: "Fighting for peace is like" ...
04:26 AM on 12/07/2010
When we were attacked in the Fall of 2001, I was teaching MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and FrontPage to foreign high school students, age 16. They wrote their documents in English--not their native language--and upload them to the school's www server, so everything students wrote was open to public view.

One student wrote an essay with a rationale supporting Osama bin Laden for engineering the attack on 9/11, the essay's title "Why the Attack on America was Justified." Technically, his essay included clearly stated points and supporting details, but I did not let him post his essay online for reasons much the same as Columbia University's original position.

The student was upset, but I explained that at 16, he didn't have any idea whether his education would lead him to study in the US or apply for a US scholarship, so he should not post his essay. I asked the student to talk with his parents about the issue, and if they wanted to discuss whether his essay should be posted, I would discuss it with them. However, the incident never rose to a level higher than the discussion between my student and me.

Columbia University has no ability whatsoever to enforce their original position, but their point was made. Students SHOULD consider the ramifications of what they put online. Having made that point and lifted it to the level of a discussion, Columbia University "walked back" with very carefully crafted wording, which is entirely appropriate.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
beingthebest
try as I might, I'm only human
08:16 AM on 12/07/2010
Wow.. good going. You advised someone to stop having their own opinions and do whatever it takes to get the all-mighty dollar. Thumbs up for the dumbing down.

Not that I agree with his opinion, but lord, isn't the U.S. suppose to be founded on the right to have one
zanzy
your micro bio is empty, just like our democracy.
02:18 AM on 12/07/2010
The US state department is blacklisting students and employees for exercising their rights to free speech and expression. They still are doing this, they just cannot say it officially because it is a constitutional crime.

Next election we need vote out Republicans and blue dog democratics and get only progressive, human rights democratics. Or else we will not have any rights left.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:40 AM on 12/07/2010
Ah, pardon me for saying so, but we have a Democrat in the White House, and isn't he incharge of the Stae Department?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
axollot
....
07:27 AM on 12/07/2010
Reading comprehens­ion is needed I see. The poster said "get rid of Republican­s and Blue Dog Democrats"
Progressiv­e Dems lost 2 seats (they caucus together fyi)
Blue Dogs were annihilate­d (they have their own caucus too)
The President is a Dem but clearly a Blue (lap) Dog Dem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
05:11 AM on 12/07/2010
U sir hv posted something foolish.....Who's the President ?? Who had the majority if the house & senate seats untill they blew it all ???? No points for guessing
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
axollot
....
07:27 AM on 12/07/2010
Reading comprehension is needed I see. The poster said "get rid of Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats"
Progressive Dems lost 2 seats (they caucus together fyi)
Blue Dogs were annihilated (they have their own caucus too)
The President is a Dem but clearly a Blue (lap) Dog Dem.
photo
HaroldHeckubah
Off off Broadway
01:50 AM on 12/07/2010
During WW2 it was "Loose Lips Sink Ships" Now, in the war against terrorism, Julian Assange says, "Hey, Terrorists, Here's a List of Places The United States Thinks Are Important". And people are cheering him and calling our government the enemy. I think we're doomed, and I'm probably glad.
photo
RabidRightRebel
Rebelling against wilful ignorance is a duty
06:32 AM on 12/07/2010
Are you sure that a government that monitiors your e-mails and blacklists you if you in any way disagree with policy decisions is not on its way to becoming the enemy?

Is this not the kind of thing that totalitarian regime do? Why should poeple not be uspet about it?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
beingthebest
try as I might, I'm only human
08:20 AM on 12/07/2010
Here's a list of Places...LOL.. They could have given him a more complete list. You really think these people are so dumb they need to be handed information from Wikileaks. No wonder we keep underestimating them
photo
Priori Decoherence
Skål til fitte og brannvesenet
01:01 AM on 12/07/2010
The outrage is misdirected in this instance; the anger should be over the fact that the school felt the need to warn students against potential future consequents of free expression. The USA has always held up the notion of free-speech and the freedom of holding government accountable; that citizens should now fear engaging in that lawful activity is vary chilling. However, that fear is not misplaced: employers already make frequent use of Google, Facebook, and other on-line services to check a potential employee’s background.
Business, organizations, clubs, non-profits, and governmental departments will consider all available information and sometimes lawful activities will haunt an applicant. A church could decide against a minister who sympathized with gay-rights, a law firm might choose not to hire a person who advocated for tort reform, and a designer is not going to hire an animal-rights activist to make fir coats.
The more important question is how to protect against a suppression of free and lawful expression? The thought that a future employer might be prejudiced supplies a powerful motivation for self-censorship.
12:52 AM on 12/07/2010
This makes no sense. Lets ensure that everyone in the US Diplomatic Corp know less than every other government's. Lets tie one arm behind our back.

It should be desirable that every one of our State Department employee know as much as possible about all the information that has been distributed. This would be so that they can recognize, assimilate, and report on useful linkages and information. Do we want expert or ignorant state department employees? And citizens for that matter.

Why does our government have no trust in its people?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
beingthebest
try as I might, I'm only human
08:22 AM on 12/07/2010
It's not about trust. Yes, it is about keeping them dumb as possible. That's how we do business now a days. And we wonder why we are in a free-fall
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Maung Pon Nya
12:39 AM on 12/07/2010
They should also advice the student that "don't read this article". So far 2000+ comments already.
12:06 AM on 12/07/2010
I actually think it was good advice. The school did not force anyone to abide by it. They just shared information that could be helpful to upcoming graduates that may be applying for positions dealing with confidential government data.