iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Will Scott Brown's Support For DADT Repeal Boost His Reelection Prospects?


First Posted: 12/06/10 04:12 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) may be breaking away from his Tea Party supporters who poured blood, sweat and tears into getting him into office in January, but many observers believe that this is exactly what he needs to do in order to be reelected in one of the bluest states in the country.

Last week, Brown distanced himself from the majority of his party and expressed an openness to overturning Don't Ask, Don't Tell (DADT), the military's ban on gays and lesbians serving openly.

"I accept the findings of the report and support repeal based on the Secretary's recommendations that repeal will be implemented only when the battle effectiveness of the forces is assured and proper preparations have been completed," said Brown.

"We have a long history in Massachusetts of respecting fiscal conservatism," noted Marc Landy, a Boston College political science professor. "We have elected a lot of Republican governors who reflect that. But they really need to show that they respect the cultural liberalism of the state. This was the first state to have gay marriage, and the Don't Ask Don't Tell policy, for this state, is too anti-gay. I think Brown's ability to show that he's not in the pocket of his party on this question is really going to help his reelection."

Brown was a darling of the Tea Party movement during his campaign. The Tea Party Express PAC spent nearly $300,000 backing Brown in the race, with one activist commenting, "If it wasn't for the Tea Party movement, Scott Brown wouldn't have gotten that seat."

But apparently, he believes he can afford to ruffle a few of their feathers and still win in 2012. In April, he skipped a massive Tea Party rally in Boston and downplayed their significance in his race, commenting, "Did the Tea Party movement help me? Sure they did. So did 1.1 million other people in my state and so did others across the country. So to have one particular party take credit -- I'm appreciative. But I had a big tent in my election."

Financial reform -- not gay rights -- however, seems to be the big sticking point in the Tea Party's relationship with Brown. The Greater Boston Tea Party announced it was "greatly disappointed" when the senator announced he would vote for the overhaul package.

Christen Varley, president of the Greater Boston Tea Party, which has an active member of 2,700, said that even for social conservatives like her, Brown's statement on DADT -- while disappointing -- really isn't a major issue in the state. She added that his vote in favor of financial reform was a much bigger deal and infuriated Tea Party activists.

"Something that people in Massachusetts -- especially those of us on the conservative end of things -- have learned in the last year, we're not always going to be able to elect a David Vitter in Massachusetts -- you know, someone on that conservative end of the spectrum," said Varley, pointing to the fact that Brown was with them last week on opposing an extension of unemployment benefits that wouldn't be offset.

Jay Dwyer of the Greater Waltham Tea Party said that the group, which has about 150 active members, supported Brown and actually formed partially in response to his candidacy. "Scott Brown really lit us up," he told The Huffington Post on Monday, saying that the group was generally pleased with the senator's performance -- with the exception of financial reform. Social issues, said Dwyer, were not as much of a focus.

"For a Massachusetts senator who's a Republican, he's pretty good," said Dwyer, adding, "I also have an extra measure of confidence in him because he is a military person, with this subject. I understand the concept of DADT is equal rights, but the situation when you join the military, by rule, you give up a number of rights. You do. You give up the right of freedom of expression. You can't. You give up the right to say things politically when you're in uniform. You can't. You give up privacy. You give up a lot of things. So it's a different environment than just a regular workplace environment, which it's often compared to. It's not."

Additionally, Brown's latest announcement seems to put him squarely within the majority of Bay State voters. A May poll found that 77 percent of Massachusetts voters support repealing DADT.

Gay rights groups had been skeptical of Brown, pointing to anti-LGBT comments he made in the past, such as the idea of two women having a child is "just not normal."

Kara Suffredini, executive director of MassEquality, said she was pleasantly surprised at Brown's announcement on DADT and suspected a certain amount of political considerations factored into his decision.

"Well, the Tea Party announced after the election cycle was over that they were going to go after him," said Suffredini. "They had already come out saying that before he ever announced his position on Don't Ask Don't Tell. If you look at what happened during the election cycle in Massachusetts, the state Republican party and the national Republican party put tens of millions of dollars into elections here, and every statewide race they lost. Democrats won every statewide race at the state level and all the congressional races. My guess is that this is some political calculus on Scott Brown's part -- that it's not about the Tea Party, it's not about the Republican party. He's run, basically, as an independent, and he needs to vote according to what the state wants him to do."

Suffredini added, however, that Brown needs to do more than just put out a statement on DADT for MassEquality and other LGBT groups to consider him an advocate. After all, she added, he left himself some leeway in perhaps not voting to bring the National Defense Authorization Act, which contains DADT repeal, to the floor, which would satisfy his base.

Landy doesn't think Brown will have any trouble winning a GOP primary in 2012, and a recent poll suggests that he is in a strong position against hypothetical Democratic challengers.

"The difference is that, unlike a lot of these establishment Republicans who ran into so much trouble [in other states] -- some of whom were actually defeated in the primaries -- Brown is really personally popular with people in Massachusetts," said Landy. "So that makes a big difference. I mean, there could always be a challenger, but he will survive a Republican primary in this state. He won't lose in the primary."

Varley agreed with the assessment that Brown is unlikely to face a serious challenger in his primary, stating, "I think Scott Brown is as socially conservative as you can elect at the national level in Massachusetts."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) may be breaking away from his Tea Party supporters who poured blood, sweat and tears into getting him into office in January, but many observers believe that t...
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) may be breaking away from his Tea Party supporters who poured blood, sweat and tears into getting him into office in January, but many observers believe that t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:04 PM on 12/29/2010
"But apparently, he believes he can afford to ruffle a few of their feathers and still win in 2012."
No, he can't. Scotty's political goose is cooked.
IreneNH
Please feel free to disagree
02:44 PM on 12/07/2010
"I accept the findings of the report and support repeal based on the Secretary's recommendations that repeal will be implemented only when the battle effectiveness of the forces is assured and proper preparations have been completed," said Brown.

I don't read the above as strong support for DADT repeal. ..."implemented only when the battle effectiveness of the forces is assured".... Thereby, he can vote for repeal and then take issue if it is implemented before he considers the battle effectiveness of the forces completed.

In other words, I think he is talking out of both sides of his mouth.

If you follow Massachusetts politics closely, you know that Brown didn't win the election - Martha Coakley lost it. While he may very well win a Republican primary, he will not win the election. MA democrats got a rude awakening and I don't believe they will allow the same mistakes to be made.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:59 PM on 12/07/2010
It doesn't matter what he does. The guy is toast.  The 2012 election will be hotly contested in Massachusetts and whatever happens there will be a higher turnout than at his last special election against an aloof, lackluster opponent. There will be no surprises.  With Obama on the ticket nationally even Martha Coakley could win this time.
11:54 AM on 12/07/2010
Elizabeth Warren should run against Scott Brown. She could take him.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
11:45 AM on 12/07/2010
Would MA have to do the Bush analogy of fool me once shame on you, and then stand in front of the camera and let Senator brown fool them twice, i would think the good people of MA will check out Scott brown's voting record on his voting on every issue before voting.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Toonguy
Draws funny pictures
11:29 AM on 12/07/2010
All citizens of Massachusetts should be asking Brown "What have you done for us lately?" He's done a terrific job of campaigning for R's and defending their policies, but responding to the needs of his constituents, he's simply missing in action.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
moose and squirrel
Very soon we would both be completely twisted...
08:37 AM on 12/07/2010
please MA who is your dem challenger?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan1902
United we bargain,divided we beg!
08:24 AM on 12/07/2010
The Congressional Ken Doll will be hanging with Barbie again after his re-election drubbing!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meldy1
Nurse&Pianist,but I don't have to work!
03:37 AM on 12/07/2010
One important thing I know,I have some family members living in the woods of Randolph,you don't con the Bay State twice,they won't forget it,they don't have amnesia on the first.They don't forget!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
samiles96
03:03 AM on 12/07/2010
He probably can win. He got elected in Mass. so it's inevitable that he would be a liberal Republican and not beholden to the Tea Party. If the teabaggers thought otherwise, they don't understand politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Toonguy
Draws funny pictures
11:26 AM on 12/07/2010
He got elected because (A) his opponent did not run any sort of a campaign until it was too late and (B) because it was a special election, the cons were able to devote 100% of their resources on MA. I don't think that'll happen this time around.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:10 AM on 12/07/2010
I thought he got elected because Martha basically didn't campaign.
photo
Watermelonman
Seeker of truth and justice.
09:20 AM on 12/07/2010
One could argue that Martha actually elected him.
02:03 AM on 12/07/2010
Scott Brown know what is he doing, all the TEA parties cannot re-elect him in a general election in a heavily democratic base.....He has to dance to left a little to appease his demography.

It is a very difficult dance, he is just like the blue-dog democrats but on the other side....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
we-r-stardust
Time flies like an arrow Fruit flies like a banana
06:43 AM on 12/07/2010
He can go on Dancing With The Dems. and see how long it`ll be before he`s voted off the show ;-)
01:27 PM on 12/07/2010
He may not make it out of the primary.
12:51 AM on 12/07/2010
Talk is cheap - let's wait and see how FigLeaf Brown votes in the US Senate - so far he has a record of verbally supporting issues that he then votes against because he thinks, we the voters of MASS. are not listening and watching. Take my word for it - we are watching and listening and recording - take his support for would-be congressman Jeff Perry in the tenth MASS - we were watching and listening and despite support from both FigLeaf and Willard Romney, we proudly supported Congressman Bill Keating against the ner'do'well Perry. Good luck with your national ambitions Scotty because you won't win again in MASS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greta42
Let's make the House tea-free in 2014
10:02 AM on 12/07/2010
Well said moneyman. The 2010 midterms were a forewarning in MA - Brown continues to vote lock-step with McConnell. He voted against the Disclosure Bill before Nov 2nd and last Saturday he voted with the Rethugs against extending Unemployment Insurance extension and against cutting the tax breaks for the wealthy. This guy is only conservative in voting no against the regular people, but yes for the anonymous big $ campaign donors - He will not win re-election.
photo
ThankGodhesgone
Always Progressive and loving the CONs meltdown.
12:04 AM on 12/07/2010
Brown either used the tbgrs to get elected, or he has smartened up since his election.

When will the baggers realize that they were just tools of the repubs, especially in 2010? They really are done and will fade into mediocrity by 2012. All fads do, in time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WowJones
Non union slaves built the White House
11:29 PM on 12/06/2010
In Mass. of course he can win.