iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Prince Charles, Camilla's Car Attacked By Student Protesters In London

AP     First Posted: 12/09/10 02:51 PM ET   Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

**SCROLL FOR PHOTOS**

LONDON -- In Britain's worst political violence in years, furious student protesters rained sticks and rocks on riot police, vandalized government buildings and attacked a car carrying Prince Charles and his wife, Camilla, after lawmakers approved a controversial hike in university tuition fees.

Demonstrators set upon the heir to the throne's limousine as it drove through London's West End shopping and entertainment hub. Protesters who had been running amok and smashing shop windows kicked and threw paint at the car, which sped off.

Charles' office, Clarence House, confirmed the attack but said "their royal highnesses are unharmed."

Police said it was unclear whether the royals had been deliberately targeted, or were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The couple arrived looking composed at the London Palladium theater, where they were attending a Royal Variety Performance. Their Rolls Royce limousine was left with a badly cracked rear window and was spattered with paint.

Protesters erupted in anger after legislators in the House of Commons approved a plan to triple university fees to 9,000 pounds ($14,000) a year.

As thousands of students were corralled by police near Parliament, some strummed guitars and sang Beatles songs - but others hurled chunks of paving stones at police and smashed windows in a government building.

Another group ran riot through the busy shopping streets of London's West End, smashing store windows and setting fire to a giant Christmas tree in Trafalgar Square.

Police condemned the "wanton vandalism." They said 38 protesters and 10 officers had been injured, while 15 people were arrested.

The violence overshadowed the tuition vote, a crucial test for governing Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition, and for the government's austerity plans to reduce Britain's budget deficit.

It was approved 323-302 in the House of Commons, a close vote given the government's 84-seat majority.

Many in the thousands-strong crowd booed and chanted "shame" when they heard the result of the vote, and pressed against metal barriers and lines of riot police penning them in.

Earlier small groups of protesters threw flares, billiard balls and paint bombs, and officers, some on horses, rushed to reinforce the security cordon.

The scuffles broke out after students marched through central London and converged on Parliament Square, waving placards and chanting "education is not for sale" to cap weeks of nationwide protests aimed at pressuring lawmakers to reverse course.

The vote put Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and his Liberal Democrat party in an awkward spot. Liberal Democrats signed a pre-election pledge to oppose any such tuition hike, and reserved the right to abstain in the vote even though they are part of the governing coalition proposing the change.

Those protesting in central London were particularly incensed by the broken pledge from Clegg's party.

"I'm here because the Liberal Democrats broke their promise," said 19-year-old Kings College student Shivan David from London's Trafalgar Square. "I don't think education should be free but I do think that tripling fees doesn't make any sense. We are paying more for less."

Inside the House of Commons and to the jeers from the opposition lawmakers, Liberal Democrat Business Secretary Vince Cable insisted that the new tuition plans were "progressive" as a heated debate over the proposal began.

Many in his party disagreed, and 21 Liberal Democrat lawmakers - more than a third of the total - voted against the fee hike. Another eight, including at least one government minister, abstained.

Demonstrator John Dawson, 16, admitted that it might be too late to change lawmakers' minds but said protesters must keep up the fight.

"The fact that so many students came out to protest today shows that, even after the vote, they will still do whatever they can to avoid paying this much for higher education," he said.

Experts warned that fallout from the policy could pose a greater risk after the vote.

"The real danger for the government is not that they won't pass it through, but that it will be a policy fiasco," said Patrick Dunleavy, a political science professor at the London School of Economics. "By picking this fight with the student body ... the government seems to have gotten itself into choppy water."

All of this has made Clegg one of the least popular politicians on university campuses. Protesters chanting "Nick Clegg, shame on you for turning blue" underscored the sense of betrayal.

Clegg defended the proposals, saying the plans represent the "best possible choice" at a time of economic uncertainty.

"In the circumstances in which we face, where there isn't very much money around, where many millions of other people are being asked to make sacrifices, where many young people in the future want to go to university, we have to find the solution for all of that," Clegg told the BBC.

Cameron's government describes the move as a painful necessity to deal with a record budget deficit and a sputtering economy. To balance its books, the U.K. passed a four-year package of spending cuts worth 81 billion pounds, which will eliminate hundreds of thousands of public sector jobs and cut or curtail hundreds of government programs.

The government proposed raising the maximum university tuition fees in England from 3,000 pounds a year to 9,000 pounds. Students reacted with mass protests that have been marred by violence and have paralyzed some campuses.

In response, the government modified its plan by raising the income level at which graduates must start repaying student loans and by making more part-time students eligible for loans.

Students have said the concessions are not enough to lessen the blow of higher fees. They say that under the proposal, piles of debt will plague graduates and make a well-rounded education unattainable for many.

The controversy has highlighted regional educational differences in the United Kingdom.

The Welsh regional government has pledged to subsidize the higher fees for any student from Wales who enrolls at an English university. Student fees in Scotland are just 1,820 pounds per year, sparking fears of a future stampede of bargain-hunting students from England. Northern Ireland's fees are capped at 3,290 pounds a year.

Associated Press Writers Jill Lawless and Gillian Smith contributed to this report.

1 of 13
Britain's Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall react as their car is attacked, in London, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010. Angry protesters in London have attacked a car containing Prince Charles, the heir to the British throne, and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall. An Associated Press photographer saw demonstrators kick the car in Regent Street, in the heart of London's shopping district. The car then sped off. Charles' office, Clarence House, confirmed that "their royal highnesses' car was attacked by protesters on the way to their engagement at the London Palladium this evening, but their royal highnesses are unharmed." (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)
Total comments: 3031 | Post a Comment
1 of 13
Rate This Slide
Scary
Justified

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

**SCROLL FOR PHOTOS** LONDON -- In Britain's worst political violence in years, furious student protesters rained sticks and rocks on riot police, vandalized government buildings and attacked a car...
**SCROLL FOR PHOTOS** LONDON -- In Britain's worst political violence in years, furious student protesters rained sticks and rocks on riot police, vandalized government buildings and attacked a car...
Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,031
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
Ana4
neutrino alert, just passing through
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trueheart
Member, Endangered Species
08:26 PM on 12/13/2010
Many of my ancestors rioted against unfair taxes imposed by British rule. Eventually the rebellion morphed into a war, which is commonly known as the American Revolution­. Our efforts to construct a fair society based on respect for a person's inalienabl­e rights [that means NO ONE has the power or might to take them away], inspired Europe and has continued to stand as an ideal for oppressed people all over the world.

Some "founding fathers" wanted to make George Washington a monarch, but he thought that was anathema.

My point is that sometimes progress comes from social protest in the streets, and we shouldn't be so eager to put it down because a member of the ruling class gets their limo kicked or has paint thrown at them....in the old days the peasants would hurl not only verbal abuse, but throw putrid meat, rotten vegetables and excrement at the royal carriages. I think we've become much more civilized.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
12:15 PM on 12/14/2010
While I agree with your sentiments, I think these protestors were venting their bile at the wrong people. The royals have almost nothing to do with the British legal system or government budget process. The proper focus of the people's displeasure should have been parliament.
Ana4
neutrino alert, just passing through
02:46 PM on 12/14/2010
It was. They were demonstrating peacefully all day, according to BBC, msnbc, and other news sources. The problems arose when a handful of agitants started throwing bricks, etc. It is more than possible that the "thugs" were planted to discredit the students, as was done in Toronto at the G-20 conference. (Canadian witnesses said that the police infiltrated the crowd in plain-clothes and were the ones setting cars on fire.)

On this thread, 4 British pro-royalist shi[ls have been saying that tweets planning the violence were intercepted by a handful of "thugs" out of ~50,000 reported demonstrators. Was that in the Times, or are these Embassy shi[ls complicit?
Ana4
neutrino alert, just passing through
02:49 PM on 12/14/2010
That should read: tweets sent by a handful of "thugs" were intercepted.
06:01 PM on 12/12/2010
The British should have taken after the French. Every single person that voted to TRIPLE tuition costs should be imprisoned for life for blatant treason. So what if they're having budget problems? How can they POSSIBLY expect that to improve by degenerating their future job market? You have to wonder how many of the police officers there just wanted to look the other way during the protesting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SonyaInTx
Money doesn't buy class.....
02:46 AM on 12/12/2010
I feel for the students in England. If tuition at any of our major universities were tripled, you'd see angry protests too.

The difference is, if people stormed the caiptal and threw paint and petrol, there would be many dead students at the hands of our police.....

Bravo to the restraint of the British police.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NVEnvy07
Your micro-bio is no longer empty.
05:25 AM on 12/12/2010
I think that there wouldn't be much of this in the US...the students there as well as in other countries seem to have less fear or maybe more motivation to get out there and fight...it isn't just the students either but the people in general...I wish that some of these students would come to the US and teach us how it's done.

Totally agree about the police though...it would be a big news scandal and lots of people exercising their rights would be injured.
Ana4
neutrino alert, just passing through
09:24 PM on 12/12/2010
There were demonstrations by Latinos in California after the recent fee hikes. It was under-reported and shoved out of sight quickly.
11:32 PM on 12/11/2010
They both look like the Prince "broke wind" in the limo!
06:05 PM on 12/11/2010
A love fest compared to the French Revolution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CammyV
01:44 PM on 12/11/2010
Will-I-Am and his fiancee might want to rethink their multi-million dollar wedding and elope instead of rubbing their wealth in the noses of the people who will now have to pony up a wad of cash to go to school that was once free. Discretion is the better part of valor. Looks like they're grabbing their pitchforks and torches. lol
12:49 PM on 12/11/2010
if the royals are going to enjoy all the benefits of the position- i.e. living off our work, being treated like ...(lack of better words) Kings and queens on earth- while the rest of the population live like slaves.

well then.. they have to take the bad as well---

when the people are unhappy well... OFF WITH THEIR HEADS !!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:35 PM on 12/11/2010
"...while the rest of the population live like slaves...."

Didn't know that I was living like a slave ... learn something new every day, I guess.
04:05 PM on 12/11/2010
It has never been a foot inside the UK, nor obviously, read a book about Britain.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
naschkatze
A free man creates himself.
08:18 PM on 12/11/2010
British society is the role model for what is happening here in the US right now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:48 PM on 12/11/2010
You seem to be advocating that it's okay to perform violent acts on people who have had nothing to do with the tuition raise, and you justify it by some weird, fake notion of royalty that you've cooked up in your so-called "mind."
03:27 AM on 12/11/2010
This is what happens when a socialized government runs out of other peoples money. -biddan1000 12 Fans.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No this is what happens when countries like Britain whose economy is intertwined with the almighty USA suffer because of the shameless their American cousins who caused the near collapse of the financial markets in 2008.

People like biddan1000 must have short memories, or they just choose to once again blame those who are not making six figure incomes for the economic ills of the nation.

I should also like to point to biddan1000 and his ilk that the current Tory millionaire cabinet has chosen to try and balance the budget and reign in the deficit by causing severe hardship to those who live at the bottom of the proverbial economic ladder, just like his/ her republican friends in the US whose only wish is to keep as much for themselves, and deny hard working Americans the chance to enjoy a healthy standard of living and an enhanced quality of life which includes access to a university education that does not tithe a college graduates income to a bank for the next 30 years.

Finally biddan1000, please stop using words like socialist in your knee jerk responses, because you obviously have no clue as to the real definition of the word, and you also show very little comprehension of the British political party system.
Thank you.
EngChina.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcus1
Trickledownscam
09:13 AM on 12/11/2010
What planet have you been on the past two years. Last time the rest of us looked the banks and Wall st. had to bailed out by the "peoples money" and now our reward is coming austerity while the rich get more tax breaks.
Here's some of the headlines from earth while you were gone.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/03/AR2010050304265.html?nav=most_emailed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlexABC
12:00 AM on 12/12/2010
The roots of the financial crisis are much more complex than "America caused everything." Financial services as a percentage of GDP are even higher in the UK than in the US.
03:26 AM on 12/11/2010
I hope the students in London can find this guy in this article and exact some street justice.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1173320/Transatlantic-escort-chauffeured-Channel-Tunnel-trip-female-Barclays-bosss-pampered-pooch.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Helen In Canada
10:09 PM on 12/10/2010
The real story here is the anger brought on by the obvious injustice of suddenly TRIPLING students' tuition fees - forced by the austerity measures voted on by Parliament, done after many of these public officials vowed to voters that that would not happen. This will definitely price thousands of young people out of their education. Hope they have alternatives to offer these kids. Otherwise, expect even greater protests/uprisings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biddan1000
08:31 PM on 12/10/2010
This is what happens when a socialized government runs out of other peoples money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marcus1
Trickledownscam
09:16 AM on 12/11/2010
Read much?
11:34 PM on 12/11/2010
Infantile pablum! Are you really Glenn Beck?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MsNancyMitford
06:16 PM on 12/10/2010
Commented Dec 9, 2010 at 22:11:12 in College
“"The Government­’s sensible compromise raises costs for those who can pay while shielding lower income students from the burden. It’s a more progressiv­e, fair system than asking poor and non-gradua­te taxpayers to subsidise university educations­. Do self-right­eous middle and upper class student protesters really expect their tertiary education – which generates a tremendous return on investment for them – to be paid for by low income taxpayers?­"

http://blo­gs.telegra­ph.co.uk/n­ews/piotrb­rzezinski/­100067493/­high-earne­rs-would-a­void-a-gra­duate-tax-­by-working­-abroad-th­e-tuition-­fee-rise-i­s-the-only­-way-to-av­oid-a-brai­n-drain/”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trueheart
Member, Endangered Species
11:44 AM on 12/15/2010
This argument doesn't hold water. From a left-brained, dollars-and-cents viewpoint, education accrues value to the society as a whole. Not only does the individual earn a higher income, but also contributes a higher rate of taxes. So yeah, what's the problem with free education from kinder to graduate school? If anything created a rising tide that lifts all boats, it is education.
05:56 PM on 12/10/2010
People forget how Charles and company get their money and that is off the backs of the people.
06:06 PM on 12/10/2010
Wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MsNancyMitford
06:18 PM on 12/10/2010
“TIME FOR YOUR EDUCATION

The Royal Family boost the British economy over a $2 billion a year, most related in tourism.

The Crown Estate Corporatio­¬n, leases from lands, etc. earns over $400 million a year which is voluntaril­¬y given to the government­¬. Quite a bit a change for a country smaller than Alabama.

The Royal family is reimbursed only for protection and travel for official duties as ambassador­¬s and Heads of State, a mere $7.9 million a year. Pocket change, which they pay for themselves (see above), the State simply returns a small portion.

The Royals naturally pay all other personal expenses and enormous taxes on private income.

The Royal Wedding will add another much needed economical boost of close to an additional $1 billion in 2011, for a total of $3 billion that year. Sorely needed, as well as the collective good will, national pride, and celebratio­¬n.

Of course, as one of the wealthiest family in the world, they COULD step down, not perform over a thousand yearly charitable and ceremonial engagement­¬s and simply live off their billions in their privately owned castles and estates with hundreds of thousands of acres of privately owned farmland, mineral rights, leases, etc.

However, England would lose it's luster, the economy $2 billion a year, and become what it has been since 1939, a 2nd world country.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
01:41 AM on 12/11/2010
Oh so the Royal Family has always been this way, eh? How long have they been around, hey? 1000 years? 2000 years? Hmmmm, I wonder what they were doing in the medieval times for money. Maybe you might know. What were they doing with the colonies of America in the 1600s and 1700s. Tax tax tax. Just give us your money and we'll call it even. You might be right about the current situation. But, historically, the Royal Family has made it's fortune off the backs of the people. Lies by ommission are lies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Palaver
Men make laws, but the people follow custom.
03:14 PM on 12/11/2010
If one Royal Family earns the British economy "over $2 billion year", why not consript the entire British labor force into the Royal Family? It pays so well after all and I'd be the first to volunteer. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Susan Shaffer
watching you...
04:27 PM on 12/10/2010
i watched the video of the students surrounding the car and smashing the window. You can hear that the students are outraged with the words they are using and they are directed at charles
Wonder if Diana rather than Camilla had been in the car if there would have been a different outcome
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hieagle
05:08 PM on 12/11/2010
um... probably not, 'cause she wouldn't be dead yet...! isn't that what made her so famous?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trueheart
Member, Endangered Species
07:25 PM on 12/14/2010
Are you saying Lady Diana is famous because she is dead? Or are you asking?