More

Public Blames Grad Rates On College Students: Poll

ERIC GORSKI and ALAN FRAM   12/ 9/10 03:27 PM ET   AP

Graduation Rates Poll

The public verdict is in and overwhelming: The better the education people get, the stronger the U.S. economy will be, a poll shows. But don't count on folks to support higher taxes to improve schools.

Eighty-eight percent say a country's education system has a major effect on its economic health. Nearly as many – 79 percent – say the U.S. economy would improve if all Americans had at least a two-year college degree, according to an Associated Press-Stanford University poll.

Yet when it comes to financing public school improvements, people tilt slightly against raising taxes to do so, with 47 percent opposing and 42 percent in support. The findings underscore the tensions confronting federal and local officials across the country balancing the competing pressures of strengthening education while not overburdening taxpayers at a time of economic weakness and huge federal and state budget deficits.

"Education is vitally important to our country today," said Ronald Bartlett, 66, of Marshall, Texas, who works at a mechanic's shop. But when it comes to higher taxes for schools he says no, adding, "We're continually pouring money into the government supposedly to improve education,and it's not improving. Too much government control is not good."

The consensus about education's impact on the country's economy differs little by gender, age, race or levels of education and income. The responses were similar to when the same questions were asked in a June 2008 AP-Knowledge Networks poll, though the number saying the economy would get a very large boost from better education has grown somewhat.

"Obviously, the public is getting the message that colleges give you a better shot at a good job, and that's going up because of the economy," said Michael Kirst, professor emeritus of education and business administration at Stanford.

The tendency to oppose raising taxes to help schools is also fairly consistent among different groups of people.

The AP-Stanford University poll also shows that people mostly blame students and their parents for poor college graduation rates. And they give high marks to all sectors of American higher education including for-profit colleges, despite recent criticism of dubious recruiting tactics, high student loan default rates and other problems at some schools.

Asked where the blame lies for graduation rates at public four-year colleges, 7 in 10 said students shouldered either a great deal or a lot of it, and 45 percent felt that way about parents. Between about a quarter and a third blamed college administrators, professors, teachers, unions, state education officials and federal education officials.

Kirst said the tendency to mostly blame students for graduation rates is a troubling sign for reformers who have elevated college completion to the forefront of higher education policy debates and pushed colleges to fix the problem. But Stan Jones, president of Complete College America, which championed such efforts, disagreed.

"This will play out like the high school dropout issue," Jones said. "The more it becomes a subject of public discussion the more advances we will make on confronting the college dropout problem."

Just over half of first-time students who entered college in 2003-04 had not earned a degree or credential within six years, the Education Department reported recently. That's slightly worse than students who started in 1995-96.

Overall, about 4 in 10 Americans between the ages of 25 and 64 have a two-year college degree or more, according to Census Bureau data.

Experts caution it is tricky to measure success and compare graduation rates because today's older, less-traditional college student population takes more time to finish school and is harder to track.

The poll also found that:

_ Seventy-seven percent of Republicans and 68 percent of Democrats fault students heavily for low graduation rates. Republicans are also slightly likelier than Democrats to blame federal officials for the problem.

_ Fifty-seven percent of minorities blame parents for college graduation rates, while just 40 percent of whites do.

_ Minorities are more prone than whites to blame professors and teachers for college graduation rates, with 40 percent of minorities but just 29 percent of whites doing so.

_Asked about the quality of schools, public four-year colleges received the highest marks, with 74 percent calling them excellent or good.

_Other institutions got strong marks, too: Four-year private nonprofit colleges (71 percent), two-year public colleges (69 percent), private for-profit colleges (66 percent) and private for-profit trade schools (57 percent).

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Lumina Foundation and others have directed money and attention to states and colleges to improve completion rates, and several states are taking action.

The poll was conducted September 23-30 by Abt SRBI Inc. It involved interviews on landline and cellular telephones with 1,001 adults nationwide, and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

Stanford University's participation was made possible by a grant from the Gates Foundation.

_____

Online:

AP polls: http://surveys.ap.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

The public verdict is in and overwhelming: The better the education people get, the stronger the U.S. economy will be, a poll shows. But don't count on folks to support higher taxes to improve schools...
The public verdict is in and overwhelming: The better the education people get, the stronger the U.S. economy will be, a poll shows. But don't count on folks to support higher taxes to improve schools...
Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 173
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
08:44 AM on 12/11/2010
"Public Blames Grad Rates On College Students: Poll"

Stupid public. They should blame themselves for engendering a culture that forces young people to go to college regardless of ability or desire, leading to many students being saddled with debt and having nothing meaningful to show for it; many young people could've been just fine in a vocational program or under an apprenticeship (example: an 18 year old with great cooking skills could be mentored by an established chef rather than forced to sit through a 19th century British Lit. class en route to a B.A.).
photo
Tracy Fortune
Geek, mother, lesbian, fair & compassionate ;^)
05:15 AM on 12/11/2010
No need to be mean about this-

It's a perfectly valid point to say that you're barely making it, treading water furiously, yet understand education is the key...

The issue is: the giving up, the doing without- for the sake of others, strangers children perhaps, so that the country is bettered by it.

It isn't a simple matter- some are heartbroken to vote against education because they must do to survive...

You go with what you believe will be best- and never look back~

T
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
11:56 AM on 12/10/2010
We should take the money that we are putting into wars and put it into education instead.
11:12 AM on 12/10/2010
"Nearly as many – 79 percent – say the U.S. economy would improve if all Americans had at least a two-year college degree"

Why do all Americans need a two-year degree or higher? The country needs people to be garbage men, dig holes and other menial jobs, it also needs tradesmen like plumbers, it needs truckers and other jobs which in no way require a college education. Under the current system all universal college education would lead to is universal debt.
12:29 PM on 12/10/2010
I agree. I don't feel like we give young adults all the options. We used to have programs in highschools that prepared kids for the real world. Like shop, welding, hair dressing and cooking. Things that can be put to use immediately after they graduate. But because of cuts in funding these programs are endangered.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:38 AM on 12/10/2010
The problem isn't that more money is needed all around. The problem is that more money is needed in certain schools in certain school districts. Some schools get showered with money and others get NOTHING. I love that new show on NBC called "School Pride" where they go and rennovate schools. The state of the schools they choose to rennovate compared to others in those school districts is disgraceful. It's the WAY money is allocated that is the problem. We've divided the schools into rich and poor districts and made them rely on their own local tax base for funding. I don't understand why a child who had the misfortune of being born poor must be relegated to a poor education. Why do we put the pressure on HIM? We basically tell him, "hey you were born poor, and we know you're just a child with no power over your life at all and your parents can barely feed you, but fight your way out of it with no help at all. Good luck." That is BS. His school should be funded to provide him with the same education as those who were simply fortunate enough to be born under better circumstances.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
05:42 AM on 12/10/2010
Hey, this is not a generalization. Spend time on any college campus! Empty beer bottles, pizza boxes, condoms litter the residence halls or go to the local drinking spots.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:49 AM on 12/10/2010
I think when you say "this is not a generalization" followed by the words "any college campus" you contradict yourself. Condoms litter the residence halls? Where? Sounds more fun than my college.
07:37 AM on 12/10/2010
Go to the Library at "any college" about 12 a.m. and you will find it packed with students doing homework.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MG Metiva
For Great Justice, I shall post.
08:45 AM on 12/10/2010
Maybe that's why 55% of them drink at least twice a week. Because they are laughing at the other 45%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ldcook
Gay Harvard Grad
12:25 PM on 12/10/2010
So packed that many, myself included, find other places to work.
photo
Paul The Octopus
My micro-bio is empty.
11:06 PM on 12/09/2010
This is a ridiculous choice: of course people are against raising taxes for education, they are just against raising taxes. It's a no brainer. There's no need to raise taxes to improve our education anyway: our government just needs to set its priorities straight, i.e., they need to STOP WASTING MONEY fighting ridiculous/unprovoked wars and invest that money in our youth!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bruinlover09
10:40 PM on 12/09/2010
I think the government should pay for education up to Ph.d. With some caveats, if a student is failing or wasting time, then he or she should pay for that privilege. But a better educated citizenry means more better paying jobs, which is more revenue for the government; it is also means better educated voting populace, which means less stupid decisions are made. Oh wait, the last one, not be popular Republican politicians and demagogues who need under-educated voting public to support them.
06:11 PM on 12/10/2010
Not gonna work, just ask California.
08:09 PM on 12/09/2010
The school systems are a wreck. Nothing gets done because all the politicians send their own children to private schools, and then to Ivy League schools.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
05:44 AM on 12/10/2010
Not really, students smoke lots of weed in the Ivys, cheat on tests, party, like their counterparts attending one of the bottom feeders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MG Metiva
For Great Justice, I shall post.
08:46 AM on 12/10/2010
More like smoke even more weed, cheat more often on tests, and party.
06:13 PM on 12/10/2010
Thats not the point of texadonkey's post. None of what you are talking about has to do with politicians not feeling the need to focus on issues that don't affect them.
05:24 PM on 12/09/2010
Education is the absolute most vital but no we shouldnt raise taxes for it. We just need to relocate all those Trillions spent on unlawfull wars.
photo
Marcus01
It all just seems like it's real
05:12 PM on 12/09/2010
In the late 1960s the federal government commissioned Professor Ronald Havelock at the University of Michigan to restructure our educational system. The intention was not to improve education in this country. It was to develop a system designed to break down any values a student's parents had instilled in the student to make them more malleable to the educational process, and to revamp the process to create a nation of submissive workers rather than thoughtful citizens. This is all well-documented if you care to do the research.

The program began to be implemented in the early 1970s, and really picked up steam during the Reagan administration. Liaisons were sent from DOE to the school boards, with instructions on how to identify those school board members who resisted the changes, as well as how to manipulate them into supporting the changes.

No Child Left Behind is a part of that program. If you wonder why Johnny can't read, this restructuring of education is why. If you wonder why so many students entering college require remediation, this is why. If you wonder why critical thinking is no longer taught in schools, why the incidence of narcissism among young people is so high, or why so many drop out of college, this is why.

Students are not prepared to think for themselves, nor are they prepared to take responsibility for themselves. The system does produce droves of unconscious worker drones as intended, but was never designed to turn out thoughtful adults.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howard53545
05:49 AM on 12/10/2010
Your argument does not make sense. So this Havelock was responsible for restructuring ALL of the school boards in the nation, and Reagan was messed up the school boards, even those members of the school board are periodically elected. By the way, very few states even complied with no child left behind, mostly an assessment program for specific subjects such as reading, writing and math. Students are not prepared to think for themselves because of multiple reasons, including media, sports, celebrity culture, etc.
photo
Marcus01
It all just seems like it's real
10:19 AM on 12/10/2010
Do the research and you'll see that what I say is true. There is indeed a program in place to deliberately dumb-down the populace, and Dr Havelock designed it. Educators have written numerous books on the topic.

It's a complicated situation, and yes there are many factors involved, but our education system clearly began to fail us when Havelock's program was put in place. Again, do the research.

A personal anecdote that illustrates the situation: about ten years I met a young woman who days before had received her Bachelor's degree from a state university. She was very full of herself about it, so just for fun I asked her who had won the Civil War. She couldn't tell me. I asked who had fought the Civil War. She didn't know. Later that day I met a German national and out of curiosity asked her the same questions. Although she had been educated in Germany she knew the answers to both questions.

With all due respect, yours is also a case in point. I was clear about Havelock's role, and DOE's role vis a vis the school boards, and you still got it all twisted around. : )
photo
HippieDippieWeatherman
I reason, therefore I am not Republican.
05:07 PM on 12/09/2010
Thank you, Ronald Reagan, for selling the American people on the idea they can have lotsa stuff (good schools, body armor for their troops, roads, bridges, functioning airport security, etc.) without paying for it. They still believe it, and still worship you for it.

Effing. Brilliant.

No wonder we're plummeting in so many categories of competitiveness:

http://blogs.courant.com/rick_green/2010/11/where-are-the-best-math-studen.html

http://www.good.is/post/how-to-turnaround-a-school-system/
photo
gomezrules
Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
05:02 PM on 12/09/2010
The govt has no business being in the business of college financing. There presence has increased the costs of higher education. Colleges do not have to compete for students, they are assured of revenues regardless of whether students graduate or not. Students who drop out and/or end their education are not responsible for paying back govt provided grants. It is a scam and a sham. The performance of our elected and appointed officials should prove to all that higher education doesn’t not readily translate into more integrity or a better standing of the country. No doubt, if anything, they represent what 'connections' can do for you that are often established in college.
 
There's nothing wrong with some of the govt research programs that are conducted on campuses. Also, there is nothing wrong with the govt reimbursing or paying for students who commit to the military, or other security related entities like the CIA, FBI, etc., after graduation. But this throwing good money after bad at the usual suspects is a disaster for the tax payer, and for the cost of education. In fact, the cost of education is the BEST argument for tax cuts for ALL. Higher income folks do not qualify for any of the govt provided financial assistance that they contribute to as tax payers, or any other govt program for that matter. There's nothing 'fair' about the present system. This is an example of something the reach of govt is ruining!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WarrenPease
Your interests are special, too.
05:46 PM on 12/09/2010
So *that's* why Harvard, whose endowment is still so enormous they do not need to charge tuition, raises their tuitions every year.
04:30 PM on 12/09/2010
Why are we a "country?" Let's just be colonies again. That worked out really well. (snark)
04:27 PM on 12/09/2010
What's with this myth about local vs. national control. K-12 has ALWAYS been locally controlled!!!! This is a simple fact. Any federal "mandate" is not really a mandate, it's a condition attached to receiving federal money. Blame your local school boards for poor performance.
photo
HippieDippieWeatherman
I reason, therefore I am not Republican.
05:13 PM on 12/09/2010
In the just-released PISA test results, all of the 15 countries outperforming Amurcan students in Science, Math, and Reading have three things in common:

1. Standards, curricula, and testing are centrally controlled
2. The school years are much longer
3. The school days are much longer

We can keep waving the foam "number one hands" and talking about "Amurcan grateness," or we can choose to work actually achieve it, but while Congress dithers and the President quivers, time is growing short!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MG Metiva
For Great Justice, I shall post.
08:48 AM on 12/10/2010
And look, the countries are homogenous in culture.