More

Tax Cut Bill: WH, Lawmakers Reach New Compromise

DAVID ESPO   12/ 9/10 11:22 PM ET   AP

Mcconnell Boehner

WASHINGTON — The White House and key lawmakers cleared the way Thursday night for swift Senate action to avert a Jan. 1 spike in income taxes for nearly all Americans, agreeing to extend breaks for ethanol and other forms of alternative energy as part of the deal.

Tax provisions aimed at increasing production of hybrid automobiles, biodiesel fuel, energy-efficient homes, coal and energy-efficient household appliances would be extended through the end of 2011 under the bill.

Debate on the expanded measure began almost immediately. While there is no precise timetable for passage, a test vote was set for Monday afternoon that appears likely to demonstrate overwhelmingly support for the legislation, which supporters say would help accelerate a sluggish recovery from recession.

The events unfolded as the White House predicted that the agreement between President Barack Obama and top Republicans would clear by year's end – even though House Democrats voted Thursday not to allow it to reach the floor without changes to scale back tax relief for the rich.

"If it's take it or leave it, we'll leave it," said Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, after a closed-door meeting in which rank-and-file Democrats chanted, "Just say no."

"The deal will get passed," said presidential press secretary Robert Gibbs. There were no predictions to the contrary among senior Democrats on either side of the Capitol.

As announced by Obama on Monday, the deal would extend tax breaks at all income levels that are due to expire on Jan. 1, renew a program of jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed that is due to lapse within days and implement a one-year cut in Social Security taxes.

At the insistence of Republicans, it also includes a more generous estate tax provision. That, in turn, infuriated Democrats already unhappy with Obama for agreeing to extend personal tax cuts at incomes over $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples.

The two-year cost of the plan, estimated at about $850 billion, would further swell record federal deficits.

Despite significant criticism from fellow Democrats, Obama has said the sweeping measure is necessary to help the struggling economy recover from the worst recession in decades. With unemployment at 9.8 percent, a top White House official warned Democratic critics Tuesday they risk sending the economy back into recession if they block the measure.

In the Senate, the emergence of bipartisan legislation also indicated progress for the White House and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., toward possible year-end passage of other major items on their agenda.

Obama has made ratification of a new arms control treaty with Russia a top priority. The White House is also pressing Reid to try once more to end the Pentagon's 17-year ban on openly gay members of the military.

Republicans have vowed to block action on all legislation until a tax bill and a year-end government spending bill have been resolved.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has said he expects most of his rank and file to support the huge tax bill. Prominent House Republicans back it, too, although they have generally refrained from speaking out at a time when doing so would divert attention from the spectacle of Obama at odds with lawmakers of his own party.

Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, in line to become House speaker when Republicans take power in January, "supports the framework as agreed to by" Obama and McConnell and spoke with the president about it over the weekend, a spokesman said Thursday.

Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, whose views on economic issues are influential among House Republicans, also swung behind it. "While I have concerns with some specific aspects of the plan, I support the proposed framework to avert further economic hardship and provide a first step to restore the foundations for sustained growth and job creation," he said in an interview.

Among the energy tax provisions added was an extension of the current 45-cent per gallon subsidy for ethanol, at a cost to the Treasury estimated at nearly $5 billion. The issue is of particular interest to lawmakers from Midwestern states with grain crops.

The changes did nothing to ease the opposition among some critics, though. Liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., attacked the measure's tax breaks for the wealthy as a threat to the middle class.

The energy-related tax provisions will presumably increase support for the measure in the House, officials said Democrats there are eager to see a scaling back of a provision that would allow estates as large as $5 million escape taxation.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, "That was a bridge too far for many of our members" already upset about Obama's decision to bow to Republican demands for extending tax cuts on individuals making over $200,000 and couples earning more than $250,000.

Under the estate tax provision, the first $5 million of a couple's estate could pass to heirs without taxation, and an additional $5 million for the spouse. The balance would be subject to a 35 percent tax rate.

According to a Tax Policy Center estimate based on census data, that would mean only about 3,500 estates would be liable for taxes in 2011, out of more than 2.5 million forecast to be filed. Barring legislation, about 44,000 estates would be subjected to taxation in 2011, the groups said.

Some Democratic officials suggested a relatively minor change to the estate tax portion of the Obama-GOP deal might assuage critics of the plan. If accepted, however, it could come at a price in the form of additional concessions to Republicans, several officials said.

Vice President Joe Biden has told Democrats in closed-door meetings this week that they are free to oppose the agreement but it might unravel if they do, according to officials familiar with the discussions.

Whatever the disagreement over the economic wisdom of renewing tax cuts for the wealthy, the legislation also marks the emergence of a new era of divided government following midterm elections in which the Republicans won power in the House and gained seats in the Senate.

Privately, several House Democrats complained that the White House had not consulted them while negotiating a deal with McConnell.

The House passed a measure last week that would have let the tax cuts lapse at higher incomes, but Senate Republicans blocked it on Saturday – with the knowledge the president had already agreed he was ready to sign a measure that was more to their liking.

Democrats and Republicans have spent two years gridlocked over the question of extending the expiring tax cuts, and Obama has characterized his compromise with Republicans as a temporary, two-year concession on a policy he opposes.

House and Senate Democrats debated privately in the weeks before the elections whether to hold votes on the issue. They decided not to at that time after lawmakers who were seeking re-election said they would prefer not to have go on record if it meant Republicans would attack them for raising taxes on small businesses.

___

Associated Press writers Charles Babington and Stephen Ohlemacher contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The White House and key lawmakers cleared the way Thursday night for swift Senate action to avert a Jan. 1 spike in income taxes for nearly all Americans, agreeing to extend breaks ...
WASHINGTON — The White House and key lawmakers cleared the way Thursday night for swift Senate action to avert a Jan. 1 spike in income taxes for nearly all Americans, agreeing to extend breaks ...
Filed by Carly Schwartz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,776
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (86 total)
  1 of 20  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
monicaangela 08:41 AM on 12/10/2010
So, after TARP and the Stimulus, spending of trillions of dollars we are now being told that none of that evidently has worked, and that this big propagandist effort to tell us our economy is on it's way out of the ditch is yet another attempt at covering the truth, now we need to spend even more money to keep our economy going, we need to give that money to the rich, or we could see ourselves back at  Read More...
10:27 PM on 12/15/2010
Has anybody thought of just doing away with Tax Exclusion income & Tax deferred income. Now would that not be equitable to all those hard working self-reliant tradesmen who must use after-tax income to pay for such expenditures. Who could complain because such a perquisite did not exist before President Truman instituted it in the 40's.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
08:19 PM on 12/12/2010
There once was a young senator from Chicago,

Who fancied himself as presidential hero,

While he dreamt much of change,

He became quite insane,

And ended up just so much like Nero.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
Geeky nerd. Or is it nerdy geek?
08:06 PM on 12/12/2010
Hopefully, I can put these thoughts down in a coherent fashion.

This so called agreement is a sham. Consider the following.

1---The rates terminate in 2012.
2---There is an election in 2012.
3---Politicians normally don't raise tax rates during an election year.
4---Republicans will hold the house. Tax legislation originates in the house. Republicans do not want to raise taxes.

This extension is a De Facto permanent rate.

1---Other than the temporary decrease in the payroll tax, everyone's paycheck on Jan 2nd will be the same as it was on Dec 30th.
2---We have had this rate for the last ten years, which includes the financial meltdown over the last two.
3---The so-called rich invest additional income. They generally do not buy more stuff.

If this rate continuance was beneficial for the economy, it would have had an impact over the last two years. It did not.

1---Banks are awash with money. They are still not lending adequately.
2---The stock market has increased nearly 72% since Obama was sworn in.
3---The so-called small businesses will have the same tax rate on Jan 2nd that they did on Dec 30th. They were not hiring on Dec 30th. Or Nov 30th.

Translation? We got snake oiled.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
08:51 PM on 12/12/2010
Fanned for the great summary for those missing this sort of info in their busy daily routine of trying to survive. And yes, it will be readily understood.

Might add that the taxes on inheritance are not returning to levels they were prior to W's chopping them to 0%, but they will return a bit (so if you happen to be quite wealthy and you actually have heirs that love you back, this might be a good time to consider dying).

Oh, the rest of you, keep in mind that the Repugnants were right to re-label the inheritance tax as the "death tax" because the death of the inheritance tax is a big part of the death of this country we all share, and that the ultra-rich now own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
Geeky nerd. Or is it nerdy geek?
09:22 PM on 12/12/2010
You are correct, I did not include the death tax into the equation.

I will give him credit for getting that one into the mix.

On the whole though, the rest of the package which results in lost revenue will still increase our debt. Unfortunately for our President. Because it is my belief that the Republicans will turn around and blame him in 2012 for increasing the debt.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
07:45 PM on 12/12/2010
It's that 3 AM call.

And then it's Barack phoning the Repugnants to see if it's okay with them to hit the Red Button.

The Repugnant Caucus responds: "Remember our filibuster overrides your little button there. How much time we got? Oh, 5 minutes? Okay Bud, all you gotta do is push the zero-tax button first and then let then missiles Rip."

That's the way filibastar­ds work for our country.”
10:45 AM on 12/12/2010
I get excited when I see the term "tax cuts" but then I realize it's a distortion of simply extending the tax cuts that were already in place during the "W" administration and then am saddened. I was in favor of not extending tax credits to the very wealthy until I realized that if the very wealthy deliver additional tax revenues to the treasury, the greedy Congress will get their hands on it to appropriate it to earmarks and other foolish spending. I then thought if any others could determine better means for it, they probably will. Anything to get it out of P-lousy and company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pamm Stadt
speak the truth slowly
05:42 PM on 12/11/2010
Al Gore apologized for ethenol.

Trickle Down never works - the money gets su cked up.

If I have no money to spend in the stores, the stores don't move their product and lose money in the process.

The rich don't shop at Wal Mart.

Rush Limbaugh makes $58.7 million a year. He doesn't shop at Kroger.

Glen Beck makes $33 million a year. He doesn't shop at Kohls.

We pay the House and Senate rank-in-file $174,000 an year. They can turn down raises if the want. (some actually do) Guess where they don't shop.

To give the economy a boost the working folks have to have disposable cash to spend at their local stores (corporate owned). The wealthy obviously don't get on to that process because their money is working for them. They don't have to care how the rest of the people are making ends meet and buying food. Good Grief.
10:36 AM on 12/12/2010
OK, Charlie Brown, I second your exclamation, GOOD GRIEF!
Are you part of the CIA. or Patriot Act? How do you know where people shop?
He sees you when you're sleeping; he knows when you're awake; he knows if you've been bad or good.
I don't care how the rest of the people are making ends meet and buying food and I am far from rich. Actually I could not even be called middle class. I am in that gloomy space between middle class and poverty called Senior Citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pamm Stadt
speak the truth slowly
06:54 PM on 12/12/2010
Actually I'm with the SIA, Shoppers Intelligence Agency.

In all honesty, WalMart has made a deal with Homeland Security to teach their employees to look at the customers as the shop an determine if there is any "suspicious behavior" and not just the shop lifiting behavior. I called WalMart Corporate on Friday and they confirmed it. It's their way of "keeping America safe." So if you scratch your bu tt they can call in the guards and have you picked up thinking you may have a bomb in your underwear.

There's also some electronic shopper watching as well.

I'm not going to shop at WalMart any more.
rogergoldkin
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance
04:40 PM on 12/11/2010
Let Mitch McConnell or John Boehner take 8 hours and 37 minutes to explain to the American people why adding billions in tax cuts for the upper 2% income earners that will have to be paid for by borrowing from Chinais a really, really good deal for the the United States. Prediction, I don't think that will happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Badfinger1
...reconstruction has failed...
10:28 AM on 12/11/2010
...Any extension of the Bush tax cut for the upper brackets is an assault on the majority of American citizens,period. These are the same people who are reaping the majority of record breaking corporate profits while these same corporations do not increase hiring and/or cut back on wages,hours and benefits(including medical) on the labor force....
WE are either all in this together,or WE are not...If the upper brackets don't see the need to share in our economic problems and solutions,they then are drawing a line between them and us,and so should not be surprised when they realise how badly outnumbered they are when things get a little bit more like Europe.....Austerity for them is not having that month in Tuscany...For some of us it is no college or no home or worse for some of us,as in no meat this week. If the wealthy Conservatives continue to get what they THINK that they want,then they should not expect to be safe in public because they are askig for anarchy and the hungry will find a way to visit this apon them...
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
08:29 PM on 12/12/2010
Hmm, yes, maybe so re "...they are askig for anarchy and the hungry will find a way..."

We see the student rioting in Great Britain, and that's just over hiking student tuition. Even though many a student can report experiencing hunger now and again, consistent and hopeless hunger probably does rise the anxiety level considerably above one’s tuition costs.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
09:36 PM on 12/10/2010
Then do you know them, MrStat? Or are you one of them? We don't hear you complaining about the billions larger deficit to continue giving the wealthy tax cuts. So you were taken in too by Limbaugh who, by the way, will qualify for his continued large tax cut. Will You? We didn't think so.
photo
rebelriser
artist, published author, activist
09:28 PM on 12/10/2010
Oh Yes! Those corporates are really struggling! Poor filthy rich can't get their usual bundles of $$$$, huh? Don't you feel sorry for them? Yea, like they're suffering. My, oh my! Has anyone seen or heard from those tea baggers, Limbaugh fairy talers who were yelling & yelling about the deficit? And they voted for TeaBaggers & Republicans to help fix the deficit. Wonder what happened to them & why they aren't yelling about the billions to be added to the deficit for the wealthy tax cuts. They must be hiding, maybe in shame for their ignorance of not understanding what Republicans were up to. Limbaugh probably didn't tell them. Maybe he lied to them. Do you suppose? Must be Limbaugh's fault.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RM Greer
04:08 PM on 12/10/2010
So, in order to erase the terrible original bill, they have compromised on a damnably horrible bill. Biodiesel fuell tax breaks only create more money for republican constituents and corn is the worst possible source of biofuel.
04:00 PM on 12/10/2010
For anyone who hasn't heard Al Franken's eloquent and telling speech on tax cuts, I highly recommend that you take the time.... and then share it with as many people as possible. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVURyaA9UWY&feature=player_embedded Every American should hear this speech.

Also - check out Bernie Sanders filibuster going on now.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
BoyInBOYCOTT
03:59 PM on 12/10/2010
Gibbs and Auntie McConnell's rank and vile Republicans....look awful small next to Bernie Sanders and Mary Landreiu
04:45 PM on 12/10/2010
Just like diseases inside a host.
photo
MadAs
Tuned-in science editor
12:14 AM on 12/13/2010
No lemme as a biologist clarify -- you mean "parasite."

Pathogens usually kill and swarm to the next host, whereas parasites want to keep the host alive and use it to multiply into other hosts, all the while staying healthy and happy and keeping their parasitic reproduction factories going.

No, we're definitely talking parasites rather than pathogens.
03:50 PM on 12/10/2010
It could be me, and you may disagree, but I think for years this country has been in a "Class War" and now it looks like the deck is stacked against the lower class more so than it ever has been before. The top 1 to 5% have bought enough pull with the politicians in this country to screw the little guy with a $250 or $300 check as opposed to a check for the big guy for anywhere from $600 to $800 thousand dollars. When will the people rise up to the point of rebellion against the "Let Them Eat Cake" faction? Just Saying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Thinkster Paulson
A concerned American moderate
03:55 PM on 12/10/2010
They'll rise up if and when they learn the truth. The problem is that they're fed all sorts of nonsense that motivates them to vote against their own best interest.
04:17 PM on 12/10/2010
Did you ask them? Do you know them? You have no idea what movtivates them. You assume they vote against their own interest buy you don't really know. You must feel real good running off at the mouth and showing your ignorance!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
03:47 PM on 12/10/2010
We already knew the Senate would be overjoyed to sell out to the Goop.
 
The House will save us, like they did as much as possible with Obama's terrible sell-out HCR bill... but it's unlikely it will be a lasting result. 
 
Obama capitulated now because he needed to make sure he could capitulate later.  Had he allowed the House Dems to do what they wanted, the conservative's $700 Billion Welfare for the Wealthy would have gone away... and like any good lockstepper, Obama had to make sure that never happened.