More

China Takes Another Step To Curb Bank Lending

JOE McDONALD   12/10/10 08:37 AM ET   AP

China Economy

BEIJING — China ordered its banks to increase their reserves in a move to curb surging lending as financial markets watched for a widely anticipated interest rate hike amid efforts to cool inflation.

The central bank's order Friday was the third reserve increase in five weeks and came as Beijing tries to rein in a flood of money flowing through the economy from stimulus spending and bank lending that helped China rebound from the global crisis.

Beijing has announced a slew of measures in recent weeks to cool inflation that rose to a 25-month high of 4.4 percent in October, well above the government's 3 percent target. Analysts and traders expect a rate hike soon to bring lending and deposit rates, which were slashed during the crisis, back to more normal levels.

The order Friday by the People's Bank of China told commercial lenders to increase minimum reserves by 0.5 percent of deposits.

The move weighed on world markets. Gains in European shares were tempered and Asian stock benchmarks mostly closed lower ahead of the news in anticipation of an interest rate hike or other credit tightening measure.

China raised interest rates Oct. 19 for the first time since the crisis, highlighting the divergence of its robust expansion from the United States, Europe and Japan, which still are trying to shore up growth. Chinese business newspapers have reported that a rate hike might be announced as early as this weekend.

"A rate hike still cannot be ruled out this weekend," said Mark Williams, an analyst for Capital Economics, in a report.

The announcement came as Chinese leaders began an annual economic planning meeting that is expected to run through Sunday.

"It may be that the People's Bank has chosen to defer a symbolically more significant move on interest rates until those discussions have concluded," Williams said.

On Friday, regulators announced Chinese banks lent a total of 564 billion yuan ($82 billion) in October. That would push total lending so far this year to 7.45 trillion yuan and mean they would likely overshoot Beijing's official 2010 lending target of 7.5 trillion yuan.

The state press has carried reports on the necessity of a rate hike, apparently to prepare the public and entrepreneurs for a change.

Inflation so far is limited to food costs, but analysts say easy credit flowing through the economy will start to push up prices in other areas if Beijing doesn't tighten credit.

The reserve increase came after Chinese stock markets closed. Stocks have fallen in expectation of more interest rate hikes, which investors worry might further slow economic growth and reduce credit that has been helping to support stock prices.

China's rapid economic expansion eased to 9.6 percent in the three months ending in September from a post-crisis high of 11.9 percent in the first quarter. It is expected to fall further in coming months but to stay strong.

The ruling Communist Party's top body, the Politburo, announced Dec. 3 that it was ordering a "prudent monetary policy" next year, a change from the "relatively easy" credit policy in place throughout the crisis.

The Oct. 19 hike pushed the lending rate on a one-year loan to 5.56 percent. JP Morgan & Co. says it expects three to four more increases beginning as early as this month and pushing the benchmark rate to 6.31 percent by mid-2011.

Analysts believe a key worry for policymakers is the low rates paid on Chinese bank accounts. Inflation has risen well above the 2.5 percent paid on deposits, which has prompted an outflow of money into stocks and real estate as families seek a better return, fueling fears of a dangerous price boom and bust.

Beijing also has tried to cool inflation by launching an effort to increase vegetable supplies and has ordered a crackdown on what it says is hoarding and price-fixing of fuel and other materials.

___

People's Bank of China (in Chinese): http://www.pbc.gov.cn

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
12:44 PM on 12/13/2010
It's just window dressing. Chinese businesses run on CASH, not loans.

The horse has left the bar n. Trumpeted activity which makes it look like they are closing the door now will make the foreign devils and internal trouble makers believe they are tamping down inflation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlexABC
07:32 PM on 12/11/2010
They are behind the curve. Credit and money supply expanded exponentially over the past two years. Excess liquidity was dumped into the real-estate markets at a rate that would have made 1980s Japan blush. It was always clear that there would be consequences.

It is odd how many tracts on China hold that China can keep its cheap lending going while also elevating the share of consumption in the economy to over 50%. Cheap lending to fund real-estate construction and other investments and subsidies is the main reason that consumption has continued to decline relative to overall GDP.

Some figures to chew on:

-Construction accounts for 2/3rds of China's GDP. Exports account for less than 6% of the same.

-Corriente Advisors estimates that China's government debt to GDP ratio is anywhere from 105%-200%, or far more than the allegedly insolvent US. This is often underestimated and even ignored due to the opaque accounting measures in China.

-The Shanghai Composite is in a neck-and-neck race with Spain for the worst stock performer of the year. Which companies on the Composite are taking the hardest hit? Real-estate developers.
12:36 PM on 12/10/2010
A ticking time bomb is what this all amounts to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:23 AM on 12/10/2010
The Chinese are smarter that the US academic and government economists that our president(s) listen to!

The Chinese and other foreign industrial nations know that foreign trade balance will accumulate wealth if it is positive, or create poverty if it is negative for any family, island, nation, etc.

What will happen to the buying power of the US dollar if the US government just keeps on printing US dollars and US Treasury Bonds willy-nilly like Mexico?

Or prints US Treasury Bonds like Greece prints Greek Federal Government Bonds?

But the current US government administration is already doing this!

What happens when foreigners stop buying US Treasury Bonds at FED auctions, or if they only bid a few pennies on the dollar for our freshly printed paper US government treasury bonds?
08:21 PM on 12/10/2010
They have to raise reserve requirements because the Chinese economy is flooded with yuan. The Chinese economy is flooded with yuan because, among other reasons, they have to print a boatload of yuan and institute capital controls to maintain the exchange rate.

If we keep printing, maybe eventually the Chinese will abandon the peg and we can more easily devalue, allowing us to get a bigger piece of the export pie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
01:01 PM on 12/13/2010
If we abandon our bilateral currency agreement with China, then the value of the US dollar will go down as you say, but the prices in US dollars of the things that we buy will increase!

I think that might be a good start, but it will be an insignificant factor for starting the USA to re-industrialize and create US jobs.

If labor rates to make shirts in Sri Lanka cost 4% of the US labor costs, then if the $4.00 of labor to make that $10 shirt that you and I bought at Walmart might cause that shirt to cost ($4.00 / 4% = $100.00) $106.00 if US labor was used to make that shirt. This is does not include any additional overhead costs, payroll burden costs, environmental compliance costs, profit and other normal business costs that are applicable to US businesses, and this would further increase the cost of that US made shirt to the US consumer.

If more technical products are made in other countries, then those factors will not be that uneconomical in comparison to US labor and US environmental costs.
10:41 AM on 12/10/2010
It looks like the Chinese learned a lot from what happened to Russia and Japan in the 80's and 90's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlexABC
07:40 PM on 12/11/2010
China in 2010 is more Russia in 1997 than it is Japan in 1989. Japan had developed a sophisticated economy with high per capita income by the time its real estate bubble popped. Russia, by contrast, temporarily surged on the backs of spendthrift customers like the Asian Tigers (Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, and Hong Kong) who bought up Russian exports like oil, natural gas, steel, and timber. When the Asian Tigers crashed in 1997, Russia slowed dramatically and ended up defaulting on its (previously invisible to outsiders) debt.

While it is popular to argue that China rolled through the 2008 crisis unscathed (while customers like the US and the EU slowed), it really has been undergoing a slow-motion, deceptive slowdown of its own. The current tightening measures are late-coming attempts to address the structural distortions caused by the reckless lending of the past two years.

For comparison,consider: in 1987, the US economy endured an unprecedented decline in stocks and a short recession which many thought would jeopardize Japan's rapid "export-driven" growth. On the contrary, Japan surged during 1987, 1988, and 1989. Its "secret"? Expansive credit and excess liquidity channeled into real-estate and commodities. This should sound familiar. The party ended by the early 1990s, though it was so slow-motion that many did not realize it until the Asian Tiger crisis of 1997 laid the whole continent bare and, for a few years in the late 1990s, made the US back into the driver of growth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:18 AM on 12/10/2010
China's Wealth in created by their industrial might that creates products for export that are priced lower than products manufactured in other countries!

The USA has destroyed our industries and the associated jobs for US citizens,

US citizens continuously pay US dollars to people and companies in the industrial nations (through Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and the other imported/distributor/retailers) with US dollars to manufacture and supply the imported products that US citizens consume (instead of US citizens producing these products ourselves).

This creates a constant flow of US dollars from the USA to foreign industrial nations, mostly China.

This process needs to be reversed before foreigners own everything of value in the USA.

The US government is continuously borrowing back US dollars (actually printing and selling new paper US Treasury Bonds) from individual citizens and businesses in the industrialized nations and spending those US dollars to pay US citizens to do things such as re-build the infrastructure (with imported equipment and imported materials) in order to stimulate the economy?

The US government should not borrow US dollars from US banks or foreign individuals to pay for US government expenses that are greater than the taxes that they collect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:36 AM on 12/10/2010
Please correct the my first sentence to read:

"China's Wealth is created by their industrial.............."
10:40 AM on 12/10/2010
They believe in REAL business (one that builds factories, hires people, builds physical products, etc., etc.) unlike in many of the wall street businesses that have more penchant for SPECULATIVE businesses (one that just "moves" money-liquidity around, using hedging/exotic investment instruments or stratgies) for get-rich quick strategies. This is what happens to many of the US financial institutions -- banks, investment banks, hedge funds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:57 AM on 12/10/2010
I also believe that real wealth and the associated long term jobs for any country are created and/or acquired ONLY when the members of a family (or a nation, city-state, island, tribe, etc.) plant, grow and/or harvest something of commercial value from the earth; extract something of commercial value from the earth; provide professional services (medical, legal, dental, engineering, architecture, accounting, land surveying, technology, etc.); collect payment for patent and copyright uses; manufactures or constructs something of commercial value that is consumable or permanently useful for rental income; and then trades, sells, leases or rents these items and/or services to parties outside of their family, in return for a net transfer of gold, currency or commodities from other parties outside of their family into their own family.

The members of that family can then reflect their real wealth and financial security with the net positive accumulation of grain, gold, cattle, jewels, land, buildings, hotels, casinos, factories, commodities and/or other marketable products for reserve use in times of emergency and/or also to raise the standard of living for the members of that family.

This continuous stream of newly created wealth is available to be taxed in order to create funds to spend for pork barrel projects, green projects, infrastructure projects, water & sewer, wars, streets, bridges, highways, welfare, unemployment, school teachers, policemen, fire fighters, and other additional government services.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
09:47 AM on 12/10/2010
causing much higher prices in the u.s. in 2011, would be a long term benefit if oil prices stay low but they won't the chinese want and need it and deserve it