More

Chuck Schumer Wages Battle With White House To Get The Name 'Chuck Schumer' Into Newspapers

First Posted: 12/10/10 11:26 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Schumer

When President Barack Obama first fixed on what he wanted to see happen to the Bush tax cuts, he imagined that they should be extended for all Americans earning under $250,000, and ended for everyone earning above that amount. After the election, with Congress facing a more hostile and emboldened GOP Congress, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) imagined a compromise, where the extend-or-end line was pushed to Americans earning $1,000,000. The Congress is not going to pass either plan, so now, Obama and Schumer are at odds. At least, according to two simultaneous stories in the Washington Post and Politico.

By the way! You can make a pretty safe bet that this Obama vs. Schumer angle was spoon-fed directly to the two papers by Schumer's office, because this story is not interesting enough for anyone to actually chase down, and Schumer's plan has basically been a non-starter for weeks. But both papers have a hunger right now for anything having to do with intra-party squabbles -- from either party, really. So Schumer baits the hook with a conflict that no one had heretofore been discussing.

Having vanquished Four Loko, Schumer's camp really, really wants you to know that he is kind of a big deal. That's why the second paragraphs of each piece reads like this:

Washington Post:

The newly appointed Senate Democratic "message" guru has emerged as the White House's chief antagonist over the tax cut deal Obama worked out with GOP leaders.


Politico:

Schumer, the newly anointed message guru for besieged Senate Democrats, told Obama he wanted the president to hold the line and oppose Republican efforts to extend the cuts to families making more than $250,000.


See what they did there? There's a new "message guru" in town, folks! (And it's not Representative Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.), who has lately been demonstrating his own Schumer-esque abilities to get himself in front of teevee cameras.) Behind the scenes of this "private" conflict between Schumer and the White House (that's no longer private, or even relevant to the tax cut discussion), Schumer is being rebirthed in fire. And lest you think of him as some tool of Wall Street -- a conclusion you may have reached as a result of being familiar with Chuck Schumer -- he wants you to know that he's sick of all the attention being lavished on millionaires, and that he cares about the middle class:

Washington Post:

Schumer took a different view. Middle-class independent voters abandoned Democrats in droves last month, and Schumer, who just won a third term, wanted to portray the GOP as the party of millionaires and billionaires.


Politico:

"My advice is very simple. It would be the same to the president, to my colleagues in the Senate and House, to people of the other party: Focus on the middle class like a laser," Schumer said.


Remember how this "standoff" was basically over Schumer's desire to give tax breaks to people earning up to $1,000,000?

There's also stuff in these articles that may as well have come from a Schumer campaign ad:

Washington Post:

The contentious, mostly private standoff has turned Schumer into an unlikely villain among administration officials who have long valued his tactical skills and political acumen. It has also made him an unlikely champion to liberal activists who are seething at the Obama deal. In an appeal this week to supporters, the liberal group Moveon.org praised Schumer, a long-time ally of Wall Street, as one of their "progressive heroes" and saying "we need you now."


Politico:

The elevation of Schumer, who oversaw historic Democratic pickups in the 2006 and 2008 cycles as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, poses a new challenge to Obama, who had enjoyed dominance of the party's national messaging operation over the past two years.


See, Schumer may be a villain today, but even as the White House grouses, they recognize that Schumer has amazing "tactical skills" and "acumen." How amazing? Well, just recall that as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, he got a lot of Democrats elected to office. Chuck Schumer is a man in whom "seething liberal activists" can put their faith. MoveOn needs him!

Anyway, my guess is this is basically the Schumer camp offering up a "Democrats in disarray" story in return for having newspapers talk about how awesome he is. It basically helps to confirm what you've long suspected -- that most of the "Democrats in disarray" stories are fed to the media by Democrats. It also goes to show what safe ground the media is running these stories: The pitch proves the thesis.

But I could be wrong! Maybe the White House leaked these stories about the conflict, and how dreamy and amazing Chuck Schumer is. Depending on how many times I hit myself in the head with a ball peen hammer, I could start believing this.

At any rate, you get the feeling that maybe if the Democrats were to ever all get on the same page, they might not be a half-bad political party!

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

When President Barack Obama first fixed on what he wanted to see happen to the Bush tax cuts, he imagined that they should be extended for all Americans earning under $250,000, and ended for everyone ...
When President Barack Obama first fixed on what he wanted to see happen to the Bush tax cuts, he imagined that they should be extended for all Americans earning under $250,000, and ended for everyone ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 243
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:37 PM on 12/16/2010
The Schumer camp doesn't need to provide a made-up "Democrats in disarray" story; the Democrats are in disarray and any journalist can figure this out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emma richmond
05:43 PM on 12/13/2010
Schumer need to talk about the Pork he have gotten, before he start to bad mouth the President, the thing is they stay in front of the Cameras, this is why no Bill get's passed, they whine because the President called them out for what they are, how many years have Schumer been in the Sen. 30 years what have he done, maybe got one bill passed, how many of these Senators or Congressmen did anything for the People, but take money from the Special Interest Groups, most of these Sen. and Congressmen have been in Washington for 30 to 40 years and done nothing but whine, Senator Obama his short co-sponsored 689 bill and 408 in which he Secured his Support. With these Snakes coming out and nothing but Camera Hounds where was they when Bush was in the Seat for 8 years and years passed, Every since President Obama been in the Seat we have the MEDIA, people like Ed MSNBC trying to play this Challenge Card and Exposing himself to who he really are, MSNBC, FOX and CNN trying to tell the President how to do his Job, did they ever tell Bush or Clinton how to do they Job, if President Obama was White, nothing would be said, if the President go to the Bathroom they whine, if he pick his nose that's wrong, if he smile that's wrong, nothing never Positives with some of these people everything Negative just for Rating.
photo
Puller58
Man of Mystery
01:40 PM on 12/12/2010
I've read before that the most dangerous place to be is between Chuck Schumer and a television camera.
05:49 PM on 12/11/2010
It's a shame it had to take Obama making this deal with the Devil (aka reTHUGS) to get these congressional and senate dems to finally DO THEIR JOB for once.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
04:08 PM on 12/11/2010
Why the attack on Schumer? Of course his office is going to have a press release about his proposed legislation. Obama has a Press Secretary. What about it?
09:43 AM on 12/11/2010
Rabid self-interest seems to command these democrats’ every waking moment. They have become what they say they abhor, do-nothing seekers first of fame and fortune. Country be damned!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleolwinemakerme
Put A Cork In It!
09:08 AM on 12/13/2010
You're looking at the wrong party when you spout such things.
09:17 AM on 12/11/2010
Schumer will do anything to get his name in the paper . He's the make Sarah Palin . I wish the he would walk away too . It's all about him
09:02 AM on 12/11/2010
Where was Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders and Sherrod Brown when the Senate decided NOT to address the tax cuts until after the midterms? Where were they when their Democratic colleagues voted with Republicans NOT to uncouple tax cuts for the rich from tax cuts for the middle class? History has shown repeatedly that Senators have more power over each other on tough votes, than a President has. So, where were they when the Senate was once again failing the middle class?

There wouldn't have been a need for Obama's last-minute negotiations with those GOP vipers if the Senate had done its job. But wait...I forgot, that's Obama's fault too. He didn't MAKE them do their job. What a feckless group they are.

Any Democratic senator who whines about Obama not helping them get this or that passed must have forgotten the cheap shot one of them fired at Obama and Biden before they were even sworn in...the one in which they unambiguously said the Obama Administration had ITS end of Pennsylvania Avenue and THEY had THEIRS!
09:59 AM on 12/11/2010
I totally agree. And the same goes for the House of Representatives. Which leads me to believe that most of those so-called progressive Democrats in both houses of Congress really DID want the tax cuts to be extended, even for the rich and so they allowed it to be put off until after the election. Then at the 11th hour, when it's really too late to win with extending the tax cuts only for the middle class, the President cuts the absolute best deal he can. Then they blame him for not "fighting". Give me a break. With what is he to fight with? Sticks? Stones?
All this "feigned" outrage by Democrats in Congress is as phony as it gets in Washington. This one cannot be blamed on Obama. Now all these Democrats will have their little protest votes but not enough to sabotage the deal because Rethugs will bail the President out with enough Democrats (blue dogs, mostly) so that it doesn't fail. AND EVERYBODY WILL GET THEIR CORPORATE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND "REVOLVING DOOR" COMMITTMENTS. HOW SICK DOES IT GET. The American people are being "played".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No Yards
I never said most of the things I said.
08:38 AM on 12/11/2010
I don't understand the point of this article?

I don't care much either way for Schumer, some times he's progressive, some times he caves in to the right, but the story here is what? That a politician tried to get his message out to the people?

Amen to that then, the more politicians are put in front of the media to have their opinions known to the public the better.

Sounds to me like this article is just an offended Obamabot trying to discredit anyone that tries to get a better deal than Obama was able to get.

Another attempt by Centrist Democrats to brow beat anyone who has an original thought that might go against what Obama tells us to think.
10:04 AM on 12/11/2010
Are you serious? How you could possibly blame Obama for this one is beyond me. We have a Senate and House of Representative with huge Democratic majorities that are impotent to get what the President has promoted for years in one campaign speech after the other. They decided NOT to have a vote on this before the recent elections. Whose fault is this. You are another progressive who would just like to scapegoat one person - the President - when so many others are at fault. You don't understand the propaganda spin campaign going on in Washington. Huge numbers of Democrats play the "progressive" card to their constituents and then play the "corporate" card to their campaign contributors and their future K Street employers. Give me a break. You don't see the duplicity. How come Chuckie Shumer didn't even score on the radar screen in his re-election bid? You know why. He was corporate-endorsed and so the Rethugs put up a weak candidate against him. OPEN YOUR EYES.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No Yards
I never said most of the things I said.
10:41 AM on 12/11/2010
I don't have any issue at all with putting a fair share of blame on congressional Democrats and their lack of support for what Obama promoted in his campaign speeches. Obama's lack of support for those same polices not withstanding.

My point is not necessarily to place all blame on Obama, my point is that anyone complaining that some politician is speaking to the media too much doesn't understand democracy. Every politician should be making major efforts every day to present their policy ideas in the media for the people to inspect and judge.

An article claiming that some politician is somehow diminished because they are trying t get in front of the media to present an idea is an article that is not worth the bits used to transmit it ... and that's coming from a fan of Sam'.
photo
LCdruid
Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day
08:22 AM on 12/11/2010
Schumer's not just a tool of Wall Street, he's a tool in general.
10:06 AM on 12/11/2010
Amen. He's also a total fraud. The fact that he's in the leadership in the Senate explains a whole lot about why things fail. He's a first class con artist.
08:16 AM on 12/11/2010
From another Monday morning quarterback:
Too bad Democrats didn't "focus like a laser" on the utterly corrupt take-over of America by the corporate elite and its resultant erosion (now eroding at an accelerated rate, by the way) of the once great middle-class instead of health reform. If this message had been put out there consistently, sincerely, and with gusto the Democrats probably would have swept the 2010 elections and could now get down to real health care reform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Randolph Greer
I am a Poet .
08:05 AM on 12/11/2010
My comment is not about Schumer , it is about the Washington Post and Politico . Neither one of these news sources are worth reading . Both are as establishment as you can get . When both of these editorial pages agree on a policy , that policy should never be followed . Frankly , everyone reading these two should just switch to USA Today for their regular news . And read Roll Call or The Hill to get their political news . Of course , my advice is only for those who don't get their news by way of Huffington . Huffington is the only place to really get the full range of news issued by the hour and minute . And it is the only place where those with a vision can see
a preview of future realities .
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
05:59 AM on 12/11/2010
ouch
photo
richj45
politically correct linux vegetarian
05:22 AM on 12/11/2010
the problem isn't Schumer who has won easily in New York State three times, its the system made worst by the supreme court ruling on allowing corporations unlimited funding of politicians. Unknowns do not get elected to office anywhere in this country... look at Sarah Palin a relative unknown made famous by McCain and now presidential material seeking funding for a possible run.. I've voted for Schumer all three times and have been in agreement with vast majority of his votes for those terms.. Wall street making money is a good thing but being taxed at 15% capital gains is totally unfair.. there was local coverage a wall st. trade last year where a client made 4 billion dollars (thats income) which will be taxed at 15%.. we need to tax trades on a graduated scale
03:46 AM on 12/11/2010
Wait. Chuck Schumer is a tool of Wall Street?

Why isn't this astonishing news on the front page?