iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hoyer: Senate Has Votes Needed To Repeal DADT [UPDATED]

First Posted: 12/15/10 07:51 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Steny Hoyer

UPDATE: Dec. 16, 10:05 a.m. - The Senate has at least 62 votes to repeal the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said Thursday morning.

"I have to give Joe Lieberman credit. We were told, Steny Hoyer was told by the Senate leadership, and particularly by Senator Lieberman -- Senator Collins and I will give her credit too, she has been good on this from our standpoint -- that if we passed it as a separate bill that would help," Frank said on the Sirius XM Satellite Radio show "POTUS." "There are at least 62 senators -- more than the 60 that is needed under that outrageous filibuster rule, but at least we have even met that -- who are committed to repealing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' It was tied up with other things and they said they couldn't do it until they got a tax bill worked out, until they got the spending bill. All the obstacles that people have said existed to a straight up-or-down vote have now been met. And unless there are some liars in the Senate, we are going to get this done."


* * * * *

The Senate has enough votes to pass a standalone repeal of the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) has been told by Senate counterparts, he said in an interview with HuffPost Wednesday evening after the House approved its own version of the bill.

Hoyer said that he's been working closely with Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), the leading reform advocates in the Senate, and that he suggested last week to Lieberman that the House move first.

"Senator Lieberman and Senator Collins determined that they would introduce a bill," said Hoyer. "I called and talked to a number of people. I then called Senator Lieberman and said 'Joe, my intent will be to talk to Congressman Murphy' -- who's the sponsor of the amendment that was adopted in the defense bill -- 'and put this in as a free standing bill, because we can probably send it over to you more quickly than you can send to us.' And he agreed and we introduced exactly the same bill that they have in the Senate."

That bill passed 250-175 after heated debate and a number of unusual statements made by Republicans in support of continuing the policy. "The United States military is not the YMCA. It's something special," insisted Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.).

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said that it is not the soldiers who have a problem with repealing the discriminatory policy, but rather that Republicans are "imputing their own unease" about gays and lesbians on to those soldiers, who, said Frank, "are better than that."

Hoyer said that his Senate partners say they have the votes, though he has no assurance yet from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) as to when it'll come up.

"I talked to [Reid] late last week and early this week so he anticipated this action, but I have no assurances from him. I do, however, have talked to both Senator Lieberman and Senator Collins and they both believe they have the requisite number of votes to pass this legislation," he said.

The repeal will need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster; it won 57 votes last week. Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) has vowed to support it next time after missing the vote. Sens. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who have expressed some level of support for repeal, could cast the deciding votes.

Earlier on Wednesday, Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) said he was still open to voting for repeal, raising the possibility that if it becomes clear the repeal has 60 votes, several other Republicans may switch and support it in order to get on the right side of history -- and avoid interrogation from grandchildren over the holidays who have long since discarded the prejudice that underlies the policy.

Watch the floor speeches on behalf of repeal:


FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
UPDATE: Dec. 16, 10:05 a.m. - The Senate has at least 62 votes to repeal the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said Thursday morning. "I have to give Joe Lieber...
UPDATE: Dec. 16, 10:05 a.m. - The Senate has at least 62 votes to repeal the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said Thursday morning. "I have to give Joe Lieber...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,905
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (86 total)
09:16 PM on 12/18/2010
What a shame, these gay freaks were capable of Dr.Jekylling themselves and keep their Hyde side hiding long enough to make people believe they are normal. That's O.K. it isn't over till it's over! Sooner or later right wing America will wake up and smell the Tea partly steaming and decide it's time to take back their country. These libs and their constitutional rights, in the end might is right, and we make our choices by instinct. The Bible is flawed and the constitution is to. Hey maybe we can use the 3rd ammendment and the 9th ammendment and challenge this DADT.
photo
Madelaine
Psychotherapist, researcher; advocate-human rights
12:09 PM on 12/18/2010
Perhaps a little off subject, but.....I wonder how hard Boehner will sob about this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HTM
12:10 AM on 12/17/2010
You seem like a pretty bright guy, why ask me a question if you already no the answers
09:50 PM on 12/16/2010
DADT, is NOT the only thing that is overdue my friends. By 2025, this excellent Nation's Article states: we will lose more than our private rights to be what we are, but the country we want to serve. Please share and read: http://www.thenation.com/article/156851/decline-and-fall-american-empire Pay particular attention to our "present situation"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
07:10 PM on 12/16/2010
"Is The White House Stalling DADT Repeal In The Senate?"
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/is-the-white-house-stalling-dadt-repeal-in-the-senate.php
Sources on the Hill are telling me a big reason DADT repeal isn't moving faster comes right from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Despite President Obama's public support for repeal, with DADT stacked up against the START nuclear arms reduction treaty that Obama carefully brokered with the Russians earlier this year, the White House is putting its legislative push behind START.

"The White House has been crystal clear that their number one priority in this lame duck session is START," said one Senior Democratic aide.

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who's been pushing for a vote this weekend on DADT repeal, told MSNBC Thursday that the START treaty would still be ratified by the new Republican-heavy Senate that will be sworn in on Jan. 5 -- and thus isn't as pressing as DADT during the lame duck.

DADT repeal may pass the new Senate, but its prospects are a lot less assured. And besides, whatever bill the next Senate passes (if it does pass a bill) would have to be approved by the new Republican-controlled House, where the chances for repeal are expected to be really grim.

With that in mind, Lieberman said, DADT really should come first. His spokesperson, Erika Masonhall, put the position succinctly.

"The votes for repeal will be there. Why delay the vote any longer?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kara Kramer
06:10 PM on 12/16/2010
So this is the part of the tax cut deal that never went on paper.
It's sad that republicans now have to be bribed in order to do the right thing.
Still, as long as they do it.
photo
jkb5371
what is this??
07:01 PM on 12/16/2010
LOL...how did the dems get healthcare passed??? They had to BRIBE members of their OWN party "to do the right thing"...too fu**ing funny dude!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EspritDeVoltaire
K Street PR firm board member
05:55 PM on 12/16/2010
Patriots should be allowed to serve. Fighting their right to do so because of sanctimonious nitpicking hurts all involved.
photo
jkb5371
what is this??
07:05 PM on 12/16/2010
Agreed...when someone enlists they are required to swear an oath promising to give their life if needed to defend the country...how can you deny someone who is willing to do that?
I am a proud Republican and I'm a Marine...2nd Battalion, 2nd Marine Division 1979-1983.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TyneCrescent
A Word To The Wise Is Sufficient
07:17 PM on 12/16/2010
F&F'd. What ticks me off is the majority of those in Congress haven't even been in uniform, but want to try to lecture everyone else. I did 23 years in the AF, and proudly so, but all their high brow rhetoric just burns under my collar.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David01
texan Badges, I don't got no badges. I don't need
05:37 PM on 12/16/2010
Sen. Reid : Take the dang vote!! Get it done and get on to the next thing. Give us ALL a Christmas gift.
05:23 PM on 12/16/2010
I told my wife that if DADT and the START treaty make it through the Senate then we'll know that Obama negotiated for more than just UI benefits in the tax tradeoff. It means he negotiated a deal where he would get a vote on the treaty and DADT as well. It would only make sense that no Democrat or Republican would admit that these two pieces of legislation were part of the deal. For Republicans it would mean they would be facing the white hot anger of their base as well as vitriolic attacks from FOX, Limbaugh, Savage, and all the rest of the right wing nutjobs. For Democrats it would derail the deal.

So we'll only know if these two measures get through the Senate but if they do then my hat is off to Obama. He got a better deal than I thought he did which means I have to consider supporting him once again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
07:24 PM on 12/16/2010
Looks like Obama's focus is entirely on START, even if the treaty is something that could be passed after January 5 while DADT repeal can only be passed now if at all.

"Sources on the Hill are telling me a big reason DADT repeal isn't moving faster comes right from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Despite President Obama's public support for repeal, with DADT stacked up against the START nuclear arms reduction treaty that Obama carefully brokered with the Russians earlier this year, the White House is putting its legislative push behind START."
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/is-the-white-house-stalling-dadt-repeal-in-the-senate.php
Gibbs said: "There's an effort to get this done if we have time to do it."

Note: "if we have time to do it"
And Lieberman is saying DADT should come first. But the White House, it seems, has pushed it to the back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lynzyluhu
Something clever and smart goes here: _____
05:01 PM on 12/16/2010
Why do I feel this was tied up with trip wires? Now all of a sudden people changed their minds? What's the real reason behind this..?

Don't get me wrong, I'm ecstatic and give two cheers for a cause I deeply believe in...But I have a feeling someone sold their soul somewhere...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LynnW49
"A great democracy must be progressive." TR
07:26 PM on 12/16/2010
"I have a feeling someone sold their soul somewhere.­.. "

Bill Clinton in 1993 when DADT was enacted.
04:21 PM on 12/16/2010
Liars in congress? Find one that isn't! It's a requirement like being tall and playing professional basketball. They just lie with a straight face better than most..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
03:39 PM on 12/16/2010
Unfortunately when it comes to the GOTP and some of the Dems.....there are ALWAYS liars!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HTM
03:32 PM on 12/16/2010
The Democratic Party is a joke and is playing power moves with the republicans in the Congress and senate because both parties are against the DADT Law and are trying to rush it through so the blame will be on the Republican Party who are indifference toward repeal or changing the repeal.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GabeSmall
03:56 PM on 12/16/2010
Huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert 999
Elections have Consequences
05:22 PM on 12/16/2010
Interesting angle, do you have a source, or is your post your opinion?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
02:33 PM on 12/16/2010
The only bright point is that some more people will be allowed to be put in harms way while killing primarily civilians for a failed corporate boondoggle.

A victory for justice and injustice at the same time.

Makes me proud to be an Uhmurican.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lwallis
Liberalism on the move again, finally.
02:21 PM on 12/16/2010
The nerve of them to even suggust that they are to good to work on
Christmas. Our men and women in uniform work on Christmas, do they not
deserve these votes? How about all the low paying service jobs, not only do
they work on Christmas they make a whole lot less than these bums do.