More

Julian Assange Bail Hearing: WikiLeaks Founder Court Hearing (LIVE UPDATES)

First Posted: 12/16/10 07:29 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Julian Assange Bail

The WikiLeaks founder is back in court, facing an appeal of a British judge's decision to allow him bail. He has been in a British prison since being denied bail last week. Assange was granted bail on Tuesday, but owing to an appeal, he was forced to stay in custody. He is wanted for questioning for alleged sex crimes involving two women in Sweden. Assange has received promises of cash from many celebrities to support his bail request.

According to the Guardian, the judge in today's hearing has banned journalist from using Twitter in the courtroom.

You can follow live updates below.

live blog

Oldest Newest

According to a recently released cable, a facility in Yemen holding nuclear material was left unsecured after its one guard was removed and a security camera broke, according to the AP. The cable quoted one official as saying, "Very little now stands between the bad guys and Yemen's nuclear material."

Assange was asked about the decision to release cables that identified sites vulnerable to terrorist attacks when Katie Couric interviewed him on Friday. Assange told her:

We are an organization that attempts to promote human rights by revealing abuses that are concealed. So, of course we never want to be in a position where through our releases we are actually causing harm to indivduals, or at least more harm than the good we are causing.

Share this:

In case you missed any WikiLeaks cable highlights last week, here's a quick guide to get you up to speed. It covers Tom Cruise on Scientology, Castro on Obama and everything in between.

Share this:

The Today show interviewed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Friday after his release from prison on bail Thursday afternoon. During the interview, he described his recent court appearances as "not the beginning of the end, rather it is merely the end of the beginning."

Assange confirmed that he has heard there will be espionage charges filed against him in the U.S., and denied knowing Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army intelligence analyst accused of providing WikiLeaks with information. The U.S. is allegedly putting together a case against Assange on conspiracy charges.

You can watch the entire interview here.

Share this:

Assange is reportedly preparing himself for a U.S. indictment on espionage charges. Reports Sky News:

Speaking upon arrival at the Suffolk country mansion where he was bailed to by the High Court, he said the American legal action "had yet to be confirmed" but was "very serious".

Sky also quotes Assange as saying, "We have heard today from one of my US lawyers that there may be a US indictment for espionage for me coming from a secret grand jury investigation."

The New York Times reported yesterday that the U.S. is trying to build a conspiracy case against Assange, focusing on proving that he "encouraged or even helped" Bradley Manning with the leak.

Share this:

The Independent has an interesting article by Vaughan Smith, the man sheltering Assange after his release. Smith describes how he came to the decision to open what is being called his "British country mansion" to the beleaguered WikiLeaks founder. Writes Smith about:

They made him out to be the internet’s Bin Laden. The likeness might be poor, but that was OK because the colours were familiar and bright. Now the focus is on Julian’s court fight, instead of on the opaque political system that his leaks have exposed. The charges that Julian faces have already been dropped once, from a Swedish court that even Glenn Beck, the incendiary US Fox News TV host, rubbishes.

Julian is different to most of us. He is clever and obsessive but also funny and self-deprecating. But he has started something seismic but inevitable, a consequence of modern communications that cannot be stopped.

You can read Smith's entire piece here.

Share this:

Now that he's free, what will the WikiLeaks founder do next? Cast your vote for Assange's next move here.

Share this:

Reuters is reporting the text of Assange's speech outside the court. It reads in part:

During my time in solitary confinement in the bottom of a Victorian prison I had time to reflect on the conditions of those people around the world also in solitary confinement, also on remand, in conditions that are more difficult than those faced by me. Those people also need your attention and support.

And with that I hope to continue my work and continue to protest my innocence in this matter and to reveal, as we get it, which we have not yet, the evidence from these allegations. Thank you.

You can listen to Assange speaking on a live audio recording here.

Share this:

Assange has emerged from court and is speaking. According to Sky News, he declared, "It's great to smell the fresh air of London again."

Share this:

Julian Assange has just been released, the Guardian is reporting.

Share this:

ABC is reporting that Assange's paperwork the only possible holdup to his release, is complete. @jimsciuttoABC tweeted:

We're told Assange's paperwork is complete and going to court clerk now

Share this:

Christine Assange said outside the courthouse that "I had faith that the British justice system would do the right thing... and that faith has been confirmed," according to CNN. The report also states that she "'could not wait' to see him 'and to hold him close.'"

Share this:

High Court Justice Duncan Ouseley ordered Assange free on bail because he had a compelling reason to return to court. Assange will now be released to an English "country mansion." Reports the AP:

Prosecutors had argued there was a risk the 39-year-old Australian, who faces sex-crimes allegations in Sweden, would abscond if he was freed. But Ouseley said if Assange fled "he would diminish himself in the eyes of many of his supporters" – and make famous backers like filmmaker Michael Moore look foolish.

"I don't accept that Mr. Assange has an incentive not to attend (court)," Ouseley said. "He clearly does have some desire to clear his name."

Share this:

According to Guardian correspondent Vikram Dodd, Assange may not be released until tomorrow. Dodd reports the hold-up revolves around the surety documents. Many well-known figures pledged to provide bail for the WikiLeaks founder, but they must now physically go to a police station to fill out the official documentation, reports Dodd.

Share this:

You can hear an audio report on the decision from Guardian correspondent Luke Harding here. In the audio update, Harding says:

"I would expect him to be freed. Whether that takes hours or a little bit longer, I don't know, but it seems that he's going to be out."

Share this:

A British judge has denied the bail appeal, meaning that Assange will be freed, according to the Guardian.

Share this:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

The WikiLeaks founder is back in court, facing an appeal of a British judge's decision to allow him bail. He has been in a British prison since being denied bail last week. Assange was granted bail on...
The WikiLeaks founder is back in court, facing an appeal of a British judge's decision to allow him bail. He has been in a British prison since being denied bail last week. Assange was granted bail on...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,664
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (49 total)
photo
LiberalOutlaw
Yes I am and NO you can't watch
02:54 PM on 12/20/2010
Wanna know who I think would've really hated Wikileaks?

Hitler. Yeah, that guy probably would've have Julian Assange killed, no questions asked.
06:15 AM on 12/17/2010
Sweden should be ashamed of itself, portraying itself as a fair and honorable country.when all along its no different to so many other shady nations.
09:26 PM on 12/16/2010
So, in regard to the Swedish thing, his crime, (for which he was held in $375,000.00 bail), is that in one case he had sex without a condom; and in another case, after his condom broke while having sex, he continued.

These are crimes? Very sharia-like!
09:37 PM on 12/16/2010
I expect better out of Sweden. If it was Iran I'd understand but Sweden?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:14 PM on 12/16/2010
More happiness today. Sharing the pretty. :)

Julian - age 24
http://i.t­elegraph.c­o.uk/teleg­raph/multi­media/arch­ive/01688/­assange2_1­688693c.jp­g
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
05:23 PM on 12/16/2010
Maybe Assange can work on hacking China's computers. Now I could get behind that!
03:14 PM on 12/16/2010
I suspect (heh heh) that my fellow Progressives will disagree BUT :

I believe the US Govt. is MEANT to have *some state secrets that are NOT ever leaked, so as to ensure National Security.
That's it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SophiaFlorere
More funding for pancreatic cancer research please
03:20 PM on 12/16/2010
I have to agree with you there LOL.
03:21 PM on 12/16/2010
See ? Anything's possible :))
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Remember Remember
the fifth of November...
03:32 PM on 12/16/2010
I agree we need to have secret information. However, there's a difference between the structural plans and yields of nuclear weapons and diplomatic cables that, for the most part, are idle chatter between offices.
03:37 PM on 12/16/2010
I have a phone line. I use it for business & idle chatter, both. I want it private.
I have a computer. I do business with it. I email with it.
I have a filing cabinet. One of the drawers is locked. By me, for my eyes only.
I'm just one of the little guys. Not the govt.

We need to establish the means to restore privacy. Personal, Business & National.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:59 PM on 12/16/2010
Open Letter to the Power Elite:

Julian Assange is a free man - admired, respected, beloved.

Consider your actions very carefully - and tread even more carefully.

You are now walking through the minefield of Pandora’s Open Box.

It will be unforgiving, should you make the wrong step.

Remember -

You cannot silence or kill a martyr.

~ America
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 PM on 12/16/2010
Aerica and the world is watching..and the h8t for the power structure grows with every new crack down...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Remember Remember
the fifth of November...
03:51 PM on 12/16/2010
The powers that be will be felled by something more powerful than any weapon on the planet. Their own words.

They will be taken from positions of power and persecuted with the extreme prejudice.

Fanned and Faved
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:52 PM on 12/16/2010
The real shock and awe is witnessing the progress of American fas!sam right in front of peoples face and they can not see it or come to grips with it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:41 PM on 12/16/2010
I’ll say it here and now.

Julian Assange will go down as one of the biggest heroes in history.
02:51 PM on 12/16/2010
And PFC Manning?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Remember Remember
the fifth of November...
03:33 PM on 12/16/2010
He's going to be locked in a supermax and have the key thrown away. Doesn't matter there was no (as far as we know so far) evidence suggesting he released military information...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
04:00 PM on 12/16/2010
Thank you! He did the work and he is being held in isolation in Quantico. I did not hear Assange acknowledge him and he appears to be a totally forgotten man.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
texlib2112
Arsenal - Gooners Forever
02:39 PM on 12/16/2010
people who throw the word terrorist to label Assange without backing your argument is real sad if you are trying to have a reasoned discussion. Terrorist is a subjective term what one person see's as a terrorist one might see as an hero. The British Government considered Sinn Fein a terrorist organization in Northern Ireland and yet the Catholics who wanted Northern Ireland to be no longer a part of The United Kingdom did not consider Sinn Fein a terrorist organization. In the end it is all relative to ones point of view of what you define as a terrorist organization.

I wish those who do not like Julian Assange would stop with the labeling and instead give a specific example of what he did wrong other then release information that we the people in a free society have every right to know about our government of our Republic. We always ask for transparency in our government well this is transparency at its finest and for some the ugly truth of what the government does is too hard to handle.

There are many post that I respectively disagree with a lot however I do respect everybody's point of view no matter how illogical and unreasoned. I respect it because that is what we should do in an open and civil society and free republic such as our country.

I hope this is posted
02:53 PM on 12/16/2010
Flagged!

...Just Kiddding. ;-P lol
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:55 PM on 12/16/2010
I would also love to have reasoned civil discussions with people but this is imposable with unreasonable duplicitous abusive authoritarian types that sculck this forum...I could also waist my time explaining quantum theory to a 5 year old
02:39 PM on 12/16/2010
Folks:

I hear tell the American government is attempting to assemble a 'conspiracy' case against Julian Assange. The premise is that Julian Assange 'facilitated' Bradley Mannings transfer of information to Wikileaks.

Alarm bells should be going off in the heads journalists everywhere right now. For the rest of you, here's why.

A journalist MUST facilitate the transfer of information from a source. Especially if that informant wishes to remain anonymous (not THAT anonymous :)). If Julian Assange was chatting with Bradley Manning over the internet it is no different than a journalist getting a phone call from a pay phone (Manning could easily have hid his identity from Assange at that point). Any instructions that Assange gave Manning are no different than a journalist telling a source to mail it to such and such an address or to meet under the Main Street Bridge at midnight. A source may wish to go to extraordinary lengths to remain anonymous and that discussion might involve a certain amount of negotiations between the parties until both are satisfied. Facilitation?

Letting the American government win on those grounds will open the door to prosecuting ANY journalist who facilitates a source in the transfer of information... IN ANY WAY!

Any faults with my logic? Am I missing something. I must have. Why don't I see news agencies across America fighting for their very journalistic lives right now?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:43 PM on 12/16/2010
No you are correct  this is a systemic planed tightening of the noose of fas!sam around all our necks...
Obama and Biden are part of the Oligarghy rulers and doing the bidding of the corporate state...
The Democrats in the Cult of Washington are the other side of the neoconszionist Agenda....Its plain to anyone that has avoided the systemic propaganda machine we call the "news"
02:59 PM on 12/16/2010
I think the difference lies, not in if Assange guided Manning on how to get the files to him but rather in actually helping PFC Manning extract the files from the classified computer, which is highly doubtful and far fetched. Plus, PFC would not have needed help there because it was extremely low tech. In Manning's words ''It was childishly easy'' to copy things to a memory stick and a CDROM labeled Lady Gaga.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:03 PM on 12/16/2010
And we dont discus the moral implications of a person who had empathy and was disturbed by the criminality of his own government to have wanted to do something..NO we all don't discuss that for some reason its all about the technicality..the fact that he helped expose the dark disturbing underbelly of the lies and deceptions and hidden agendas of our encroaching fas!st government goes unheard.....
03:07 PM on 12/16/2010
Oilvaarch:

According to 'the story' Manning himself removed the files from the system and burned them to CD. If he could see the cables, he could copy them... period. It was the contents of the cables and war logs that drove Manning to whistle blow to Wikileaks. He needed no help from Assange at that point so I think my argument stands.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:09 PM on 12/16/2010
The coordinated systematic beat down of wikileaks and its founder is the canary in the coal mine of the coming fas!st state and new world order...that is the trajectory no one will notice until far too late..wile you all argue the semantics of "surprise" sex..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NomadicView
02:24 PM on 12/16/2010
Exactly. There are so many people waiting to milk this Wikileaks case to fulfill the goals of their own agenda. I think in about two years, for example, we won't even be able to recognize the Internet as we know it today. That's one example too. Soon we may look back to this time and say.. "Gosh there were so many signs and we just couldn't see them clearly."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:58 PM on 12/16/2010
After LIEberman and his cohorts get done it will be locked down tight and NO free exchange of information will be possible again.. the corpofasists will make sure of this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soma99
04:14 PM on 12/16/2010
In the big picture wikileaks will not change the way the top lizards in global politics, money and war have done business since the feudal age -- which is to say with arrogant disregard for the rest of us. Theirs is an ancient system of human dominance that only shifts names and methodolog ies over the centuries. Two years from now, little will have changed in the old, old story of the powerful few over the powerless many. In this overarchin g drama, Obama, Bush, Hillary and Julian Assange are passing players. Watching the sweaty, fetid machinatio ns of our overlords with such passionate involvemen t only keeps us from seeing the big picture -- that they are the players and we are the pawns.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:08 PM on 12/16/2010
Holy crap, now I'm really depressed! LOL

Fanned anyway, for a great post and telling the truth. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NomadicView
02:08 PM on 12/16/2010
So what do you think the reaction would be inside the US and outside the US if Assange was abducted as part of an extraordinary rendition? after all, the British courts have precisely situated the man. You know that at least bald-head has sat at a meeting table and suggested this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:12 PM on 12/16/2010
From people inside the US there would be cheering except from a few. That is, if the condoned papers were left out of the fray. Outside, and to a few within, The damage would make what the US stepped into seem paltry in comparison.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NomadicView
02:14 PM on 12/16/2010
That's about my take too. I just hope that remains a fantasy because it has already been a PR disaster.. that would just take it one step beyond all reckoning.
03:03 PM on 12/16/2010
At which point does the insurance file get decrypted?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
02:07 PM on 12/16/2010
I am still waiting for Assange to express some concern for Corporal Manning who is in solitary confinement at Marine base at Quantico for doing Assange's dirty work for him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:12 PM on 12/16/2010
HMM nice spin! The demonetization tactic 101
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rinpochet
Do unto others ...
04:07 PM on 12/16/2010
You really do not agree that Manning is the lost soul in all this? No mention of him anywhere. Why not? Assange called a hero and ... Manning who?
02:30 PM on 12/16/2010
Yep. Delicately woven spin, I guess, from that viewpoint, but pretty ham-handed from a, you know, reality-based viewpoint...

If you saw something unconscionable to you being lied about and buried, and knew it would go on and on and on unless you took the hit, would you? He knew he'd be looking at life in a military prison. The way I read it, he went looking for WikiLeaks because he was looking for an honest (read: not U.S.) broker. But since he's being held far away from the press, he's pretty hard to ask.
03:07 PM on 12/16/2010
So, was this like PFC Manning jumping on the proverbial grenade, taking the fall, so that others may be saved from furtherance of corrupt crimes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giveadamn
Don't let them school you or even try to fool you.
02:05 PM on 12/16/2010
If Assange's computer guerrilla's can take down Visa, MC, and Facebook, I wonder what kind of tactics they'll use to harass Assange's accusers with, until they drop their complaints?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NomadicView
02:10 PM on 12/16/2010
Wikileaks and Assange and Anon, the guerrillas are not connected except by the fact that both parties reject Internet censorship.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giveadamn
Don't let them school you or even try to fool you.
05:23 PM on 12/16/2010
How do you know they've never "connected"? They may claim that, but that doesn't make it true!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
clemmers
The rich require an abundant supply of the poor.
02:21 PM on 12/16/2010
Anonymous are NO ONE's minions. They are completely and proudly independent to the point of anarchy. They spontaneously reacted to the PTB threatening to censor information.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Giveadamn
Don't let them school you or even try to fool you.
03:01 PM on 12/16/2010
How do you know that? You remind of those bible thumpers who'd believe about anything!