iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Julian Assange RELEASED: WikiLeaks Founder Free From Jail

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 12/16/10 01:14 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Assange Released

LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been released on bail following a week of legal drama over his extradition.

The 39-year-old Australian is fighting moves to take him to Sweden, where he faces sex-crimes allegations related to a visit there over the summer.

He handed himself in to British police last week but has been fighting for bail since.

Assange told journalists assembled outside of London's High Court Thursday that he was pleased to taste the fresh air and would continue to protest his innocence.

Assange is now expected to head to a British country mansion where he will have to observe a curfew and wear a monitoring device.

--

You can follow live updates to this developing story below.

live blog

Oldest Newest

According to a recently released cable, a facility in Yemen holding nuclear material was left unsecured after its one guard was removed and a security camera broke, according to the AP. The cable quoted one official as saying, "Very little now stands between the bad guys and Yemen's nuclear material."

Assange was asked about the decision to release cables that identified sites vulnerable to terrorist attacks when Katie Couric interviewed him on Friday. Assange told her:

We are an organization that attempts to promote human rights by revealing abuses that are concealed. So, of course we never want to be in a position where through our releases we are actually causing harm to indivduals, or at least more harm than the good we are causing.

Share this:

In case you missed any WikiLeaks cable highlights last week, here's a quick guide to get you up to speed. It covers Tom Cruise on Scientology, Castro on Obama and everything in between.

Share this:

The Today show interviewed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Friday after his release from prison on bail Thursday afternoon. During the interview, he described his recent court appearances as "not the beginning of the end, rather it is merely the end of the beginning."

Assange confirmed that he has heard there will be espionage charges filed against him in the U.S., and denied knowing Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army intelligence analyst accused of providing WikiLeaks with information. The U.S. is allegedly putting together a case against Assange on conspiracy charges.

You can watch the entire interview here.

Share this:

Assange is reportedly preparing himself for a U.S. indictment on espionage charges. Reports Sky News:

Speaking upon arrival at the Suffolk country mansion where he was bailed to by the High Court, he said the American legal action "had yet to be confirmed" but was "very serious".

Sky also quotes Assange as saying, "We have heard today from one of my US lawyers that there may be a US indictment for espionage for me coming from a secret grand jury investigation."

The New York Times reported yesterday that the U.S. is trying to build a conspiracy case against Assange, focusing on proving that he "encouraged or even helped" Bradley Manning with the leak.

Share this:

The Independent has an interesting article by Vaughan Smith, the man sheltering Assange after his release. Smith describes how he came to the decision to open what is being called his "British country mansion" to the beleaguered WikiLeaks founder. Writes Smith about:

They made him out to be the internet’s Bin Laden. The likeness might be poor, but that was OK because the colours were familiar and bright. Now the focus is on Julian’s court fight, instead of on the opaque political system that his leaks have exposed. The charges that Julian faces have already been dropped once, from a Swedish court that even Glenn Beck, the incendiary US Fox News TV host, rubbishes.

Julian is different to most of us. He is clever and obsessive but also funny and self-deprecating. But he has started something seismic but inevitable, a consequence of modern communications that cannot be stopped.

You can read Smith's entire piece here.

Share this:

Now that he's free, what will the WikiLeaks founder do next? Cast your vote for Assange's next move here.

Share this:

Reuters is reporting the text of Assange's speech outside the court. It reads in part:

During my time in solitary confinement in the bottom of a Victorian prison I had time to reflect on the conditions of those people around the world also in solitary confinement, also on remand, in conditions that are more difficult than those faced by me. Those people also need your attention and support.

And with that I hope to continue my work and continue to protest my innocence in this matter and to reveal, as we get it, which we have not yet, the evidence from these allegations. Thank you.

You can listen to Assange speaking on a live audio recording here.

Share this:

Assange has emerged from court and is speaking. According to Sky News, he declared, "It's great to smell the fresh air of London again."

Share this:

Julian Assange has just been released, the Guardian is reporting.

Share this:

ABC is reporting that Assange's paperwork the only possible holdup to his release, is complete. @jimsciuttoABC tweeted:

We're told Assange's paperwork is complete and going to court clerk now

Share this:

Christine Assange said outside the courthouse that "I had faith that the British justice system would do the right thing... and that faith has been confirmed," according to CNN. The report also states that she "'could not wait' to see him 'and to hold him close.'"

Share this:

High Court Justice Duncan Ouseley ordered Assange free on bail because he had a compelling reason to return to court. Assange will now be released to an English "country mansion." Reports the AP:

Prosecutors had argued there was a risk the 39-year-old Australian, who faces sex-crimes allegations in Sweden, would abscond if he was freed. But Ouseley said if Assange fled "he would diminish himself in the eyes of many of his supporters" – and make famous backers like filmmaker Michael Moore look foolish.

"I don't accept that Mr. Assange has an incentive not to attend (court)," Ouseley said. "He clearly does have some desire to clear his name."

Share this:

According to Guardian correspondent Vikram Dodd, Assange may not be released until tomorrow. Dodd reports the hold-up revolves around the surety documents. Many well-known figures pledged to provide bail for the WikiLeaks founder, but they must now physically go to a police station to fill out the official documentation, reports Dodd.

Share this:

You can hear an audio report on the decision from Guardian correspondent Luke Harding here. In the audio update, Harding says:

"I would expect him to be freed. Whether that takes hours or a little bit longer, I don't know, but it seems that he's going to be out."

Share this:

A British judge has denied the bail appeal, meaning that Assange will be freed, according to the Guardian.

Share this:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been released on bail following a week of legal drama over his extradition. The 39-year-old Australian is fighting moves to take him to Sweden...
LONDON (AP) — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been released on bail following a week of legal drama over his extradition. The 39-year-old Australian is fighting moves to take him to Sweden...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 543
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
11:21 AM on 12/17/2010
This is a story of David and Goliath.
10:54 AM on 12/17/2010
Just as with Al Capone, they finally got him on, of all things, tax evasion. I believe that when the U. S. draws a blank, they will feverishly look for other things such as did Julian spit in public, did he park in a no parking zone, did he step on a crack...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
09:41 AM on 12/17/2010
Who Precisely Is Attacking The World?
By Paul Craig Roberts
12-2-10

The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift onus from US State Department, Hillary Clinton paints Wikileaks' release of "diplomatic cables" as an "attack on the international community." To reveal truth is equivalent in the eyes of US government to an attack on world.

It is Wikileaks' fault that all those US diplomats wrote a quarter of a million undiplomatic messages about America's allies, a.k.a., puppet states. It is also Wikileaks' fault that a member of the US government could no longer stomach the cynical ways in which the US government manipulates foreign governments to serve, not their own people, but American interests, and delivered the incriminating evidence to Wikileaks.

The US government actually thinks that it was Wikileaks patriotic duty to return the evidence and to identify the leaker. After all, we mustn't let the rest of the world find out what we are up to. They might stop believing our lies.

The influential German magazine, Der Spiegel, writes: "It is nothing short of a political meltdown for US foreign policy."

This might be more a hope than a reality. The "Soviet threat" during second half of the 20th century enabled US governments to create institutions that subordinated the interests of other countries to those of the US government. After decades of following US leadership, European "leaders" know no other way to act.
balance article

http://www.rense.com/general92/hpdwv.htm
09:33 AM on 12/17/2010
BECAUSE less than 1% of the hundreds of thousands of documents has been published, a lot of powers that be (specially in the foreign policy department), are gravely concerned as to WHAT's COMING NEXT from the Wikileaks exposure... Such powers that be (e.g. US and some of the foreign politicians that US works with) will do everything in their power to stop Assange and its team or its supporters EVEN
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 AM on 12/17/2010
The US is going to waterboard that admission out of Manning whether it's true or not, so let's cut through the posturing here. There will be no American justice for Assange, just a lot of trumped up charges. The real question is how long are Americans willing to put up with the erosion of their constitution before realizing that's it's not Assange who's on trial, it's freedom of the press and freedom of speech. I suppose freedom of speech is not crucial to someone who has nothing to say so this will be an interesting litmus test. Too bad this test is costing two men so much.
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
02:35 PM on 12/18/2010
furby4, your points are insightful and accurate. The Assange and Wikileaks repression demonstrates how the process works, how the Constitution is shredded and discarded:--

First comes the banning of free speech, by labelling it deviant, unpatriotic, treasonous, ...
Next comes the banning of the right to listen, by shutting down internet websites, disrupting easy global access to information in the public domain.
Then comes the banning of the right and license to think, aloud to others or privately to oneself and one's family and friends, by (legal or illegal) wire-tapping, internet tracking of google searches, emails, ...
Finally, beginning with individuals singly and separately, putting offenders of the official orthodoxy in control of the corporate power and government apparatus into solitary confinement to drive them literally insane (this is how secret governments do it -- whether it's KGB or CIA), or by cruder unrefined methods making them physically disappear down the river, in shallow graves, or in crematory ovens. Eventually, if this insidious anti-democratic, anti-human process is not checked, discredited and dismantled, ... eventually the numbers of victims of this process would inevitably grow indiscriminately into the millions, or even into billions with 21st century technology of mass-destruction and mass-indoctrination, because NOBODY CARED.

It all starts with individual acts of conscience and the acts of their suppression. History of "Thousand Years' Reich" (1933to1945) clearly demonstrated how it happened and is on its inexorable path of replication in America.
08:17 AM on 12/17/2010
Bravo Julian . . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
06:48 AM on 12/17/2010
It won't be long before the cables reveal who told the CIA to work on what projects when, and the DoJ who to target and not target, and the IRS who to harass and abuse, and which cases to drop quietly........Oh this is going to be fun.
06:43 AM on 12/17/2010
I can understand Manning having access to the military cables re Iraq and Afghanistan but why would a lowly soldier have access to diplomatic cables.
If he did then then the security of the system is deeply flawed and whoever set it up should be seriously questioned.
I think there is more than one leaker involved in this. Manning is a scapegoat.
The govenment needs to realize that this is the world of today. Get used to being honest or get out.
08:42 AM on 12/17/2010
fanned Kate52 . . why indeed would a lowly soldier have access to diplomatic cables . . I suspect the whole system is flawed and the US is so embarrassed that is why they are going after Julian . . . he has done nothing wrong . . . .
09:26 AM on 12/17/2010
"access to diplomatic cables..." --- accordingly, it's the result of the integration of intelligence work among the numerous federal agencies. IOW, the issuance of personnel clearances may not be that organized, given that some personnel can now access sensitive information outside of their own departments...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zacky Ahmed
Astro-physics, Science, Politics
06:43 AM on 12/17/2010
They will probably water board Manning until he "confesses" and says Assange
encouraged me to do what i did.
In that way they get both of them.
But no matter what happens Wikileaks will continue
do not question that.
photo
Whinger
I'm Just Me!
04:56 AM on 12/17/2010
The international bloody minded conspiracy to persecute and silence the messenger....

This brainless international knee jerk reaction will ultimately fail, the only way to stop the leaks is to accept responsibility for the failure and work to put a secure system in place!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
04:11 AM on 12/17/2010
One has to love the British the commitment to freedom of speech.

If only the US could live up to that
04:49 AM on 12/17/2010
the british let assange go because obama insulted their Queen and Country. obama's reset button has been a total failure.
03:51 AM on 12/17/2010
This entire British-Sweden-USA circus is all about the US desire to persecute Assange because he embarassed them. The US Attorney General should be ashamed of himself, he certainly shames America.

Yet these touhg guys, ready to beat up a small Aussie, do nothing about any of the massive crimes by banksters that destroyed the country. OR the person who deliberately outed US agents about of revenge.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
06:32 AM on 12/17/2010
The DoJ is completely fake, especially the Civil Rights Division.
08:18 AM on 12/17/2010
fanned and fav'd Global One . . it is a travesty of justice . . . ditto . . this is about public embarrassment . . most of us were not surprised by the leaks . . most of it we already knew . . .
11:37 AM on 12/17/2010
Except I didn't know the U. S. was hiding cluster bombs in the U. K. and I didn't know that we were working hard to suppress criminal cases from surfacing in Spain and Germany against U. S. leaders and soldiers for war crimes and I had no idea thelevel of disdain that we had against Daniel Ortega after he democratically won the Nicaraguan elections and I didn't know our level of infiltration into Venezuela's Army nor that the U. S. is trying to ''persuade'' the brazilian government into adapting ''anti-terror'' measures similar to that of the U. S. and neither did I know that U. S. diplomats were following CIA directives to collect biometric, credit card, passowrd and other info from top U. N. diplomats including Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, etc., etc., etc.... and that's that WikiLeaks has only released
11:39 AM on 12/17/2010
and that's that WikiLeaks has only released
12:50 AM on 12/17/2010
REPOST from previous day:

DON'T BE SURPRISED -- IF:
Pfc MANNING, who is now in 23-hr solitary confinemen­t without blankets and pillows, will be coerced by US into making statements that Assange, "encourage­d him [MANNING] to "steal" confidenti­al US documents for WikiLeaks"­. [That is, Assange may have advised MANNING something like, I need "proof, documentat­ion" about any allege crimes by the US that MANNING is whistleblo­wing about.] In this case, the US can then say that Assange "conspired­" with MANNING on the theft of confidenti­al US informatio­n. And such is a "crime". IOW, whistleblo­wing is being "criminali­zed". Just my own thoughts..­.
03:27 AM on 12/17/2010
Unfortunately this is now true in the USA. The powers that be think nothing wrong in framing and victimising innocent people, or of torturing Americans, and will invent 'evidence' if they have to.

No country should extradite anybody to the USA at the present time. They are guaranteed to be victimised and found guilty, not even if they were Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Paine....there corruption is such that nobody is safe from their bile.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:23 AM on 12/17/2010
Look up Swedish laws related to what constitutes "rape". Either way, one of the accusers is in Palestine I think, and she's supposedly not cooperating anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
07:17 AM on 12/17/2010
She was supposed to have gone to Palestine, but canceled. It's believed she is still in Sweden. A woman (think her last name was Nunu?) who works for the Christian mission group that Ardin was supposed to work with had been contacted by a reporter and said Ardin cancelled at the last minute.
02:01 PM on 12/17/2010
I wonder what made her cancel?