More

CIA Waterboarding Legal Defense: $5 Million Shield For Pair Of Contractors

Cia Waterboarding Legal Defense

ADAM GOLDMAN and MATT APUZZO   12/17/10 01:52 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — When the CIA decided to waterboard suspected terror detainees in overseas prisons, the agency turned to a pair of contractors. The men designed the CIA's interrogation program and also personally took part in the waterboarding sessions.

But to do the job, the CIA had to promise to cover at least $5 million in legal fees for them in case there was trouble down the road, former U.S. officials said.

Turns out the contractors needed that secret agreement as taxpayers pay to defend the men in a federal investigation over an interrogation tactic the United States now says is torture. The deal is even more generous than the protections the agency typically provides its own officers, giving the two men access to more money to finance their defenses.

It has long been known that psychologists Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen created the CIA's interrogation program. But former U.S. intelligence officials said Mitchell and Jessen also repeatedly subjected terror suspects inside CIA-run secret prisons to waterboarding, a simulated drowning tactic.

The revelation of the contractors' involvement is the first known confirmation of any individuals who conducted waterboarding at the so-called black sites, underscoring just how much the agency relied on outside help in its most sensitive interrogations.

Normally, CIA officers buy insurance to cover possible legal bills. It costs about $300 a year for $1 million in coverage. Today, the CIA pays the premiums for most officers, but at the height of the war on terrorism, officers had to pay half.

The Mitchell and Jessen arrangement, known as an "indemnity promise," was structured differently. Unlike CIA officers, whose identities are classified, Mitchell and Jessen were public citizens who received some of the earliest scrutiny by reporters and lawmakers. The two wanted more protection.

The agency agreed to pay the legal bills for the psychologists' firm, Mitchell, Jessen & Associates, directly from CIA accounts, according to several interviews with the former officials, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.

The company has been embroiled in at least two high-profile Justice Department investigations, tapping the CIA to pay its legal bills. Neither Jamie Gorelick, who originally represented the company, nor Henry Schuelke, the current lawyer, returned messages seeking comment. Mitchell and Jessen also didn't return calls for comment.

The CIA would not comment on any indemnity agreement.

"It's been nearly eight years since waterboarding – an interrogation method used on three detainees – was last used as part of a terrorist detention program that no longer exists," CIA spokesman George Little said.

After the terrorism attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mitchell and Jessen sold the government on an interrogation program for high-value al-Qaida members. The two psychologists had spent years training military officials to resist interrogations and, in doing so, had subjected U.S. troops to techniques such as forced nudity, painful stress positions, sleep deprivation and waterboarding.

But those interrogations had always been training sessions at the military's school known as SERE – Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape. They had never conducted any actual interrogations.

That changed in 2002 with the capture of suspected al-Qaida facilitator Abu Zubaydah. The agency believed tougher-than-usual tactics were necessary to squeeze information from him, so Mitchell and Jessen flew to a secret CIA prison in Thailand to oversee Zubaydah's interrogation.

The pair waterboarded Zubaydah 83 times, according to previously released records and former intelligence officials. Mitchell and Jessen did the bulk of the work, claiming they were the only ones who knew how to apply the techniques properly, the former officials said.

The waterboarding technique involved "binding the detainee to a bench with his feet elevated above his head," formerly top-secret documents explain. "The detainee's head is immobilized and an interrogator places a cloth over the detainee's mouth and nose while pouring water onto the cloth in a controlled manner."

The documents add that "airflow is restricted for 20 to 40 seconds and the technique produces the sensation of drowning and suffocation." The session was not supposed to last more than 20 minutes.

The psychologists also waterboarded USS Cole bombing plotter Abd al-Nashiri twice in Thailand, according to former intelligence officials.

The role of Mitchell and Jessen in the interrogation of confessed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is a bit murkier.

At least one other interrogator was involved in those sessions, with the company providing support, a former official said. Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times in Poland in 2003, according to documents and former intelligence officials.

The CIA inspector general concluded in a top secret report in 2004 that the waterboarding technique used by the CIA deviated from the rules outlined by the Justice Department and the common practice at SERE school. CIA interrogations involved far more water poured constantly over the prisoner, investigators said.

"One of the psychologists/interrogators acknowledged that the agency's use of the technique differed from that used in SERE training and explained that the agency's technique is different because it is 'for real' and is more poignant and convincing," the inspector general's report said.

It was not clear whether Mitchell or Jessen made that remark.

Justice Department prosecutor John Durham is investigating whether any CIA officers or contractors, including Mitchell and Jessen, should face criminal charges.

In at least two instances, Mitchell and Jessen pushed back. During Zubaydah's interrogation, the psychologists argued he had endured enough waterboarding, believing they had reached the point of "diminishing returns." But CIA superiors told them to press forward, two former officials said.

In another case, Mitchell and Jessen successfully argued against waterboarding admitted terrorist Ramzi Binalshibh in Poland, the official said.

On top of the waterboarding case, Mitchell and Jessen also needed lawyers to help navigate the Justice Department's investigation into the destruction of CIA interrogation videos.

Mitchell and Jessen were recorded interrogating Zubaydah and al-Nashiri and were eager to see those tapes destroyed, fearing their release would jeopardize their safety, former officials and others close to the matter said.

They often contacted senior CIA officials, urging them to destroy the tapes and asking what was taking so long, said a person familiar with the Durham investigation who insisted on anonymity because the case's details remain sensitive. Finally the CIA's top clandestine officer, Jose Rodriguez, made the decision to destroy the tapes in November 2005.

Durham investigated whether that was a crime. He subpoenaed Mitchell, Jessen & Associates last year, looking for calendars, e-mails and phone records showing contact between the contractors and Rodriguez or his chief of staff, according to a federal subpoena. They were ordered to appear before a grand jury in northern Virginia in August 2009.

Last month, Durham closed the investigation into the destruction of the tapes without filing charges.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — When the CIA decided to waterboard suspected terror detainees in overseas prisons, the agency turned to a pair of contractors. The men designed the CIA's interrogation program and a...
WASHINGTON — When the CIA decided to waterboard suspected terror detainees in overseas prisons, the agency turned to a pair of contractors. The men designed the CIA's interrogation program and a...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,473
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (31 total)
01:54 PM on 12/19/2010
I think if we would have just given those prisoners, and future prisoners, or people who want bomb and kill us.. For no other reason, than we don't agree with their religion beliefs.. And we should believe as they do.. We should give them a hug, and bet they would be ok.. They would just leave us alone... Anyone want bet on this..?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
06:08 PM on 12/19/2010
There is something familiar about your writing style. I'm guessing you are one of the "banned" returned to make another try.

Faux news much?

Aside from the unhinged style of your writing, your thought process is beyond ignorant.

"For no other reason, than we don't agree with their religious beliefs"? Seriously? You might be that simple, but their reasons certainly are not.

And NO ONE is offering "giving them a hug" as a reasonable response to their aggression. What most people ARE saying is "Becoming THEM isn't a reasonable response."

Sadly for those who can justify TORTURE, it isn't a case of "becoming THEM", you already were THEM.
10:17 PM on 12/18/2010
Aren't we as a self respecting Nation supposed to stand for something superior in character to those who would commit such brutality and lawlessness against us.? Aren't we supposed to be fighting for the preservation of society and civilization? If we are lured to the level of inhumane thugs then they have won and made their world ours.Even if torture had a better efficacy rate then the remarkably low one it has there are still certain principles that we all should be willing to die for . It takes no integrity to act as an animal and get our desired results. It takes amazing amounts integrity to live as a man and know we fought for the right desires.
09:27 AM on 12/19/2010
You hit the two key issues applescruff. If we want to claim the moral high ground, we have to use it, otherwise our hypocrisy negates such a claim. As you said, "they have won and made their world ours." The other key issue is, what useful intelligence is gleaned from these techniques? Since they (including Bush) said they got useful information, but won't tell us what it is, I have to assume they got none. People that think water boarding is a useful intelligence tool aren't doing the cost/benefit analysis and watched too much Jack Bauer in 24. Cost, lost of international respect and credibility. Benefit, useless intelligence. The only way to recover is to come clean, prosecute the perpetrators and establish policy to never go there again. But alas, I'm a dreamer. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-military-tells-jack-bauer-cut-out-the-torture-scenes--or-else-436143.html
02:36 PM on 12/19/2010
Agreed.

"You're not the only one" (ie. Dreamer)
We have too many Americans that never matured as human beings. .
photo
SageSpencer
Angel brought Him the leaden heart & the dead bird
06:23 PM on 12/18/2010
The United States of America: We are making the world SAFER. Torturing people, one at a time!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:41 PM on 12/18/2010
Cage and neuter the CIA .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:40 PM on 12/18/2010
Jose Rodriguez, Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen should be tried and then what is done to
people who commit treason should be done to these three men .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
05:32 PM on 12/18/2010
I don't know, maybe this waterboarding stuff isn't so bad, maybe it can help clear things up during that next budget meeting...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
P51MUSTANG
From the planet Sarcasia
05:32 PM on 12/18/2010
So do we need a NEW law prohibiting the government from indemnifying contractors against breaking the law?

(US Code 18 Chapter 113c, prohibition on torture).
photo
timetraveler2039
Choose peace.
04:42 PM on 12/18/2010
Perhaps all the uproar over Wikileaks is an attempt to cover up Truth about torture, secret prisons, secret wiretaps.......it isn't the crime, it's the cover up! In many ways we are no better than the people we criticize for torture, secret prisons........
05:32 PM on 12/18/2010
We have become worst.
Our crimes and corruption has not only destroy the lives of our citizens , but has reached around the world.
We no longer have American corporations. They have become Global Empires which no longer give a darn about the citizens of this country,, but use us for financing their crimes overseas.
03:16 PM on 12/18/2010
The well known Americans (legal, scholars, and media) who supported Jr's torture will not be treated kindly by history.
02:57 PM on 12/18/2010
The original title of this picture was SURPRISE 50TH B-DAY GOES HORRIBLY WRONG.
02:49 PM on 12/18/2010
Everything You Need to Know about the War on Terror

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/blueskybigstar/tsa-pats-down-videos_n_786681_68362191.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
02:17 PM on 12/18/2010
Obviously these people should have no legal shield or money from the government.
Just lock them away till they're found guilty, than keep them locked up for the rest of their lives.
Allow their victims to sue in civil court so their families are bankrupted.
photo
Guytar
I'm sorry that I made you cry
01:41 PM on 12/18/2010
Who authorised water boarding during the Bush administration?
03:22 PM on 12/18/2010
Santa Claus a.k.a Chris Kringle.
03:41 PM on 12/18/2010
Bush said -- on video -- that he did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Australopitenico
Caveman, not Australian
04:35 PM on 12/18/2010
And yet he is not at The Hague, sigh.
01:36 PM on 12/18/2010
AM I supposed to agree with this because WE used bottle water or that WE gave him a raincoat?? I think w asked his dad how it was really done it in the cia,one chief to the other.
photo
Guytar
I'm sorry that I made you cry
01:49 PM on 12/18/2010
No, Water boarding is torture. Japanese officers were executed for this crime against Allied POWs in WW2.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
03:23 PM on 12/18/2010
True.
01:29 PM on 12/18/2010
What is the issue? The people who are outraged by this are prepared to give taxpayer funded legal representation to the terrorist who killed thousands of Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Australopitenico
Caveman, not Australian
02:04 PM on 12/18/2010
Here, take your 50 cents, go buy something nice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Laney
09:11 PM on 12/18/2010
You are damned right on that one, bub. Everyone is entitled to their day in court and adequate representation in this country, even though in practice we fall far short of the mark for those without lots of money. What country do you represent?