More

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal Passes In Senate, 65-31

ANNE FLAHERTY   12/18/10 10:36 PM ET   AP

Dadt Repeal

WASHINGTON — In a historic vote for gay rights, the Senate agreed on Saturday to do away with the military's 17-year ban on openly gay troops and sent President Barack Obama legislation to overturn the Clinton-era policy known as "don't ask, don't tell."

Obama was expected to sign the bill into law next week, although changes to military policy probably wouldn't take effect for at least several months. Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers must first certify that lifting the ban won't hurt troops' ability to fight. After that, the military would undergo a 60-day wait period.

Repeal would mean that, for the first time in American history, gays would be openly accepted by the armed forces and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.

More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.

"It is time to close this chapter in our history," Obama said in a statement. "It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed."

The Senate voted 65-31 to pass the bill, with eight Republicans siding with 55 Democrats and two independents in favor of repeal. The House had passed an identical version of the bill, 250-175, earlier this week.

Supporters hailed the Senate vote as a major step forward for gay rights. Many activists hope that integrating openly gay troops within the military will lead to greater acceptance in the civilian world, as it did for blacks after President Harry Truman's 1948 executive order on equal treatment regardless of race in the military.

"The military remains the great equalizer," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. "Just like we did after President Truman desegregated the military, we'll someday look back and wonder what took Washington so long to fix it."

Sen. John McCain, Obama's GOP rival in 2008, led the opposition. Speaking on the Senate floor minutes before a crucial test vote, the Arizona Republican acknowledged he couldn't stop the bill. He blamed elite liberals with no military experience for pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.

"They will do what is asked of them," McCain said of service members. "But don't think there won't be a great cost."

How the military will implement a change in policy, and how long that will take remains unclear. Senior Pentagon officials have said the new policy could be rolled out incrementally, service by service or unit by unit.

In a statement issued immediately after the vote, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he will begin the certification process immediately. But any change in policy won't come until after careful consultation with military service chiefs and combatant commanders, he said.

"Successful implementation will depend upon strong leadership, a clear message and proactive education throughout the force," he said.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he welcomes the change.

"No longer will able men and women who want to serve and sacrifice for their country have to sacrifice their integrity to do so," he said. "We will be a better military as a result."

Sen. Carl Levin, a chief proponent of repeal, said he has received a commitment from the administration that it won't drag its heels.

"We hope it will be sooner, rather than later," he said.

The fate of "don't ask, don't tell" had been far from certain earlier this year when Obama called for its repeal in his State of the Union address. Despite strong backing from liberals in Congress, Republicans and conservative Democrats remained skeptical that lifting the ban could be done quickly without hurting combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In February, Mullen provided the momentum Obama needed by telling a packed Senate hearing room that he felt the law was unjust. As chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mullen became the first senior active-duty officer in the military to suggest that gays could serve openly without affecting military effectiveness.

"No matter how I look at the issue," Mullen said, "I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens."

With Mullen's backing, Gates ordered a yearlong study on the impact, including a survey of troops and their families.

The study, released Nov. 30, found that two-thirds of service members didn't think changing the law would have much of an effect. But of those who did predict negative consequences, most were assigned to combat arms units. The statistic became ammunition for opponents of repeal, including the service chiefs of the Army and Marine Corps.

"I don't want to lose any Marines to the distraction," Gen. James Amos, head of the Marine Corps, told reporters. "I don't want to have any Marines that I'm visiting at Bethesda (Naval Medical Center) with no legs be the result of any type of distraction."

Mullen and Gates counter that the fear of disruption is overblown and could be addressed through training. They note the Pentagon's finding that 92 percent of troops who believe they have served with a gay person saw no effect on their units' morale or effectiveness.

But even with backing from Gates and Mullen, the bill appeared all but dead this month when Senate Republicans united against it on procedural grounds. In last-minute wrangling, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was able to revive the bill during the rare Saturday session with just days to go before the lame-duck session was to end.

The Republicans who voted for repeal said the Pentagon study on gays and assurances from senior military leaders played a crucial role.

"The repeal of 'don't ask, don't tell' will be implemented in a common sense way," said Ohio Republican Sen. George Voinovich. "Our military leaders have assured Congress that our troops will engage in training and address relevant issues before instituting this policy change."

Advocacy groups were jubilant following the Senate's initial test vote that passed 63-33 and set up final passage. The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network called the issue the "defining civil rights initiative of this decade." Supporters of repeal filled the visitor seats overlooking the Senate floor, ready to protest had the bill failed.

"This has been a long-fought battle, but this failed and discriminatory law will now be history," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign.

At least 25 countries allow gays to serve openly in the armed forces, among them Britain, Canada and Israel, according to the Palm Center, a research institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

___

Online:

Pentagon study: http://tinyurl.com/23lxc49

Servicemembers Legal Defense Network: http://www.sldn.org/

Information on the bill, H.R. 2965, can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — In a historic vote for gay rights, the Senate agreed on Saturday to do away with the military's 17-year ban on openly gay troops and sent President Barack Obama legislation to overt...
WASHINGTON — In a historic vote for gay rights, the Senate agreed on Saturday to do away with the military's 17-year ban on openly gay troops and sent President Barack Obama legislation to overt...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,243
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (46 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Steamboater 11:58 AM on 12/18/2010
An MSNBC reporter said early this am (Alex...the blonde woman with the big hair) that she spoke to some general, and he told her if repeal is passed the military then has has to figure out barrack arrangements and arrangements about toilets etc. I hope that doesn't happen because seperate facilities still keeps Gays and Lesbians as The Other and would make passage of this repeal a failure. Let's just hope  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Motorgoon
02:23 AM on 12/19/2010
mrs. Truth, it is so sad you are so disillusioned. If there were no gays, wo would do all the flawless hair and music like elton john and geroge micael and liberace. Imagine a world without gays. And miss thang I will tell you, I'm a mean ass drill sgt. In the u.s. marine corps, when I take my boots off and lay down my gun at the end of the day, I curl up with my husband to watch diy network. There's lots of us out here and we have no gay agenda, its called equality and fairness. Something you know nothing about. And well maybe not liberace, but cher is a good stand in, she's so gay friendly, she may as well be a sister too!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Motorgoon
02:17 AM on 12/19/2010
First off, let me say that this is a good day for America. For those of us who have lost faith, this restores the promise of equality in America. Now for the angry rant: where does John McCain and his croanie from the Family Leadership Council get off saying such awful hate and get away with it in this day and age?if people made comments about african americans or mexican americans like that, there would be riots and total destruction nationwide. Shame on McCain and what's his face. Until they walk a day in this season Manolo Blahniks like half of my drag queen comrades in San Francisco, they won't know what hate is like. Never in my lifetime have I seen such organized hared. So now this DADT is law, I say with all my heart, piss on you to those who hate to see equality. Marriage is next and here we come baby! I'm cracking my vintage Grand Dame and kicking up my heels. But palion and mccain wouldn't know what grand dame is because you can't buy it at walmart.
12:54 AM on 12/19/2010
The agenda of the homosexual population is to be legitimized. The repeal of DADT is just another step towards special treatment.
photo
Unsui
You callin' my Bio micro?!
04:29 PM on 12/19/2010
Your handle is perfect, you miss the truth alright!
12:20 AM on 12/19/2010
Thank your parents. They weren't gay.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Involver
12:22 AM on 12/19/2010
Your hatred for mankind is unmatched. Congratulations.
12:25 AM on 12/19/2010
It's a love for human kind. Two homosexuals have never created a child.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
12:47 AM on 12/19/2010
Mine weren't fundamentalists either.
12:07 AM on 12/19/2010
wow, and they did it without our Obama... congrats
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
12:48 AM on 12/19/2010
You do understand the concept of separation of powers, I hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Purcy
12:04 AM on 12/19/2010
"Sen. John McCain, Obama's GOP rival in 2008, led the opposition. Speaking on the Senate floor minutes before a crucial test vote, the Arizona Republican acknowledged he couldn't stop the bill. He blamed elite liberals with no military experience for pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime." Shame on John McCain. He knows that what he is saying is not true and that it is past time for DADT to be repealed. I applaud those who voted in favor of that repeal and absolutely believe they are on the right side of history. It is a great day for America and wonderful that the gay/lesbian who so honorably serve in the military are now being afforded the rights they have been fighting for, for the rest of us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
12:49 AM on 12/19/2010
Elite liberals with no military experience like John Kerry, Jim Webb and Dan Inouye?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:03 AM on 12/19/2010
It was about damn time...
11:54 PM on 12/18/2010
The GOP still in the after glow of getting the tax cut for the rich decided not to stop this. It shouldn't have taken this long.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
theuniversalcollective
from the ether that is net
11:54 PM on 12/18/2010
With this repeal, I am once again proud of my President, I am once again proud of both houses of Congress, and I am as I have always been , proud to be a citizen of this great and free country. God Bless Barack Obama for fulfilling his promise, God Bless our men and women of every shape, stripe, and orientation who protect us from harm, and God bless The United States of America. 6.5 More Years !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12:07 AM on 12/19/2010
he didn't do anything- work of coongress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Not all liberals are silly.
12:50 AM on 12/19/2010
What was he supposed to do to get "coongress" to change the law, that he didn't already do?
amtheone
I have wonderful children and a new grandbaby
12:37 AM on 12/19/2010
Thank you "theuniversecollective". F&F
amtheone
I have wonderful children and a new grandbaby
11:53 PM on 12/18/2010
I am glad this passed but are they lbgt community going to be as vocal about this accomplishment as they were that President Obama did not sign an executive order? I would love to see someone on the Sunday line up praising the President for once!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeepBlueShe
11:53 PM on 12/18/2010
Whoops...shouldv'e said a teabagger TYPE of split or sect. My bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rktboy
Fire this mother up!!
11:52 PM on 12/18/2010
Amen.
11:52 PM on 12/18/2010
Hmm, don't know how I feel. I am not sure if there is a moral question on this or not, so I'll suspend judgment.
11:58 PM on 12/18/2010
Correcting a social injustice is never a moral problem....we are all human beings!
12:05 AM on 12/19/2010
The point is that I am not so sure that this was a social injustice.
01:12 AM on 12/19/2010
Wow. So how is your right to privacy socially unjust. This new act will require applicants to claim their sexual preference. Seperate and divided. Not very strong for any united force.
11:51 PM on 12/18/2010
I'm old, I've seen a lot in the last 70+ years, and I must say, today's vote to allow homosexuals to serve openly in the United States military is a very, very big deal. This day will go down in history as marking one of the most significant social changes in the history of this country.

One of the greatest characteristics of America is that social changes are resisted and fought against, but eventually changes are made for the better. I know a man who joined the Navy a long time ago when discrimination against blacks was rampant. He had the brains and discipline to become an admiral, but as an African American he was denied the opportunity to become an officer. He served his country loyally anyway and became an aide to several admirals during his career.

A generation from now, the idea that homosexuals were unfit to serve in the military will have disappeared entirely in exactly the same way that the idea that African Americans were unfit to be officers has disappeared.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeepBlueShe
12:01 AM on 12/19/2010
A hug, Machiventa.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Involver
12:05 AM on 12/19/2010
Very nicely articulated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeepBlueShe
11:49 PM on 12/18/2010
Whoa!...let's remember we're all (most of us here) are on the same team. A tea-bagger party movement/"split" will only do us harm. C'mon {{peeps}}. I'm to blame too, but Wowee, I do NOT want us to end up fractured. Yes, there are sub-parties, I get that...but look across the aisle. I really truly do not want us to go down that creepy road.
11:53 PM on 12/18/2010
Seriously...tea baggers...I'm gonna be sick!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeepBlueShe
11:58 PM on 12/18/2010
Divine...take a look at my post above: in my hurry to get it out there I blew it...anyway...here it is:

"Whoops...s­hould've said a teabagger TYPE of split or sect. My bad."