More

Pakistani Spy Agency Denies It Unmasked CIA Chief

NAHAL TOOSI   12/18/10 07:54 PM ET   AP

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's main spy agency denied it had unmasked the CIA's station chief in Islamabad, and warned such allegations could damage its already fragile counterterrorism alliance with the United States.

The CIA pulled its top spy out of Pakistan on Thursday amid death threats after his name emerged publicly a few weeks ago from a Pakistani man threatening to sue the CIA over the alleged deaths of his son and brother in a 2009 U.S. missile strike. The attorney involved with the complaint said he learned the name from Pakistani journalists.

But the station chief's outing has spurred questions whether Pakistan's spy service might have leaked the information. Lawsuits filed last month in New York City in connection with the 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai, India, also may have raised tensions by naming Pakistan's intelligence chief as a defendant.

The recall of the top American intelligence official in Pakistan comes at a delicate time.

The White House over the past week released the results of a review of progress in the war in neighboring Afghanistan. The report included the conclusion that the existence of safe havens for militants on Pakistan's side of the border remained a major obstacle to defeating the Taliban and al-Qaida.

Pakistan's assistance in clearing those militant hideouts – and providing intelligence to help the U.S. pinpoint targets for its covert, drone-fired missile strikes – is considered crucial. A breakdown in the relationship with Pakistani intelligence could be a major blow to the U.S.

An official with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, its lead spy agency and a powerful force in the country, said Saturday any suggestions it outed the station chief were "a slur."

In particular, he denied the notion that the U.S. lawsuits had spurred the ISI to retaliate.

Such "unfounded stories can create differences between the two organizations," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he is not cleared to brief the media.

The U.S. lawsuits were filed last month, and the plaintiffs include relatives of victims in the Mumbai attacks, which left 166 people and nine attackers dead. The assault has been blamed on the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, which is listed as a defendant in the suit.

But they also list the ISI and its chief, Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha. The suits repeat long-standing allegations that the ISI "has long nurtured and used international terrorist groups," including Lashkar.

"Defendant ISI provided critical planning, material support, control and coordination of the attacks," the lawsuits allege in pursuing wrongful death and additional claims against the ISI, Pasha and others.

The lawsuits claim at one point that a safe house in Pakistan used in connection with the attacks was part of the ISI's "Karachi Project" – "an initiative by which anti-Indian groups were tasked and/or supported by the ISI in a surreptitious fashion to engage in acts of international terrorism."

Pakistan has denied any government agency was involved in the attacks in India, its archrival with whom it has fought three wars since 1947. Islamabad has detained seven suspects in the case, but their trials have stalled in the country's slow-moving court system. India has convicted the sole surviving gunman in the attack.

It's unclear how far the U.S. lawsuits will go or how quickly they will move, but being named in such legal documents is an embarrassment to the ISI and Pasha.

"We are in the process of serving all defendants," James Kreindler, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, wrote in an e-mail. "Most have been served, which triggers their obligation to answer."

The Pakistani intelligence official said the CIA has not directly accused the ISI of any wrongdoing in the revelation of the station chief's name.

The station chief in Islamabad operates as a virtual military commander in the U.S. war against al-Qaida and other militant groups hidden along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. The chief runs the Predator drone program targeting terrorists and handles some of the CIA's most urgent and sensitive tips.

He also collaborates closely with Pakistani intelligence. The alliance has led to strikes on key militant leaders but has also been marred by spats between the two agencies and ongoing suspicion that the ISI has not fully severed its ties to the Afghan Taliban, which it supported before the Sept. 11 attacks in 2001.

During the first term of President George W. Bush's administration, Pakistan almost expelled a previous CIA station chief in a dispute about intelligence sharing.

Pakistanis involved in the threatened lawsuit over the missile strikes have held rallies in Islamabad featuring posters bearing the CIA officer's name and urging him to leave the country.

A number of Americans and other Westerners, including a Wall Street Journal correspondent, have had to leave Pakistan or take extra precautions after their names surfaced in press reports as possible spies for the CIA, Israel or India. Some right-wing newspapers have even printed Westerners' addresses or claimed they were Jewish in some articles.

___

Associated Press writer Adam Goldman in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's main spy agency denied it had unmasked the CIA's station chief in Islamabad, and warned such allegations could damage its already fragile counterterrorism alliance with th...
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's main spy agency denied it had unmasked the CIA's station chief in Islamabad, and warned such allegations could damage its already fragile counterterrorism alliance with th...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 241
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
04:14 PM on 12/21/2010
The US cant win in Afghanistan.

And to cover this up every ideologue out there likes to blame someone else for their own bad decisions. Pakistan in this case is everyone's favorite whipping boy. Gets blamed for even the common cold.

According to Patreaus's own counter insurgency manual, the US needs 20-25 soldiers for every 1000 civilians.

http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/coin/repository/FM_3-24.pdf

Please see Page 25 and I quote.

"Most density recommendations fall within a range of 20 to 25 counterinsurgents for every 1000 residents in an AO. Twenty counterinsurgents per 1000 residents is often considered the minimum troop density required for effective COIN operations"

Afghanistan has a population of 28 million people.

This means that at a MINIMUM, the US needs to deploy 560,000 troops and for EFFECTIVE counter insurgency atleast 700,000 troops are needed.

The US is currently spending 2 billion a week for keeping 94,000 troops in Afghanistan. Imagine the cost at 560,000.

These arent my figures. These are by the top guy leading the charge in Afghanistan.

Let me draw a parallel.

India needs 700,000 troops to hold on to Kashmir. That is one soldier for every 10 Kashmiri civilians. Kashmir regularly erupts in violence but India is able to manage the whole thing at enormous cost.

US would need 2.8 million deployed troops if it follows India's lead.

The US needs to withdraw and let the majority pushtuns back into power in Afghanistan. Let actual democracy prevail
02:22 AM on 12/21/2010
to MOONWALK
dont worry buddy;you are ahead of time;smart !.
USA hit countries were/are: iraq>.afghanistan>syria>iran>saudi arabia>egypt AND finally PAKISTAN.
1/2 of the world's oil will be owned by USA. " the new world order "
02:07 AM on 12/21/2010
to moonwalk
be rest assured that uncle sam-usa dont give out 'free lunch' to anyone with out getting something in return.with pakistan/india is bumber/bauncer against chinese influence in the region..in regards to israel it is a weapons storage/springboard to the middle east saga including iran and turkish influence.japan and south korea military bases to control the economic and military aspects of all asia.finally,britan;it is the hound dog to keep the european community/russia to behave and be subseivant to NATO- arm of usa military policy and expansion.
CarmanK
democrat, retired tax acct
01:00 AM on 12/20/2010
Just what is the big deal here??? So, Pakistan reveals the identity of a spy. GEE, didn't that happen here?? Where our VP and friends, including the WAPO columnist Robert Novak collude to reveal the identity of a CIA operative for purely political gain!! Nobody got upset about that. No prosecutions, except for poor Scooter Libby whose wife said if he didn't get "freed", she would reveal a lot more. Scooter is just doing fine isn't he. Revealing a CIA operative by a foreign entity, why how could that possibly be more offensive than to be betrayed by our OWN with no consequences to them. Pakistanis do what they have to do to survive!! It is obvious, we cannot hold them to a higher standard than we do our own. And their motives is survival as well as loyalty to their own country.
05:20 PM on 12/19/2010
Just like Iraq, we are fighting in the wrong country in Afghanistan. Pakistan is where we should be
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
07:17 AM on 12/20/2010
So your argument is that instead of Iraq you should have gone to war with Iran?

:D

Let me draw a picture for you. Iraq is a 25 million fractured nation with 60% Shia and 40% Sunni population.

Instead of that you wanted to invade Iran a 60 million nation with a pretty united and nutty populace. Good luck with that.

Then we come to AFPAK.

Afghanistan is a nation of 28 million with approx 50 % pushtun and the rest are smaller ethnicities. There is no heavy weaponry to speak of. The best anyone can call the talibs is that they're a militia; not an army.

So you ignore that and head for a nation (Pakistan) of 175 million people who have the fifth largest standing army in the world and makes its own nukes, tanks, cruise missiles, fighter planes and ships?????

Germany was a nation of 80 million during the second world war

That might just work.
01:46 PM on 12/20/2010
Iran had no role to play in 911. Your comprehension skills appear to be a bit off since i did not mention iran at all. I was talking about pakistan. Maybe you are not a native english speaker. Regarding pakistan, you are talking about an army which is poorly trained and is no match for the US armed forces. The Pakistan army is cannon fodder like most third world armies with poor pay, training and motivation. They fight to feed themselves and their family and not for any higher purposes. Thats the reason they have performed poorly against the Taliban in Pakistan. And don't forget that Pakistan cannot function without the financial and military aid we give them. I wouldn't be surprised if we had a kill switch on the more lethal equipment we give these people just in case.
01:10 PM on 12/19/2010
In my comments below, I wrote , "Besides, as Wikileaks have revealed, Pakistani military and politician­s don't move an inch without taking directions from their US masters. Mumbai attacks, if Pakistan was involved, could not have come without US cooperatin­g.

In this regard, read about CIA-FBI-ISI - LeT collusion on Mumbai attacks and historically before that here:

http://www.countercurrents.org/mithiborwala291010.htm

The Headley Saga: What Are They Hiding?

By Feroze Mithiborwala

“The speculation gaining respectability in Delhi is that Washington knew in advance about the Mumbai attack & deliberately chose not to pass the details to Delhi .” That would he said, “Reveal the links between the CIA-ISI & LeT”. - MK Bhadrakumar (ex-Ambassador, GOI).

“Headley was a deep penetration agent of US Intelligence” - Bahukutumbi Raman (Former Counter-Terrorism Chief (RAW).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
01:55 PM on 12/19/2010
To be very honest;

B Raman is known as BS Raman in Pakistani circles. The guys a bit of a nut...
02:23 PM on 12/19/2010
PZ,

I agree. My point is different though. All I am trying to say is that whenever someone points a finger at Pakistan, 3 fingers point at themselves - CIA, Pentagon and Indians for purposely implicating Pakistan alone in every thing that happens in the world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeBelAge
04:20 PM on 12/19/2010
Smoke screen and propaganda of the highest order to cover for the Pakistan's involvement. Headly was working as an agent for the DEA to cover for his dealings with terrorist. He infiltrated the US government in order to travel the globe un-noticed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
07:19 AM on 12/20/2010
Why would he need to infiltrate the govt to "travel the globe un-noticed"?

He was already a US citizen.
04:25 PM on 12/20/2010
LeBelAge,

When you get into an argument, you can't come with lukeworm response.

First of all, the article I quoted is from an Indian analyst and many quotes appearing therein are from Indian spokepersons and experts on intelligence at a very high level.

Secondly, the Indian experts themselves are claimimg that CIA-FBI knew about the hideous plans of Headly and did not tell India. At least Americans could have alerted New Delhi about those plans. So if there was "smoke screen and propaganda of the highest order to cover for the Pakistan's involvemen­t" then why do you Indians blame Pakistan only? Why don't you hold the USA equally accountable? Why do you have two separate measures for Gori Chumdee (White Skin ) and Desi Chumdee (brown skin)?
12:48 PM on 12/19/2010
On how media twists the facts ranging from matters like Iraqi WMDs to what the convicted terrorist Faisal Shahzad actually said in the court, read an article by Michael Moore here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/juan-williams-is-right-po_b_772766.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeBelAge
12:38 PM on 12/19/2010
Pakistan is currently allowing 43 terrorist camps to operate within its borders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
01:47 PM on 12/19/2010
Please point these out...

Lets see them on Google Earth...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeBelAge
04:22 PM on 12/19/2010
Do you expect the average person to have the coordinates of terrorist camps? Read wikileaks. You either believe them or you don't. I'm just reporting what I read.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:57 AM on 12/19/2010
The pink sign being held in the photo says it all, even though is should say 'are' instead of is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeBelAge
12:39 PM on 12/19/2010
The pink signs says that hyperbole is not exclusive to American conservatives. Its a world wife phenomena.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:56 PM on 12/19/2010
It isn't hyperbole if it is true.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Butterfly M
11:27 AM on 12/19/2010
Serves you right for paying the Pakistni Army/ISI $20Billion
12:53 PM on 12/19/2010
$ 20 b? What saffron color drug are you on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
-PZ-
Amateurs talk tactics, profession­als talk logist
01:53 PM on 12/19/2010
Thats what happens when you're consuming too much daal and chubji... The ammonia gets to your head...

:)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cybersense
10:44 AM on 12/19/2010
I read some of these comments and think about how little is done in the way of understanding what happened. I read the article, then look at the comments and it's amazing what is not understood.
Progressives-Unite
Never vote against your interests.
10:36 AM on 12/19/2010
Yes and Pakistani's had nothing to do with the Mumbai Massacre either.
12:41 PM on 12/19/2010
That could be true. The guy who had links to Mumbai was arrested in Chicago. The US did not allow Indians to question him. This is open to debate. Many people have postulated that he would have disclosed CIA links to Mumbai attacks.

Besides, as Wikileaks have revealed, Pakistani military and politicians don't move an inch without taking directions from their US masters. Mumbai attacks, if Pakistan was involved, could not have come without US cooperating. I admit that this is circumstantial evidence at best. However, you seem to believe what media tells us to believe, which is mostly hearsay, anectodal and sometimes analogical evidence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
08:04 AM on 12/19/2010
Wow...CIA keeps shootin itself in the foot....Just imagine of yr intelligence dept is a joke....Be scared be very scared...
11:18 AM on 12/19/2010
Not really, the Station Chief is just moved around, these things happen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schweik
07:14 AM on 12/19/2010
With friends like Pakistan, who need enemas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:54 AM on 12/19/2010
Josef, you crack me up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schweik
08:57 AM on 12/19/2010
The crack about the crack is worthy of Rabelais-esque Schweik humor.

Weiter dienen!
10:05 AM on 12/19/2010
It may be the other way around too :p
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Riddler This
Engineer, accountant, analyst, independent.
03:42 AM on 12/19/2010
Go figure! Pakistan doesn't like us, and I don't blame them. Were running amuck over there and for nothing. Pakistan better shape up tho because were going to be their buddies for the next 100 years!