iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Quiet Deal On Obama Judicial Nominees Unfolds In Senate After Prolonged GOP Blockade

DAVID ESPO   12/20/10 03:02 PM ET   AP

Obama Appointee Confirmation Deal

WASHINGTON — After a monthslong blockade, Senate Republicans have agreed to let at least 19 of President Barack Obama's non-controversial judicial nominees win confirmation in the waning days of the congressional session in exchange for a commitment by Democrats not to seek votes on four others, according to officials familiar with the deal.

Among the four is Goodwin Liu, a law school dean seen as a potential future Supreme Court pick, whose current nomination to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has sparked strong criticism from Republicans.

As part of the arrangement, the Senate has approved 10 judges in the past few days without a single dissenting vote. One of them, Albert Diaz, had been awaiting confirmation to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., since clearing the Judiciary Committee in January.

The agreement was worked out between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Republican counterpart, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, with the knowledge of the White House, officials said. Spokesmen for the two Senate leaders declined comment.

In the talks, Reid also pushed for confirmation for James Cole, whom Obama picked last spring for the No. 2 post in the Justice Department. His nomination to be deputy attorney general is opposed by Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the senior Republican on the Judiciary Committee, and its fate is unclear.

Officials described the maneuvering on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to discuss private conversations.

Judicial nominations have become intensely political in recent years as presidents seek approval for nominees who frequently spark opposition from outside interest groups aligned with the opposing party as well as from senators themselves.

Democrats filibustered several of President George W. Bush's conservative nominees, refusing to allow a vote on some for years. The logjam was broken in the spring of 2005 in a compromise that allowed some to be confirmed while a smaller number were jettisoned.

More recently, Democrats have accused Republicans of delaying confirmation of even non-controversial nominees advanced by Obama by refusing to permit them to come to a vote without a time-consuming process than can take three days on the Senate floor.

In remarks over the weekend, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said 49 circuit and district court nominations made by Obama had been approved so far, "less than half the number confirmed during the first Congress of the Bush administration."

Before the action this weekend, Leahy said some 30 Obama judicial nominees, including seven to fill appeals court vacancies, were awaiting Senate confirmation.

"A majority of the nominations pending on the Senate's calendar received unanimous support from the Senate Judiciary Committee, and 17 of the nominations are to fill seats designated as judicial emergencies by the nonpartisan Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts," Leahy added.

The Senate also has confirmed both of Obama's nominees to the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

In addition to the 10 nominees confirmed since Thursday, the Senate is expected to approve at least nine more before lawmakers adjourn for the year. All have been pending in the Senate since Sept. 23 or before. Another 15 have been awaiting a vote for less than a month.

The unconfirmed nominations will expire when Congress adjourns for the year. Obama is free to reappoint them, but Republicans will have more seats in the Senate in 2011, and there is no assurance the most controversial among them would be approved quickly, if at all.

Apart from Liu, they include Edward Chen, Louis B. Butler Jr. and John J. McConnell, Jr., all nominated to become U.S. District Court judges.

Liu is a dean at the University of California law school at Berkeley and the best-known of the four. Supporters and critics alike speak of him as a potential future selection for the Supreme Court by a Democratic president. He also could be the first Supreme Court nominee of Asian-American descent.

Republicans have attacked his nomination from the first.

At his committee confirmation hearing, Sessions Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., noted Liu's criticism when Samuel Alito was nominated to the Supreme Court by Bush. At the time, Liu said Alito's vision was an America "where police may shoot and kill an unarmed boy ... where federal agents may point guns at ordinary citizens during a raid, even after no sign of resistance ... where the FBI may install a camera where you sleep ... where a black man may be sentenced to death by an all-white jury for killing a white man, absent ... analysis showing discrimination."

Kyl called those comments "vicious and emotionally and racially charged."

Liu said he used "unnecessarily colorful language" and added, "I have the highest regard for Justice Alito's career." He said those remarks followed a 14-page analysis of Alito's rulings.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a Republican who supported Obama's nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, called Liu, "a bridge too far for me. He should take those views and run for office."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — After a monthslong blockade, Senate Republicans have agreed to let at least 19 of President Barack Obama's non-controversial judicial nominees win confirmation in the waning days of...
WASHINGTON — After a monthslong blockade, Senate Republicans have agreed to let at least 19 of President Barack Obama's non-controversial judicial nominees win confirmation in the waning days of...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 847
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hellooo
07:00 AM on 12/27/2010
Exactly where did Liu lie?
photo
murphysgirl
I prefer coffee, not tea..
08:18 PM on 12/21/2010
Hopefully Obama fills the gap with recess appointments..
06:41 PM on 12/21/2010
Don'tcha wonder what The Pres. traded away to get this done?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyus
San Francisco native
05:56 PM on 12/21/2010
At least we're starting to see some action.
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
09:46 PM on 12/21/2010
This is just a little trinket to inspire Obama to surrender even juicier prizes to the GOP.
05:15 PM on 12/21/2010
OK here's the deal, we give you a list of who we find acceptable and you accept them... End of story! Caveman!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:26 PM on 12/21/2010
Obama gets rolled by the GOP again,
ALiberalKidd
Before U Fan Know, Liberal ON Poor, Peace, Race
01:33 PM on 12/21/2010
Talk is cheap, modern liberals talk too much, without action. There are just a few things worth repeating now, China, War, Democrats Senate / Republicans House/ Executive Obama.

1. We need all those American jobs in China back in America and tariffs placed on cheap imported junk.

2. All aggression and war should cease immediately.

3. We need the trillions in bribes going to Jordan, Israel, Egypt, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc and other foreign government to stop immediately. Most American states are bankrupt, but their republican governors, the tea party, republican controlled House, and democrats cannot stop the flow of money to foreign states; is this madness or grand thief national corruption.

4. Americans need to go strong after the collusion in America's three branches of government that has turned us into a, one party, police nation.

5. Regardless of race or national origin “all” illegal aliens must go back to their native home and get in line to enter America legally.

Every liberal should frame these “Five Positions” in their own way, but these should be our strict standards and focus going forward, then everything else will fall in palce.

Liberals give too much credit to conservative republicans, while it is clear that many bias, two-faced democrats, like Harry Reid and blue dogs, are complicit with racial conservatives, in only wanting weak, passive, and dysfunctional whites and black like John Roberts, Sarah Palin, and Clarence Thomas to ascend to power in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CharlesCT
12:06 PM on 12/21/2010
This is a disgrace. The Repubs are like spoiled little children, holding up the business of America. They probably go home and brag at how powerful they are to do this.
06:42 PM on 12/21/2010
and the winner of the pizzing contest is......
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
09:47 PM on 12/21/2010
Judging by the moisture covering Obama, it wasn't him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
imfedup
Fight the lies.
11:22 AM on 12/21/2010
Well, isn't that white of them. . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TexianLife
When nothing goes right ... go left.
11:21 AM on 12/21/2010
The GOP needs to start working for the people of this country instead of playing their block, blame & whine game. For what little work they actually do, they're way overpaid.
11:59 AM on 12/21/2010
And the Democrats - formerly led by Mr. Reid, Ms. Pelosi, and Mr. Obama need to stop robbing from one group of folks to "give" to another group of folks. As Obama said, he just wanted to spread the wealth around... Not that spreading the wealth around has helped anyone, but in reality has kept people once in a temporary situation closer to it being a permanent one. Sooner of later, you will run out of OUR money because at some point we will say NO. That is what the voters said during the mid-terms and as usual the nitwits weren't listening and have chalked it up to "We didn't explain ourselves well enough............"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SojournerForTruth
12:06 PM on 12/21/2010
utbes01, that's not what the voters were saying in the midterms. Quit re-selling that lie. First of all a lot of voters stayed home and a lot of them just got tired of Blue Dogs representing their votes as republicans. So they got kicked out. What the people were saying is, Enough of the stall and obstructionist tactics. Get the peoples work done and put the country first, not specia interests. DEms didn't create this mess and it is going to take balls to get us out of it, but it won't happen if the GOP don't get serious. They need to play hard or go home!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chriss0114
the meanderings of a madman
12:08 PM on 12/21/2010
WOW! as an ultra rich Repub, I would think you would have more important things to do than trolling here!

You must REALLY love the redistribution of wealth from the middle and lower classes to you in the ultra rich!

Unless you are not ultra rich, you must not be aware of reality and not viewed economic data showing middle and lower income people losing money while the ultra rich have an even larger slice of the pie of which there is only so much to concentrate at the top which seems to be your political philosophy
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
09:48 PM on 12/21/2010
Why would they quit their day jobs of $ucking Corporatists? That pays pretty good, or they wouldn't do it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
CornellDublier
Historical facts are tuff on Republican­s.”
11:06 AM on 12/21/2010
The Great obstructionist party (GOP) at always and again
photo
jujub
Festina Lente
10:54 AM on 12/21/2010
"As the first congressional session of Obama's presidency draws to a close, what began as a slow process of confirmation has ballooned into a full-blown judicial crisis. The Senate has overseen the slowest pace of judicial staffing in at least a generation, with a paltry 39.8 percent of Obama's judges having been confirmed, according to numbers compiled by Senate Democrats. Of the 103 district and circuit court nominees, only 41 have been confirmed.

By this time in George W. Bush's presidency, the Senate had confirmed 76 percent of his nominees. President Clinton was working at a rate of 89 percent at this point in his tenure.
12:00 PM on 12/21/2010
Maybe after watching Mr. Obama load the government with socialists, progressives, and lovers of communism has something to do with this...............? ? ? ?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
theerrantsoul
12:50 PM on 12/21/2010
I would like some evidence of this.  Are you able to list your sources which prove that Obama has attempted this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ann Thurlow
01:04 PM on 12/21/2010
Progressives, inarguably, in the spirit of both Roosevelts, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, etc., etc. Name a "lover of Communism," with supporting evidence.
craig asia
Not part of upper-most 2%...yet!
10:54 AM on 12/21/2010
Oh sure, no one talks about how much money was spent on those ships doing the blockading!
10:51 AM on 12/21/2010
100 senators are deciding America's future

38 of them are uniformly not even going to let the other 62 vote on anything
5 more of them are going to waver if they are bought off enough for various reasons
57 will vote fairly regularily for democratic prnciples with maybe another 7-8 going rogue

Having just stayed at home and not voting allowed that 38 number to grow with there never being a chance to come even close to your ideals and principles­­.

To complain ad nauseum that other people have to go within the administra­­tion and not lay any blame for these current circumstan­­ces is even worse and just self serving.

These are the guys holding the power. no more radically right or blue canines

PROGRESSIV­­ES! !”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ohiotrailrunner
10:55 AM on 12/21/2010
The 57 who will vote fairly regularly for democratic principles. Where they part of the group that held up any voting at all on many of Bush's judicial nominations?

Both parties do this. The idea that one party is more enlightened and fair than the other is total rubbish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
e paw
Ol' Blood and Guts
11:47 AM on 12/21/2010
Yes they did it too, but they at least reserved it for some, not all. I would say that is more enlightened. At least they settled on the ones they could not possibly live with instead of makign it the status quo.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
theerrantsoul
12:53 PM on 12/21/2010
And Republicans have proven that their ability and inclination to obstruct far, far exceeds anything from the Democratic party.  The difference is that the Democrats leavened their obstruction with a desire to ensure that our nation was effectively governed, whereas Republicans' gross hubris seems to lead them to believe that Republicans, and only Republicans, deserve to call the shots, regardless of what impact their obstinance has on our nation.
IreneNH
Please feel free to disagree
10:23 AM on 12/21/2010
Kyl called those comments "vicious and emotionally and racially charged."

Maybe a little too colorful, but nonetheless true.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
damilitantone
Fed up with politicians
10:41 AM on 12/21/2010
And in some cases very true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
e paw
Ol' Blood and Guts
11:49 AM on 12/21/2010
How is your statement supposed to be NOT racially charged when you're speaking of a racially charged subject. O right, we must never discuss anything uncomfortable and it will go awa--never happened.