iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

In Obama Anti-Foreclosure Program, Thousands Of Homeowners Strung Along For A Year

First Posted: 12/20/10 09:32 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Foreclosure

More than 29,000 troubled American homeowners have been stuck in mortgage modification purgatory for at least a year, with no end in sight, under the Obama administration's anti-foreclosure program, according to a recently released report from a watchdog panel appointed by Congress.

These homeowners were supposed to receive lower payments on a trial basis lasting three months and then gain so-called permanent mortgage modifications--lowered payments lasting five years. But more than a year after beginning their trial phase, they have yet to be granted the permanent relief, leaving them unsure about their ability to hang on to their homes. Meanwhile their lenders continue to report them to credit bureaus as delinquent, impairing their ability to borrow in the future.

The new data, disclosed last week in a report from the Congressional Oversight Panel, added the latest sign of trouble to an anti-foreclosure program that was once supposed to help 3 to 4 million hang on to their homes. It is now on track to aid less than one-fourth that number.

The homeowners stuck waiting for permanent relief now contend with a higher cost of living thanks to lower credit scores and higher mortgage debt. They're also prevented from moving on as they try to keep a mortgage teetering on the verge of foreclosure.

"It's horrifying, but it's not surprising," said Diane E. Thompson, counsel to the National Consumer Law Center. "I hear about this everyday from people. When I go out to do trainings, I have people put their hands up in the room and I try to think of prizes for the person who has the oldest trial mod, and they're routinely 18 months old."

Twenty-eight homeowners who entered the program in March 2009, or more than a year-and-a-half ago, remain in the trial phase. Some 475 have been in trial limbo for 18 months. More than 29,100 borrowers have been stuck in the trial phase for at least a year, data through October show.

"After promises of hope, the fact that so many families remain in financial limbo goes to the heart of our biggest concern: some mortgage servicers on their own simply seem not to be up to the task of effective, widespread mortgage modification," said Richard H. Neiman, New York's top bank regulator and a member of the oversight panel. Neiman added that "Treasury has not been able to hold them fully accountable."

While the Treasury Department discloses the number of homeowners who have been in the trial program for at least six months, Treasury has never revealed the number of borrowers who have been in the trial phase for at least a year. Bank of America, the nation's largest bank by assets, accounted for nearly half of all the aged trials, according to Treasury's latest publicly-released scorecard.

Thompson said the number of homeowners stuck in limbo is likely much higher as mortgage firms self-report their data to Treasury, and are likely to skew the numbers in their favor.

The modification initiative, known as HAMP, long ago was dismissed by housing experts as a failure.

More homeowners have been bounced from the program than have received permanent relief.

The average borrower lucky enough to get into a five-year plan ends up owing more on their mortgage than they did prior to entering the program. Research shows that homeowners in this state, known as being underwater, are less likely to move--such as in pursuit of a job--and more likely to default.

And more than a third of those in so-called permanent mortgages spend more than 80 percent of their monthly income servicing debt, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of the modifications.

The oversight panel said HAMP would prevent less than 800,000 foreclosure, at a cost of about $4 billion. The administration originally allocated $50 billion in bailout funds to help homeowners.

Last week, the Treasury Department official overseeing its bailout programs admitted for the first time that the mortgage modification initiative will not meet the goal laid out by President Obama when he announced the program in February 2009. Then, Obama said it would enable "as many as 3 to 4 million homeowners to modify the terms of their mortgages to avoid foreclosure."

"I think it's apparent from our numbers that we will not have 3 to 4 million" permanent modifications, said Tim Massad, Treasury's acting assistant secretary for financial stability.

More than 2.8 homes received foreclosure notices last year, according to real estate data provider RealtyTrac. The Federal Reserve expects 7.4 million homes to enter foreclosure this year through 2012. It recently revised its projection up from 6.5 million as the crisis has worsened.

Treasury officials say the program's shortcomings are due to mortgage firms' inability to handle the huge influx of distressed borrowers that flooded the system when the housing market soured; the changing nature of the housing crisis, which was once dominated by subprime mortgages and now remains depressed due to a lingering high unemployment rate; and borrowers' lack of maintaining proper documentation describing their circumstances, like monthly income.

To deal with the borrower issue, Treasury redesigned the program to require documentation in order to enter the trial phase, rather than the previous practice of rushing to get homeowners enrolled in the program and asking for their paperwork later.

Treasury maintains that this has led to better results.

But according to the oversight panel's data, nearly 30 percent of borrowers who made their first trial payment in June--and made their payments on time in July, August and September--remain in the trial phase. A little more than half actually converted into a permanent modification, making it the only month dating to March 2009 in which the conversion rate eclipsed 50 percent, data show.

Andrea Risotto, a Treasury Department spokeswoman, cautioned that there is some lag between when a decision on a permanent modification is reached and when that is entered into the system.

Still, Treasury officials argue that even with homeowners remaining in limbo, they're still benefitting from the program as they're able to continue living in their homes, at a reduced rate, and without cost to taxpayers (the initiative only pays for permanent modifications).

"The trial period provides immediate relief to struggling homeowners at no expense to taxpayers," Risotto wrote in an e-mail. She added that Treasury data show that a majority of borrowers rejected during the trial phase end up in alternative foreclosure-prevention programs.

Thompson, who works with homeowners and their advocates, completely disagreed.

"The big overarching thing is, nobody wants to be in a trial mod. Everyone wants resolution in their lives," she said. "Everyone in foreclosure is desperate to get out of foreclosure. It's incredibly stressful, it's humiliating, and shameful. Nobody feels good about it. People want it done, they want it over with, they want to be able to move on."

Also, even though the homeowners are making their payments, they're still being reported as delinquent to the major credit reporting bureaus, Thompson said.

"So think about what that does when they go to apply for a car, or what it does to their credit card rates, or if they're applying for a job, or want to move, or even want to rent a place," she said. "It affects their cost of living and their ability to manage their life in all sorts of ways. Credit is a huge issue."

Finally, when homeowners are in the trial phase their mortgage company tacks on to their mortgage principal the difference between their old monthly payment and the reduced amount. The longer the trial, the more gets added.

Thompson said that for some of these homeowners, that tacked-on amount is enough to tip the scales against a permanent modification when their mortgage company finally decides to run the formula that determines whether they keep their home, or are forced out. A bigger debt load works against homeowners, she added.

"This is not a good deal for homeowners."

*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is a business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 646-274-2455.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
More than 29,000 troubled American homeowners have been stuck in mortgage modification purgatory for at least a year, with no end in sight, under the Obama administration's anti-foreclosure program, a...
More than 29,000 troubled American homeowners have been stuck in mortgage modification purgatory for at least a year, with no end in sight, under the Obama administration's anti-foreclosure program, a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 390
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
07:20 AM on 01/13/2011
Try three years. We tried with Chase Bank, for three years. We spent the last year trying to get the bank to tell us how much we owed so that we could write them a check as our situation had changed. We have completely paid what we owe but they still report us as behind. It ruined our life for that time. I am so happy that we were able to pay, as we tried to alert all elected officials in our area, the OCC, ect. No one cared We have moved on but I have lost all faith in the United States.
01:37 PM on 12/22/2010
Let's take one major bank involved in this scam, say BofA, and drive to get ALL account holders to withdraw all money they have in that paticular bank (savings, checking, CC's,investments, etc.) Take it ALL & put into local & regional banks near their hometown. What I'm proposing is to starve them out, as they are doing to us....Let's start NOW!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
10:35 AM on 12/22/2010
Many of my dearest friends applied for the foreclosure relief via their lending institutions.

It was those organizations that dragged their feet for months; and, immediately denied them and foreclosed without any warning. These are people who had great jobs and credit; and laidoff by during the recession.

Now, some of living with relatives (many their own children); while others, try to rebuild their lives from scratch.

This is not our President's fault. It is the banks that continued to play dirty games; even after support was made available to homeowners.
cureyourosity
INDEPENDENT--cuz the other two parties suck
03:28 PM on 12/21/2010
Obama: Change you can believe in!

Had the DEM congress & senate chose to overhaul the Fannie & Freddie when Bush & the GOP had requested the Treasury to do so in 2002 this wouldn't be an issue today! You owe it all to Barney Frank & friends for continually stating that there was NOTHING wrong with the housing market and pushed for legislation to allow more unqualified buyers to buy homes they couldn't afford. Then you let another DEM (Obama) tell you it's all going to be okay!
It's been proven over and over again that when the government gets involved this is the kind of MESS that will happen. Yet the lemmings still follow them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bwestleyj
Not a Zero-Sum Gamer..
10:29 AM on 12/22/2010
Please get your facts straight.

In 2002, the Republicans held both sides of Congress and decided NOT to do as you suggest.
03:00 PM on 12/21/2010
I am ok for now in with my home loan, but I can empathize with those in trouble given the economic conditions. I was listening to a radio program last night where the guest (I believe she was the former chair of Urban Housing) speculated that the reason it was so hard for people to get home modifications is because the banks have no idea who actually owns the mortgage note. She even went further to speculate that when the banks were bundling home mortgages they sold many of the mortgages more than once to as many as 10 times. So rather than to admit that, the banks give people the run around until they default or walk away. Could you imagine the fall out if this was exposed that the "assets" on the bank's books (although toxic) are only worth 1/2 to 1/10 of what they really hold?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clive Coogan
Lang may yer lum reek!
02:07 PM on 12/21/2010
This is not about Obama. This is about the banking mafia running our government. Thievery, bribery, corruption and dishonest behavior in our government should be dealt with in true French Revolutionary style. Bring back the Guillotine!
07:22 AM on 01/13/2011
Not all about Obama, he has done little to help, mainly ignoring the situation and surrounding himself with Wall Street hucksters. The point of view that he seems to be interested in receiving is surprising from a candidate that billed himself as "Change you can believe in." What a sad joke that has turned out to be.
02:02 PM on 12/21/2010
Somehow, all the banks and foreign corporations got their "relief" ASAP... and none of THEM had their credit ratings ruined.

Our leadership was very keen to use this populist sounding program to their benefit when it suited them. And yet, look at what they have done... shameful.

Mr. Compromise (read: give the plutocrats whatever they ask for) needs to pull a New Deal out of thin air pretty quickly or people are going to give up. Nobody wants to see what happens when millions of people realize that they have nothing to lose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rasberry
We are sorry, your mb did not meet our guidelines
01:32 PM on 12/21/2010
Applied for HAMP in April 2009... still not even in trial payments. Credit ruined and case is still "under review".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sarah Albers
no longer quite so empty
09:31 PM on 12/23/2010
I hear that. I applied in Feb 2009 or so and still have nothing. Bank allowed to foreclose while I was waiting on loan modification. Public trustee sale date is 01/04/11. Happy Holidays.
01:25 PM on 12/21/2010
So its Obamas fault
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
noygdb
can we have cheese with our whine? GOP
01:17 PM on 12/21/2010
Treasury officials say the program's shortcomings are due to mortgage firms' inability to handle the huge influx of distressed borrowers that flooded the system when the housing market soured; the changing nature of the housing crisis, which was once dominated by subprime mortgages and now remains depressed due to a lingering high unemployment rate; and borrowers' lack of maintaining proper documentation describing their circumstances, like monthly income.

News Flash for the Treasury: the programs' shortcomings are due to 1) the failure of the administration to lay down rules to the lenders, hence the lenders are free to screw the public, and 2) the greed of the banks who never plan to permanently modify a loan
01:04 PM on 12/21/2010
"when homeowners are in the trial phase their mortgage company tacks on to their mortgage principal the difference between their old monthly payment and the reduced amount."
This is the first article that points out what I've been saying all along. Even if approved, you're pushing your principal and interest to a later point in the loan. So, even if approved for the 5 year modification, good luck keeping up with the payments once it reverts. Even if approved, it's a requirement that all escrows for homeowners insurance and property taxes be added to the payment. If you couldn't make the payment before, once again, good luck now.
Do what you can to apply for a permanent modification, if unemployed, ask your bank if they have any forbearance plans. Repayment plans if you're only a few payments behind. If it doesn't look like you'll be able to afford the payments going forward to keep the house, ask for a short sale, or better yet, a deed in lieu option. Most banks will require the house be listed for a short sale for at least 3 months first though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rasberry
We are sorry, your mb did not meet our guidelines
01:38 PM on 12/21/2010
Forbearance just kicks the can down the road. When we first called BofA to apply for HAMP due to unemployment, they told us that since we weren't in default yet, we couldn't apply. Then they put us in forbearance, which made me very nervous. Of course, your payments are still due and they report you late/default because you are only making half your payments. They promised that by the end of the 3 month forbearance, they would have a mod ready for us and that the unpaid amounts would be tacked on to the end of the loan. That was in April 2009 and we still have no mod, and the forbearance put us so far behind we couldn't possibly pay off the past due payments. We would have been better off to stop paying credit cards and keep up on our mortgage than to listen to BofA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
espressobeans
. . . just saying it like it is.
12:54 PM on 12/21/2010
Sounds like they would have been better off putting this money in their pocket during this phase and it was another help the banks for their bad decisions with our dimes program and people will still be on the street, only further behind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alkahest
12:46 PM on 12/21/2010
Why is Obama's picture on this article? When:
"After promises of hope, the fact that so many families remain in financial limbo goes to the heart of our biggest concern: some mortgage servicers on their own simply seem not to be up to the task of effective, widespread mortgage modification," said Richard H. Neiman, New York's top bank regulator and a member of the oversight panel. Neiman added that "Treasury has not been able to hold them fully accountable."

Personal evaluations of the President, pro and con, aside, HuffPo looks really CHEAP when it buys into rabid anti-Obama hucksterism.
12:41 PM on 12/21/2010
The administration has refused to hold the banksters accountable for their crimes and instead has chosen to hope and have faith that the banks would be reasonable which is just not good enough. The lesson of the bailouts is that corporate crime does pay.
12:55 PM on 12/21/2010
These banks substantially financed Obama's campaign for president, and Obama's appointments of Geithner and Summers and Orszag, for the most part, prove Obama is in bed with the banks and other corporate gangsters.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
noygdb
can we have cheese with our whine? GOP
01:18 PM on 12/21/2010
bush was in bed even more
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zizizzi
Power to the PEOPLE... Right on!
12:41 PM on 12/21/2010
Does anybody know anything about NACA?
I've been working with them to reduce my interest rate.
So far my lender has not responded.

NACA came to my city and had tens of thousands of homeowners at the Convention Center to write down their loans. People were on TV saying they were going to save up to a thousand a month.
By the time I got down there it was too late to get an "instant reply".

So I applied through NACA on the internet.
They say they can reduce my interest rate by 4 points and save me allmost $1,000.00 a month for five years.

Is this a scam?

My lender did not respond in 30 days so now NACA is telling me to send my application to my congress person.

Am I spinning my wheels here???

If anyone has any experience with NACA I would very much like to hear about it.