More

2010 Census Count Expected To Bring News Of GOP Gains

2010 Census Findings

HOPE YEN and CHARLES BABINGTON   12/21/10 09:26 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Republican-leaning states will gain at least a half dozen House seats thanks to the 2010 census, which found the nation's population growing more slowly than in past decades but still shifting to the South and West.

The Census Bureau announced Tuesday that the nation's population on April 1 was 308,745,538, up from 281.4 million a decade ago. The growth rate for the past decade was 9.7 percent, the lowest since the Great Depression. The nation's population grew by 13.2 percent from 1990 to 2000.

Michigan was the only state to lose population during the past decade. Nevada, with a 35 percent increase, was the fastest-growing state.

The new numbers are a boon for Republicans, with Texas leading the way among GOP-leaning states that will gain House seats, mostly at the Rust Belt's expense. Following each once-a-decade census, the nation must reapportion the House's 435 districts to make them roughly equal in population, with each state getting at least one seat.

That triggers an often contentious and partisan process in many states, which will draw new congressional district lines that can help or hurt either party.

In all, the census figures show a shift affecting 18 states taking effect when the 113th Congress takes office in 2013.

Texas will gain four new House seats, and Florida will gain two. Gaining one each are Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah and Washington.

Ohio and New York will lose two House seats each. Losing one House seat are Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Florida will now have as many U.S. House members as New York: 27. California will still have 53 seats, and Texas will climb to 36.

In 2008, President Barack Obama lost in Texas and most of the other states that are gaining House seats. He carried most of the states that are losing House seats, including Ohio and New York.

Each House district represents an electoral vote in the presidential election process, meaning the political map for the 2012 election will tilt somewhat more Republican.

If Obama were to carry the same states he won in 2008, they would net him six fewer electoral votes under the new map. Some states Obama won, such as Florida, tilted Republican in last month's election and the electoral votes they will gain could further help GOP candidates in 2012.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said he did not expect the census results to have a "huge practical impact" on national politics.

For the first time in its history, Democratic-leaning California will not gain a House seat after a census.

Since 1940, 79 House seats have shifted to the South and West, mainly from the Northeast and Midwest, census officials said.

Starting early next year, most state governments will use detailed, computer-generated data on voting patterns to carve neighborhoods in or out of newly drawn House districts, tilting them more to the left or right. Sometimes politicians play it safe, quietly agreeing to protect Republican and Democratic incumbents alike. But sometimes the party in control will gamble and aggressively try to reconfigure the map to dump as many opponents as possible.

Last month's elections put Republicans in full control of numerous state governments, giving the GOP an overall edge in the redistricting process. State governments' ability to gerrymander districts is somewhat limited, however, by court rulings that require roughly equal populations, among other things. The 1965 Voting Rights Act protects ethnic minorities in several states that are subject to U.S. Justice Department oversight.

The average population of a new U.S. House district will be 710,767. But each state must have at least one district. So Wyoming, the least populous state with 563,626 residents, will have a representative with considerably fewer constituents. Six other states will have one House member. Each state has two U.S. senators, regardless of population.

The U.S. is still growing quickly relative to other developed nations. The population in France and England each increased roughly 5 percent over the past decade, while in Japan the number is largely unchanged, and Germany's population is declining. China grew at about 6 percent; Canada's growth rate is roughly 10 percent.

The South had the fastest growth since 2000, at 14.3 percent, the Census Bureau said. The West was close behind at 13.8 percent. The Northeast had 3.2 percent growth while the Midwest had 3.9 percent.

The declining U.S. growth rate since 2000 is due partly to the economic meltdown in 2008, which brought U.S. births and illegal immigration to a near standstill compared with previous years. The 2010 count represents the number of people – citizens as well as legal and illegal immigrants – who called the U.S. their home on April 1.

States losing political clout may have little recourse to challenge the census numbers. Still, census officials were bracing for the possibility of lawsuits seeking to revise the 2010 findings.

North Carolina just missed picking up the last House seat, falling short by roughly 15,000 people.

The release of state apportionment numbers is the first set of numbers from the 2010 census. Beginning in February, the Census Bureau will release population and race breakdowns down to the neighborhood level for states to redraw congressional boundaries.

Louisiana, Virginia, New Jersey and Mississippi will be among the first states to receive their redistricting data in February.

The 2010 census results also are used to distribute more than $400 billion in annual federal aid and will change each state's Electoral College votes beginning in the 2012 presidential election.

___

Online:

http://www.census.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republican-leaning states will gain at least a half dozen House seats thanks to the 2010 census, which found the nation's population growing more slowly than in past decades but sti...
WASHINGTON — Republican-leaning states will gain at least a half dozen House seats thanks to the 2010 census, which found the nation's population growing more slowly than in past decades but sti...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,217
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
AnnfromCA 11:27 AM on 12/21/2010
Ford announced truly great news. They have rebounded. They refused the bailout. And the new plant will be built.....in the South. Not Michigan. The problem with the blue states is that they really, really are in the pockets of the unions. And it's a bad, bad issue. It will be the ruination until those state default entirely and renegotiate. And that could be another few years. So the exit moves will  Read More...
03:22 PM on 12/22/2010
This article's premise is premature. The growth in these regions is due to the rise of the Latino population. Expect this to grow even more and expect the Northeast to rebound with Latinos moving their way up the eastern seaboard from the South. Remember, the median age for all Latinos in the nation is 25. That's right smack dab in their prime child bearing years.
03:14 PM on 12/22/2010
The census data is only based on regional growth and shows the West and South growing. That trend is not new. Wait until the census releases its data on race and ethnicity and it will show that the growth in both these regions is due to Latinos. The political predictions are premature except for the fact that Latino voters will constitute a major swing voter group.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
01:55 PM on 12/22/2010
This is presupposing that everyone was being absolutely factual when submitting their information. Were all the illegal immigrants counted? They are classified as "undocumented" for a reason.
photo
bd7769
I may not always be right, but I am never wrong.
11:25 AM on 12/22/2010
I don’t agree with the assumptions that Hispanic minorities won’t support a republican view point on social and economic issues.
I know many Hispanic people in my community and they are very traditional, pro-family, devout Catholics, and fiscally conservative.
Neither Party should be counting on support from a group of people in terms of blocks. This mindset just affirms that those who subscribe to this approach are only putting their self interests ahead of those who they can cow tail with false promises.
Also the track record of rising stars in the Republican Party like Rudio, Steele, Martinez, West, Flores show that wishful thinking in terms of stereo types continues to be detrimental to the Democratic Party.
03:17 PM on 12/22/2010
The veiled Republican attacks on Latinos through the wedge of illegal immigration are transparent to any Latino. The message is very clear: we don't like you. That's the way Latinos feel. Republicans at one time enjoyed growing receptivity under George Bush but lost all that with the recent illegal immigration campaign which was nothing more than an attack on Latinos in general and their growing numbers. Illegal immigrant is a code word for Latinos. All Latinos.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
09:52 AM on 12/22/2010
Again, this is a silly way to look at it.  You take the 2000 election and extrapolate forward that this is the way things will always be.  Do you think Obama could have won Virginia, and North Carolina without their population gains?  Sure, New York loses a couple of votes, but Democrats gained 28 in the 2008 election by winning those states.

Vermont used to be a solidly Republican state and Texas was a solidly Democratic state until the 1980s.  Most of the growth in Texas comes from Hispanics, who will soon make up a majority in the state and who despise Republicans.  Democrats may lose 3 EVs to Texas this election and gain 34+ in the near future by making Texas competitive once again.
07:17 AM on 12/22/2010
Maybe we have enough people for a third or fourth party. The two party's that we have now are functionally useless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amd02148
02:43 AM on 12/22/2010
The GOP feels threatened by the ever-changing demographics in America. The 2010 census was not good news for Republicans. The GOP is aware that by 2050 whites will be a minority. This scares them about the prospect of the future of their party, so they're putting up a vicious fight. In the process they are making some big errors, by alienating every minority group. If they don't clean up their act, the political high of the 2010 elections is going to be very temporary, if not extinct. They have the usual sense of "white entitlement" that has plagued conservative parts of this country for hundreds of years, and that is all going to change.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AxelDC
01:24 PM on 12/22/2010
The news is focusing too much on the shifts in populations as if the states are permanently fixed as Red/Blue.  Look at the 2008 election and you will see how these population shifts made Virginia an easy win for Obama, the first Democrat to win there since LBJ, and pulled off NC.

Texas is going to be a major shift over the next decade.  Republicans have only dominated since 1990, and the rise of Hispanics and the Republican contempt for Hispanics will make it more difficult for them to maintain control.  By 2020, Texas could be the Mother of All Swing States, and Republicans will have no large states to consider "safe".
03:19 PM on 12/22/2010
Texas will fall because of their treatment of Latinos. When Texas goes, the Republican Party will cease to be relevant until they court the growing Latino vote. Simple as that. That is the reality Karl Rove was saying years ago before the party lost its head on illegal immigration and its thinly veiled attack on all Latinos.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Douglas
01:35 AM on 12/22/2010
Wait until they run out of water and energy prices are too high for air conditioning and they'll be moving back north.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Heath
02:42 AM on 12/22/2010
Not trying to be rude, but all the rivers flow southward, right? And winter is close to 6 to 7 months out of the year - the most expensive and energy consuming part of the year. Moving south sounds more economically viable than spending more time and money on bundling up and heating up.

I think that many republicans are moving south to go back "home", and some democrats to the larger city hubs where it's 'safe'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Douglas
09:20 AM on 12/22/2010
You're not being rude. You make some good points. BUT. The only major river that flows into Texas for instance is the Colorado and by the time it reaches Texas it's a shadow of what it used to be because it's siphoned off for irrigation and for drinking water for California and other western states. Most of the south uses the underground aquifers for water and there levels are already dropping since more water is being pumped out than is being replaced by nature. Energy is already heavily subsidized in this country but if prices go up it's going to be difficult to work/sleep when temps go up to 110 degrees or higher. There's an old saying that in the winter you can always put on more sweaters but in the heat all you can do is sweat. This is only my opinion and it's all moot anyway because nobody knows what is going to happen. Thanks for the input and have a great day!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
01:15 AM on 12/22/2010
so your father didn't pay taxes as a democrat?..you can't be from Puerto Rico.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
10:17 PM on 12/21/2010
I do think that the media's being premature in calling the census figures a victory for the Republicans. Much of the growth comes from the Hispanic population, and the Republicans seem intent on driving them into he Democratic fold.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amd02148
02:06 AM on 12/22/2010
Thank you fanned JudgeMoonbox, I don't understand the authors totally ignoring the hispanic population. The rise of the Latino populations is bad news for the GOP. It's just about going to crush them.
03:21 PM on 12/22/2010
Hispanic votes today will run blue because of the thinly disguised campaign of illegal immigration that really targets ALL Hispanics by the Republican Party. But look for the party to rebound with Hispanics sometime in the future due to the naturally conservative values of Hispanics. When the Republicans nominate George P. Bush for president, then you will know the Republicans got the message.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:07 PM on 12/21/2010
The Miracle of Birth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47P59ha9k9s
10:00 PM on 12/21/2010
Census seems to prove that the land of opportunity is no longer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frisbeeredcat
07:37 PM on 12/21/2010
Yes, Texas will be gaining legislative seats. Due to the increase in the Hispanic population (+36%) and black population (+16%). White population stayed the same. I don't see how this will add to Republican seats unless they jerrymander the districts, which is possible. But as time goes by this will be harder and harder to do. These people will have children and the Hispanic and Black populations will continue to grow as will their political power. It's great this is what America is about!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stuckintraffic
08:40 PM on 12/21/2010
I think you answered your own question...we will see them gerrymander like never before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JudgeMoonbox
09:42 PM on 12/21/2010
"I think you answered your own question..­.we will see them gerrymande­r like never before. "

They've got a tough act to follow. After DeLay got a second redistrcting, there are 4 districts that stretch from Austin to the Mexican border, and a fifth nearly makes it. Imagine what stuff the Republicans would pull if they didn't think the media was liberally biased.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amd02148
02:07 AM on 12/22/2010
fanned frisbeeredcat
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
07:04 PM on 12/21/2010
It will be fun when they start doing this. Hopefully they can do a better job then the last bunch. Straight lines with no special treatment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:19 PM on 12/21/2010
Any slowing in the rate of increase of the US population is to be greeted with cheers - we must at some point realize that living like we do, in a world adding another 2-3 billion people is quite simply impossible.
photo
soyyosisoy
CEO and Janitor.
06:37 PM on 12/21/2010
Without replacement of the current workforce, who's going to pay the social security plans of the retirees?
photo
TexasTreader
My other dog is a gator
07:05 PM on 12/21/2010
I thought the end of social security was a given.
07:19 PM on 12/21/2010
Noone. You will die. Everyone will. And within 5 billion years Earth will vanish too. Any problem? What makes you think this species should exist at all? Th universe will go just fine without it like it did for ~13 billion years