More

Iraq: New Government Sworn In

LARA JAKES and REBECCA SANTANA   12/21/10 10:13 PM ET   AP

Iraq New Government

BAGHDAD — Iraq seated a freely elected government Tuesday after nine months of haggling, bringing together the main ethnic and religious groups in a fragile balance that could make it difficult to rebuild a nation devastated by war as American troops prepare for their final withdrawal.

One of the government's first priorities will be to decide whether to ask the Obama administration to keep thousands of U.S. soldiers in Iraq after their scheduled departure in December 2011.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's new government solidifies the grip that Shiites have held on political power since Saddam Hussein's ouster. It leaves open the question of whether the country's disgruntled Sunni minority will play a meaningful role.

Despite tortuous negotiations that threatened to unravel the country's tenuous democratic gains, the public face of the new government will look remarkably like the outgoing one. The prime minister, president and foreign minister will remain the same.

The outcome was a huge victory for al-Maliki, who has made more than his share of enemies as prime minister since May 2006. Parliament originally tapped al-Maliki as a compromise candidate to lead Iraq following tumultuous elections in December 2005 during the height of the war.

The new government was sworn in Tuesday immediately after the Iraqi parliament voted to approve 34 Cabinet ministers including al-Maliki. The remainder of the 44-member Cabinet is made up of acting ministers who will be replaced at a later date because of ongoing disputes among coalition partners.

President Barack Obama praised Iraq for building an inclusive coalition that he described as "a clear rejection of the efforts by extremists to spur sectarian division."

At United Nations headquarters in New York, Security Council members said they welcomed the formation of the new government.

"This decision reflects the will of the Iraqi people as displayed by the parliamentary election of 7 March 2010," the council said. "We encourage its leaders to continue to pursue a federal, democratic, pluralistic and unified Iraq based on the rule of law and respect for human rights."

Al-Maliki hailed what he called a unified but diverse government, the creation of which was "the most difficult task in the world."

But even as he praised the new government, al-Maliki hinted at its weakness: the need to include all the major political factions as a way to preserve stability at the expense of efficiency.

"There were people whose parties have only one or two seats and even they were demanding a ministry," al-Maliki said. "So I know that nobody is satisfied with me."

Indeed, two groups blasted the new Cabinet even before it was sworn in.

The Kurdish splinter Goran party, which has only eight lawmakers, said it should have gotten more than the one Cabinet post it was offered and threatened to boycott the government. And women lawmakers jeered the male-dominated political parties for largely excluding them from the Cabinet though they make up a quarter of parliament.

"This government is not a strong one because it is built on sectarian divisions and self-interests," said Hassan al-Alawi, a leading member of the Sunni-backed Iraqiya coalition that won bragging rights by narrowly edging al-Maliki's bloc in the March 7 parliamentary election. "It is a fragile government."

Doing the work of the government ultimately may prove as hard as putting one together.

Experts said Iraq's top priority over the next few years is to control its vacillating levels of violence and protect itself from foreign threats. Sandwiched between Shiite majority Iran and Sunni Arab states, Iraq is a Mideast fault line for sectarian tensions and has weak borders.

Baghdad University political analyst Hadi Jalo said that factor alone should help al-Maliki gain the necessary support from parliament to ask U.S. troops to remain in Iraq past the December 2011 deadline outlined in a security agreement between Washington and Baghdad – should he choose to do so.

"Stability is the backbone for any other progress," Jalo said. "Al-Maliki knows that he cannot overcome any challenges while the security problem is not solved. This is the only way to win the trust of the people and the foreign investors."

The clock is already ticking on that decision: A senior U.S. military official said plans will be approved by early April to start sending troops and 1.75 million pieces of equipment back to the U.S. next summer. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the ongoing discussions.

Neither Obama nor al-Maliki has shown any enthusiasm for keeping U.S. soldiers in Iraq. More than 4,400 American troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis died in a war that has yet to bring stability and prosperity to this oil-rich Middle Eastern nation.

On Tuesday, al-Maliki maintained his commitment to keeping "the pact of the foreign troops' withdrawal, according to the announced schedule."

Saying otherwise, however, amounts to political suicide before he is firmly ensconced in his second term.

A slew of other top concerns must be settled quickly to satisfy Iraqis who have been frustrated with the lame-duck government since the March elections.

The government has been dithering for years over a package of laws that would streamline oversight of the country's oil wealth and make it more quickly available to investors. Iraq holds the world's fourth largest oil reserves, valued at $11 trillion according to current oil prices.

Electricity and water shortages, too, have been a major source of anger across Iraq – especially during the sweltering summers. Iraqis have been furious with lawmakers who collected cushy salaries and perks for doing light work while the rest of the country suffered.

"We hope that this government will offer something to the people," said Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq, a lawmaker with the secular Iraqiya bloc who only last week was allowed to return to political life after being accused of having links to Saddam's former regime.

Although Iraqiya won two more seats than al-Maliki's bloc did in the March elections, the prime minister was able to hang onto his job by making admittedly uneasy allies during months of backroom deals.

Iraqiya's leader, former prime minister Ayad Allawi, agreed to join al-Maliki's government in exchange for heading a council that will oversee the government's security and foreign policies. It was still unclear how much power the council will have.

Al-Maliki also had to accommodate the hardline Shiite followers of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. Al-Maliki and the Sadrists reached an uneasy detente several months ago after years of fighting each other.

A senior Sadrist said his 40-member political coalition was pressured by Iranian officials and Iraq's top Shiite cleric to fall in line behind al-Maliki. He spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive negotiations.

The competing demands within the new democracy will help foster Iraq's stability, said Joost Hiltermann of the International Crisis Group.

Still, "it's going to be a government that is beset by problems," Hiltermann said. "It's going to take a long time for Iraq to rebuild itself."

___

Associated Press writers Qassim Abdul-Zahra, Hamid Ahmed and Mazin Yahya contributed to this report from Baghdad, Sameer N. Yacoub from Amman, Jordan, and Anita Snow from New York.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BAGHDAD — Iraq seated a freely elected government Tuesday after nine months of haggling, bringing together the main ethnic and religious groups in a fragile balance that could make it difficult ...
BAGHDAD — Iraq seated a freely elected government Tuesday after nine months of haggling, bringing together the main ethnic and religious groups in a fragile balance that could make it difficult ...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:15 PM on 01/24/2011
Could you give the status of the Iraqi Diar revaluation? Return email barryevansonline@gmail.com
10:05 AM on 12/22/2010
no diversity, no women, no Kurds...the same old men of Saddam's age...

I will pray for the best
photo
jmdziuban1
Heeey, Mr Spaceman.
05:54 PM on 12/21/2010
Wow, already. I'm impressed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moe Sislak
05:14 PM on 12/21/2010
If they just let the Kurds have their own country with land that's theirs anyway, they'd have 1/3 less of a problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:23 PM on 12/21/2010
Bought and paid for by the US government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MeinNH
Ooooo Silly Me
04:19 PM on 12/21/2010
Good now can we leave?
04:16 PM on 12/21/2010
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.. If you are the leader of something ungovernable are you really in charge of anything? Much like here... They need to create a supreme court so it can step in and do the ruling classes bidding like they do here so this doesn't take so long..
03:57 PM on 12/21/2010
Every time there is a story on Iraq, I see different figures for Iraqis killed during this war. Is there a dependable resourse out there that would provide an accurate figure on Iraqi civilian deaths?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Burke
04:09 PM on 12/21/2010
My thoughts exactly.. Figures are closer to a half million in Iraq.. Afghanistan combined goes over a million.. easily
There are no strait figures because many cities where bombed. But over a million is a more than reasonable figure.
researcher
researcher
03:47 PM on 12/21/2010
the american puppet gov locked up in the green zone.

the name for that green zone would best be described as the protection zone.

if they let these puppets out their own people would destroy them and their families.

it is another american con designed for corp america and its empire building.

americans will buy it lock stock and barrel.

they have been conditioned to having wars for corp profits from the get go of their lives.

"Every ambitious would-be empire, clarions it abroad that she is conquering the world to bring it peace, security and freedom, and it is sacrificing her sons only for the most noble and humanitarian purposes. That is a lie; and it is an ancient lie, yet generations still rise and believe it." -- Henry David Thoreau

if thoreau were alive today he would include corp profits along with peace security and freedom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
03:47 PM on 12/21/2010
Creating a Secret Propaganda Campaign to Manufacture a False Case for War Against Iraq.

Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression.

Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, to Manufacture a False Case for War.

Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Posed an Imminent Threat to the United States.

Invading Iraq in Violation of the Requirements of HJRes114.

Invading Iraq Absent a Declaration of War.

Invading Iraq, A Sovereign Nation, in Violation of the UN Charter.

Initiating a War Against Iraq for Control of That Nation's Natural Resources

Creating a Secret Task Force to Develop Energy and Military Policies With Respect to Iraq and Other Countries

Reckless Misspending and Waste of U.S. Tax Dollars in Connection With Iraq and US Contractors

Illegal Detention: Detaining Indefinitely And Without Charge Persons Both U.S. Citizens and Foreign Captives

Torture: Secretly Authorizing, and Encouraging the Use of Torture Against Captives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Other Places, as a Matter of Official Policy

Spying on American Citizens, Without a Court-Ordered Warrant, in Violation of the Law and the Fourth Amendment

Repeatedly Ignored and Failed to Respond to High Level Intelligence Warnings of Planned Terrorist Attacks in the US, Prior to 911.

Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001

===============
EmpireNotRepublic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
03:59 PM on 12/21/2010
Doesn't a trillion dollars at least give me a transcript of the evil-doer's trial?

I'm curious if he described the relationship between his administration and the Empire. In particular, I'm curious about why he went into slant-drilling Kuwait.

I sometimes wonder why such a powerless little shiekdom would slant drill into Iraq -- unless a greater power wanted them to.

Just thoughts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
03:38 PM on 12/21/2010
Why doesn't the Empire consider garrisoning this people's oil fields constitute "combat"?

Is it like defining "is"
03:36 PM on 12/21/2010
Does this mean the soldier will go back home after the invasion? Just like it happened with Panama?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Atlanta
Active Citizen 54
03:34 PM on 12/21/2010
So the Corporateists have their puppet in place.
Get us out.
AfPak Too.

Let's hope they can keep it together.
03:32 PM on 12/21/2010
Some of you are claiming this to be a "Puppet Gov't" of the U.S. That is completely illogical when you look at the difficulty and time passed that went into forming a Government in Iraq.

Puppet regimes are easy to create. Puppets are easily manipulated. The very nature of a "Puppet Gov't" goes against the reality of Iraq.
03:30 PM on 12/21/2010
Please don't tell Harry Reid.