More

Gene Sperling, Leading NEC Director Candidate, Made Millions On Wall Street As Economy Tanked

Sperling Nec

First Posted: 12/22/10 06:00 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Gene Sperling, a leading contender for a top economic post in the White House, made millions on Wall Street even as the economy faltered.

The adviser to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is near the top of President Barack Obama's list of candidates to replace Larry Summers as director of the National Economic Council, HuffPost reports. By appointing Sperling, the president would fuel perceptions that his administration is overly close to Wall Street, installing a policymaker who has not only overseen monumental deregulation of the financial sector, but has also collected hefty paychecks from its leading firms.

The next NEC director will help determine the administration's economic policy over the next two years. Summers, who last week left his White House post for a Harvard professorship, met with the president almost daily to discuss economic decisions. Long sympathetic to Wall Street interests, Summers pushed for deregulation of financial instruments under President Clinton, a policy that experts -- and Clinton himself -- now say was misguided, contributing to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Sperling, if appointed, would be expected to take a stance similar to that of Summers and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, said those familiar with his history. (Rubin became chairman of Citigroup after leaving the Clinton administration and later resigned from that post in disgrace.) Sperling worked under Rubin in the early Clinton years, when Rubin was NEC director. In Clinton's second term, during Sperling's own tenure as NEC director, Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, prompting a rule-easing that allowed Citigroup to become the world's largest financial services company.

Citigroup later required a $45 billion taxpayer bailout.

"He saw nothing at all wrong with the pattern of growth we had in place in the '90s," Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, said of Sperling. "He was not thinking at all critically, seeing that there were even any issues here."

Sperling's appointment would likely draw criticism from consumer advocates, who have clashed with Wall Street supporters in the debate over how the government should promote the economic recovery. By appointing Sperling, the president would be sending a message that his administration would continue to be sympathetic to big bank interests.

"It's striking that he's not concerned about the image," Baker said, referring to the president. "It might be better to keep them at a little distance -- not to have everyone on this staff be a former Rubin person."

Sperling has never worked full-time in the financial sector. But that hasn't prevented him from earning paychecks on Wall Street.

Goldman Sachs paid Sperling $887,727 for his advice in 2008, according to Bloomberg News's analysis of financial disclosure forms. Sperling advised Goldman on one of its charitable projects, known as "10,000 Women," which provides business education to women in poor countries.

It was a lucrative year for Sperling. During that time he also earned $250,000 for giving briefings to two hedge funds, Brevan Howard Asset Management and Sterling Stamos Capital Management. He also earned $480,051 as director of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange. During October 2007, he was paid to speak at an event sponsored by Citigroup, but the financial disclosure forms, according to Bloomberg, do not say how much that speech was worth.

"Once again, you would have someone who owes Goldman in a top economic position," said Robert Kuttner, co-editor of the American Prospect and co-founder of the Economic Policy Institute. "It's such an emblematic example of how these guys work."

All told, Sperling took home more than $2.2 million during 2008 and the first month of 2009.

It would take a typical U.S. worker with an income of about $49,777, more than 40 years to earn the sum that Sperling made in one. As NEC director, Sperling would help determine the policies that directly affect American middle class families.

Jenni LeCompte, a Treasury spokesperson, wouldn't comment on the record. Amy Brundage, a White House spokesperson, emphasized that the president has not yet made a decision as to the next NEC director.

Sperling's ties to the financial sector don't mean he would be unsympathetic to consumer interests, or to the interests of small banks and small businesses.

An advocate for community banks said Sperling has unique insight into the small business lending process. Sperling was a key adviser in the creation of a $30 billion account that small banks can access for funds, said Steve Verdier, executive vice president of Congressional relations for the Independent Community Bankers of America, a leading lobbyist group. The president signed the Small Business Jobs Act in September, creating the Small Business Lending Fund.

"He's had an opportunity to understand where small banks are coming from, and what our concerns are," Verdier said of Sperling.

According to the Obama administration's estimate, small businesses, which rely on small banks for loans, create about 70 percent of the nation's jobs.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Gene Sperling, a leading contender for a top economic post in the White House, made millions on Wall Street even as the economy faltered. The adviser to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is near the to...
Gene Sperling, a leading contender for a top economic post in the White House, made millions on Wall Street even as the economy faltered. The adviser to Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is near the to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 294
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
ThatsTheTheWayItIs 09:42 AM on 12/23/2010
I strongly object to these personal attacks on corporate employees. Millions of people work for corporations, they are not automatically sell-outs and corporate shills.

He made $2M a year giving advice, that makes him a tool of Wall St? Perhaps a little jealousy here? Pro athletes make more than that, CEOs make 10x that. I know mediocre engineers who made more than that in stock options. I  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thrashertm
06:32 PM on 01/07/2011
I don't understand how Obama voters can still support him. I am not advocating support for the Republicans (who are just as bad if not worse mostly), but isn't it time to repudiate the corporatist-in-chief and get behind some liberals with principles? I gave up on the Democratic establishment after they refused to impeach Bush in 2006, and now stand with Ron Paul in his effort to restore Constitutional government (repeal Patriot act, end our empire, end the Fed).
photo
treemonkey
Illegitimi non carborundum
12:44 AM on 12/27/2010
Oops, he is doing it again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vegetablelollipop
11:22 PM on 12/25/2010
I nominate the following women economists:

Margaret Simms: http://www.urban.org/about/MargaretSimms.cfm

Stephanie Wilson: http://www.neaecon.org/swilson.htm

Marie T. Mora: http://portal.utpa.edu/utpa_main/daa_home/coba_home/coba_images_files/MarieTMora-CV.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thrashertm
06:28 PM on 01/07/2011
Any reason to support them other than their female genitalia?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
09:36 PM on 12/25/2010
Looks like business as usual....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deadfed
08:37 PM on 12/25/2010
Both parties play this game and anybody that thinks differently isn't paying attention...there's a revolving door between D.C. wall street and big corporations, it's a party and you ain't invited!

http://deadfed.com/
(big fed, media, government, and corporations…bigger bailouts
the power of ideas…the truth is out there)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:26 PM on 12/25/2010
......................................I PROTEST..........................
this is, again, more of the WALL STREET Crowd....remember under Clintons watch we had RUBIN, SUMMERS< GREENSPAN that were responsible for repealing the Glass-Steagal act which allowed the Banksters (Friends of above) to game the system and bring the World to its knees. WE then had Goldman,Sucks (Friends of above) go to Moodys and bribe them to grade all TOXIC junk to AAA. Goldman then went to AIG and bribed them to INSURE this TOXIC junk so they could play the market UP or DOWN. so far no one has gone to JAIL...WHY IS THAT?
(Sperling) He was an architect of the Clinton economic plans while serving on the Clinton-Gore 1992 presidential campaign. He was known for his long hours, passionate commitment to his work, and detailed knowledge of economic policy. Following Clinton's election, from 1992-1996, Sperling served as deputy director of the [[United States National Economic Council|National Economic Council while the Council was directed by Robert Rubin, who was promoted to Treasury Secretary. Sperling became National Economic Adviser to President Clinton and director of the National Economic Council from 1996 to 2000.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:38 PM on 12/25/2010
"I didn't know Brooksley Born," SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt, a member of President Clinton's Working Group on Financial Markets. "I was told that she was irascible, difficult, stubborn, unreasonable." Levitt explains how the other principals of the Working Group -- former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin -- convinced him that Born's attempt to regulate the risky derivatives market could lead to financial turmoil, a conclusion he now believes was "clearly a mistake."

Born's battle behind closed doors was epic, Kirk finds. The members of the President's Working Group vehemently opposed regulation -- especially when proposed by a Washington outsider like Born.

"I walk into Brooksley's office ; the blood has drained from her face," says Michael Greenberger, a former top official at the CFTC who worked closely with Born. "She's hanging up the telephone; she says to me: 'That was Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers. He says, "You're going to cause worst financial crisis [He says he has] 13 bankers in his office who informed him of this. Stop, right away.

Greenspan, Rubin and Summers ultimately prevailed on Congress to stop Born and limit future regulation of derivatives. "Born faced a formidable struggle pushing for regulation at a time when the stock market was booming," Kirk says. "Alan Greenspan was the maestro, and both parties in Washington were united in belief that markets would take care of themselves."

Now, many of the same men who shut down Born in key positions in the Obama administration,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
07:47 PM on 12/25/2010
here is a 53 minute video "The Warning". It will only take a few minutes though to be totally outraged at what the Wall Street crowd is allowed to get away with....WHY? because some of them namely Goldman,Sucks, JP Morgan, CitiGroup are part of the private banks that control this country. House of Rothschild, Bank of England...We have been under the yoke of this crowd since 1913. their manifesto is to saddle every American from cradle to grave. click on the smiling faces for the low down.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/view/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
11:54 PM on 12/24/2010
Great. Another freakin GS insider in the administration. Just what we the people need.
07:46 PM on 12/24/2010
Once a crook always a crook.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegan Girl
Compassion for all
07:29 PM on 12/25/2010
You know sadly your post is very relevant to most of the threads here.... : /
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
07:22 PM on 12/24/2010
Not that any of our comments will make any sort of difference, it is a wonder that voters or those who THINK that they are up-to-date on the latest and the most corrupt can ever believe in themselves or this government again. It seems that those in power believe that they know better than we do and want us to understand that those who know how to deal with wealth are the best folks to be in power. We should be grateful for their succor. Being an American these days requires us to do our obeisance to our betters.
blogisti
Approved Knowledge Only
06:22 PM on 12/24/2010
New people from Wall Street with revised plans on how to continue the shoveling of huge amounts of wealth to the already rich. How much more is there? As long as the middle class, working class and poor have a dollar left the rich will be after it. They have a plan. It's illegal, it's fraud, but hey, it doesn't matter, they have their men in power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bigdaddyvike
left and rightly so...
04:55 PM on 12/24/2010
Replace the old rat criminals with new ones. No better people to avert the oncoming crisis that the stooges that caused the first one.
heckmepitus
Truth, justice and the American way
05:41 PM on 12/23/2010
Obama and the Democrats love big corporations just as much as they love big government.
08:35 AM on 12/24/2010
While Obama and Democrats love big business, Republicans and those who vote Republican are the cheap $2 dollar prostitute on the street corner with heroin needles sticking out of her arms. Democrats are the higher priced option. At $5.

Me love you long time, The Democrats and Republicans say to their 'customers'.

And Global Wall Street replies, "Honey, this is 100% pure Wall Street Finance snake. The pay is not too big." while laughing to the bank.

Love that movie.
11:44 PM on 12/26/2010
The Republicans also love big corporatio­ns just as much as they love big government­. The Republicans created the giant bureucracy in the Department of Homeland Security and cut taxes during a war.

Hope and Change is more of the same.
heckmepitus
Truth, justice and the American way
05:40 PM on 12/23/2010
Obama and the Democrats are corporatists, supporting established big corporations at the expense of free market competition and the public.
05:04 PM on 12/23/2010
It looks like the incurable optimists among us who were still holding out hope that the economy would improve somewhat during our lifetimes are destined to be disappointed ... again.
04:52 PM on 12/23/2010
Well, well, well. Looks like Dear Obama is going to replace one Goldman Sachs shill (Summers) with another. Why am I not surprised. And our dear President is all grins about his great accomplishments. What a joke.