iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Civil War Message Decoded After 147 Years

Civil War Message

STEVE SZKOTAK   12/25/10 11:13 AM ET   AP

RICHMOND, Va. — A glass vial stopped with a cork during the Civil War has been opened, revealing a coded message to the desperate Confederate commander in Vicksburg on the day the Mississippi city fell to Union forces 147 years ago.

The dispatch offered no hope to doomed Lt. Gen. John C. Pemberton: Reinforcements are not on the way.

The encrypted, 6-line message was dated July 4, 1863, the date of Pemberton's surrender to Union forces led by Ulysses S. Grant, ending the Siege of Vicksburg in what historians say was a turning point midway into the Civil War.

The message is from a Confederate commander on the west side of the Mississippi River across from Pemberton.

"He's saying, 'I can't help you. I have no troops, I have no supplies, I have no way to get over there,' " Museum of the Confederacy collections manager Catherine M. Wright said of the author of the dispiriting message. "It was just another punctuation mark to just how desperate and dire everything was."

The bottle, less than 2 inches in length, had sat undisturbed at the museum since 1896. It was a gift from Capt. William A. Smith, of King George County, who served during the Vicksburg siege.

It was Wright who decided to investigate the contents of the strange little bottle containing a tightly wrapped note, a .38-caliber bullet and a white thread.

"Just sort of a curiosity thing," said Wright. "This notion of, do we have any idea what his message says?"

The answer was no.

Wright asked a local art conservator, Scott Nolley, to examine the clear vial before she attempted to open it. He looked at the bottle under an electron microscope and discovered that salt had bonded the cork tightly to the bottle's mouth. He put the bottle on a hotplate to expand the glass, used a scalpel to loosen the cork, then gently plucked it out with tweezers.

The sewing thread was looped around the 6 1/2-by-2 1/2-inch paper, which was folded to fit into the bottle. The rolled message was removed and taken to a paper conservator, who successfully unfurled the message.

But the coded message, which appears to be a random collection of letters, did not reveal itself immediately.

Eager to learn the meaning of the code, Wright took the message home for the weekend to decipher. She had no success.

A retired CIA code breaker, David Gaddy, was contacted, and he cracked the code in several weeks.

A Navy cryptologist independently confirmed Gaddy's interpretation. Cmdr. John B. Hunter, an information warfare officer, said he deciphered the code over two weeks while on deployment aboard an aircraft carrier in the Pacific. A computer could have unscrambled the words in a fraction of the time.

"To me, it was not that difficult," he said. "I had fun with this and it took me longer than I should have."

The code is called the "Vigenere cipher," a centuries-old encryption in which letters of the alphabet are shifted a set number of places so an "a" would become a "d" – essentially, creating words with different letter combinations.

The code was widely used by Southern forces during the Civil War, according to Civil War Times Illustrated.

The source of the message was likely Maj. Gen. John G. Walker, of the Texas Division, who had under his command William Smith, the donor of the bottle.

The full text of the message to Pemberton reads:

"Gen'l Pemberton:

You can expect no help from this side of the river. Let Gen'l Johnston know, if possible, when you can attack the same point on the enemy's lines. Inform me also and I will endeavor to make a diversion. I have sent some caps (explosive devices). I subjoin a despatch from General Johnston."

The last line, Wright said, seems to suggest a separate delivery to Pemberton would be the code to break the message.

"The date of this message clearly indicates that this person has no idea that the city is about to be surrendered," she said.

The Johnston mention in the dispatch is Gen. Joseph E. Johnston, whose 32,000 troops were encamped south of Vicksburg and prevented from assisting Pemberton by Grant's 35,000 Union troops. Pemberton had held out hope that Johnston would eventually come to his aid.

The message was dispatched during an especially terrible time in Vicksburg. Grant was unsuccessful in defeating Pemberton's troops on two occasions, so the Union commander instead decided to encircle the city and block the flow of supplies or support.

Many in the city resorted to eating cats, dogs and leather. Soup was made from wallpaper paste.

After a six-week siege, Pemberton relented. Vicksburg, so scarred by the experience, refused to celebrate July 4 for the next 80 years.

So what about the bullet in the bottom of the bottle?

Wright suspects the messenger was instructed to toss the bottle into the river if Union troops intercepted his passage. The weight of the bullet would have carried the corked bottle to the bottom, she said.

For Pemberton, the bottle is symbolic of his lost cause: the bad news never made it to him.

The Confederate messenger probably arrived to the river's edge and saw a U.S. flag flying over the city.

"He figured out what was going on and said, 'Well, this is pointless,' and turned back," Wright said.

___

Online:

Museum of the Confederacy: http://www.moc.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Whitney Snyder  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,361
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Mezhir
08:49 PM on 12/28/2010
And why is this news? It's not as if historians were working 147 years to decode a message. All they did was open the bottle and decode the message with existing knowledge. Big Deal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
merrymay
02:50 PM on 12/28/2010
The Ivy League Universities, (Harvard, Yale, Brown, etc), were endowed by the vast fortunes made by the shipping of slaves to the New World by New England shipping companies.

The emancipation movement didn't get really active until this importation of slaves became illegal in the USA. Then these very same schools, funded with blood money, encouraged the cause.

The huge banks exploited the issue by underwriting both the anti-slavery movement AND the Southern extremists...in order to prevent a peaceful resolution to the issue. That would have been bad for banks, who make fortunes in debt-funded conflicts.

There's mighty little room for gloating by anybody here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
12:55 PM on 12/30/2010
Thank you MerryMay.....for your comment and information. It's too bad we can't employ a 'way-back machine' like Peabody had on the cartoon.... and visit some moments in history and try to affect(sp?) some change..???? I would probably go back to the 60s to my grandparents cafe,
insist that my grandpa give me one good reason black people can't come in the front door like anyone else.! Of all the places I could go......that would be it.
Didn't the Haitian slave independence occur just prior to the Civil war?? I seem to be dwelling a lot in the past--especially in the 'what should have been-except for' - section of history! Perhaps
this is just a side-effect of ageing....revisiting the past, ad nauseum...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
merrymay
04:53 PM on 12/30/2010
No, dear, it just shows you love to understand the past of things and sometimes cut through the 'revisionist' version.

Get hold of a book with all the times Hitler could have been stopped easily and without bloodshed. I had a world history teacher made us memorize those.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Everett
03:18 PM on 12/31/2010
merrymay,
you are correct, my question is always why so many want to hold our Confederacy to the past, while absolving the empire of its past ? It is responsible a far larger range of atrocities than the Confederacy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
merrymay
06:24 PM on 12/31/2010
Because the "so many" are the winners!! The winners always write history making themselves the righteous ones and the losers evil.

Slavery could have been peacefully ended years before. The reason why it wasn't ended is not racism but economics. The looms of England and New England poured cheap calico out to the world. Customers wearing calico and sipping cocoa and coffee sat in meetings righteously condemning the South.

The system was dubbed "Lords of the Loom and the Lash".
05:57 PM on 12/27/2010
Good thing they didn't have self destructing messages until 1966 when Mission: Impossible came out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
only livin boy in NY
04:28 PM on 12/27/2010
if we lose ..remember its states rights not slavery we're fightin for
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
06:44 PM on 12/30/2010
If President James Buchanan, a Pennsylvania Yankee (1857 - 1861) had still been in office reconciliation might have trumped division.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Everett
03:19 PM on 12/31/2010
Yeah and the empire is not invading for oil, its all about WMD and human rights. RIGHT ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
only livin boy in NY
05:26 PM on 12/31/2010
GWmdB
02:02 PM on 12/27/2010
After decoding the message read: "Starving; what I wouldn't do for an In-N-Out Burger right about now!"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:19 PM on 12/27/2010
The Civil War is an amazing milestone in American history. Information is missing via classroom, etc. for at least two generations of citizen/voters. Would love to see a resurgence in interest & education. Bravery, self-sacrifice, redemption(Lincoln), political saavy. How do we move forward at all w/bulk of voters/Americans ignorant of this period in U.S. history?? The question of slavery seems nil to me since Jim Crowe as a political decision to appease the south cancelled out some major aspects of emancipation. The '60s civil rights movement picked up where civil war left off. The stories of our grandads, etc. are not diminished because of the failure of emancipation.
photo
GOPNoLonger
Just not mean enough to be Republican.....
08:03 AM on 12/28/2010
As a life-long Southerner, I will say that you are absolutely right about the stories of our grandads not being diminished. However, you must understand that the Goofs that run around from Virginia to Texas with their Confederate baseball hats and flags in their truck windows are only about the history that their ancestors with an axe to grind have given them.

Civil War History is so tainted by opinion posing as fact that it could be a Disney movie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 PM on 12/28/2010
Got that right! This is an issue I've put little thought into. My mom (I'm lifelong westerner) was Alabama/Georgia, etc. Very much explained faux pas of slavery, Jim Crowe but also how the south was damaged beyond imagination from Sherman's march to the sea, etc.Recovery was happening up until the 50s & 60s (19 that is) The reasons for the destruction were so apparent and understandable but the psychological recovery of the 'south' has yet to happen. Michael Moore pointed this out during the wild resurgence of biblebelting, beer drinking, 'patriots' during the Bush years. He said we never resolved the civil war & that resonated w/me. I think Americans growing past adolescence politically & in lots of ways would really help. Interesting feedback! Thanks!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
01:01 PM on 12/30/2010
Thank you !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Knudsen
01:56 PM on 12/28/2010
it is to bad patreotic censors have had so much influance over over our history books,,, it is letters home and things like this that tell the truth of history...and we critize the russians and others for doing the same things don''t we the old viking sorry did not learn to spell over the holidays what can say
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:40 AM on 12/29/2010
Very true! Definitely have skewed our knowledge of our history. I still think there are many books, etc. available not to speak of dvds, Netflix that tell us about the civil war. So much sacrifice which is being belittled now. Even the south needs up front historians to help set the record straight & honor those poor farm boys & morally conflicted 'others' who fought for their region or state. It's not straight forward, for sure. Thanks!
04:19 PM on 12/29/2010
Would you feel the same way about glorifying Nazism?
09:33 AM on 12/27/2010
And here we are, 145 years after the US Civil War put an end to legal slavery in the United States. Today the United States State Department estimates that 50,000 to 100,000 women and girls are trafficked each year in the United States. Many times these girls are some of the most vulnerable that are thrust into this industry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_slavery).

Isn't it time to eradicate slavery all together?
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
11:52 PM on 12/26/2010
I'm astonished at how many people commenting here still believe that nonsense we were all taught in grade school.

Lincoln only started to care about slavery 3 years into the war, when it became apparent that the North could lose. This was not the Good North versus the Bad South, like many of you are making it out to be. Don't kid yourself, abolishing slavery was only a tactic for winning the war.

Also, the North was notorious for a standard of child labor that made Southern slavery look almost humane. History is written by the victors. As such, you'll be hard pressed to find a text book mention 6 year-olds being maimed by industrial machinery, but all of them hammer on the point of black slavery in the South.

And before anyone wants accuse me of being a southerner or some nonsense- I was born to Polish immigrants who moved to the West. I really have no ancestral stake in the Civil War to speak of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:25 AM on 12/27/2010
Fanned. It took Fredrick Douglas to convince Lincoln to let black soldiers fight, when it looked as if the north could lose, with the promise of freedom for slaves in hostile territory. This rejuvenated the abolitionist movement, who were reluctant to fight against the south, if the end of slavery was not part of the bargain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
04:44 AM on 12/27/2010
I'm astonished (well, not really) that there are still people who try to convince others that Lincoln didn't actually care about the slaves until some time during the war. From early in his political career, Lincoln stated his opposition to slavery, especially the expansion of slavery into US territories where it didn't yet exist, but also (which might be confusing to us) his original opposition to suddenly prohibiting it through abolition, claiming sudden abolition would cause more problems than it would solve (at least in the short term). He originally believed in a gradual dismantling of slavery, sometimes calculating that it might take as long as 100 years. The South didn't believe his stated intentions, so much so that his election was one of the main reasons the South declared secession from the Union.

The history of the Emancipation Proclamation is more complex than merely being a tactic to help win the Civil War. Originally, Lincoln wanted to deliver it in 1862 AFTER the Union won some key battles that Lincoln thought meant the end of the war was near. But as the war continued, Lincoln soon realized that emancipation was the key remaining element necessary to win the war and keep the Union together.

The North may not have been perfect in its labor practices, and not racist-free, but at least they wanted to end slavery of black people, as in outright ownership of one person by another. Compared to the South, that was no small desire.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Everett
04:22 PM on 01/02/2011
Yeah, But the North and the Empire Lincoln helped to establish, went west and Committed genocide on many of the Native American Indian peoples. NO SMALL FEAT !
I would say that when it came to the Native American, the people of the North were, well lets just say RACISTS.As one of your imperialist Generals said " The only good Indian I ever saw was a DEAD Indian" Gen Phillip Sheridan. All this as the Empire continued its crusade to eradicate the Native American Indian, that they considered an infestation.
10:42 PM on 12/26/2010
I still dont understand why they call it a CIVIL WAR when by definition, it was not
photo
AZLibDem
If you're speeding, you're an "illegal"
11:21 PM on 12/26/2010
The CSA was never realistically recognized as an independent country; as such, it was in fact a civil war between the states of the Union.
11:52 PM on 12/26/2010
go look up what a civil war is, and educate yourself
12:10 AM on 12/27/2010
do you even know what a civil war is??
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DJlaysitup
Most people who have been fooled won't believe it.
10:19 PM on 12/26/2010
A bit O.T. but more Europeans died in one battle in WWI that did on both sides during the entire American Civil War

This is not to diminish the suffering and loss of life during our civil war - only to make the point that the European nations seem to have been able to get past their previous wars, yet , for some reason we keeping fighting our own on many levels.
photo
Cantinflas
My micro-bio is not empty.
11:55 PM on 12/26/2010
The nation was seriously divided brfore the War Between the States, which, of course, was why there was a war. The war and its aftermath only deepened the division in many ways for decades, even up to the present day.
10:36 AM on 12/27/2010
It is mainly Southerners that nurture this grudge.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Everett
06:40 PM on 12/29/2010
Well the Baltic States didn't get past their occupation by the soviet union until just a few years ago.
They are now free of that National Tyranny. someday (soon) perhaps your empire will collapse and the Confederate States too will be free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladybost74
Why not laugh, crying hurts
08:39 PM on 12/26/2010
i wonder will Texas not put this in the history books too
photo
Intolerantcentrist
No thanks…I brought my own air.
11:35 PM on 12/26/2010
They’re still trying to re-write their “DECLARATION OF CAUSES: February 2, 1861; A declaration of the causes which impel the State of Texas to secede from the Federal Union.”

Now they’re calling the Texas “Declaration” a call to “States Rights”; back then they called it sometime different.
http://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ref/abouttx/secession/2feb1861.html

Their arrogance of ignorance is just amazing to me…
12:20 AM on 12/27/2010
Great post. Fann-ed!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
10:17 AM on 12/28/2010
Thank you:
'Arrogance of ignorance' is so apropos.
AgingLady
laughter is best medicine
06:25 PM on 12/26/2010
Real people in a really tragic situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
06:18 PM on 12/26/2010
In other words general.....you're screwed.
05:03 PM on 12/26/2010
Nice little tidbit on The Civil War.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
newworldman777
What would our future 7th generation think of us?
04:59 PM on 12/26/2010
My own g-g-grandfather, a member of the Mississippi 36th Infantry, participated in the Vicksburg campaign. He went through the siege along with the others and was paroled following the surrender.

I wrote a book (historical novel) about the the Union's failed attempt (Yazoo Pass Expedition) to reach Vicksburg via the Tallahatchie and Yazoo Rivers. The Rebels scuttled the steamship "Star of the West" in the Tallahatchie River's channel at Greenwood, MS to obstruct the navigation of the Union's gunboats and transports, and they constructed a defensive fort of cotton bales (Fort Pemberton) there. Following a pitched battle, the Union conceded defeat and steamed back up the Tallahatchie, marking the first time that a U.S. Naval force was defeated by a land force.

The "Star of the West" was the very side-wheel steamer that was targeted by the first shots of the Civil War, on January 9, 1861. With the mission of resupplying Fort Sumter, she steamed through Charleston Harbor before being fired upon by artillery manned by seceded South Carolina troops. She consequently turned around and steamed back to New York, whence she had come. The remains of the steamer now lie at the bottom of the Tallahatchie River at Greenwood, about a mile from my home. The sesquicentennial (150th anniversary) of that January 9th attack occurs in around 2 weeks.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
09:33 PM on 12/26/2010
Fascinating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Everett
06:43 PM on 12/29/2010
They were not REBELS, They were Confederate soldiers.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]