More

Even At Lowest, U.S. Teen Birth Rate Far Higher Than W. Europe

MIKE STOBBE   12/30/10 07:26 PM ET   AP

Birth Rate

ATLANTA — The rate of teen births in the U.S. is at its lowest level in almost 70 years. Yet, the sobering context is that the teen pregnancy rate is far lower in many other countries. The most convincing explanation is that contraceptive use is much higher among teens in most Western European countries.

Last week, U.S. health officials released new government figures for 2009 showing 39 births per 1,000 girls, ages 15 through 19 – the lowest rate since records have been kept on this issue.

That's close to the teen birth rate for Romania, Turkey and Bulgaria in 2007, the latest numbers available from the World Bank, which collects a variety of data gauging international development.

The teen birth rate for Western Europe and a few other countries is dramatically lower. In the United Kingdom it's 24 per 1,000 girls. In traditionally Catholic Ireland, it's 16 and in Italy it's 5. France's rate is 7 per 1,000. Canada's rate is under 13, Sweden's is under 8, Japan's is about 5, and in the Netherlands it's close to 4.

The disparity has existed for decades. Several experts say the reason mostly has to do with more realistic approaches to birth control.

Birth control is less expensive and easier for teens to get in many other developed countries than in the United States. And teachers, parents and physicians tend to be more accepting of teenage sexuality and more likely to encourage use of contraception, said Sarah Brown, chief executive of the Washington, D.C.-based National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

Teen births are a concern: The hazards of teen pregnancy include higher dropout rates, as well as possible health and other problems for young mothers and their kids.

There are few comprehensive studies of why teen birth rates vary from country to country. And experts say there's probably not one overarching explanation. For example, the reason for a low teen birth rate may be different in the Netherlands, where prostitution is legal, than in Japan, which traditionally has a more conservative culture when it comes to sex and sex education.

Some countries may have predominant social values that discourage teenage sex, but abstinence-only education programs – a hot topic in the United States – are generally not considered a major reason other countries have lower teen birth rates.

"Not at all," said Cecilia Ekeus, a researcher in international public health at Stockholm's Karolinska Institute.

"We're working the opposite way," she added, describing Sweden's comprehensive sex education and easy teen access to condoms and birth control pills.

Experts say teen births can be lower when:

_Teens have less sex.

_Teens use contraception correctly and often.

_A larger proportion of pregnant teens has an abortion.

But do those explain the international differences?

As to the first, there is no evidence teens in Europe are having less sex than American teens, so that's not considered a likely explanation.

If anything, "there may be more sex there than here" among teenagers, said Carl Haub, a demographer with the Washington, D.C.-based Population Reference Bureau.

As to the third, most international comparisons of abortion rates are considered dated and somewhat unreliable because of incomplete information. One smaller study found the United States had a higher abortion rate than Canada and some European countries, and not all experts think it's a major reason for different birth rates.

But some researchers say abortion is a significant factor in some nations. In Sweden, for example, abortions are legal without parental consent – and quite common. Indeed, one in two women who get pregnant in their lifetime has an abortion, said Ekeus.

There's much more consensus that birth control is the key to a lower teen birth rate.

Studies indicate that about 80 percent of sexually active teen girls in Sweden and about 88 percent in England and France use contraception. In the United States, it's about 61 percent.

And in some European countries they are more likely to use longer-lasting forms of birth control, such as the IUD, experts said.

Other explanations? Perhaps race and ethnicity, said Dr. Monique Chireau, a Duke University assistant professor who researches adolescent pregnancy.

She noted the birth rate for white U.S. teens – about 26 per 1,000 – is much lower then the black and Hispanic rates (59 and 70, respectively).

"There are distinctions between different ethnicities," and the U.S. whites are more comparable to countries with more homogenous white populations, she said.

Factors like proportions of teens that are married in each country, proportions living in poverty, and other demographics also should be considered, she and others said.

Cultural expectations have a lot to do with it, too, said several sources pointing to societies where teen childbearing is not considered an attractive option.

In Sweden, teen motherhood is so far outside the norm that young moms often are assumed to have other problems like a psychiatric diagnosis or drug addiction, Ekeus said.

Swedish teen mothers "differ very much from the general population," she said.

___

Online:

U.N.-World Bank teen birth data: http://tinyurl.com/36nyqmu

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

ATLANTA — The rate of teen births in the U.S. is at its lowest level in almost 70 years. Yet, the sobering context is that the teen pregnancy rate is far lower in many other countries. The most conv...
ATLANTA — The rate of teen births in the U.S. is at its lowest level in almost 70 years. Yet, the sobering context is that the teen pregnancy rate is far lower in many other countries. The most conv...
Filed by Nicholas Miriello  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 90
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:43 PM on 01/03/2011
The fact this is the birth rate we are speaking of, versus pregnancy rates, is misleading, as the birth rate obviously will be lower since abortion was legalized, so statistics before then are largely incomparable. There are more teens just having abortions rather than giving birth. As the article infers, this can also easily explain the birth rates in other countires, as they may just be having more abortions, which may certainly be so given even less restrictions. And now with drugs like RU-486 and Plan B, there are how many more abortions, and which may not even be counted as abortions, if just due to the denial that these are abortifacients.

We should be thankful that the attitude in the U.S. regarding having the baby versus an abortion is not as warped as in these other countries, e.g., the comments regarding Sweden about those teens who choose to have their children are considered disturbed some how.

There seems to be an underlying agenda to the story- to argue that we need even more contraception and sex-ed programs, failing to realize the connection between contraception and increased promiscuity, and abortion.
08:09 PM on 01/03/2011
Apparently you had your mind made up when you read the article (or you did not read the article), since this is what the article say about abortion:

"One smaller study found the United States had a higher abortion rate than Canada and some European countries, and not all experts think it's a major reason for different birth rates."

We certainly need a more comprehensive sex education, it is obvious that what we are doing is not working.
05:53 PM on 01/03/2011
"And experts say there's probably not one overarching explanation."

And yet notice how many try to make sure there is one overarching explanation. That's what happens when agendas trump solutions. Fact is, the reasons are legion, for they are many. Anyone who has lived in various countries in Europe, or knows folks from different countries around the world, knows it's far more than one reason or the other - as the article repeats over and over and over again. If we really tried to look at the various reasons, we might find some solutions. But all too often we become content to take an article that admits nobody really knows why, and demand it's because of the issue or cause I believe in, that's why!
02:04 PM on 01/02/2011
Does this have anything to do with our abstinence programs?
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
09:06 PM on 01/02/2011
the participants in abstinence programs have a higher pregnancy rate....sorry....
10:46 PM on 01/03/2011
Interesting there are no citations provided but just a blanket statement, which makes it questionable, as indeed it is. And any data should be very specific too, i.e. not just because the newspapers or planned parenthood reported some study. Of course, there are studies showing the opposite so such a blanket statement is again immediately questionable. Also, according to the centers for disease control, about 3/4 of sex-ed funding has gone towards non-abstinence approaches, so applying the same logic, the regular sex-ed progams would seem to responsible for the majority of teen pregnanicies, cases of V.D., etc. Now there will be no abstinence funding thanks to Obama, and I will bet all the money in the world that the rates of teen pregnancy, V.D., illegitimacy, will not decrease, but in fact will increase. And who/what will be blamed then?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:27 PM on 01/02/2011
So where are the statistics that compare US states with comprehensive sex ed, like West Coast and New England states, with the Bible Belt states where sex ed is all about "don't do it"?
I'm sure the teen pregnancy rates will show the same picture.
Oh and the social stigma differences are there too. It may be normal to be pregnant as a teen in Tennessee, but not here in CA. Here it means you're poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZiloRS
01:18 PM on 01/02/2011
I think two important (and contradictory) factors are that the U.S. is big on cultural shaming: you are somehow morally a bad person if you have sex outside marriage. And the U.S. (being a capitalist country) sells sex very well. In fact, *most* products here, I would venture to say, are sold by equating them with sex. It makes for a very confusing society to live in. That goes double if you're a young person coming up in this culture.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 AM on 01/02/2011
I blame it all on sexxy movies, dancin' and the bibble ....
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
09:07 PM on 01/02/2011
and don't forget the alky and playin cards....
photo
constitutional 1
No ad hominem
08:16 AM on 01/02/2011
"There are distinctions between different ethnicities," and the U.S. whites are more comparable to countries with more homogenous white populations, she said.
01:52 AM on 01/02/2011
My first instinct, having lived in Sweden, is that abortion accounts for the discrepancy. And by the end of the article, the writer seemed to suggest that could very well be a cause. There is a difference between teen pregnancy and teen birth rates, and for the article to say that higher teen birth rates are of concern because of health risks, without mentioning that the very reason the birth rates are higher could be due to something else in Western Europe--abortion--which also carries health risks, is a bit silly.

I have come back to this belief with various topics, but it applies here as well: humans are not as civilized as we like to think we are. We do inhumane things because we like the end results more than the inhumane means to get there. And we sometimes even consider ourselves progressive in doing so. Like the southern Italians who offered their sons up for castration up until three centuries ago (many died) in the hopes they would be operatic stars. Or the idea that a progressive country is one in which young women have choices and are not burdened with a baby which stops their options for the rest of their lives. Such a vision may be progressive in terms of what a woman is afforded. But I don't think anyone would say that the means to such a progressive vision of the future is progressive. I hope that no one thinks abortion is progressive.
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
12:13 PM on 01/02/2011
i think choice is progressive. choice includes contraceptives, education and abortion.
02:12 AM on 01/03/2011
Choice is progressive. Choice includes abortion.

Is that true?

In a way, but people can choose lots of things. People can choose to vote for Sarah Palin.

The issue I brought up is whether abortion is progressive. And I understand that choice is a factor in the controversial topic of abortion in that it involves a woman who is carrying a fetus. What role does the woman have in making a choice about something in her body? Choice is unique to abortion in that way. But choice isn't the entire story of abortion and whether or not it is progressive.

I'm just saying that your transitive property argument doesn't hold water entirely. The issue of choice is part of what could be used to make the argument that abortion is progressive. But abortion is not an entity that entirely exists as a subset of the virtue of choice.

When people say they are pro-life or pro-choice, they are choosing to ignore the fact that they are talking about the same issue--abortion--by referring to it with words that a reasonable person could not disagree with: choice or life. Both choice and life are factors in a discussion of abortion, but neither of them is the entirety of the situation.

Personally, I think abortion itself is not progressive. I think progress means finding more and more humane and more and more compassionate ways to deal with problems. I simply don't see abortion meeting that criteria.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZiloRS
01:12 PM on 01/02/2011
Totally off topic: I LOVE your handle.
01:55 AM on 01/03/2011
Thanks
01:42 AM on 01/02/2011
Bristol and Sarah have knocked themselves out to make sure that pregnant teens get what they deserve. "Pregnant teens", actually means Bristol, and "get what they deserve", actually means becoming a millionaire for being se xua lly active and not using birth control.

Oh, and they believe in ABSTINENCE also and too. ABSTINENCE of THOUGHT, that is!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneTop
Uh, is that a beer hall?
01:22 AM on 01/02/2011
Number One .... finally !
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
12:57 AM on 01/02/2011
Proof that abstinence only programs are a waste of money and don't work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Batland
11:45 AM on 01/02/2011
It would work if men were not so picky about raising other males babies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
malander
11:43 PM on 01/01/2011
Sex in the US is considered dirty and kids hide what they are doing. Because birth control is not as readily available, they have unprotected sex and end up pregnant. Education and information are the keys to lowering teen pregnancy.
08:11 PM on 01/03/2011
Well said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmiCataclysm
07:56 PM on 01/01/2011
How can you compare us to Western Europe? How is that a relevant comparison. We have 330 Million persons residing here. Each color of person here outnumbers the most populous W. European countries' entire populations.
10:30 PM on 01/01/2011
USA holds 4.51% of the worlds population (source ;- wikipedia) US census bureau estimates 2009 population in US at 307,006,550 ..western europe holds and estimated 397,475, 754 people in a much smaller land mass ... western europe has a far greater population density..countries such as UK have almost 700 per sq mile..here its approx 67 .. in terms of wealth distribution we are no comaprison .(europe is considerably more equitable ) and in comparison of educational standard we are 3rd world ...but population numbers are a reasonable comparison ... ..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmiCataclysm
07:27 PM on 01/02/2011
The United States is a COUNTRY.

Western Europe is part of a CONTINENT with many individual COUNTRIES that have their own GOVERNMENTS.
.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
05:39 PM on 01/01/2011
More teen mothers and also more abortions. Until the so called pro life crowd quit opposing sex education and contraceptives this will continue to be the case.
02:45 AM on 01/02/2011
X2
schatsie
banks are more dangerous than standing armies
09:13 PM on 01/02/2011
They may call themselves PRO-LIFE but they are Misogynists who have prevented women from voting, from discussing birth control with their doctors until the 1960s....This is the next progression....just remember they are misogynists who do not care about the children we have or teenage pregnancies......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
05:18 PM on 01/01/2011
The US population is declining. It is not a good situation. Children are the precious resource of the nation and no matter the circumstances of birth, the children need the citizenry to create the environment/institutions necessary for their human development.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GreenKate
05:41 PM on 01/01/2011
The US population has increased by 200 million in the last century. No more egg nog for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
06:44 PM on 01/01/2011
Our own human development has been impacted by the killer culture, radical population control policies emanating from International leadership. The population boom you site, is the result of the success of the American economic model our elite have been tearing down these 60 years.

People have been dumbed down regarding our national perspective and priorities, and have not considered the consequences of policies of liberation that promise Utopia.
02:50 AM on 01/02/2011
Where did you get that the population is declining? It is growing..
1900 76,212,168
1910 92,228,496
1920 106,021,537
1930 123,202,624
1940 132,164,569
1950 151,325,798
1960 179,323,175
1970 203,211,926
1980 226,545,805
1990 248,709,873
2000 281,421,906
2010 308,745,538

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_the_United_States
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClarcKing
Citizen
01:24 PM on 01/02/2011
Our standard of living goes up as the population goes up. Demands for radical population reduction will not produce the liberation/benefits promised. Just the opposite.