More

WaPo Editors Finally Realize The GOP Isn't Serious About The Debt

First Posted: 01/03/11 12:37 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:20 PM ET

Washington Post

For the better part of the past year, the editors of the Washington Post have been generically a-screech with worry over the deficits, and their insistence that the Obama administration needs to get serious about them. Well, today, the editors seem to have finally realized that the alternative is not much better, and that the GOP may actually not be all that serious about taming them either:

Are House Republicans serious about dealing with the deficit? You could listen to their rhetoric - or you could read the rules they are poised to adopt at the start of the new Congress. The former promises a new fiscal sobriety. The latter suggests that the new GOP majority is determined to continue the spree of unaffordable tax-cutting.

The ominous signs come in the wording of the new majority's version of its pay-as-you-go rules, which normally require that new programs or tax initiatives be covered with cuts to other programs or new revenue. In the GOP concept, pay-as-you-go applies only to spending programs. When it comes to tax cuts, it's all go, no pay. Taxes can be cut, and the national debt increased, without any offsetting savings.

The editors are referring to the new "cut-go" plan, which exempts tax cuts from the fiscal realities of the federal government's balance sheet. It seems to have caught them by surprise! Had they, say, availed themselves of their own paper's reporting, they might have caught a whiff of this coming from several million miles away. Let's check in with Washington Post reporter Lori Montgomery, circa September:

Even as they hammer Democrats for running up record budget deficits, Senate Republicans are rolling out a plan to permanently extend an array of expiring tax breaks that would deprive the Treasury of more than $4 trillion over the next decade, nearly doubling projected deficits over that period unless dramatic spending cuts are made.

Of course, the Obama administration's original stated plan was to sunset the tax cuts on top earners, which would have avoided expanding at least some of that massive debt hole. Democrats backed down from putting the GOP on the spot, however, punting the decision on the Bush tax cuts to the lame-duck session, when everyone buckled under the pressure of all the "hostage taking" that Obama would finally and impotently decry.

But when the White House struck its deal to extend the top-bracket tax cuts, the WaPo editors were incredibly enthusiastic. In a Dec. 23 editorial, they gushed that the "president and lawmakers have every reason to feel good about the closing weeks of the 111th Congress" and that the tax-cut deal specifically was an "achievement to be celebrated." No mention was made at the time at the way that same tax cut deal added to the deficits, because the glorious bipartisanship on display trumped all of those practical considerations.

The editors closed that piece by writing: "We continue to think the best strategy to keep an ugly spring from spoiling December's good cheer would be for Mr. Obama to rise above the fray with a long-term, make-the-hard-choices plan to reduce the nation's debt while fostering economic growth." Quite the ironic kicker, given that they were celebrating a decision that would achieve neither growth nor deficit reduction.

The Republican stance on the Bush tax cuts is an essential component to the philosophy of cut-go, so maybe the Post editors should have thought twice about celebrating it. At any rate, it seems that they are poised for an exquisite heartbreak, of which they were a brilliant ally. It sucks to be the last to know! Maybe next time around, they'll know better.

[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

For the better part of the past year, the editors of the Washington Post have been generically a-screech with worry over the deficits, and their insistence that the Obama administration needs to get s...
For the better part of the past year, the editors of the Washington Post have been generically a-screech with worry over the deficits, and their insistence that the Obama administration needs to get s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 410
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
realitytrumpsbull 04:24 PM on 01/03/2011
I say balance the budget. Hire/appoint  the financial experts, provide them with the records, and the data processing equipment necessary to handle it, and make the magic happen, and publish the results publicly, in the paper, online, wherever/whenever/whatever. Call IBM, and have them load Deep Blue on a trailer, and ship it to the main accounting office. Cut the hype, and get this country on a paying  Read More...
10:35 PM on 01/05/2011
You say that Obama wanted to "sunset" the Bush tax cuts for the rich. That's just not so. It's bad journalism. You should instead be writing about the fact that Obama claimed he wanted to sunset the tax cuts for the rich but actually supported them, since that is what happened. If Obama had truly wanted to end the tax cuts for the rich he could have. All he needed to do was to ask Reid to pass the original Dem bill extending only tax cuts to the middle class by using Budgetaary Reconciliation, the special process that requires only a simple majority for passage. Bush used Reconciliation to pass the tax cuts for the rich, but Obama refused to use it to let them die. Bush was evil, but at least he was honest. And on top of that Obama negotiated a Social Security tax cut that puts SS in real danger in the future. Even Bush didn't do that. Your articles are usually excellent, but you have failed to write about how Obama actually wanted to pass the tax cuts for the rich. Thus you allowed Obama and Reid to get away with blaming the Republicans and escaping from responsibility for their own actions. I hope you will return to your usual high standards in the future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Fisher
04:08 PM on 01/15/2011
well your not all wrong on this point. reconciliation was used during the health care debate so that option was off the table.
04:18 PM on 01/05/2011
Follow the money. WaPo editors are paid by someone who's political interest they have no choice but to promote. Journalism is no longer independent these days. So it could be good to be like Palin. Don't read.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Fisher
04:09 PM on 01/15/2011
sounds to me they just wanted to sell some papers
hopeisalive
Old enough to know better, but young enough to try
08:27 AM on 01/05/2011
It took the WaPo this long to figure out that the Party of No doesn't always do the right thing? What a surprise.
cuchulain
Occupy the Tao
01:34 PM on 01/04/2011
It's amazing to hear conservative politicians talk about how wrong it is to pass on deficits and debt to our grandchildren.

The hypocrisy of that is off the charts.

When they call for tax cuts in the here and now, they are passing on debt and deficits to their grandchildren. They are essentially saying that we won't pay for what we spend in the here and now. You pay for it in future generations.

Every time they call for tax cuts, the Media should remind them of that.

Clinton left office with a massive surplus. The CBO projected, at that time, that we could pay off the entire national debt by 2014. We were on the road to doing that. We were on the road to stopping the debt and making it so our grandchildren wouldn't have one to deal with.

Bush gets in office, slashes taxes, goes to war, pushes for an unfunded Medicare giveaway to Big Pharma, and doubles the debt. He leaves the next president nearly 11 TRILLION in debt and 1.3 trillion in that year's deficit.

Conservatives, obviously, don't want to talk about that. They don't want to talk about the fact that THEY are the ones who derailed our chances to pay off the debt and take that off the table for future generations. They did that to our grandchildren. They made sure the rich could party today and leave the tab for future generations.

Incredible that they want to blame that on others.
12:39 PM on 01/04/2011
Another example of conservatives wedded to an ideology despite the real world around them. It is the achilles heel of their movement - but we and the media rarely confront them with it. We need to be asking them with a civil and devilish smile, "How are going to pay for that (war, tax cut, ect) or what is going to happen in the real world if you pass that? And just keep asking it until they look silly blowing a gasket, change their thick thinking or admit that if a gov treasure had 0 dollars they'd still pass a tax cut...as ritualistic offering to the idols of their ideology. The 2011 progressive offensive weapon must be this concept of 'conservative ideology is divorced from reality' and the progressive solutions must be tied to reality over ideology if we have half a chance at combating the insanity about to unfold. The one upshot - because of conservative penchant for ideology over reality - real life tends to make them look pretty foolish - unfortunately after the damage has already been done. This is why knowing your history is so so important. Name any war that conservatives love so much...it was always about ideology over context...and if understood correctly always makes them look foolish. Happy asking annoying reality based questions.

Cheers.
AquarianInExile
Eykis is Aquarian
12:49 PM on 01/04/2011
Empire,

You are correct - the Rethuggery Obstructionist Party of Teabagging Fewls has no understanding of "real life" or "Americans".

F&F

--------------------Eykis
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
11:01 AM on 01/04/2011
The Washington Post reminds me of the old idea of "The Peter Principle": In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to their level of incompetence. The WP has risen up the ranks of newspapers until it now hold a position where it displays its incompetence in all its glory on a daily basis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
10:29 AM on 01/04/2011
So it only took WaPo three decades to realize the truth!
sanevoter
never missed a vote since 1965
09:14 AM on 01/04/2011
I think we are entering a time when the obligation of the media of this country to educate the people as to what is really going on in Washington and it's long term implications has never been higher. Letting talking heads throw out speaking points (regardless if they are from left or right) that either mislead or are simply lies without challenges or clear balance by other views simply adds to the propagandizing of the media that has been in progress for the last 25 years. When the founders spoke of a free press, they meant a free press, not those bought by particular political forces. Propaganda radio needs serious challenges if we are to survive.
photo
keramos
Who are the brain police?
10:24 AM on 01/04/2011
Concur.  The media got cowed in 2001 and remained that way through most of the boy george regime.  It's time they did their job properly.

23
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenyatta J Yamel
09:14 AM on 01/04/2011
What was their first hint? All I had to do was watch their lips move.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
08:59 AM on 01/04/2011
The best thing that could happen in the next month or two dare i say it is to have the Democrats in the House tell Speaker Beohner that they agree with the Tea party and vote down raising the debt ceiling, and watch the good old Republican establishment cringe........... That is right Democrats call the Republicans bluff and vote for it and watch the fun begin!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chichel
Yep, that's my bleeding heart you see on my sleeve
01:31 PM on 01/04/2011
The whole debt ceiling vote is ridiculous anyway. We're the only country that does this. It's just a political football.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
08:54 AM on 01/05/2011
This is the best way to send the whole economical world into a tail spin and at this time sending various nations into bankruptcy cause a collapse of the free market which in turn would ruin the wealthy. Of course it would finally give our nation back to its people......
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
08:43 AM on 01/04/2011
Wasn't it Dick Cheney who said "Reagan proved, deficits don't matter"?

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/01/26-0 explains the deficit and the Republicans part in it much better than I could.
GHO
Sooner or later you run out of other peoples money
08:33 AM on 01/04/2011
Just who is "serious" about the debt or deficits? Both parties consider it a big deal - but only when the other side is in office.

Dems and Repubs seem like a married couple awash in debt - fat mortgage, two car payments and maxed credit cards - arguing over what to buy next. He wants a new flat screen and she wants a living room set. Each one says they can't afford what the other wants but argues that they absolutely NEED the item he or she is touting. Of course, in reality, they can't afford either.

Congress seems the same. Dems and Repubs argue over tax cuts and expanded entitlement programs when we can't even afford what we spend now.

No one in DC can be called "serious" about the debt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
10:32 AM on 01/04/2011
Actually, Democrats always pay down the national debt, and Republicans always deficit spend like the USD is going out of style (which is actually their goal).
 
This is simple, basic, unambiguous fact.  "Fical Conservatives" created ALL of our over $20 Trillion National Debt, and Democrats have been the only ones to try paying it down.
 
So you can stop puling about "Dems and Repubs", or "Both parties", or any other "split the difference", "they are all the same" shrill puling talking point.  They aren't the same, as the facts clearly demonstrate.
photo
Hitchcockcameo
In the shadows, directing your every move.
02:58 PM on 01/04/2011
In fact, this is the rationale used by some blue dawgs for following the Republican lead. They've long ago tired of siding with liberal Dems in fixing the Cons mistakes because as soon as the Cons regain power, they screw things up again. I'm not saying that's the correct attitude, but it shows you who in D.C. is actually fixing problems (Dems) and who is causing them (Cons).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Fisher
04:17 PM on 01/15/2011
the two Santa theory.
cuchulain
Occupy the Tao
01:27 PM on 01/04/2011
We could easily afford to pay for what we spend. We're the least taxed nation in the developed world.

The Federal government took in just 15% of GDP in taxes last year. Compare that with the Scandinavian countries, for instance. They routinely take in 35-50% of GDP.

They also live longer, healthier lives, are better educated, and happier.

It's not the total amount of spending that is problematic. It's the revenue side of the ledger. And a ton of that spending is actually just subsidizing rich people through corporate welfare and other wealth redistribution scams (upward).

Americans have to decide what they want government to do, and then decide to pay for it in the here and now, instead of putting it on the national credit card. That simply means raising taxes on the wealthy. They've seen the vast majority of the tax cuts in the last several decades, and all of the gains in wealth accumulation.

It's time for them to give back. They can afford it.

The rich used to bring in roughly 8% if the total income pie. Now it's 25%. And while their take of the pie tripled, their taxes were cut by 2/3rds.

That's not right and it's not sustainable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chichel
Yep, that's my bleeding heart you see on my sleeve
01:33 PM on 01/04/2011
Thank you for speaking truth to power and using common sense all the while. It's a beautiful thing. Fanned and faved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Fisher
04:18 PM on 01/15/2011
hear here
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
josephebacon
08:20 AM on 01/04/2011
The Washington Post is a joke. It's just a propaganda organ for the Republican Party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
applebutter
03:03 PM on 01/05/2011
They have some excellent progressive voices there, too, like Gene Robinson and EJ Dionne. They are part of my daily new rounds.
photo
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:44 AM on 01/04/2011
WaPo decides not to be the WSJ's wannabee.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
07:14 AM on 01/04/2011
Usually we'd rely on the Democrats to fight tax cuts and Republicans to fight spending, but since the Bush administration they're all useless. Neither party can resist throwing tax cuts and more benefits and bribes to their constituents. Spineless and useless.