iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

WikiLeaks: Sea Shepherd, Anti-Whaling Group, Tax Exempt Status Revocation Discussed By U.S., Japan Officials

JAY ALABASTER   01/ 3/11 04:31 AM ET   AP

Antarctica Whaling

TOKYO — Japanese and American officials discussed taking action to weaken a prominent anti-whaling group, with Tokyo insisting that Sea Shepherd's confrontations on the high seas actually hurt efforts to reduce whaling, U.S. diplomatic cables show.

The U.S. representative to the International Whaling Commission, Monica Medina, discussed revoking the U.S.-based conservation group's tax exempt status during a meeting with senior officials from the Fisheries Agency of Japan in November 2009, according to the documents released by WikiLeaks on Monday.

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's yearly protest campaigns – which chase Japan's whaling fleet in boats trying to disrupt the hunt by fouling fishing lines and throwing rancid butter at whalers – have drawn high-profile donors and volunteers, and spawned the popular Animal Planet series "Whale Wars." In Japan, the harrassment is seen by some as foreign interferance in national affairs, making politicians wary of getting involved.

Action against Sea Shepherd would be a "major element" in achieving success at international negotiations on the number of whales killed each year, the cables cite the director general of Japan's fisheries agency, Katsuhiro Machida, as saying.

Referring to Sea Shepherd, Medina said "she believes the USG (U.S. government) can demonstrate the group does not deserve tax exempt status based on their aggressive and harmful actions," according the cables.

Paul Watson, founder of Sea Shepherd, said Japan has previously pressured foreign governments to take action against the group, such as revoking the registration of its ships. He said the organization had last been audited about two years ago, which is before the exchanges detailed in the cables.

"We have had our tax status since 1981, and we have done nothing different since then to cause the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) to change that," he told The Associated Press by telephone from his ship.

The diplomatic cables, posted on WikiLeaks' secret-sharing website early Monday but dated Jan. 1, show Japanese officials repeatedly told U.S. counterparts the group's actions were making whaling a political issue and hurting any chance of a compromise on the numbers of whales killed each year.

Sea Shepherd vessels are currently chasing Japan's whaling fleet in the Antarctic Ocean in the hopes of interrupting its hunt, which kills up to 1,000 whales annually and typically lasts from December to February.

Japan hunts whales under the research exemption to a 1986 worldwide ban on commercial hunts. Critics say there is no reason to kill the animals, and the research program amounts to commercial whaling in disguise because surplus meat from the hunt is sold domestically.

Protest ships harass the whaling fleet, and clashes between the sides often take place. On Saturday, Watson said that whalers had shot water cannons at anti-whaling activists nearby.

Last January, a Sea Shepherd boat was sunk after its bow was sheared off in a collision with a whaling vessel and a New Zealand protestor was later arrested after he boarded a Japanese whaling ship. He was taken to Tokyo and later deported.

The cables are dated before an International Whaling Commission meeting last year that was seen as a major chance to end a decades long stalemate. They show the U.S. worked with Japan in late 2009 to reach a deal on the issue, calling it an "irritant" in international relations.

The meeting ended without a major agreement.

"Action on the SSCS (Sea Shepherd Conservation Society) would be a major element for Japan in the success of the overall negotiations," a Japanese official said, according to one cable.

Watson said Monday that his group was against anything less than a complete stop to Japan's whaling program in Antarctica. The activists hope to block whaling activities for the Japanese fleet so it incurs deep financial losses.

"I don't think a solution is going to come through politics, it's going to come through economics," Watson told The Associated Press by telephone from his ship while pursuing the Japanese fleet.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

TOKYO — Japanese and American officials discussed taking action to weaken a prominent anti-whaling group, with Tokyo insisting that Sea Shepherd's confrontations on the high seas actually hurt e...
TOKYO — Japanese and American officials discussed taking action to weaken a prominent anti-whaling group, with Tokyo insisting that Sea Shepherd's confrontations on the high seas actually hurt e...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 612
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimpager
06:29 PM on 01/11/2011
The Japanese "Research" ships claim to be collecting tissue samples and "need" say, ten humpbacks to achieve their goals each trip (its actually more). Average adult Humpbacks are say 50 tons. If my math is right that's 100,000 pounds of tissue samples per whale times ten whales per trip or 1,000,000 pounds of tissue samples per trip. Then they sell those tissue samples in the fish markets of Tokyo (before actually researching them) and we are still waiting to see our first research papers....five years later. But I guess we can't get too upset with the Japanese "research" community. With a million pounds of tissue samples, they are still manufacturing microscopes in backlog to look at their samples and they're still training marine biologists in their universities to use the microscopes to look at the tissue samples that are growing in backlog at a million pounds per year. My guess is they never catch up with their tissue samples. But they might make a hell of a lot of money in the Tokyo fish market.

And now the rumor is President Obama wants to agree with the Japanese to lift the "research" cap on Humpback Whales that can be caught each year to something on the order of 40,000 whales each year. Eureka. More tissue samples.

More change you can believe in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:40 PM on 01/13/2011
Well lets use facts that the Japanese have yet to take a humpback whale, so even your exaggerated average weight doesn't matter.

Plus you forget to account for the fact that not all of a whale is meat. From data on Greenland's hunt the meat is about 70%.

Oh and then there is the fact that you don't need to analyze every ounce of the whale to get your data. A few small samples from the organs of interest is all, probably less than a kilo per whale.

And Japan has produced a slew of research papers and delivered significant data to the IWC.

Lastly there is no "research" cap on Humpback whales or any other whales for that matter. The IWC allows a country to set whatever quota they want to.
09:30 PM on 01/13/2011
What people fail to realize is the Japanese perspective on whaling. The fact is, most people in Japan don't even eat whale or dolphin. If anything, it's more a annual tradition or simply a rare occurrence when they do.

A man living in Japan, interviewed and uploaded a video on just this topic.

Quote: "You can imagine if a bunch of foreigners came to your country and were sneaking around, breaking the law... And then saying to you, 'Look what your country's doing, it's doing this bad thing you should stop.' In the unlikely event that they (Japanese) see it, they're just going to think how rude those people were to come to this country and do that."

That is why this anti-whaling, Cove stuff is all pointless. Ignorance is funny sometimes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN22mAI9r24

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZe_vJ7i_FA&feature=channel
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cheyla
02:11 PM on 02/16/2011
No one is going to Japan telling them to stop whaling. Japan is invading a whale sanctuary (definition = whales are safe) to murder thousands of innocent animals in a brutal way that causes prolonged suffering before death. Sea Shepherd is protecting whales within this sanctuary. . .so why doesn't Japan "go home?"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:05 AM on 01/06/2011
While I understand the sentiments of the idealistic volunteers who sign up for Sea Shepherd duty, the irresponsible and unsafe egomania of Watson makes the organization itself entirely unsympathetic and I wouldn't doubt the U.S. and Japan would discuss how to shut them down before he gets somebody (probably a Steve Irwin crew member) killed.

Yes I hope the Japanese stop whaling someday ... no, I don't find the cultural imperialism of Watson trying to impose those values on a sovereign people any more attractive than I'd find Saudis coming to South Beach and trying to put burqas on women. Watson is one of the ugliest of Ugly Americans out there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:23 PM on 01/06/2011
Well he was born in Canada.
08:53 PM on 01/06/2011
Eastern Canada to be exact and we have no use for him here. He has a down right hatred for fishermen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lro7644
09:54 PM on 01/06/2011
That would be fine. They can whale all they want in their own waters not in international waters designated as a marine sanctuary by the International Community. If you have no regard for the whales that is fine as well but their value goes far beyond food. They are worth more alive economically than as food that not even the average Japanese person wants to eat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:03 AM on 01/08/2011
I think my post made it clear I do have a regard for the whales ... I'm just not such an Ugly American that I think we can demonize and impose our values on another sovereign people .... a sovereign people who may take the opinions of the country that found it morally acceptable to incinerate hundreds of thousands of Japanese women and children to be slightly less than compelling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Coyote1177
11:32 PM on 01/04/2011
What about the aggressive and harmful actions of the whalers!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:10 PM on 01/05/2011
Do you mean the justifiable defense of a group legally hunting whales when they are attacked by a group breaking the law?
photo
mariusvinchi
Saint Lucia is looking better and better every day
10:17 PM on 01/05/2011
You mean shooting a calf to bring the mother in closer for a kill shot, then leaving the calf to die a slow death?
Just because something is technically "legal" doesn't make it right. Slavery, suffrage, and child labor are just a few of those things that were once legal until enough people stood up against those who profited from these atrocities.
We are quickly killing off apex predators that are essential to the health of our Oceans. If our oceans die, we will quickly follow suit. If you doubt that our oceans are in serious trouble, just ask ANY professional fisherman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lro7644
10:22 PM on 01/06/2011
They are selling the whale meat in a commercial market which is against international law. Killing the whales for scientific research is legal but as most international legal experts agree, the intent is commercial and therefore makes the hunt illegal.

Sea Shepherd campaigns are guided by the United Nations World Charter for Nature. Sections 21-24 of the Charter provides authority to individuals to act on behalf of and enforce international conservation laws. When Australia brings it case against the Japanese Gov. in the International Court the matter will settled then.

The Irwin Fly's a Dutch Flag and the Dutch Gov. sets and defines Sea Shepherd rules of engagement. In other words Sea Shepherd is sponsored by various EU Govs. This has just as much to do with international fishing rights and the Atlantic Blue Fin Tuna as it has to do with the whales. Perhaps you should reconsider your position the given Japanese propensity to destroy fisheries. Regardless of how you feel about the whales supporting Sea Shepherd is in your best interest
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Coyote1177
11:31 PM on 01/04/2011
Their horrible crimes against humanity and nature need to be exposed!
04:43 PM on 01/04/2011
below is the entire synopsis of the Wikileaks revelation of the proposed agreement between the Obama Administration that included Hillary Clinton.

my suspicions about this president has just been confirmed, he will throw anything under the bus just avoid confrontation and fighting for what is just and right..as for Hillary who I once held in esteem and respect that too has all but vanished into the ice blue seas of the Antarctic.

seriously these two are no better than the GOP, at least with them you know what you're getting.

http://www.seashepherd.org/news-and-media/news-110103-1.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
01:57 PM on 01/04/2011
(this post will be in several segments but it's supposed to be one post - sorry, it's long)

Commercial whaling is banned by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) under the 1986 moratorium but there is no law that enforces this ban. As a member of the IWC, Japan agreed to the ban and nominally conducts whaling only for scientific purposes. The amount of whales they kill (around 935 minke whales per year) are regulated by the Revised Management Plan (RMP) of the IWC that dictates that about 2000 minke whales can be killed annually without threatening the growth of the species. Thus, the justification for Japan's current whaling practices rests on two key points and a third which is slightly less compelling but nevertheless, argued: 1) it is for the sake of science, 2) it is done sustainably, and 3) it is a part of their culture.

Problem is, 1) is false, 2) is highly dubious, and 3) is also false.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
02:05 PM on 01/04/2011
1) The "scientific" nature of Japan’s whaling program is doubtful. Japan insists that they need lethal sampling of whales in order to properly determine a whale’s age, reproductive status, and diet. However, Japan’s justification for lethal sampling only lies in the fact that they must analyze the stomach contents of whales. The problem is, age, reproductive status, and diet can all be determined without having to go into a whale’s stomach. Biopsies (firing a dart into a whale’s body and pulling back a sample of tissue) can provide age information by examining telomeres (structures on the end of chromosomes that decay with age) and information on reproductive status through hormone analysis as well as on diet, although this is harder. In principle, you can isolate chemical traces of prey through whale tissue and analyze stable isotopes to determine whale diet. However, information on whale diet can be better provided by analysis of feces. Japan chooses to ignore these methods citing that analysis of the stomach is just more direct and much easier.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 PM on 01/05/2011
More lies. Even the IWC has admitted that some of the data the Japanese plan to collect can only be done with lethal means. The telomere age technique has not be proven in Minke whales and is know to be affected by many other variables beside age. Also a biopsy dart can't tell you anything about chemical/pollutant load of various organs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:36 PM on 01/05/2011
"HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang 01:34 AM on 1/04/2011
36 Fans

Most data gathered by Japan's "scientifi­c" whaling program can be gathered through non-lethal means. "

So did you change your opinion between 1am and 2 pm? Or do you still agree that MOST data can be obtain non-lethally, meaning SOME data can't be obtained non-lethally?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
02:11 PM on 01/04/2011
However, such a decision has clearly profited Japan’s economic interests and not their scientific interests. Japan has killed 10,250 whales under the banner of scientific research SINCE the banning of whales by the 1986 IWC moratorium. In contrast, between 1954-1986, Japan’s commitment to scientific research only moved them to kill 840 whales in the name of science. Their lack of scientific commitment is further shown by the fact that close to none of Japan’s research has been published (nor have they been peer-reviewed) in the official scientific journal of the IWC known as “The Journal of Cetacean Research and Management.” In 2006, there were 488 papers on whales on the ISI Web of Knowledge database. Only 0.8% of these papers came from Japan’s whaling program or drew on evidence gathered from lethal-sampling.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:17 PM on 01/05/2011
Well before the moratorium Japan could collect data from commercially caught whales so there was no need for a large research hunt. Even you should be able to figure that out.
photo
Cori527
Gay democrat agnostic vegetarian!
02:06 AM on 01/04/2011
Every whaling vessel should be sunk. It's really that simple.
photo
Sacchinftw
Isn't it sad...?
09:46 AM on 01/04/2011
They tried that when they lost the Ady Gil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Harker
03:27 PM on 01/04/2011
typical liberal disregard for human life that would be lost.
photo
Cori527
Gay democrat agnostic vegetarian!
09:11 PM on 01/04/2011
I don't mind if the crew is rescued but the vessels themselves should be sunk.
Peatbog
Puffins are nice and serious!
12:15 AM on 01/04/2011
Political action against a U.S. organization's tax status, at the whim of a U.S. diplomat or a corrupt administration, were it to happen, would be illegal and an affront to the constitution and the rule of law, would it not?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
02:54 AM on 01/04/2011
Such a decision would be made by the IRS, they have revoked tax exempt status before for various reasons.
Peatbog
Puffins are nice and serious!
03:32 PM on 01/05/2011
Revocation of tax exempt status has to be for non-compliance with the requirements for the status, not because the Japanese want it done. And if the State Department leans on the IRS to cause a revocation, then what good is the law? If the State Department even considers such action, what kind of people are running the State Department?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
07:56 PM on 01/03/2011
Unfortunately, due to boardings of Japanese Whaling vessels two seasons running, Japan now has armed Coast Guard Officers on the ships of the whaling fleet : http://www.pretorianews.co.za/nz-warns-of-dangerous-whaling-season-1.1001641

What needs to be done is the elimination of the loophole that both allows for 'research' and demands that the whales not go to waste. Frankly, I'm of the opinion the loophole was deliberately written this way to ensure Whaling Nations signed the treaty.
photo
Sacchinftw
Isn't it sad...?
09:14 PM on 01/03/2011
But closing the loophole doesn't make for an enthusiastic season of Whale Wars!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
11:21 PM on 01/03/2011
No, but it might stop a hot head on either side from committing murder, ie: the killing of a human being. Because sure as God made little green apples someone is going to get killed by one of these 'stunts'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:32 PM on 01/05/2011
Well your opinion would be wrong. Article VIII was in the original IWC charter in 1946 when all the signatories were whaling nations.

And in the 80's and early 90's the anti-whaling countries had the 75% majority needed to shange the charter but they never even tried.
07:45 PM on 01/03/2011
Just the fact that there were/are ongoing communications between these "officials" is proof that this whaling operation is nothing but a commercial, for profit operation, being done under the guise of "scientific study".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:54 PM on 01/03/2011
Can you explain that. Do 'officials' only discuss commercial operations?
06:43 PM on 01/03/2011
Japans research is presently the only long term scientific program researching important biological and environmental information at this time. Their take of whales is minuscule when compared to the bio mass of the species( a target this year of 440 from an estimated population of around 500,000 or more southern ocean minke whales representing about .08 percent of the population) and no endangered species are negatively affected by the program. From a conservation standpoint, a cautious program of harvesting and researching healthy populations can help endangered populations improve. Japan has never been shown to violate any international laws with their research program and the bi-product, whale flesh, is not wasted and goes to partially pay for the scientific efforts.
The militant thugs with sea shepherd violate numerous international laws every year while trying to disrupt the research program. They put many lives unnecessarily at risk as well, some innocent and some simply ignorant. Opposition to this research program is based solely on emotion, completely ignoring science and common sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:57 PM on 01/03/2011
Before some one jumps on your post. The quota for minke this year is 850, not 440. The 440 number was during the first two years of JARPA II, after that the quota increased.

Still only 0.17% though.
08:50 PM on 01/03/2011
Thank you for pointing out my error. Estimates of southern ocean minke range much higher than half a million as well, Of course the point being that harvests in the 1 tenth of 1 percent of the population range is marginally enough for population analysis. And certainly not enough to have an adverse affect on populations. Objection to this is based on a certain sector of the populations irrational equalization of humans and animals, not scientific reasoning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
01:34 AM on 01/04/2011
Most data gathered by Japan's "scientific" whaling program can be gathered through non-lethal means. For example, we can determine species, gender, population size, migration patterns, stock fidelity, and other relevant biological information without harming the whales. Japan's claims that they need lethal samples of whale meat flies in the face of scientific data. Japan also announced that they will begin "scientifically" hunting sei whales - an endangered species - in order to determine the whale's diet. Problem is, Japan has already analyzed data from the stomachs of almost 20,000 sei whales it hunted over the past 50 years. The "scientific" aspect of these hunts is a disguise for commercial whaling. They even package the whale meat for consumption on these very "scientific" whaling ships.

There is a problem of numbers involved here that you don't seem to recognize. Whale population like many other marine populations, are difficult to count. This is reflected by the spurious data given in an attempt to establish their exact population. Minke whale population in the southern hemisphere has been estimated from anywhere ranging from 380,000 to 1,400,000. From 1940-1960, Australian whalers reduced east coast humpbacks to less than 5% of their population. It is unclear how sustainable minke hunting is and given the ghastly state of humpback and fin whale populations, the prospects of it being sustainable are slim.
11:38 AM on 01/04/2011
Which is why the Japanese research program is prosecuted under such stringent international guidelines, which the researchers follow implicitly. The objections to this project are irrational and based on emotions, not science. If the whale flesh was wasted, would that be better? This is just another display of leftist hypocrisy. Its all about the science, unless they don't like it. Paul Watson and his thugs do more damage to the environmental and conservation movements than help. Even the radicals in greenpeace understood this, which is why they ditanced themselves from Watson and the enviropirate SS in the first place.
I love the show though, no matter how hard they try, the producers and editors can't scrub out all of the bumbling idiocy that occurs. I am sure it would be impossible to come up with a full episode otherwise.
05:04 PM on 01/03/2011
More documentaries may ultimately be able to elevate the status of elephants and whales to that of humans, thereby protecting them from slaughter.

As for human cruelty, just imagine that African Pygmies were considered animals till early 1900s. Read this:

"Edward Tyson was one such physician and zoologist. His book, The Anatomy of a Pygmy Compared with that of a Monkey, and Ape and a Man was published in London in 1751. Tyson tried to establish the argument that pygmies - as well as mythical creatures, such as satyrs mentioned in Greek classics - were not men, but apes. More recently, Ota Benga, a pygmy from the Democratic Republic of Congo (then a Belgian colony), was brought to the 1904 World Fair in the United States, where he was displayed as an exhibit. Benga, born in 1881, was 4 ft 11 in tall and weighed 103 lbs. He was later caged in New York’s Bronx Zoo, where he slept in a monkey cage. Benga committed suicide in 1916."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
07:57 PM on 01/03/2011
Today,, we have DNA so it can be proven what is and is not human.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justin Stamper
10:19 PM on 01/03/2011
Whales are incredibly intelligent creatures. Does it matter if they are human? Who are we to decide?
05:23 PM on 01/04/2011
So tolerance is contingent on technology? That doesn't seem right to me.

In fact, if Neanderthals were alive today, it wouldn't be clear if they are human or non-human, even with DNA tests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
01:37 AM on 01/04/2011
It doesn't matter what their ontologica­l status is. It doesn't change their importance to their ecosystem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
05:04 PM on 01/05/2011
They are important, but I worry far more about the condition of the plankton -- that is the foundation of the ecosystem, if that collapses the whole food chain of our oceans goes.
photo
GirlsRule
Make Everything Simple As Possible But Not Simpler
05:00 PM on 01/03/2011
I had no idea this was going on until I a saw an advert for WW a couple of years ago. I'm glad it's
making life difficult for these butchers.
photo
Sacchinftw
Isn't it sad...?
09:16 PM on 01/03/2011
I'm curious, are you a vegetarian?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Zhang
01:38 AM on 01/04/2011
Does it matter?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lance Manling
04:50 PM on 01/03/2011
Cool boat.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Wong23
Card-carrying Progressive
03:59 PM on 01/03/2011
Teabaggers:

Anti-Muslim
Ant- Hispanic
Anti-Gay
Anti-Women
Anti-African-American.. And now

Pro-Whale slaughter.

No one should be surprised.
04:06 PM on 01/03/2011
Funny thing is that you really believe that
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Wong23
Card-carrying Progressive
04:20 PM on 01/03/2011
The most recent poll NBC/WSJ in December asked respondents whether they consider themselves supporters of the Tea Parties or not;

29% Yes
61% No

Apparently more than two out of three Americans believes it as well.
04:30 PM on 01/03/2011
Send Sarah with a harpoon to demonstrate it on TV.