More

Safer Tobacco? Company Claims It's Made A Less Harmful Product

MICHAEL FELBERBAUM   01/ 4/11 03:11 PM ET   AP

Tobacco Safer

RICHMOND, Va. — Tobacco maker Star Scientific Inc. says it has developed a moist smokeless tobacco with lower levels of cancer-causing chemicals than any other tobacco product now on the market.

The small Virginia company, which sells tobacco lozenges that dissolve in the mouth, said Tuesday it plans to ask the Food and Drug Administration this quarter for approval to sell the new item as safer than any competing product.

Star Scientific hopes its products will be the first the federal agency allows to be marketed as less harmful than other forms of tobacco.

Star Scientific says the "modified-risk" label that the FDA is developing belongs on the new Stonewall Moist-BDL because it contains 90 percent to 99 percent less tobacco-specific carcinogens than other smokeless tobacco products.

The federal Centers for Disease Control says that, because smokeless tobacco contains 28 cancer-causing agents, it is not a safe substitute for smoking cigarettes. But a 2007 report from the United Kingdom's Royal College of Physicians suggests that some smokeless tobacco products are less harmful than cigarettes.

Curtis Wright, senior vice president and clinical director for Star Scientific's subsidiary Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals, said the new product could "substantially" reduce the amount of carcinogens that moist tobacco users encounter.

The FDA is still considering similar applications from Star for two of its dissolvable tobacco products. Star has sold dissolvable tobacco under the Ariva and Stonewall brands since 2001.

The applications highlight a philosophical debate over how best to control tobacco. Some health advocates and officials say there's no safe way to use tobacco. Others say smokeless tobacco, electronic cigarettes and other products with lower levels of carcinogens than traditional tobacco products can improve public health by reducing the number of people who smoke.

Cigarette sales have been falling for years due to tax increases, health concerns, smoking bans and social stigma. Bigger tobacco companies are watching the FDA response to Star's applications for clues about what products they'll be able to sell to replace the revenue from cigarettes.

The FDA won the authority in 2009 to evaluate tobacco products and approve some as safer than others. But it may take the agency another year to iron out its guidelines for such products, and approvals would come only after guidelines are set.

About one in five Americans smoke, down from one out of four in 1995, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 3 percent of American adults use smokeless tobacco; the segment has grown about 7 percent in recent years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:37 AM on 01/07/2011
What happened to the ethics in business management schools?
04:36 AM on 01/07/2011
Oh yes, let's chew on those tobacco losengers, so we can keep the surgeons busy cutting away our malignant gums, tongues and jaws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neontom69
Student, Veteran, Prince of Soul-Glo
08:19 AM on 01/05/2011
I would love to see the tobacco companies go under, eventually. Hopefully public demand will get so low that they go out of business. I smoked for years, finally smartened up and quit, and would like to see all other smokers do the same.
photo
rikster
buy the ticket-take the ride
04:42 PM on 01/04/2011
more "legal" drugs...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe3245
Just waiting for our world's inevitable ending.
12:37 AM on 01/05/2011
Same legal drug, less harmful delivery...
03:22 PM on 01/04/2011
Their slogan should be "Try our new and improved cigarettes...now with NO rat poison!"
photo
Chlowina
We're skrwd
03:02 PM on 01/04/2011
An addiction is just that. There's no such thing as being a little addicted.
photo
Decorina
Hypocrisy means your karma ran over your dogma
02:57 PM on 01/04/2011
Oooooh, you need to check this out: Our poison isn't as, well, er, POISONOUS as it once was. Yay us!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubyfoo
02:17 PM on 01/04/2011
A safer addiction. How very heartwarming. I don't think I'd choose to start buying a product that I'd have to keep buying because I'm addiction. That's called drug addiction. It might be a nice drug, but... I speak as a former smoker for 29 years. One time, I was able quit with no trouble, but I probably wouldn't be alive today if I hadn't escaped from slavery to Brown and Williamson. And, no, filling your mouth with tobacco juice repeatedly is not innocuous.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MAX1
... What's a micro-bio?.
02:01 PM on 01/04/2011
R E M E M B E R:
"Smoking does not cause cancer" hearings from the past.

Back then, lobbyists went to corporations and paid them to lie, today, they just go straight to Office and lie.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Hollywooddeed
Bagger, please.
01:51 PM on 01/04/2011
Cough. Cough, cough.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elann
01:42 PM on 01/04/2011
The cigarette companies are getting desperate now that the e-cigarette is becoming so popular and proving to be successful in stopping smoking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AG creative
Ba Gawk!
02:05 PM on 01/04/2011
the FDA is about to pull the e-ciggs off the market because of the unknown carcinogens created by atomizers that are mass produced in china with no quality assurance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elann
08:38 PM on 01/08/2011
Where did you get that misinformation? As a matter of fact, the FDA just recently lost a court ruling regarding the e-cigarette. Try as they may, the FDA is not going to be allowed to use baseless fears to take the e-cig off the market. (much to the chagrin of the lying tobacco companies)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:18 PM on 01/04/2011
Who cares what people smoke, drink, eat, shoot up, what ever...it is their body and their choice. Give the people the facts and let them choose the path they want to follow.

That is freedom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BrooklynChef
01:42 PM on 01/04/2011
It's their choice until my insurance premiums go up because they can't pay their medical bills.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:47 PM on 01/04/2011
I see your a chef so you must prepare food that is 100% trans fat free, 100% healthy and even if people abuse your product will not cause them to have any medical problems there by causing my medical premiums to go up due to their failure to afford insurance because they spent the money in restaurants eating high fat foods.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:52 PM on 01/04/2011
I don't know why people feel the need to try to control what other adults will do with their bodies.
03:13 PM on 01/04/2011
pro lifers disagree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
filo
We're all Bozos on this bus.
01:15 PM on 01/04/2011
No Snus is good Snus.
AveragePatriot
I am an Apathetic Agnostic
01:06 PM on 01/04/2011
Really? A tobacco lozenge? I don't get how that could be even remotely satisfying...

After I had smoked for about 28 years, I switched to the Natural American Spirit cigs with 'chemical free' tobacco. While smoking them for the first 2 weeks, I was getting fits because I was addicted to the chemicals in regular cigs. When I decided to quit, it was nearly as hard as past attempts, and I quit, cold turkey, for good. (Or at least for the last 7 years. I don't like to talk in absolutes...)
12:58 PM on 01/04/2011
I have not smoked for years but I think about it everyday, I miss smoking with my espresso after and during sex, waiting for the bus or train, casinos, walking down the street.

None of these things could replace smoking a cig.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:53 PM on 01/04/2011
if you smoke during sex then you need to slow down.
03:19 PM on 01/04/2011
you must have missed the 60's