iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Mobile Giving Booming Despite Apple's Rules

First Posted: 01/06/11 01:39 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Iphone

Apple has agitated the nonprofit world with guidelines restricting their applications' use of "one-click donate" buttons, but at least one company has figured out a way to circumvent those limits.

Nadanu Technologies has developed a platform for an iPhone-optimized giving app with a "donate" button that can be downloaded outside of the official App Store, exempting it from Apple's mobile-giving restrictions. Many of the charities and nonprofits using Nadanu's apps, from large organizations like the Salvation Army to tiny, lesser-known community organizations, reported an immediate uptick in mobile donations toward the end of the year and said they were able to reach a much younger donor base through the iPhone.

Eddie Zuchman, 28, opened one of those apps at the dinner table on Dec. 22 to make a one-time, $1,800 donation to Friendship Circle San Francisco, an organization that helps children with special needs. Zuchman runs a diet-delivery company, and he told HuffPost that since winter is always the best season for his business, he decided to donate on a whim.

"If I would have thought about it, I may not have given such a large amount of money over the phone, but we were sitting there, and we were in a good mood, and I just went ahead and sent it over," Zuchman said. "It was a good experience for me. If you make it easy for people to give, it helps everyone out."

Rabbi Peretz Mochkin, the development director of Friendship Circle San Francisco, said he signed on to use Nadanu's technology in order to reach a generation that simply isn't in touch with older ways of giving.

"In the old days, everyone had a charity box at home, and that's completely lost now. Most homes don't know what a charity box looks like," he said. "Because people can donate on their phones now, and it's available to them any time, we have a steady amount of 50-plus people using it for daily contributions or inspirational contributions, and almost 80 percent of those people weren't giving to us without it. And we have definitely seen a pickup in the demographic of young adults."

Last year's Haiti earthquake disaster marked a major turning point for mobile giving, as organizations like the Red Cross raked in between $30 million and $40 million over the phone, and app developers across the country seem to be taking notice. Nadanu CEO Getzy Fellig said the company saw a tremendous uptick of Dec. 31 donations through its apps on Facebook and iPhone, including one $10,000 iPhone donation to a New Jersey day school.

"The fact that people are actually pulling out their phones and making $10,000 donations is just nutty to me. We literally fell off our chairs when we saw that," Fellig said. "As we started to break down the end-of-year rush, we saw that there were tremendous amounts donated through Facebook, iPod Touch and iPhones."

The smallest donation made via iPhone was for $180, he said, adding, "The dollar amounts were just extraordinary."

Unfortunately for many app developers, while the mobile giving market is growing exponentially, Apple's guidelines prevent charities and nonprofits from simplifying the process with a one-click donation button tied to PayPal or a credit card. In order to donate to a charity using their iPhones, people have to click a button on an app that redirects them to a separate web page where they then have to type in their credit information on a tiny screen with a difficult-to-use keyboard.

The tech giant refuses to comment on this policy, but Jake Shapiro, executive director of Public Radio Exchange, told The New York Times that Apple is simply trying to avoid the extra headaches such direct donations are liable to bring. "One of Apple's major objections has been that if donations were to go through its payment mechanism, it would have to be in the business of managing and distributing funds and verifying charities as well," he said.

But by making it even one click more difficult for people to donate using their iPhones, Apple may be costing charities and nonprofits a lot of money, said Ken Berger, the president and CEO of Charity Navigator, a charity-watchdog organization.

"I think it's really a tragedy that Apple is taking such a hyper-cautious position, and they're using a justification of being so risk-averse that they're putting a damper on tens of millions of dollars in charitable giving," Berger said. "This past year was historic in terms of mobile giving, and it is going to only continue to exponentially grow. There's a lot of money involved here even without easy-to-use apps, so we really hope Apple will reconsider."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST IMPACT

Apple has agitated the nonprofit world with guidelines restricting their applications' use of "one-click donate" buttons, but at least one company has figured out a way to circumvent those limits. Na...
Apple has agitated the nonprofit world with guidelines restricting their applications' use of "one-click donate" buttons, but at least one company has figured out a way to circumvent those limits. Na...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:45 AM on 01/13/2011
I like the direction you're moving in, seaward. There's definitely a lot of value in what organizations like NPR produce, and sliding-scale payment options are an excellent way for subscribers to express that value (and their support). The debate over one-click donation apps is a tricky one. Charities' impatience to facilitate giving in any way possible is understandable, but the notion that an absence of one-click ease is locking out tens of millions of dollars seems unfounded.

There is a novelty to giving apps at the moment, which may fade in time. These apps facilitate impulse giving, to be sure, but even impulse giving has a limit. Having a salvation army kettle at every corner in your town increases the odds that eventually you'll pass one and give - but having a kettle on every corner doesn't mean you'll give every time you pass. Whether you give 1 time in 10 or 5 times in 10 will still be constrained by your disposable means and the number of causes competing for them.

Real innovation will come from figuring out how to add more charitable resources to the system. I recommend the latest post on this social enterprise blog that proposes using markets as a way to support causes (kind of like your suggestions, seaward). http://getgiving.wordpress.com/
10:35 PM on 01/06/2011
Apple needs to allow podcasts to be subscribed to for a donation per download. I should be able to get my favorite NPR or indie podcast at $.25 or $.50 per download and then billed monthly with Apple forwarding 90% to the producer.

The producer could specify some price levels and you subscribe to the one you like; $0, $.25, etc

This would really fix the podcast model and finally fund "free" podcasts and could get rid of begging in the podcast itself.

This would be a great service to our community. Hey, Steve, isn't there a virtuous circle here?
08:55 PM on 01/06/2011
Good grief Laura! You can't wait to get to a Mac, or a PC if you swing that way, to make a donation. Get a real cause to champion.
08:06 PM on 01/06/2011
Get real people, no matter what you feel, what you think or what you're crystal ball says, Apple is on it's way out, Apple is out dated for the main stream market. Oh yeah it's hangin' tuff, the only real thing it had going for itself was it's operating system, but now that's gonna' be ported to X86 architecture (Intel CPU's). The iPhone was cool, but other companies are certainly offering viable options (HTC 4G, Chrome, Microsoft, etc) The Itunes format was cool, but you can get mp3's now much easier and much cheaper (sometimes FREE), burn em' to CD as audio and who needs the Itunes store Really who wants to go through some loss type conversion so the Itunes can be played on something other than a Apple? (I think even Apple Mac computers will play or can be configured to play mp3's?) Of course there are always fan bois that pay extra for that Apple logo (you can even download the Apple logo for a PC, it beats me why though?)
I will say though, if you're making a flic about dinosaurs and have an extra 10 or 15 grand Apple still has some high end graphics. I'm breathlessly waiting for the witty denial come back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Poiks
10:10 PM on 01/06/2011
Better luck next time.
08:35 AM on 01/07/2011
Tired come back. How's ABOUT SOME FACTS?
06:47 PM on 01/06/2011
It could be that Apple is just plain selfish…or cruel…why else would they want to limit something like that….if it was a one touch to give them something it would be the first app to open on the phone…in fact it would probably be the default screen…
04:23 PM on 01/06/2011
phuque Apple!
photo
born 2b different
research b4 u post
02:20 PM on 01/09/2011
Faqu
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Connolly
03:25 PM on 01/06/2011
ugggh, seriously again, Laura Basset?\

take Apple out of the title, and less people read the article.

if Apple allows people to donate via iPhone apps (which they already can) but not the one click or whatever you are talking about here. i hardly believe 10 million more dollars or more will be donated to charities, than before Apple supported one click donations.

i can just see it now Apple allows one click donations, then a month later, tons of stories about kids using their parents phone and donating 100K to a charity by accident.

stop going on like Apple is a grinch or something. they just want to protect their image.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnny g locker
03:30 PM on 01/06/2011
The issue is why Apple seems so intent on limiting the function on the phone.

It's like a car that isn't allowed to drive down certain streets because the manufacturer of the car doesn't like those streets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Connolly
02:41 PM on 01/07/2011
no... its not.
03:14 PM on 01/06/2011
Really amazing. :-) The easier and fun is the tool provided to the
donors, the more donations organizations will get. Noone could deny it !
03:01 PM on 01/06/2011
IF you have a mobile enabled account you can donate from any phone using SMS - much less an iPhone if you use the free mobile App. This is a feature of mobile banking.

Yes this a bit of a plug, but Apple should be joining in to help make giving easier and safer.

http://mangomoney.com/
02:53 PM on 01/06/2011
Apple got to easy up a bit and actually live the lifestyle they portray in their commercials.

We work with the Nadanu which has created a number of apps for our organization. They are amazing! The technological they've employed has done things we didn't think possible, like circumventing the donation ban from Apple... And their customer service is amazing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdezurik
02:53 PM on 01/06/2011
just another wat for Stevie to let us know how st00pid he thinks we all are
photo
Oldsop
Libertarian...mostly
02:28 PM on 01/06/2011
Apple’s locked down approach is similar to what IBM did with the pc. We all know that IBM lost its foothold in the personal computer market because it was obstinate about its operating system and then about its hardware.

Apple’s days are numbered because it is so difficult to do anything without going through the iPhone “store.” The act of firewalling the users is about as anti-customer service as anything.
photo
drjasonmd
Shalom, compa!
02:40 PM on 01/06/2011
I almost bought an iPhone this week. Then I started analyzing all the things that I would like to do with my phone but wouldn't be able to because of the way Apple has locked it down and I went with a Droid instead. I think a lot of people are starting to make the same decision.

Too bad. Apple really did revolutionize the PDA phone. Too bad the control freak Jobs had to stifle further innovation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdezurik
02:57 PM on 01/06/2011
well, not really. the original IBM OS was DOS which Bill was smart enough to talk them into letting he keep. IBM tried to market PCDOS but it was a loser so they tried to lock down the ARCHITECTURE (not the OS) with the PCI bus design (to try to make sure all the add-on cards came from them or paid IBM to make them) but all that did was inspire the cloners to new heights until IBM just gave up. Now if you mean OS/2, well it was clumsy hard to install and if you think Windows had errors, you have never tried OS/2
02:26 PM on 01/06/2011
That is amazing!!!! I hope Apple does come around but it's still pretty awesome that I can donate to my favorite cause this way!!!