More

Where's Microsoft's Tablet? Its Answer To The iPad Is Still In Pieces

First Posted: 01/06/11 09:40 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Microsoft Tablet

(JESSICA MINTZ, AP) SEATTLE — Instead of unveiling an elegant response to the iPad, Microsoft came to the tech industry's premier gadget show with a collection of exposed computer guts.

Microsoft's biggest news was that the next version of Windows would run on the style of cell phone chips that power the iPad and other tablets today. It proved it with a series of demonstrations on half-built computers; on the monitors hooked up to those machines, the software was indistinguishable from the current Windows 7.

Microsoft's missing tablet served as a reminder that the world's largest software maker remains years from a serious entry into this new category of devices. It also raised more doubts about whether Microsoft Corp. will ever be able to grab a meaningful piece of this fast-growing segment. If it can't, Microsoft Corp.'s dominance of personal computers may become increasingly irrelevant as people embrace ever-sleeker portable devices.

CEO Steve Ballmer mostly lingered on what went right last year when he gave the company's customary keynote on the eve of the International Consumer Electronics Show on Wednesday. He had his share to boast about. Xbox 360 and the Kinect motion-sensing controller that's racked up more than $1 billion in sales in just two months, a ground-up overhaul of the Windows smart-phone software and rapid adoption of Windows 7 on PCs are all legitimate successes.

Still, it's hard for anyone to applaud Microsoft without noting the threats posed by the growing popularity of Apple Inc.'s iPad. It's also hard to see Windows as a tablet contender amid an onslaught of new tablets running Google Inc.'s Android software, which has already helped turn mobile phones into mini-computers.

Those concerns have been weighing on Microsoft stock, which has hovered around the $20 to $30 range for the past decade. Apple, on the other hand, has seen its share price more than triple since the first iPhone was announced in early 2007. Last year, Apple's market capitalization surpassed Microsoft's, making Apple the second-largest U.S. public company after Exxon Mobil Corp.

Microsoft has not been absent from the tablet discussion – Windows tablets have been around for years, but the devices never caught on with the mainstream. At last year's gadget show, Ballmer demonstrated a sleek "slate" from Hewlett-Packard Co. that runs Windows 7, and today there are several iPad-esque tablets that use Microsoft's operating system.

But those gadgets have none of the iPad's cachet, and Microsoft has done little to market them. And it's the upcoming Honeycomb version of Android, Google's first to be designed specifically for tablets, that is seen as the best shot to challenge Apple.

Many analysts and design experts say Windows 7 is doomed to fail as a tablet system because it was created with the keyboard and mouse in mind. At best, said technology industry analyst Rob Enderle, Windows 7 tablets are a stopgap measure while Microsoft pushes ahead on what will likely be called Windows 8.

Microsoft declined to make Ballmer available for an interview Thursday. Given the rudimentary proof-of-concept work Microsoft demonstrated Wednesday, and the difficulty of the task of building a multi-platform operating system, analysts don't expect a new Windows to arrive for at least another two years. Microsoft moved late in part because it didn't take tablets seriously.

"Remember, we just had the netbook scare," Enderle said in an interview. Netbooks, a class of cheap, under-powered laptops that at first ran versions of the free, open-source Linux operating system, were heralded as the end to Windows' domination. But Windows soon edged out Linux on netbooks; shortly thereafter, consumers realized the devices weren't good for such tasks as watching online video. The phase passed so quickly that when the industry moved on to tablets, Microsoft expected to see the same progression, Enderle said.

The factor Microsoft apparently failed to take into consideration was Apple, which scoffed at netbooks but took the tablet very seriously. When the iPad launched, Apple's design and marketing savvy tipped tablets into the mainstream.

"Now, they recognize that they've got a problem," Enderle said.

In the near term, worrying about Microsoft crumbling at Apple's feet seems overblown despite its stagnant stock. After all, the software maker has for years handily fended off challenges to its cash cows, Windows and Office, from the likes of Google and Apple.

The company, with more than $40 billion in cash on its balance sheet, can afford to slog from behind in areas such as search and smart phones. Its earnings rose 29 percent and revenue grew 7 percent in its last fiscal year that ended in June, while most other companies were foundering in the global recession.

Microsoft's dividends are generous and steady. Ballmer frequently draws criticism from the media but wins high praise from analysts and large shareholders for delivering quarter after quarter of strong results that just about any other CEO would envy.

But some analysts fear that missing the tablet boat might make a lethal crack in Microsoft's complete dominance in the PC market.

Wells Fargo Securities analyst Jason Maynard said he worries that even though Microsoft still generates the bulk of its wealth from corporate spending on technology, consumers are starting to have more sway in deciding the kinds of devices that make it into the workplace.

This trend, Maynard said, could become the "Trojan horse" that Apple needs to increase Mac sales to businesses, or that Google needs to chip away at Microsoft's hold on e-mail and desktop software.

When Microsoft changes direction, it must weigh the effect its moves will have on more than a billion Windows PC users. Roger Kay, founder of the research group Endpoint Technologies Associates, said this hobbled Microsoft's tablet planning. It can't afford to repeat the pattern when the next hot device trend lands.

"It's clear Microsoft has to become more nimble," Kay said. "It may be able to recover from this tablet debacle, but this won't do for business as usual."

___

AP Technology Writer Joelle Tessler in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

(JESSICA MINTZ, AP) SEATTLE — Instead of unveiling an elegant response to the iPad, Microsoft came to the tech industry's premier gadget show with a collection of exposed computer guts. Microso...
(JESSICA MINTZ, AP) SEATTLE — Instead of unveiling an elegant response to the iPad, Microsoft came to the tech industry's premier gadget show with a collection of exposed computer guts. Microso...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 243
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
05:38 PM on 01/09/2011
Inside Microsoft we have even stopped using our own tools. In Microsoft IT we stopped using SQL Server and now use Informatica. That's how bad things are inside Microsoft.
05:04 AM on 01/20/2011
Yeah, because some anonymous comment on the Internet really shows how bad things are there. Even if it's true, it doesn't always make sense for a company to dog food all their products.
05:36 PM on 01/09/2011
Top management at Microsoft, Steve Ballmer and Kevin Turner have never coded a line of code in their lives. They are vampires who feed off the work of others but couldn't produce software if their lives depended on it. Their main focus is driving down costs, not innovation.

Today's Microsoft has no respect for programmers. They like people who talk a good corporate talk "no problems" and who will kiss their bosses butt.

If you disagree...keep it to yourself is the best advice inside Microsoft.

Our focus is in how to use H-1b work visas to keep wages down. How to use offshoring to keep wages down, and how to use tax loopholes to avoid paying taxes.

Things like innovation require trial and error and debate. Doing these things is a career ending move in Microsoft.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
10:43 AM on 01/09/2011
Also don't get the same marketing team that did the Windows Phone 7, they practically chased people away from buying that phone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
10:36 AM on 01/09/2011
I'd like a quick assemble DIY tablet, maybe for once Balmer is onto to something, unwittingly without realizing it though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Said One
10:39 AM on 01/09/2011
Like it comes in a box, five parts - and fits together like a cool puzzle. Also with accessories that one can add to the puzzle, like joysticks, different skins for each part if one wants that. So it literally looks like a puzzle except for the screen of course.
10:44 PM on 01/08/2011
Microsoft shouldn't even try anymore...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hunter Robbins
12:45 PM on 01/08/2011
Let's just review:
• iPhone vs. Windows phone (yes, it exists, but seeing one is like spotting a rare white elephant)
• iPod vs. Microsoft's Zune (see rare white elephant)
• Mac OSX vs. Windows and we all know how well that works.
• Google Docs vs Microsoft's complete lack of response to Web 2.0
• Google ($616) & Apple ($338) stocks vs. Microsoft stock ($28)

Microsoft always seems to respond very late to the party, after all the drinks are gone and the only thing left are crumpled napkins and peanut shells.
05:16 AM on 01/20/2011
What petty examples. Your "versus" stuff has almost no relation, except in trying to bad-mouth Microsoft, which kinda makes them invalid. To go over...

iPhone at first launch wasn't common at all either, and Windows phones have only launched about 2 months ago. Zune has received much better reviews, customer satisfaction, and is techincally the better media player. So your first two points indicate that by selling more, it indicates success or a better product, and in the case of OS X v. Windows, Windows dominates big time. Google Docs is pretty lousy in comparison to Office Web Apps, and even that could use some more. Stock value is not the biggest indicator of how well a company is doing; do you actually trade stocks? Either way, MS stock has been known to be undervalued and for good reason.

I don't know why I even tried, but looking at those points just indicates you're a hater.
photo
BluestateGuyInTX
A Connecticut yankee in Emperor Bush's Town.
11:27 AM on 01/08/2011
Microsoft is suffering from the thing that bedevils all those who stay too long on the top of the heap: they get cocky and complacent and think that because they are who they are they will always be on top. It happened to IBM, to DEC, to Sun, and now to Microsoft. I can't say I'm all that sorry but I'm sure we'll all be wistful about it some day. ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:50 AM on 01/08/2011
Steve Ballmer is incompetent. His "idea" is to do whatever Apple does, only badly.
05:24 AM on 01/20/2011
Like Steve Jobs badly wanted to make a smartphone OS, a tablet-based software, separate media-based TV-watching software, an internet browser, and various other things after Microsoft had done them?

Ideas get tossed around all the time dude. Get over it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrVee
04:26 AM on 01/08/2011
I don't want there to be an answer from Microsoft to apple for a tablet. Who in the hell are they? What I want from Microsoft is to help deliver a tablet that works and works well. IMHO, the Blackberry Playbook kicks the over-sized ipod touch to the curb, effortlessly. I think it even beats the existing Android tablet. I watched a lot of videos before getting a chance to get a "hands on" at CES and it is brilliant. It will do great in the tablet space. Whenever MS is ready to deliver a tablet, drop it like its hot. Don't rush anything to the market. Those unwashed masses without a tablet will be there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miamorphos
09:42 AM on 01/08/2011
I too think that Microsoft should avoid rushing a pad to the market. Microsoft should focus on making software and letting other people make machinery -- the Apple business model is not the same as Microsoft's, and I don't think that it would be a good idea for Microsoft to become so tied up to hardware in the same way. Let Apple be Apple, let MS be MS, and let people follow their hearts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrVee
12:22 AM on 01/09/2011
Besides, what apple is selling isn't a tablet at all. It's a gigantic ipod touch. It looks the same, it functions the same but its no tablet. When it dropped, it couldn't even print, just like the ipod touch. It has no usable ports as you might expect from a tablet computer but all the restrictions of the ipod touch. And it still cannot do Flash.
So no, Microsoft doesn't need to release anything like that. The device that IS a true tablet so far, is the BlackBerry Playbook.It does everything you expect a computer to do and then some.
04:13 AM on 01/08/2011
Okay folks, go on with your fight! I'm outta here/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Abdi S
12:54 AM on 01/08/2011
Microsoft will never conquered mobile market so I believe Google's honeycomb os for tablets will compete apple's ipad.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxPowerXP
12:11 AM on 01/08/2011
Microsoft's "tablet" doesn't exist because they're not a PC manufacturer, you shills. Their tablet OSes have been on the market for 9 years. Please HP, switch your tech editors for people who actually know something.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J242
Micro-bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro-bio!
04:18 AM on 01/08/2011
MS doesn't have a "Tablet OS", they have flavors of windows which they bundle touchscreen/tablet hardware I/O drivers into yet do ZERO testing (beyond installing daily builds on a hardware prototype, running it through a set of limited test passes and then signing off per build all the way until the EOL for the project) in house. HUGE difference there "MaxPower". While their might have been products on the market labeled as being "tablets" with "windows" on them for 9 years, they were not running a tablet OS. A "insert object name here" OS is one that is designed for that specific object. Windows has never released a tablet OS, just like before the Kin, it had never released a Cell Phone OS or before the Zune it had never released a PMP OS. They still don't have a "tablet" OS.

Please uninformed commentators, try working for a decade for the company in question before forming opinions as to how they develop products.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxPowerXP
10:48 AM on 01/08/2011
So, did you manage to get a straw during your frantic grabbing?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miamorphos
09:43 AM on 01/08/2011
Ah ha, I just posted a similar comment. I agree -- Microsoft and Apple have different business models, and Microsoft shouldn't waste its time manufacturing devices.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcdaidusa
12:00 AM on 01/08/2011
Keep mouthing the talking points and downplaying the trends, and sure enough you will still be promoting Microsoft when the next ice age begins because its too big to die. Well give it up, its over and the only thing keeping Microsoft alive is an army of loyal corporate IT zealots who are only protecting their jobs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J242
Micro-bio? We don't need no stinkin' micro-bio!
04:19 AM on 01/08/2011
Actually, the main thing keeping MS alive is the long-term contracts they have with schools, businesses and governments to keep maintaining and updating their software via corporate licenses. That's how MS got the funding to take on Apple in the first place way back when and it's still their bread & butter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mcdaidusa
11:03 AM on 01/08/2011
Basically that is what I meant by the IT zealots, who after all, are the gateway to these big businesses and make the purchasing decisions and keep a stranglehold on innovations in these corporations. I was in a big corporation when the IT department was introduced to corporate america. Basically the outcome was people who were perfectly competent to manage their own software and computer repairs were told hands off, only the IT guy can do that, hence the beginning of the dependancy on the IT guy who then went on to run the show and making all purchasing and platform decisioins. Microsoft and PCs won and created a monopoly. Now Apple will upend this monopoly by the iPad trojan horse if they are lucky.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotorhead1871
who are you jivin' with that cosmic debris?...
11:10 PM on 01/07/2011
MS does not really do hardware......its that simple.....they are a software company..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
10:51 AM on 01/08/2011
It is easier to steal others ideas when you do software only.
photo
AmigaMan
Your micro-bio will never meet our guidelines.
08:10 PM on 01/07/2011
It's in pieces because they have to photocopy every piece. LOL