More

Fluoride Water Causing Teeth Spots

MIKE STOBBE   01/ 7/11 10:18 PM ET   AP

Fluoride Water

ATLANTA — In a remarkable turnabout, federal health officials say many Americans are now getting too much fluoride because of its presence not just in drinking water but in toothpaste, mouthwash and other products, and it's causing splotches on children's teeth and perhaps more serious problems.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced plans Friday to lower the recommended level of fluoride in drinking water for the first time in nearly 50 years, based on a fresh review of the science.

The announcement is likely to renew the battle over fluoridation, even though the addition of fluoride to drinking water is considered one of the greatest public health successes of the 20th century. The U.S. prevalence of decay in at least one tooth among teens has declined from about 90 percent to 60 percent.

The government first began urging municipal water systems to add fluoride in the early 1950s. Since then, it has been put in toothpaste and mouthwash. It is also in a lot of bottled water and in soda. Some kids even take fluoride supplements. Now, young children may be getting too much.

"Like anything else, you can have too much of a good thing," said Dr. Howard Pollick, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco's dental school and spokesman for the American Dental Association.

One reason behind the change: About 2 out of 5 adolescents have tooth streaking or spottiness because of too much fluoride, a government study found recently. In extreme cases, teeth can be pitted by the mineral – though many cases are so mild only dentists notice it. The problem is generally considered cosmetic and not a reason for serious concern.

The splotchy tooth condition, fluorosis, is unexpectedly common in youngsters ages 12 through 15 and appears to have grown more common since the 1980s, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

But there are also growing worries about more serious dangers from fluoride.

The Environmental Protection Agency released two new reviews of research on fluoride Friday. One of the studies found that prolonged, high intake of fluoride can increase the risk of brittle bones, fractures and crippling bone abnormalities.

Critics of fluoridated water seized on the proposed change Friday to renew their attacks on it – a battle that dates back to at least the Cold War 1950s, when it was denounced by some as a step toward Communism. Many activists nowadays don't think fluoride is essential, and they praised the government's new steps.

"Anybody who was anti-fluoride was considered crazy," said Deborah Catrow, who successfully fought a ballot proposal in 2005 that would have added fluoride to drinking water in Springfield, Ohio. "It's amazing that people have been so convinced that this is an OK thing to do."

Dental and medical groups applauded the announcement.

"This change is necessary because Americans have access to more sources of fluoride than they did when water fluoridation was first introduced," Dr. O. Marion Burton, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said in a statement.

The fluoridated water standard since 1962 has been a range of 0.7 parts per million for warmer climates where people used to drink more water to 1.2 parts per million in cooler regions. The new proposal from HHS would set the recommended level at just 0.7. Meanwhile, the EPA said it is reviewing whether to lower the maximum allowable level of fluoride in drinking water from the current 4 parts per million.

"EPA's new analysis will help us make sure that people benefit from tooth decay prevention while at the same time avoiding the unwanted health effects from too much fluoride," said Peter Silva, an EPA assistant administrator.

Fluoride is a mineral that exists in water and soil. About 70 years ago, scientists discovered that people whose supplies naturally had more fluoride also had fewer cavities.

In 1945, Grand Rapids, Mich., became the world's first city to add fluoride to its drinking water. Six years later a study found a dramatic decline in tooth decay among children there, and the surgeon general endorsed water fluoridation.

And in 1955, Procter & Gamble Co. marketed the first fluoride toothpaste, Crest, with the slogan "Look, Mom, no cavities!"

But that same year, The New York Times called fluoridation of public water one of the country's "fiercest controversies." The story said some opponents called the campaign for fluoridation "the work of Communists who want to soften the brains of the American people."

The battles continue for a variety of reasons today.

In New York, the village of Cobleskill outside Albany stopped adding fluoride to its drinking water in 2007 after the longtime water superintendent became convinced the additive was contributing to his knee problems. Two years later, the village reversed the move after dentists and doctors complained.

According to a recent CDC report, nearly 23 percent of children ages 12 to 15 had fluorosis in a study done in 1986-87. That rose to 41 percent in a study that covered 1999 through 2004.

"The report of discoloration has been going up over the years," said Dr. Robert Barsley, a professor at the LSU Health Sciences Center School of Dentistry. "It is not the water that's causing this by any means. It's the extra fluoride products – toothpaste, mouthwash – that people are using. And people want nice white teeth so they brush three times a day."

Susan Jeansonne, oral health program manager for Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, said one reason for the problem is children swallowing fluoride toothpaste or eating it.

Toothpaste labels have long recommended that parents supervise children under 6 when they are brushing their teeth; give them only a pea-size amount; and make sure they spit it out. Toddlers under 2 shouldn't use toothpaste with fluoride.

In 2006, the National Academy of Sciences released a report recommending that the EPA lower its maximum allowable level of fluoride in drinking water. The report warned severe fluorosis could occur at 2 parts per million. Also, a majority of the report's authors said a lifetime of drinking water with fluoride at 4 parts per million or higher could raise the risk of broken bones.

In addition, in 2005, the heads of 11 EPA unions, including ones representing the agency's scientists, pleaded with the EPA to reduce the permissible level of fluoride in water to zero, citing research suggesting it can cause cancer.

In Europe, fluoride is rarely added to water supplies. In Britain, only about 10 percent of the population has fluoridated water. It has been a controversial issue there, with critics arguing people shouldn't be forced to have "medical treatment" forced on them.

___

Associated Press writers Dina Capiello in Washington, Maria Cheng in London, John Seewer in Toledo, Ohio, David B. Caruso in New York, and Mary Foster in New Orleans contributed to this report, along with AP news researcher Jennifer Farrar in New York.

___

Online:

CDC on fluoridation: http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

ATLANTA — In a remarkable turnabout, federal health officials say many Americans are now getting too much fluoride because of its presence not just in drinking water but in toothpaste, mouthwash...
ATLANTA — In a remarkable turnabout, federal health officials say many Americans are now getting too much fluoride because of its presence not just in drinking water but in toothpaste, mouthwash...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:46 PM on 02/03/2011
I'm 17 years old and after reading this article I realized I have some fluorosis, which I've had since I was little. I never knew what it was called, and now I'm pretty sure that it has something to do with the NYC water I drank as a kid. I can't believe it's not banned to add fluoride to drinking water!
10:31 PM on 02/01/2011
Fluoride in drinking water is credited with dramatically reducing cavities, but has also been linked to a reported increase in spots on some children's teeth, which is one reason the U.S. government announced it plans to lower the recommended levels of the mineral.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
05:52 PM on 01/08/2011
Good.

This is LONG overdue.

Fluoride is neither necessary nor beneficial. Its a poison.

See fluoridealert.org
01:32 PM on 01/08/2011
In the 70s and 80s there were programs in the schools which involved "rinsing" children's teeth with a concentrated fluoride solution in a cup.
After reading about it, I was the only parent in the whole school refusing permission for my children to have this treatment. At the time, the information I found was that fluoride was a carcinogen.
Now we have real documentation of bone damage, tooth damage, and know it is harmful systemically. WHY is it still being put into our water?
(The answer probably is deduced by knowing who manufactures the flouride used and what government contacts that company has)
01:18 PM on 01/08/2011
Health Canada: Fluoride and Human Health – It’s Your Health – July 2008

Most Canadians are exposed to fluorides on a daily basis, found in almost all foods, and (drinks) those added to drinking water supplies.

Excessive intakes of fluoride will cause damage to tooth enamel, resulting in tooth pain and, problems with chewing.

High levels of fluorides, consumed for a very long (VERY LONG? – There is no tangible, or credible idea, of how long is too long…hence very long, I guess) period of time, may lead to skeletal fluorosis.

These levels (purposely ignoring the mention of cumulative...the building up effect) are much higher than those, to which the average Canadian is exposed daily ("they," HEALTH CANADA, et al., have no current and credible means of accurately determining the levels, to which Canadians are exposed to fluorides on a daily basis. They should cease and desist in using such ambiguous phrases. It's misleading to say the least).
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/alt_formats/pacrb-dgapcr/pdf/iyh-vsv/environ/fluor-eng.pdf
01:10 PM on 01/08/2011
The following is a bit more, and really, just a minuscule amount of concerning information, relative to the practice of adding fluoride to drinking water, and therefore foods and other products as well.

Fluoride Exposure in Drinking Water: Children’s IQ and Growth Compromised...the big difference with this article, and the manganese one above (active link), is that: HEALTH CANADA, also traded as; THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, is actually advocating the adding of artificial Fluoride to our drinking water...a pre-meditated act, of polluting our drinking and, waste waters.
Read More: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852689/

Fluoride causing serious health problems: UN report.
Excessive (that's misleading, the fact is; the intentional, or rather, pre-meditated act of adding an industrial waste/pollution into the world's drinking and, waste water, should be a crime. Isn't it. But no one is prosecuting the perpetrators) amounts of fluoride in drinking water is exposing millions of people around the world to risks ranging from often crippling skeletal debilitating health problems--In China, for example, at least 10 million people are estimated to suffer from skeletal fluorosis, when fluoride accumulates in the bones over many years and causes stiffness and joint pain and, in some cases, changes to bone structure, calcification of ligaments and crippling effects: The Full Story: http://www.un.org/apps/news/storyAr.asp?NewsID=20685&Cr=water&Cr1=

The Fluoride Deception (Interview With Christopher Bryson)
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRNVMduMy4A
01:05 PM on 01/08/2011
Is it not plainly obvious, that a person’s teeth could be showing all the signs...a sign post, if you will, a warning of other affected areas of your health, being adversely troubled by ingesting recommended amounts of water (Artificially Fluoridated), is perhaps the, tell tale sign, of what’s really taking place, beneath the surface; SKELETAL FLUOROSIS for example?
Or, would you rather take “the path of least resistance” and simply believe, whats written in on the mainstream media scripts, like; CONSPIRACY THEORY!
Would you rather believe that the following two professionals, and thousands of others, are really the culprits, that are affecting the ill effects on you health?
Was Dr. Phyllis Mullenix Ph.D., a pharmacologist and toxicologist by training, and on the Neurotoxicity of Fluoride, being a conspiracy theorist, when she discovered the serious implications of ingesting Fluoride?
http://www.fluoridealert.org/pmullenix.htm
Is Dr. Russell Blaylock M.D. a neurosurgeon, also a conspiracy theorist?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ie6gJHqkSgc
01:03 PM on 01/08/2011
These governments [UNITED STATES & CANADA] along with many others around the world, and in concert with their ASSOCIATED ASSOCIATIONS, e.g. American Dental Association (ADA), Canadian Dental Association (CDA), World Health Organization (WHO), Health Canada and, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) etc, etc, have known about “Dental Fluorosis” all along, and for many, many years too.

"A surprising government study reported an increase in the spotting problem...causes spots on some kids' teeth...tooth streaking...spottiness because of too much fluoride...teeth can even be pitted by the mineral."
http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/msnbc-article.aspx?cp-documentid=27153046

For example; here is the type of mind set that we are up against—“The end-point of concern, for fluoride, is still considered to be moderate dental fluorosis…It was agreed that this should not be considered a toxicological end-point, but that this endpoint is significant because it correlates with cosmetic problems”.
Source - Health Canada: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/2008-fluoride-fluorure/index-eng.php

Cosmetic Problems?

If only we could see all of the body’s bones, just with our unaided eyes. Would they look like the mottled, pitted, stained or "splotchy" teeth, which have obviously been affected by the consistent ingestion of Artificially Fluoridated Water and other so-called health products?

"Fluoridation has been fought for decades, by conspiracy theorists."
02:42 AM on 01/08/2011
"Fresh new evidence." Why does that concept remind me so much of poop patrol caring for two large dogs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
02:21 AM on 01/08/2011
I stopped believing the nonsense about the "benefits" of fluoridated water after I heard of elk in Yellowstone drinking from pools of water with high concentrations of fluoride in it. You know how they knew to test for high fluoride content? The animals were literally breaking down. Their skeletal structure crumbling at various points under their own weight. Now the levels they were drinking were extreme, but, this stuff obviously hangs around, accumulates and does the damage over time. With fluoridated toothpaste and mouthwash there is NO conceivable reason, good reason, to be drinking ANY of it in our water.

PS - I don't drink tap water because it's loaded with all sorts of chemical, radioactive and pharaceutical BS. I'd rather drink my own urine. Seriously.
03:19 PM on 01/07/2011
If autism isn't related to vaccines, what about flouride?
03:08 PM on 01/07/2011
Fluoride is proven to lower IQ and make people more docile. How does fluoride ingested supposed to help my teeth anyway? I can see having some on toothpaste but in my body? It says it on the toothpaste to not ingest the stuff and to call poison control if you do.

Never underestimate ignorance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mphalen
12:12 PM on 01/07/2011
This is not new. I'm in my 50's and when my permanent teeth came in on the bottom they were stained and have been stained ever since. And guess what? Back then they said it was probably caused by too much flouride in the water.
11:21 AM on 01/07/2011
The Brits don't put flouride in their water... obviously.
03:06 PM on 01/07/2011
Yes professor, but the fluoride content of tea is anywhere from 4ppm to 20ppm... that compared to fluoridated water at only 1ppm. You can easily exceed a 2-4mg "daily recommendation" by simply drinking a cup of tea. So how do you explain that then, with all the tea the Brits consume?

And if you respond that fluoride only helps children with their developing teeth, and they don't drink tea... Well how do you then justify medicating the entire adult population with fluoridated water?

Comments?
03:10 PM on 01/07/2011
And I should correct myself, the "recommendation" is only 1mg per day, with 2-4mg considered dangerous, with a lifetime accumulation at 4mg per day shown to cause crippling skeletal fluorosis in later years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purenergy
09:31 AM on 01/07/2011
How about just taking it out all together.