More

WikiLeaks: US Demanding Our Twitter Account Info

RAPHAEL G. SATTER and PETE YOST   01/ 8/11 08:08 PM ET   AP

Wikileaks Twitter

WASHINGTON — Investigative documents in the WikiLeaks probe spilled out into the public domain Saturday for the first time, pointing to the Obama administration's determination to assemble a criminal case no matter how long it takes and how far afield authorities have to go.

Backed by a magistrate judge's court order from Dec. 14, the newly disclosed documents sent to Twitter Inc. by the U.S. attorney's office in Alexandria, Va., demand details about the accounts of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and Pfc. Bradley Manning, the Army intelligence analyst who's in custody and suspected of supplying WikiLeaks with classified information.

The others whose Twitter accounts are targeted in the prosecutors' demand are Birgitta Jonsdottir, an Icelandic parliamentarian and one-time WikiLeaks collaborator; Dutch hacker Rop Gonggrijp; and U.S. programmer Jacob Appelbaum. Gonggrijp and Appelbaum have worked with WikiLeaks in the past.

Justice Department spokesman Matt Miller declined comment on the disclosure in the case, which intensified following WikiLeaks' latest round of revelations with the posting of classified State Department diplomatic cables. The next day, Nov. 29, Attorney General Eric Holder vowed that anyone found to have violated U.S. law in the leaks would be prosecuted.

Assange said the U.S. move amounted to harassment, and he pledged to fight it.

"If the Iranian government was to attempt to coercively obtain this information from journalists and activists of foreign nations, human rights groups around the world would speak out," he told The Associated Press in an e-mail.

Legal experts have said one possible avenue for federal prosecutors would be to establish a conspiracy to steal classified information.

"They are trying to show that Manning was more than a source of the information to a reporter and rather that Assange and Manning were trying to jointly steal information from the U.S. government," said Mark Rasch, a former prosecutor on computer crime and espionage cases in the Justice Department.

The problem is distinguishing between WikiLeaks as a news organization and those who re-published the same classified information, like The New York Times, said Rasch, director of cybersecurity and privacy consulting at CSC, a Falls Church, Va., technology company.

"How do they prosecute?" asked Rasch. "The answer is by establishing a unity of interest between Manning and Assange. Make it a theft case and not just a journalist publishing information case."

The demand by prosecutors sought information dating to Nov. 1, 2009, several months before an earlier WikiLeaks release.

Manning is in a maximum-security military brig at Quantico, Va., charged with leaking video of a 2007 U.S. Apache helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed a Reuters news photographer and his driver. WikiLeaks posted the video on its website in April of last year. Three months later, WikiLeaks posted some 90,000 leaked U.S. military records on the war in Afghanistan, including unreported incidents of Afghan civilian killings as well as covert operations against Taliban figures.

The main target of the prosecutors' document demands is most likely the IP addresses of the Twitter users, said Stanford University law professor Larry Lessig, founder of the Center for Internet & Society, Stanford.

Getting a list of IP addresses – specific numerical address that can identify individual computers as they interact over the Internet – could help prosecutors an effort to draw specific connections between individuals, their computers, and the information they share.

"It's not very hard for an investigator to put these things together and come back and identify a specific individual," Lessig said.

In a statement about the demand to Twitter for information, WikiLeaks said it has reason to believe Facebook and Google, among other organizations, have received similar court orders. WikiLeaks called on them to unseal any subpoenas they have received.

The document demand ordered Twitter to hand over private messages, billing information, telephone numbers, connection records and other information about accounts run by Assange and the others.

A copy of the demand, sent to the AP by Jonsdottir, said the information sought was "relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation" and ordered Twitter not to disclose its existence to any of the targets.

But a second document, dated Jan. 5, unsealed the court order. Although the reason wasn't made explicit in the document, WikiLeaks said it had been unsealed "thanks to legal action by Twitter."

Twitter declined comment on the matter, saying only that its policy is to notify its users, where possible, of government requests for information.

Neither Facebook Inc. nor Google Inc. immediately returned messages Saturday.

The Obama administration volunteered little new information about its criminal investigation against Assange and WikiLeaks after news of its subpoena leaked. Under rules governing grand jury investigations – in which U.S. prosecutors present evidence and testimony to selected private citizens behind closed doors to seek their approval to formally file charges – government lawyers are not allowed to discuss the case until charges are announced publicly.

It was not immediately clear how the data being requested would be useful to investigators. Twitter's logs could reveal the Internet addresses that Assange and WikiLeaks supporters have used, which could help track their locations as they traveled around the world. The information also might identify others with official access to WikiLeaks' account on Twitter who so far have escaped scrutiny.

Assange's lawyer, Mark Stephens, said targeting Twitter showed how desperate U.S. officials were to pin a crime on the WikiLeaks founder.

Stephens told the BBC it was an attempt to "shake the electronic tree in the hope some kind of criminal charge drops out the bottom of it."

Jonsdottir said in a Twitter message that she had "no intention to hand my information over willingly." Appelbaum, whose Twitter feed suggested he was traveling in Iceland, said he was apprehensive about returning to the U.S.

"Time to try to enjoy the last of my vacation, I suppose," he tweeted.

Gonggrijp praised Twitter for notifying him.

"It appears that Twitter, as a matter of policy, does the right thing in wanting to inform their users when one of these comes in," Gonggrijp said. "Heaven knows how many places have received similar subpoenas and just quietly submitted all they had on me."

The news of the subpoena follows months of angry back and forth between U.S. officials and WikiLeaks, which has released reams of secret U.S. military documents on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and more recently, thousands of classified U.S. diplomatic cables.

U.S. officials say posting the military documents put informers' lives at risk, and that revealing diplomatic cables has made other countries reluctant to deal with American officials.

WikiLeaks denies that its postings put any lives at risk and says Washington merely is acting out of embarrassment over the revelations contained in the cables.

WikiLeaks and its tech-savvy staff have relied on American Internet and finance companies to raise funds, disseminate material and get their message out.

WikiLeaks' frequently updated Facebook page, for example, counts 1.5 million fans and its Twitter account has a following of more than 600,000. Until recently, the group raised donations via U.S. companies PayPal Inc., MasterCard Inc., and Visa Inc., and hosted material on Amazon.com's servers.

But the group's use of American companies has come under increasing pressure as it continues to reveal U.S. secrets. PayPal and the credit card companies severed their links with site and Amazon.com booted WikiLeaks from its servers last month.

The actions sparked a cyberfight with WikiLeaks sympathizers, who attacked the company's sites for days.

Assange is currently out on bail in Britain, where he is fighting extradition to Sweden on sex crimes allegations. His next hearing is scheduled for Tuesday.

___

Satter reported from London. Associated Press writer Ted Bridis in Washington, Michael Liedtke in San Francisco and Christopher Leonard in St. Louis contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

WASHINGTON — Investigative documents in the WikiLeaks probe spilled out into the public domain Saturday for the first time, pointing to the Obama administration's determination to assemble a cri...
WASHINGTON — Investigative documents in the WikiLeaks probe spilled out into the public domain Saturday for the first time, pointing to the Obama administration's determination to assemble a cri...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,765
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
Coinyer101 09:48 AM on 01/08/2011
Too bad, US Gubmint! Us libs know the Constitution and the law, and you got nothing on Wikileaks!! Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Speech are in the FIRST amendment for a reason!! That one ain't negotiable anymore!!
 
JA should just go ahead and release the 'doomsday password' and get this over with. Let the truth be known even if the heavens should fall.....,and let the chips fall where they  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Florence Baumgartner
06:59 PM on 01/10/2011
This is important :

the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act was killed at the last minute by a lone secret senator who put a hold on it, and it died. This bill had already been passed by the Senate earlier in December and by the House earlier that same day, but in the final vote on the reconciled bill, which is designed to protect government workers from being punished – as they usually are – for exposing illegality, waste and corruption – it was shut down by a lone anonymous hold.

You can help find who did it at this link, by calling, writing or e-mailing your senators, and ask them : "Did you kill this bill ?" Here is the link to the list of senators who have already been contacted,

http://www.wnyc.org/blowthewhistle/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:39 AM on 01/10/2011
Now I realise that most Americans believe the world effectively end at the US borders, but this post is rather good fun: http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=24854&Cat=9 I know it's from Pakistan, but there are actually a couple of people who can think in that country. He raises many questions that are being asked all across the world - seriously! And if someone can actually answer some of the questions raised in a non-partisan way it would be illuminating. But I expect that the vast majority of readers will not read a scurrilous Pakistani journalist, preferring instead the home- grown down-country boys they are familiar with. Good night!
09:18 PM on 01/11/2011
I read it and its nothing new. The, "there's nothing new or interesting in these cables" perspective. And it was an opinion piece, he even said so very clearly. And I don't live in the States.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:25 PM on 01/11/2011
"And I don't live in the States". Not surprised at all - you actually read it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:31 AM on 01/10/2011
We can assume with a high degree of certainty that FaceBook, Google, Skype and Microsoft - and more - were also issued with that subpoena, and under its terms have already secretly submitted everything that was demanded. Certainly if I was running this investigation I would have included everyone, not just Twitter. So congratulations, Twitter, for successfully appealing the case and having the subpoena unsealed. I won't comment on what I think of the others.

How does it feel to live in the land of the free? Everyone who has posted a comment which could be construed to be negative can be sure that if the government wants, it will get. This is one reason I post under my real name (aside from disliking anonymity anyway) - there's no point hiding as everything will be known. Unless, of course, you have been planninig this for a very long time, know how computers work better than most, and are justifiably concerned about the unfettered power of the United States government, like Julian Assange. (Remember: it isn't paranoia if they really are out to get you!)
06:23 PM on 01/09/2011
Sarah Palin's and Rush's hate in action. Prosecute the truth-teller - not the criminals.

And Messrs. Satter, Bridis, and Liedtke – Assange was not charged with sex crimes. You are slandering the man either because you are looking for sensationalism or because this is what your bosses want to hear from you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:45 PM on 01/09/2011
24 hours and the authorities are charging the yahoo in Arizona.
No one had to take months to "build a case".
Laws were broken. Period. And charges were made as the process would dictate.
So what exactly are the authorities "building"regarding Wiki and Assange?
I can tell you.
03:01 PM on 01/09/2011
the usa is more of a joke every day
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
01:58 PM on 01/09/2011
Didn't GWB do somoething similar?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Florence Baumgartner
01:54 PM on 01/09/2011
the Nation Gregg Mitchell blogs on Wikileaks everyday and today posted this :

"9:10 Well-known U.S. media writer Dan Kennedy tweets: "As a First Amendment statement, I am now following @ WikiLeaks. Come and get me, Mr. Holder."
12:25 PM on 01/09/2011
The government's strategy is correct. Prosecute Assange for aiding and abetting, and conspiracy to commit, and being an accessory after the fact of espionage, as well as receiving stolen goods.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dana Walker
01:40 PM on 01/09/2011
Yes! Ignore the war crimes and prosecute those who expose the war crimes! The government is your friend! Trust them! They know what is right! We don't need to bother our little heads with Wikileaks exposing things like Pfizer killing African children by conducting illegal drug trials because we can be assured the government will prosecute their largest campaign contributors! They would not hide this crime from us! (Oh, I forgot - according to the 'common wisdom' as expressed in the corporate media Wikileaks did not expose anything significant, did they? Did anyone hear about these drug trials from the corporate press? No, they focused on Libyan nurses and ignored Pfizer. Funny thing, eh?)
02:39 PM on 01/09/2011
Fine with me if Bush, cheney, rumsfeld, Manning and Assange share a cell for the rest of their days.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
01:59 PM on 01/09/2011
Coward!
12:23 PM on 01/09/2011
To everyone in the past weeks who insists that the US government won't prosecute Assange because it hasn't done anything about him to date: HAHAHAHAHHAH!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:03 PM on 01/09/2011
very funny. where did you come up with that ending? 1st or 2nd grade?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zenith1959
Buying Things=Job Creator
11:41 AM on 01/09/2011
A non mawded thread, can't help but notice a certain group is out in force today using their favorite phrase, "Not time for the blame game".
12:36 PM on 01/09/2011
Blame away, if it makes you feel better.

Probably a run in the park would do more good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zenith1959
Buying Things=Job Creator
12:57 PM on 01/09/2011
I place blame on the "suspect", but can't help but point out I can't recall how often a particular group always uses that comment, even when it directly applies. Bad intel leading up to the Iraq war? "Don't play the blame game", Wall street and big banks nearly crashing the world economy?, "Don't play the blame game". The suspect in this case is responsible for his own actions, but I am a "news junkie", and that non stop chorus that has been going on for years is getting old. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zenith1959
Buying Things=Job Creator
01:21 PM on 01/09/2011
I used a mawded word in my original reply, so who knows how long till it comes up, the suspect is to blame, but just like always, the right is using one of their simple terms, and repeating it, "Don't play the blame game", although it is usually used when there is actually someone to blame.
11:29 AM on 01/09/2011
Bank leaks is the only reason I started following WL. I'm just sad the bank info never came out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dana Walker
01:42 PM on 01/09/2011
Why do you think there is suddenly the extreme concern about WL? Now they are taking on the real power. Do not pack your bags yet. I suspect there is more to come.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Florence Baumgartner
01:56 PM on 01/09/2011
Exactly
11:18 AM on 01/09/2011
Bank leaks? Do they exist or just spin?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
x27
Living is easy with eyes closed
10:24 AM on 01/09/2011
A thread not on lock down! But no one here!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
smit9187
Truth Regulator
10:25 AM on 01/09/2011
I've been searching also. We have to try to do something. H/P is off the _reservation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:08 AM on 01/09/2011
Valerie Plame?