iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gabrielle Giffords Shooting Prompts Appeals To Cool Political Tone

CHARLES BABINGTON and CALVIN WOODWARD   01/ 9/11 11:51 AM ET   AP

Gabrielle Giffords Shooting

WASHINGTON — The nation's caustic political climate has become a suspect of sorts in the rampage that left six dead and a lawmaker critically injured in Arizona. Already, appeals are being heard to tone down the rhetoric.

The captured suspect's motives remain unknown despite his online diatribes betraying resentment of the government and a scattered state of mind. Still, the attack on Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and those who were with has intensified the scrutiny on how much is too much, and how hot is too hot, in political debate.

Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democratic leader in the Senate, on Sunday cited imagery of crosshairs on political opponents and Sarah Palin's combative rallying cry, "Don't retreat; reload."

"These sorts of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response," Durbin said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union."

The attack might be the work of "a single nut," Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva, whose Arizona district shares Tucson with Giffords' district, said Saturday, the day Giffords was shot. But he said the nation must assess the fallout of "an atmosphere where the political discourse is about hate, anger and bitterness."

Still others cautioned against blaming political rhetoric – or the language and imagery of a particular political group – for the tragedy in Tucson. Republicans were especially sensitive to suggestions that the conservative tea party movement, with its anti-government stances, was contributing to a more poisonous political environment,

Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., noted Sunday that the suspect in the Tucson rampage was connected to Internet postings that included Marxist and Nazi literature.

"That's not the profile of a typical tea party member, if that's the inference that's being made," he said on CNN.

Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, who ran as a tea party favorite, said on "Meet the Press" on NBC: "I just hope we can have some civility and move forward. You have extremes on both sides; you have crazy people on both sides. Your job as a leader is to talk to people in a rational way . to bring down the rhetoric".

The House's newly installed Republican leaders postponed Wednesday's scheduled vote to repeal the new health care law. That divisive issue was at the center of the harshest criticisms of Giffords and many other Democrats for the past two years.

The chief law enforcement official in the House, Sergeant-at-Arms Bill Livingood, said the Tucson attack did not appear to be part of a larger threat against Congress. Still, as a precaution, he advised each House member's office in an e-mail Saturday evening to get in touch with local law enforcement.

Washington and the nation have experienced a year or more of raw politics, with anger spilling over on both sides and gun-related metaphors coming loosely from the lips of some candidates and activists. Giffords, who had been a figurative target of the right, warned months ago that the verbal assaults were beyond the pale and could have dire results.

In Pima County, Ariz., Sheriff Clarence Dupnik suggested "all this vitriol" in recent discourse might be connected to Saturday's shootings. "This may be free speech," he told reporters, "but it's not without consequences."

Jonathan Cowan, president of the centrist Democratic group Third Way, said: "We do know that politics has become too personal, too nasty and perhaps too dangerous. Perhaps out of this senseless act some sense can return to our public discourse."

Many lawmakers, especially Democrats, felt the 2009-2010 debate over health care sometimes got out of hand. It began with emotional town hall meetings in the summer of 2009, when some critics warned of government "death panels."

Giffords, 40, was among lawmakers who reported 42 threats or acts or vandalism in the first three months of 2010, a big increase over the previous year, law enforcement officers said. Nearly all the threats dealt with the massive health care bill that Giffords and other Democrats enacted over fierce Republican opposition.

In March, someone kicked in or shot out a glass door and side window at Giffords' office in Tucson, a few hours after the House passed the health care measure with her help.

Giffords also was among about 20 Democrats opposed in last fall's elections by Sarah Palin, the 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee. Palin's Facebook page in March posted a U.S. map with the cross-hairs of a gun scope imposed over each of the 20 Democrats' districts. Gun imagery appeared in various ways in the campaign, often not connected at all with gun rights.

"We're on Sarah Palin's targeted list," Giffords said at the time. "The way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize there are consequences to that action."

Palin's Facebook page after the shooting extended condolences to Giffords' family and the other victims.

The suspected gunman, Jared Loughner, complained about the government online and spoke of matters involving currency, terrorism and "mind control." But what might have driven him to violence has not been established.

"We don't yet know what provoked this unspeakable act," President Barack Obama said Saturday from the White House. "We are going to get to the bottom of this."

Obama said he's dispatched the head of the FBI to Arizona to oversee the investigation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The nation's caustic political climate has become a suspect of sorts in the rampage that left six dead and a lawmaker critically injured in Arizona. Already, appeals are being heard...
WASHINGTON — The nation's caustic political climate has become a suspect of sorts in the rampage that left six dead and a lawmaker critically injured in Arizona. Already, appeals are being heard...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,783
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (37 total)
photo
Terry DR
Republicans are destroying America!
02:26 PM on 01/10/2011
This is America now. No respect, calling our president horrible names. Congress standing on a balcony taunting and whipping up the crowd screaming kill the bill. I believe we have crossed a line and cannot go back.
03:31 PM on 01/10/2011
So all that stuff with Bush I assume never bothered you? What about the Word "Teabagger" which MSNBC used so much and picked up by the Liberal base to make fun of the Tea party. Maybe going after Bristol Palin or Trig is the type of breaking news that you prefer.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
american2008
05:24 PM on 01/10/2011
Oh grow up for goodness sakes! The Teabaggers gave themselves that name in the beginning you Fox News zombie. Noone is saying you cant be critical of a POTUS or Congressman, we pointed to Bush's big mistakes and were called un-patriotic and worse, Obama has gotten hundreds of threats and has been called a Marxist, Pals around with Terrorists, Not American Born etc. Rush and Beck have made fun of Obama's children on several occasions, where were you then pal?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
EmmaJ76
Web Designer, Wife, Cat Mom, Politics Nerd
09:07 AM on 01/11/2011
dmezz1962 you have some valid points to make but in doing so you open yourself up as you criticize but don't see that the things you list have been done by both sides.

Take for example your accusation about the term "teabagger".  This term was first used by the Tea Party themselves.  For example Tea Party members turned up at rallies with signs saying "I'm teabagging for Jesus" and on the first Tax Day protest the term "tea bag" was used multiple times: "Tea Bag the Fools in D.C." and "Tea Bag the Liberal Dems Before They Tea Bag You."  Of course it has been used to mock the Tea Party by the Left and those who understand what it's true meaning is - but the Tea Party did use it first - please google.

As for Bush - true, people who called for the "lynching" of Bush were wrong - but you can;t cry against that without acknowledging that the Right does it in earnest too against PBO.

As for going after the Palin children - very true it is wrong, and maybe their mother should think twice about pushing them into the spotlight all the time.  But let's not forget when Glenn Beck mocks the Obama girls - for example in May 2010 when he smeared Malia, mocking her in a rant against her father.

And this brings me to my final point - I don;t prefer this "stuff" and neither should anyone. It has become a stain on the political spectrum and it should not be justified with "they do it too".  How about "enough is enough".
01:58 PM on 01/10/2011
The First Amendment does not protect yelling fire in a crowded theater. That is a legal fact.
02:37 PM on 01/10/2011
Definitely true, but there are plenty of people who will imply or pretend that "freedom of speech" is absolute.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amondale
06:18 PM on 01/12/2011
True. They are the Pavlovian strict Constitutionalist that are conditioned by their handlers to foam at the mouth whenever anyone uses judicial precedence.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
davcrock
12:30 AM on 01/11/2011
It's also a very narrow exception and it was Justice Oliver W. Holmes that said it and in a very suspect 1st Amendment case at that.  See Schenck v. US, 249 U.S. 47, 52 (1919).  The clear and present danger standard has not been widely applied because it chills legitimate free speech and allows the government to bring arbitrary prosecutions.  It's not a particularly helpful standard and Justices like Hugo Black and William Douglas did pretty much think the "no law" language of he 1st Amendment means exaclty what it says.  No law.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ampdem
12:59 PM on 01/10/2011
So far I have seen Republican/Tea Party members/leaders as well as FOX comentators say that this was an isolated incident, that was carried out by a "liberal pot smoking, maniac." (Megyn Kelly) Doese that indicate any intention by the right to back down, or at least tone down? Not to me. No one on the right has so far acknowledged that certain comments, and shows, aired by FOX and voiced by rightwing politicians and suporters, can and may have had, (or will have) an influence on a disturbed mind (especialy when repeated incesantly like by Glenn Beck.) So my guess is they are going to continue the instigation, and continue to dismiss any tragedy as a "lunatic's doing". This is their way of instigating tragedy, and havock, without being directly responsible, because they are not directly implicated per say. I have never seen a more cowardly,selfish,disgusting,imoral,corrupt, group of people.
02:37 PM on 01/10/2011
"In their wickedness, they are blind; in their folly they persist."
12:36 PM on 01/10/2011
“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun...”
-Barack Obama, June 14, 2008

Maybe all of us should bring down the tone of the rhetoric just a bit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ampdem
01:03 PM on 01/10/2011
No offense but are you sure about your facts? Can you post a link? Don't mean to doubt your mental capacity but some of us have been known to confuse fact and fiction, so let's back it up, shall we.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
american2008
05:26 PM on 01/10/2011
He was talking about a line from the movie The Untouchables you P utz!
07:38 PM on 01/10/2011
Oh, so it's okay with Obama does it because it comes from a movie. It's okay when Obama does it if you agree with it. Let's say John McCain said it for example, this board would come apart at the seams. BTW, nice of you to insult the OP... proved his point exactly! Ha!
11:50 PM on 01/16/2011
He has been a thug from the start, telling his supporters, "I want you to argue with them and GET IN THEIR FACES" (September 2008).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trackerinblue
Human Rights Activist
11:45 AM on 01/10/2011
Subject: Tell Sarah Palin: Violent threats have consequences

Dear Friend,

Our hearts are heavy for the victims of the tragedy in Arizona. We must put a stop to the escalating hate rhetoric of the right and its very specific calls to armed violent action. Lines of decency have been crossed.

Sarah Palin has a special responsibility and opportunity in the wake of the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. For it was Sarah Palin and Sarah Palin alone who earlier put the crosshairs of a gun on Rep. Giffords. And so far, Palin's response has been Facebook prayers for the victims and an official denial that her widely distributed map involved gun sights at all. This is obscene duplicity at best.

I'm joining CREDO Action in calling on Sarah Palin to renounce the use of shooting images in political rhetoric immediately, and stop using her platform to promote and validate violent calls to action on the right.

Click on the link below for more information and to find out how you can take action, too.
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/palin_violence/?r_by=14885-3262457-zCSkTtx&rc=paste2
10:56 AM on 01/10/2011
#
Are you happy now Sarah your insane retoric has caused this tragedy?
20 minutes ago ·
#
You're responsible for this.
17 minutes ago · 1 personLoading... ·

SP FB page

http://tinyurl.com/29gtd9h
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:44 AM on 01/10/2011
great link
03:34 PM on 01/10/2011
Really Palin caused this? You would not happen to have proof would you?
10:49 AM on 01/10/2011
Palin spent the weekend scrubbing her web site. If after a shooting a political leader or movement leader has to scrub their web site, they... and their movement have a problem.
01:59 PM on 01/10/2011
Scrubbing websites is what the tea party does. They put stuff up long enough to attract the lunatics, then hide it from everyone else.

She had the hospital scrub all their birth records that would have included Trig, too.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
american2008
05:26 PM on 01/10/2011
Maybe she should spend a day scrubbing her mouth now!
06:32 PM on 01/12/2011
I wouldn't volunteer to do it myself because I wouldn't want to get close to her. Cooties! :-)
11:53 PM on 01/16/2011
Listen to yourself. Go scrub your own mouth.
10:40 AM on 01/10/2011
All of the words you are all using are absolutely meant to be hurtful - to any side. How about ALL AMERICANS take proper care with their written and spoken words? We have become a callous, careless society. People lost their lives! A woman is fighting for her life! Instead of inciting hatred and playing the blame game we should be uniting in prayer for the families and victims!

h/t Sarah's FB Page
10:53 AM on 01/10/2011
BullS hit!!! You're a Ha temonger and YOU are going to be the cause for many more deaths and disruption in this country!!! YOU Are a DisGrace!!

SP FB page

http://tinyurl.com/29gtd9h
10:35 AM on 01/10/2011
You SP FB monitors can delete all you want. It's not going to do any good. People are calling Sarah out on her OWN FACEBOOK PAGE!!

http://tinyurl.com/29gtd9h

I'm watching you.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
heather65
save a bee..plant flowers.
10:26 AM on 01/10/2011
It is easier to lead men to combat, stirring up their passion, than to restrain them and direct them toward the patient labors of peace.

-- Andre Gide (1869-1951)
xzwq
don't let cons forget GWB. they ruined america
10:24 AM on 01/10/2011
Just like the Conservatives: always one step behind.

Kind of like, "America was safe under Bush" [except for that one day in September, and all these years at war] "but America was safe under Bush!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vegancheesenut
Proud American Socialist
10:38 AM on 01/10/2011
Let me be your #2 fan.......and faved. My exact thoughts........thanks
10:10 AM on 01/10/2011
Come on Sarah, admit that you have some responsibility in this. You would be respected if you did. I know there is no proof that you influenced this guy..
But who needs facts?

The language and imagery you use, in order to gain followers and supporters and to make them "feel" that you care about them is VERY EMOTIONAL.

It doesn't make much rational sense but that's ok. It doesn't have to do does it?

Because you know that when you speak to people's Emotional selves you bypass their Rational mind.

However when you use Hate-speech as a way of getting people motivated to help attain your political goals you release that irrational side of themselves.

This is dangerous.

People can behave unpredictably especially mentally unstable people who respond to emotional stimuli rather than rational stimuli.

We've seen what happens at some rallies when people are EMOTIONALLY MANIPULATED like this.

You must stop taking this tactic as you are spreading negativity.

That can only lead to tragedy Sarah.

Please change your Narrative.

It's possible to argue your corner without hatred.

SP FB page

http://tinyurl.com/29gtd9h
10:06 AM on 01/10/2011
A commenter on my blog gave what happened Saturday the name that I think it ought to have.

He called it the Tea Party M assacre. And that's what I'm calling it from now on, too.

h/t Palingater who has his own blog
10:05 AM on 01/10/2011
All the emotional black_mail about "good people" in Arizona ignores the reality that there have been "good people" in every country where political disaster has occurred. Also, the whiiining about "both sides" is such a flagrant fa_lse equivalency that any self-respecting non-rightist is not impressed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trackerinblue
Human Rights Activist
11:50 AM on 01/10/2011
Thanks, olong.fanned. I was trying to explain just what a false equivalency is to someone last night and just had to give up. He went back to listening to Rush.
09:59 AM on 01/10/2011
An article about Palin's future :

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47351.html