iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Americans Favor Semi-Automatic Weapons Ban, Wary Of 'Gun Control'

First Posted: 01/10/11 05:22 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Ggg

WASHINGTON -- Will the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 20 others in Arizona turn public opinion in favor of tougher gun control measures? The evidence is mixed at best. While public opinion has generally turned against stricter gun-control measures over the last twenty years, majorities continue to support greater restrictions on the sort of semi-automatic weapon used in the Tucson shootings.

For the last 20 years, the Gallup organization has tracked whether Americans "feel that the laws covering the sale of firearms should be made more strict, less strict or kept as they are now." As Gallup explained in a report last November, that support has declined gradually over the last two decades to the point that a "record low 44%" now support stricter gun laws, while a majority prefer laws that are kept as they are currently (42%) or made less strict (12%).

2011-01-10-Blumenthal-20110110gallupmoreless.png

As noted yesterday by ABC News pollster Gary Langer, that slow steady decline continued over a period that included notorious gun crimes like the slayings at Virginia Tech in 2007 and in Columbine, Colo. in 1999. Support for a ban on all handguns, measured by Gallup since 1960, shows a similar long-term trend.

2011-01-10-Blumenthal-20110110Galluphandgun.png

At first glance, Gallup's handgun ban question appears to show an increase in support following the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan in March of 1981. However, the apparent decline occurs on a survey conducted in December of 1980, four months before the Reagan shooting, and is mostly due to a single outlier result in January of 1980 showing unusually strong opposition for that era (full data available here).

On the other hand, the Pew Research Center found a brief increase in support for gun control following the Columbine shootings on a measure asking whether it is more important "to control gun ownership" than "to protect the right of Americans to own guns." Support for gun control on this measure rose from 57% in 1993 to 65% following the Columbine shootings, and remained at roughly that level for nearly a year (on two subsequent surveys) before falling back to the mid 50s in the spring of 2000.

2011-01-10-Blumenthal-20110110prcguns.png

The Pew Research data shows no apparent reaction to the Virginia Tech shootings, as noted by their report at the time.

While most Americans reject generally stricter gun control laws or outright bans on handguns, as ABC's Langer also points out, majorities still favor bans on the sort of semi-automatic gun allegedly used by Jared Lee Loughner in Arizona. The precise number depends on the wording of the question (and possibly on timing). But, as the following table shows, three organizations have found majority or plurality support for bans on semi-automatic weapons in recent years.

2011-01-10-Blumenthal-20110110banautoweapons.png

Only the NBC/Wall Street Journal poll has tracked opinions on an assault weapon ban since the 1990s, and as the following chart shows, they show a drop in support over time that matches the decline in support for gun control generally. That said, they continued to show plurality support for an assault weapon ban as recently as a year ago.

2011-01-10-Blumenthal-20110110nbcwsjban.png

The Arizona shootings will provide another test. One contributing factor in any change of public opinion may be whether Democrats choose to advocate for specific new gun control measures. Without prominent leaders pushing for a change, it is hard to imagine a reversal of this decades long trend.

Follow Mark Blumenthal and HuffPost Pollster on Twitter

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Will the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 20 others in Arizona turn public opinion in favor of tougher gun control measures? The evidence is mixed at best. While public ...
WASHINGTON -- Will the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) and 20 others in Arizona turn public opinion in favor of tougher gun control measures? The evidence is mixed at best. While public ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 579
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
OdinsEye
Korean-Latino cop and retired military combat vet
03:53 PM on 01/15/2011
One glaring problem with most such polls is they rely on the public's lack of knowledge of what an "assault weapon" is. Many Americans don't even know what a semi-auto is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
03:16 PM on 02/17/2011
I'm referencing these polls in a college paper I'm writing on how a knowledge gap among the public prevents accurate discovery of firearms policy. Notice how the above table is labeled "automatic weapons ban". With the right wording, you could probably convince most NRA members to oppose something.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:48 PM on 01/14/2011
Crime Statistics:

Murders with firearms (per capita)

USA is .028 deaths per 1,000 people

England is .0010 deaths per 1,000 people

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_wit_fir_percap-crime-murders-firearms-per-capita

Total crimes (per capita)

# 6 United Kingdom: 85.5517 per 1,000 people
# 8 United States: 80.0645 per 1,000 people

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_tot_cri_percap-crime-total-crimes-per-capita
11:51 AM on 02/13/2011
It's a bit nebulous to compare crimes like that with the (supposed) intent of implying that the UK is less safe because of gun control.

A) 'Crime' includes white collar crimes like fraud that don't involve violence

B) It depends on what is considered a crime and how it is recorded. In the UK there is a crime called 'affray' which is essentially an act of violence that causes distress to the general public. This means that most fights or street brawls that happen in public can get the defendant charged with both assault and affray, which in America would only be charged as a single offence.
03:43 PM on 01/14/2011
The fact is that the gun used by Loughner is also a favorite of law enforcement. The general public only favors such restrictions because they don't know firearms; a semi-auto is not a machine gun; nor are so-called "assault weapons" that were covered by the '94 ban. Understand: guns serve hero and villain alike. It is designed to be lethal. The fault isn't the gun, nor the magazine. No law can stop a criminal, only provide for penalties. Our focus should be on the criminal, not his tool.
11:02 AM on 01/14/2011
In the first place, gun ownership is about self defense, not hunting. How would Columbine or Virginia Tech have played out if a teacher or student had been allowed to carry their weapon with them? You'd have a lot less dead bodies, since all the police are going to do is create a perimeter until everything is nearly over. You seem to overlook that a gun owner shot back at this Loughner character and helped apprehend him. I encourage all of you who are scared of guns or think they had minds of their own and randomly shoot people to visit a range or ask a gun owning buddy to teach you to shoot one day. Learning how to operate a gun will open your mind and show you that it is a tool, not the boogey man.
04:05 PM on 01/13/2011
I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court has ruled that outright bans are unconstitutional. I'd go with licensing. Wait until the Militia lawsuits start up...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:49 PM on 01/14/2011
rather have them spending their money on lawyers than guns.

http://blog.stanleyyelnats.com/2011/01/13/there-you-go-again--reagun-comments.aspx
09:33 PM on 01/11/2011
I have seen some people commenting, in one way or another, that banning high capacity weapons is a slippery slope. "Next they will be banning kitchen knives" is the gist of it. This is ridiculous thinking. There is already an arbitrary line, generally agreed by society, as to what acceptable. Can you legally own a hand grenade? Can we legally carry a samurai sword in public? What about brass knuckles, are they legal to carry? The answers to these questions are no! Any level headed person accepts these laws as a part of living in a decent cooperative society.
03:50 PM on 01/14/2011
Britain, having banned gun ownership, is now discussing the ban of any knives with points. (Seriously. Chefs are HOWLING about it.) Hand grenades are WMD, which is why they're illegal. Seriously, though, if I can get a permit to carry a loaded .45 on my hip, doesn't that make a prohibition against brass knuckles silly? If I'm trusted to carry my Glock in public, why would anyone be alarmed if I had a Samurai sword? (Aside from the fact that they can SEE it.) Most gun control laws are nothing but feel-good, ineffective words on paper, hampering only those of us who follow the law, giving criminals the upper hand.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:52 PM on 01/14/2011
rime Statistics­:

Murders with firearms (per capita)

USA is .028 deaths per 1,000 people

England is .0010 deaths per 1,000 people

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_wit_fir_percap-crime-murders-firearms-per-capita
Total crimes (per capita)

# 6 United Kingdom: 85.5517 per 1,000 people
# 8 United States: 80.0645 per 1,000 people

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_tot_cri_percap-crime-total-crimes-per-capita

http://blog.stanleyyelnats.com/2011/01/13/there-you-go-again--reagun-comments.aspx
12:00 PM on 02/13/2011
'Britain, having banned gun ownership, is now discussing the ban of any knives with points'

Wow. I would think you were joking if that wasn't the sort of thing people actually believe.

Firstly, gun ownership isn't banned in the UK. My neighbours have several shotguns and a hunting rifle. Gun ownership just isn't an automatic right, you have to prove a legitimate need for a gun.

And the 'banning knives with points' nonsense is pure Onion stuff. Back in 2005 a group of doctors recommended the idea to cut down on knife crime, but it was never implemented.

I suggest you take no notice of the Daily Mail in future, which is the UK equivalent of Glen Beck
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:49 PM on 01/15/2011
"Can you legally own a hand grenade?"

Yes, we can! They are a "Any Other Weapon" and require a 5 dollar tax. I do believe you have to write the ATF if you use it though.
02:12 PM on 02/02/2011
I believe a grenade is a destructive device, thus subject to the $200 tax. Don't ask me how I know. ;-) All NFA rules apply.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedandGreen
09:08 PM on 01/11/2011
All to be expected considering the persistence of human stupidity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucidPanther
09:02 PM on 01/11/2011
The people who commit the mass murders - who shoot up Holocaust Museum, The Unitarian Church - who shoot up schools, their work place when they get fired...these people are law-abiding, decent respectable citizens - until they went over the edge.

It's these good citizens who murder their cheating spouses and lovers; who murder their business rivals.

Criminals basically kill each other; drug dealers kill each other; likewise with the gangbangers.

We need to get guns out of the hands of good, law-abiding citizens - they are the ones who commit mass murders of innocent people.
03:55 PM on 01/14/2011
Actually, most criminals/mass murderers have a criminal history. Others have a history of mental problems. Most domestic violence murders have a history, too, in the form of repeated calls to police, hospital visits, etc. In any case, the 2nd Amendment isn't about simply owning guns; it's about your right to life and to defend it.
08:46 PM on 01/11/2011
Now that we're no longer navigating a wilderness frontier, why do we need an "armed" citizenry? After more than 200 years as a nation, shouldn't we be more advanced, less primitive by now?
02:13 PM on 02/02/2011
Speak for yourself, wherever you live. There are currently two humans on 13.5 square miles of private property where I live. We're never unarmed, nor worried about it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
07:06 PM on 01/11/2011
What gun control laws did the Tucson shooter break in acquiring his weapon? Why do you suppose more laws would do any good? It's never really about the guns. It's all about control.
photo
fredvh
Just a small town Iowa guy
11:35 PM on 01/15/2011
actually, if there were good laws on the books, he might have not gotten a gun.
not all states report the same things when it comes to the NCIC. Just a couple states report anything on mental illness.
photo
blukazoo
I support your right to disagree.
06:57 PM on 01/11/2011
What the poll doesn't address is that people want the ENFORCEMENT of existing laws. Usually, the crime is ignored by some other crime that's been committed with the weapon. There should be an automatic 10 years added to any crime committed with a gun and no sentence reduction for any reason.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dlaurels
06:49 PM on 01/11/2011
No one has a real need for an automatic weapon, period.
11:16 PM on 01/13/2011
There's a ban on automatic weapons.
02:17 PM on 02/02/2011
Nor does anyone have a real need for solid investments, I guess. My fully automatic weapons (all NFA rules apply, and they're 100% legal) have appreciated 500% since 1993, and I have regular offers to buy them. They'll buy my daughter two years of university. Not sorry I did it, adn glad Uncle Sam let me. Automatics are NOT banned, they're regulated. Do your homework.
05:03 PM on 01/11/2011
I think it is telling that of all the amendments this is the only one we talk about and read polls about.

Bush kicked every amendment but this one down the drain. And Obama does not restore them.

Where are the statistics about Americans wanting free speech - Miranda rights - Geneva conventions - Habeous Corpus - ......?

Oh, right, how could I forget. - It is guns that are important. Not sich nonsense as free press or free speech. - Or not having to endure being tortured just because someone needed a diversion from selling this nations and the world to corporations instead of doing what they swore they would do: defend the PEOPLE. - You know - the ones woh gave You your jobs.
11:05 AM on 01/31/2011
Bush didn't like the 2nd Amendment either. It was the Bush Administration that wanted to automatically revoke the right to own a gun for everyone who was placed on the administration's secret blacklists, and Bush was a vocal supporter of the 1994 "assault weapon" fraud.

If you look closely, the same people pushing hardest for new gun bans---the Third Way/DLC and the corporate media---are largely the same ones defending the Patriot Act and TSA, and the same ones fighting to cover up the banks' mortgage and securities fraud.

I agree with you---ALL of the Bill of Rights are important. And trashing the 2ndA in the name of "safety" is no better and no worse than trashing the 4thA in the name of "safety."
photo
cromag
ban the parties
04:11 PM on 01/11/2011
Want a gun free utopia?
Move to England.
Oh, wait they still have violent gun crime and had to ban everything down to pocket knives and the plastic sword.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Maderous
Last time a republican cared about my well being I
07:26 PM on 01/11/2011
Yeah, their violent crime is sooooo similar to ours.
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
11:50 PM on 01/12/2011
You're right...it's actually higher.
08:49 PM on 01/11/2011
The number of gun-related homicides in England is less than 10% of ours. I think their utopia works just fine and we can learn from it.
01:09 AM on 01/12/2011
Their population is also smaller so that would make sense. Anti-gun people tend to forget to mention that number is based on total population.
09:48 PM on 01/12/2011
have you ever compared the population numbers of the two countries? Do that, and then read your post again.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mytwocents02
my micro-bio does not meet guidelines
03:29 PM on 01/11/2011
I like Chris Rock's idea:

Gun control? We need bullet control! I think every bullet should cost $5,000. Because if a bullet cost $5,000, we wouldn't have any innocent bystanders.
photo
JimInHouston
Arma virumque cano...
11:51 PM on 01/12/2011
Patently unConstitutional.