More

Autism Risk: Having Babies Close In Age May Raise Risk

CARLA K. JOHNSON   01/10/11 06:08 AM ET   AP

Autism Risk

CHICAGO — Close birth spacing may put a second-born child at higher risk for autism, suggests a preliminary study based on more than a half-million California children.

Children born less than two years after their siblings were considerably more likely to have an autism diagnosis compared to those born after at least three years.

The sooner the second child was conceived the greater the likelihood of that child later being diagnosed with autism. The effect was found for parents of all ages, decreasing the chance that it was older parents and not the birth spacing behind the higher risk.

"That was pretty shocking to us, to be honest," said senior author Peter Bearman of Columbia University in New York. The researchers took into account other risk factors for autism and still saw the effect of birth spacing.

"No matter what we did, whether we were looking at autism severity, looking at age, or looking at all the various dimensions we could think of, we couldn't get rid of this finding," Bearman said. Still, he said more studies are needed to confirm the birth spacing link.

Closely spaced births are increasing in the United States because women are delaying childbirth and because of unplanned pregnancies. Government data show the number of closely spaced births – where babies are less than two years apart – is rising, from 11 percent of all births in 1995 to 18 percent in 2002.

The study, appearing Monday in the journal Pediatrics, comes just days after a new report further tarnished a British researcher's 1998 paper linking vaccines to autism, this time calling the paper a fraud based on altered facts.

Bearman contrasted the new research to what he called the "junk science" behind the notion that vaccines cause autism.

"One of the things that leads people to think that junk science is science is the idea that science solves all problems with a single bullet," Bearman said. Instead, "science is very slow and proceeds in steps."

Reasons behind the birth spacing-autism link aren't clear. It could be that parents are more likely to notice developmental problems when siblings are very close in age, Bearman said. When 2-year-old Billy isn't developing like 3-year-old Bobby, parents might be more likely to seek help.

Or biological factors could be at play, he said. Pregnancy depletes a mother's nutrients like folate, a B vitamin found in leafy green vegetables, citrus fruit and dried beans. Prior research has tied close birth spacing to low birth weights and prematurity, possibly because of lack of folate.

"And it could be a combination of effects, not a single explanation but a combination of dynamics," Bearman said.

The researchers looked at births from 1992 through 2002 in California. They analyzed data on second-born children born to the same parents whose older siblings didn't have autism. The information on autism diagnoses came from the state's Department of Developmental Services.

The overall prevalence of autism was less than 1 percent in the study. Of all the 662,730 second-born children in the analysis, 3,137 had an autism diagnosis. Of the 156,034 children conceived less than a year after the birth of their older siblings, 1,188 had an autism diagnosis – a higher rate, but still less than 1 percent.

Children with Asperger's syndrome and pervasive developmental disorders, milder forms of autism, weren't included. Government studies indicate about 1 in 100 children have autism disorders, including the milder forms.

Dr. Diane Ashton, March of Dimes' deputy medical director, called the study results an interesting finding that she hasn't seen in prior research. The results will have to be replicated, she said, but her organization already suggests at least a year between pregnancies.

"That is to allow the mother to rebuild depleted nutritional stores and decrease the risk for low birth weight and prematurity. Surely this evidence would provide additional reasons for those recommendations to be made," she said.

The March of Dimes also recommends that all women of childbearing age take a daily multivitamin containing folic acid, an artificial version of folate. Since half of pregnancies aren't planned, the recommendation includes women who aren't trying to get pregnant.

The new study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.

Bearman hesitated to give advice to parents planning families because the results are so new and unconfirmed. Older parents may not want to wait two or three years for a second child because of other health concerns, he said.

"The advice for parents is to pay attention to the science," Bearman said.

___

Online:

American Academy of Pediatrics: http://www.aap.org

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

CHICAGO — Close birth spacing may put a second-born child at higher risk for autism, suggests a preliminary study based on more than a half-million California children. Children born less than tw...
CHICAGO — Close birth spacing may put a second-born child at higher risk for autism, suggests a preliminary study based on more than a half-million California children. Children born less than tw...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 115
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
06:51 PM on 02/01/2011
Here's my question... is there anything that doesn't cause autism? Sheesh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
10:38 PM on 01/14/2011
Adequate birth spacing has long been a recommendation of natural medicine practitioners and has long been practiced by indigenous societies. Dr Weston Price noted the emphasis on birth spacing in such cultures.
11:53 PM on 01/13/2011
Please--this is junk science--flawed methodology. Another group of assistant professors shooting for tenure..
11:59 AM on 01/14/2011
What does the title of the individual have to do with the quality of the science?
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
07:33 PM on 01/13/2011
Quoting statistics without applying any biological science to the results often results in nonsense. Such is this case. This is much like the studies from California suggesting living near interstates but not major highways produces autism. Of course the latter case ignored the fact that better diagnostics are found in the urban areas around interstates. Statistics and epidemiology are extremely useful but are a very limited tool.
09:20 AM on 02/26/2011
You really don't understand the research process. You survey large numbers of people to find suggestive relationships (not cause). You formulate hypotheses that explain the findings and results of prior research. Then you delve down to find causal relationships. This is an iterative process, and you don't start with biology.

I'm hypothesizing television. How many hours a day do infants with sibs a year or less older than they spend in front of the television? We know a little bit, but not enough, about what television watching does to cognitive development in infants ... Of course it would be unfortunate if this were a contributing factor, because parents will have to bear some of the responsibility, and that will be very sad.
06:53 PM on 01/13/2011
For several years the FDA intentionally suppressed information about Folic Acid. They had to be sued before they allowed this information to be known to pregnant and soon to be pregnant women.

http://newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan135.htm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Interbartolo
03:10 PM on 01/13/2011
I don't know both the 3yr and 2yr spread were less than 1% autistic seems like the difference is in the statistical noise than any sort of causal link.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
10:39 PM on 01/14/2011
Not necessarily. What matters is the relative risk, not the absolute risk. This was a big data set, so the statistical power was likely adequate for significance.

You cannot assume that the result is not significant merely because the incidence in both groups was less than 1%.
12:42 PM on 01/12/2011
There was another study a few weeks ago that said that a child's house's proximity to highways is a possible link to autism. Fascinating though these statistically significant findings are, they are just so arbitrary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hxwhite
07:29 AM on 01/12/2011
Although it might be a piece to the puzzle it doesn't quite give any real answers to the biological/genetic interplay.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:29 PM on 01/11/2011
Is there a greater risk of autism in families who don't use birth control and have a whole bunch of kids? I never noticed but now I'm wondering about those religions where they encourage being fruitful.
Aside from that, it seems everything causes autism! Sheesh! Older fathers cause it. Closely spaced children cause it, faulty digestive systems, maternal infections, ultrasound.... Okay. Let's all live in bubbles and do nothing until we get the green light that it's safe to have kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dugmaze
Any man's death diminishes me
08:33 AM on 01/11/2011
"The study, appearing Monday in the journal Pediatrics, comes just days after a new report further tarnished a British researcher's 1998 paper linking vaccines to autism, this time calling the paper a fraud based on altered facts"

How does Dr. Wakefield's report relate to this article?
12:00 PM on 01/14/2011
They are both about the etiology of neurological disorders?

Just a guess...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
07:36 AM on 01/11/2011
Interesting finding. My first two children were 22 months apart, and my second daughter was a "failure to thrive" infant. While she's healthy now, she suffered a large number of medical problems in her first two years of life. She's also 5'3" while her sister and brother are closer to 6'. So antecdotally I can support this conclusion with my own experience.
photo
toxicshock
Sassy, snarky, smart
12:49 AM on 01/11/2011
NOPE THIS IS ALL FALSE; ONLY VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM, GUYS! DON'T YOU WATCH OPRAH?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Interbartolo
03:04 PM on 01/13/2011
and listen to Jenny McCarthy.
12:21 AM on 01/11/2011
there is a possible connection that could be working with other possible connection­s. In other words, there also seems to be a genetic link. This study about spacing should lead additional research about what environmen­tal factors (including factors in the womb) have an impact on those genetic precursors­.
http://www.articlesmoz.com/electronic-cigarette
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dugmaze
Any man's death diminishes me
08:35 AM on 01/11/2011
"In other words, there also seems to be a genetic link. "

If it was a genetic then it shouldn't matter how far apart you have kids.
photo
cable1977
Against logic there is no armor like ignorance
11:25 AM on 01/11/2011
Epigenetic factors such an pre-birth environment could contribute to the expression or penetrance of certain genotypes.
photo
PaiaGirl
Progressive Engineer
12:08 AM on 01/11/2011
This reminds me of before they discovered the virus that causes AIDs.  So many theories...no proof
12:03 PM on 01/14/2011
Techniclally "HIV causes AIDs" is still a scientific theory. The problem is that people don't understand what "theory" or "proof" means...
10:52 PM on 01/10/2011
What if autistic entercolitis could be contracted via co-bathing between young siblings?

Fecal shedding of live polio virus from the cheaper oral polio vaccine spreads the disease in Third World countries deemed unworthy of the better, more expensive vaccine....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
08:07 AM on 01/11/2011
It's not that those countries are deemed "unworthy." Because vaccination rates are so low, you can get more people gaining immunity from one shot where the virus sheds than if it didn't shed.