iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Steve Murawski: Overfishing To Stop In U.S. For First Time In A Century

JAY LINDSAY   01/ 8/11 11:11 PM ET   AP

Overfishing

BOSTON — For the first time in at least a century, U.S. fishermen won't take too much of any species from the sea, one of the nation's top fishery scientists says.

The projected end of overfishing comes during a turbulent fishing year that's seen New England fishermen switch to a radically new management system. But scientist Steve Murawski said that for the first time in written fishing history, which goes back to 1900, "As far as we know, we've hit the right levels, which is a milestone."

"And this isn't just a decadal milestone, this is a century phenomenon," said Murawski, who retired last week as chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fisheries Service.

Murawski said it's more than a dramatic benchmark – it also signals the coming of increasingly healthy stocks and better days for fishermen who've suffered financially. In New England, the fleet has deteriorated since the mid-1990s from 1,200 boats to only about 580, but Murawski believes fishermen may have already endured their worst times.

"I honestly think that's true, and that's why I think it's a newsworthy event," said Murawski, now a professor at the University of South Florida.

But fishermen and their advocates say ending overfishing came at an unnecessarily high cost. Dave Marciano fished out of Gloucester, an hour's drive northeast of Boston, for three decades until he was forced to sell his fishing permit in June. He said the new system made it too costly to catch enough fish to stay in business.

"It ruined me," said Marciano, 45. "We could have ended overfishing and had a lot more consideration for the human side of the fishery."

An end to overfishing doesn't mean all stocks are healthy, but scientists believe it's a crucial step to getting there.

When fishermen are overfishing a species, they're catching it at a rate scientists believe is too fast to ensure that the species can rebuild and then stay healthy. It's different from when a species is overfished, which is when scientists believe its population is too low.

Murawski said it's a nearly ironclad rule of fishery management that species become far more abundant when they're being fished at the appropriate level, which is determined after considering factors such as a species' life span and death rates.

A mandate to end overfishing by the 2010 fishing year – which concludes at different times in 2011, depending on the region – came in the 2007 reauthorization of the nation's fisheries law, the Magnuson-Stevens Act.

Murawski said the U.S. is the only country that has a law that defines overfishing and requires its fishermen not to engage in it.

"When you compare the United States with the European Union, with Asian countries, et cetera, we are the only industrialized fishing nation who actually has succeeded in ending overfishing," he said.

Regulators say 37 stocks nationwide last year were being overfished (counting only those that live exclusively in U.S. waters); New England had the most with 10. But Murawski said management systems that emphasize strict catch limits have made a big difference, and New England just made the switch.

Fishermen there now work in groups called sectors to divide an annual quota of groundfish, which include cod, haddock and flounder. If they exceed their limits on one species, they're forced to stop fishing on all species.

About two-thirds into the current fishing year, which ends April 30, federal data indicated New England fishermen were on pace to catch fewer than their allotted fish in all but one stock, Georges Bank winter flounder. But Murawski said he didn't expect fishermen would exceed their quota on any stock.

In other regions with overfishing – the South Atlantic, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean – regulators project catch limits and other measures will end overfishing this fishing year. Already, South Atlantic black grouper and Gulf of Mexico red snapper are no longer being overfished.

The final verification that overfishing has ended nationwide, at least for one fishing year, will come after detailed stock assessments.

It will be a "Pyrrhic victory" in hard-hit New England, said Brian Rothschild, a fisheries scientist at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth. He said regulators could legally loosen the rules and allow fishermen to safely catch more fish, but regulators have refused to do it, and fishermen have needlessly been shut out from even healthy stocks.

The science is far from perfect, Marciano said. Regulators believed fishermen were overfishing pollock until new data last year indicated scientists had badly underestimated its population, he said. And some stocks, such as Gulf of Maine cod, have recovered even when fishermen were technically overfishing them.

"To say you can't rebuild stocks while overfishing is occurring is an outright lie. We did it," Marciano said.

Tom Nies, a fisheries analyst for regional New England regulators, said stocks can sometimes be boosted by variables such as strong births in a given year, but they'll inevitably decline if overfishing continues on them.

Peter Shelley, senior counsel of the Conservation Law Foundation, an environmental group, said the industry's problems are rooted in years of overfishing, especially during the 1980s, not regulation.

"It was a bubble," he said. "Fishermen were living in a bit of a fantasy world at that point, and it wasn't something you could sustain."

That's why Murawski's projection about the end of overfishing is "a very big deal," he said.

"I think we're just starting to see signs of a new future," Shelley said.

What fisherman Steve Arnold, 46, sees in his home port of Point Judith, R.I., are fewer boats, older fishermen and "a lot of frowns on people's faces."

Overfishing might end this year, but the fleet has suffered and has an uncertain future, he said.

"I believe we can get to a better place, but the work isn't done," Arnold said. "We're living through something that we're learning as we go. It's not a comfortable feeling."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BOSTON — For the first time in at least a century, U.S. fishermen won't take too much of any species from the sea, one of the nation's top fishery scientists says. The projected end of overfishin...
BOSTON — For the first time in at least a century, U.S. fishermen won't take too much of any species from the sea, one of the nation's top fishery scientists says. The projected end of overfishin...
Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 248
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patman77
12:03 PM on 01/12/2011
reminds me of soprano episode "hey tone"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:26 AM on 01/12/2011
Apparently I have been beating around the bush with this topic and based on a recent response to my comments I would like to make my position clear.

Murawski is a deluded old man! The people here defending his illusion have a financial interest in perpetuating this myth.

There is not a single thing sustainable about American or any other nations fishing policies.

This propaganda is about perpetuating a myth that they deserve the right to pillage the oceans with no responsibilty for the consequenses.

It is a disgusting myth and it needs to be exposed and dismantled.

It's the 'End of the Line' and your self rightous nonsense about a right to continue this immoral and destructive behaviour is repugnant to anyone with a conscious regarding this planet.
11:46 PM on 01/12/2011
Let us all know what your expertise is in this field AB. I WAS a commercial fisherman & if you read just4thehalibut's posts, mine, & a couple of others - we did say that moratoriums or reduced catch limits are needed & SOME of the fisheries are pretty well managed. Provide some documentation, instead of railing out of pure conjecture & no experience in this field. I got out of the industry for several reasons, including that I didn't like the trawling industry - preferred hook and line or longlining. I eventually got out due to this and personal reasons (I wanted to enjoy my daughter growing up). No one in this post (as far as I could tell) perpetuates that American fishermen or others want to fish out and pillage the earth's oceans. Self-destructive is it not? Is why people of conscience (besides myself) push aquaponics for instance & better ways to sustain. Educate yourself, don't just rail against everyone that doesn't agree with you. Open mind & heart just a wee bit will you/for you. There are consequences (good & bad) of every mental & physical action that we take in our daily lives. I don't have any financial interest whatsoever in defending Murawski's (according to you) delusions. You might want to learn difference of conscious/conscience. I refer to "anyone with a conscious regarding this planet." You seem to be UN-conscious - with not much of a CONSCIENCE, which is an aptitude, faculty, intuition, or judgment of the
11:51 PM on 01/12/2011
....intellect. (got cut off)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:13 AM on 01/13/2011
I agree. Go Vegan and be done with it. Eating fish at all is totally stupid, pointless, unhealthy for you, the planet and the fish. There is no medical necessity for eating fish. Fishing is simply destruction of the planet. It is mass murder, and should be illegal.
02:37 PM on 01/18/2011
People say you need protein from meat but green vegetables have more protein per calorie than meat. I know bodybuilders that live on just raw food greens ground in a blender! Raw fooders also recover much more quickly than those that eat cooked food. There are lots of great raw food restaurants around Los Angeles too: Sun Cafe (formerly SunPower) in Studio City, Cru in Silverlake and those in Santa Monica.
04:12 PM on 01/11/2011
Nice effort but this will never happen! Too many poachers - and what about all the other countries over fishing?
10:03 AM on 01/11/2011
It'll never end until everyone no longer needs to make a living. Money is what runs this country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:15 AM on 01/11/2011
Instead of invading soveriegn states, the US army should go to work protecting fish stocks from illegal fishing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:36 PM on 01/11/2011
They would then be invading sovereign states since almost 100% of illegal fishing takes place at the behest of foreign nations
12:03 AM on 01/13/2011
It would be the NAVY - not the Army - unless they learn to walk on the water...........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
b525
08:43 AM on 01/11/2011
There's a great book which documents the collapse of salmon, shad and other anadromous fish populations in the U.S. and Europe from dam building and overfishing.

The book also goes though 1000 years of Kings/governments in Europe and the U.S. trying to restrict dam building to save salmon/shad runs and repeatedly failing, with resulting collapses in fish populations. The book is called:

"King of Fish: The Thousand Year Run of the Salmon" by David Montgomery. It's a great and informative read.

Here's a great sight which documents dam removal success stories in the U.S. called American Rivers.

http://www.americanrivers.org/

Here's another sight which is involved in bringing attention to destructive dam projects worldwide called "International Rivers":

http://www.internationalrivers.org/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:40 AM on 01/11/2011
While this is commendable, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that, in this age of globalisation many fish products consumed in the US come from other countries where the fish stocks are under enormous pressure.
photo
DoctorGreeves
Leading-link suspension
08:22 AM on 01/11/2011
We can reduce the fishing fleet and insist on higher gas mileage in our automobiles, but the fact remains that we reproduce too much; we waste too much; we consume too much; and we will use any rationale necessary to continue on as we have until we break Mother Nature's back.
10:32 PM on 01/11/2011
Become a part of the solution instead of complaining about the problem doc. We can all grow produce in our back yard(s). If you have an apartment or small yard space in the city, purchase an Earth Box for growing your own vegetables, so you won't have to drive to the market as often & the trucks will deliver less to the grocery store. You save gas, you save money, you get a better product that you can eat the same day you pick it. If you have room, divert the run-off of rain from your roof to a container that will hold a few hundred gallons (One IBC tote u can purchase for $50 to $75 used can hold 275 to 325 gallons). Set up an aquaponics system where in 6 or so months you can harvest tilapia. You can raise your own feed to feed them as well by growing earthworms, duckweed, and a bio-pod to harvest black-fly soldier larvae (maggots) so you don't have to pay for industrial feed (which comes from menhaden or herring that are caught to make pellets for feeding the fish. I went to the local supermarket tonight & almost purchased tilapia fillets, but they were selling for $6.99 per lb. and they were from Honduras. Nothing against Honduras, but unless my fish are caught in U.S.A. waters by U.S.A.
fishermen, I won't eat them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
07:50 AM on 01/11/2011
Of course it won't matter one bit if we don't get a handle on carbon emissions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
06:22 AM on 01/11/2011
Finally something falls into place.

Lets do more of this - and SUDDENLY AMERICA is GREAT AGAIN!
07:46 AM on 01/11/2011
America is great again.., that couldn'rt be more of a missconception. You havent fixed the core problem of systematic egoism that runs through a deadly vein through the whole body of USA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NessEliot1932
Tax Fraud at 94% since we cannot Prosecute
05:13 PM on 01/11/2011
It takes a lot more to do that - One step in the right direction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
04:24 PM on 01/11/2011
But the barons of industry and finance want to lord over dirty, vassal states of minions.
10:35 PM on 01/11/2011
Start with dominion over yourself jimboy - are you there yet personally? It is easy to criticize the actions or inactions of others. Lead by example if you can - more people will follow as most of us are searching for a higher truth in our own lives (I believe). Figure out who you are, where you want to get to, how you want to get there (without trampling others
verbally or physically), and you will be a happier human being. I speak for myself in this as well by the way.
05:04 AM on 01/11/2011
I agree with this kind of scientific management. Problem is other nations trawl off our shores rendering it useless and reaping a harvest at the expense of US Fishermen.

All nations need to participate for this to work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just4theHalibut
12:48 PM on 01/11/2011
Actually that hasn't happened for 25+ years in the US, as "off shore" is defined as the 200 mile limit. I agree that all nations should have better management of their fisheries and enforce their 200 mile limit as we have.
photo
alex98
Dulce bellum inexpertis
02:51 AM on 01/11/2011
There is an excellent documentary about overfishing "The End of the Line "

http://endoftheline.com/

its available on Netflix
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onasphere
Job Creator. Democrat.
02:01 AM on 01/11/2011
This is a very bad thing. The fish are counted on shore. The boats are out of sight of the shore when the fish are being caught. The fishermen are selling the fish to foreign buyers who are waiting at the edge of international waters to buy the fish. More strict counting on land means more sales to foreign buyers in the water, which means we import more fish, and the overfishing continues. In the process, more American dollars are shipped overseas.
10:13 PM on 01/11/2011
That is not quite so onasphere. Depending on the tonnage (size) of the fishing vessel, they have an observer on board. Observers are paid by NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) to observe,
take samples from each tow, or time period (or both) and accumulate statistics accordingly. As evidenced by the accompanying web site, they (Alaska for instance) are looking to change it to vessels under 60 feet as well, including halibut fishing vessels. I spent time on the Bering Sea on a "smaller" vessel of about 200 feet and the observer was there 24/7 - just like I was. As the processing manager he almost worked as hard as I did. Amusing to me at the time was that he could be hired as a fisheries observer for weighing sample baskets of fish, measuring the length of the fish, weight, etc., then recording it all.... The amusing part was that you (at the time-I don't know about now) had to have a biology degree for this. No more than a high school education was needed. I can also tell you about the land part as well. When a fishing vessel came in & offloaded at the docks I worked at in Kodiak - an observer was there as well. Most vessels adhered to the rules when I was there.......it was in their best interest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onasphere
Job Creator. Democrat.
03:54 PM on 01/12/2011
My airline pilot friend tells me of seeing large rafts of small American fishing boats tied to Japanese factory ships off Alaska when he flies from Anchorage to Asia, so it is happening.
01:48 AM on 01/11/2011
I live in Alaska, and commercial fishing is a pretty big thing here. My now husband, then fiance invited me to go out on a dragger with him out of Kodiak two summers ago. I had no idea the mass amount of by catch that one boat could have. I felt so bad that I was frantically throwing over fishes they didn't need hoping that I could save them, as cheezy as that is. That boat had 30,000 lbs of fish on it, and A LOT of it went dead back into the sea. I can sit here and try to explain, but it was one of the most sickening experiences I have had. I didn't think that I would care to see dead fishes, but there were just too many, over and over again.
07:47 AM on 01/11/2011
Yeah I share your pain, it's really sick what we humans are capable of.
10:37 PM on 01/11/2011
Yes, as much as the negative we are capable of; we are also capable of the positive. Focus on that and you will be a happier person.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just4theHalibut
12:55 PM on 01/11/2011
You will be relieved to know that there are observers on many of the smaller boats--- and on ALL the big boats in Alaska drag fisheries ---and the bycatch rates the observer calculates are applied to the catches of the unobserved boats. And those bycatch fish, observed and unobserved, are also counted against the quotas which close the fisheries when reached.
I am curious, do you really believe those fish are "wasted"? What do you think crabs eat?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:57 PM on 01/11/2011
I seriously doubt the crabs need human help to find food.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:28 AM on 01/11/2011
As much as I would like to believe this, I find it very hard to swallow.
01:49 AM on 01/11/2011
You picture matches your statement perfectly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:12 AM on 01/11/2011
Sometimes old men have dreams about the future they know they will not witness. Those dreams tend to be ... let's say .... optimistic?