iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill Commission Report Prompts Congress To Improve Regulation

DINA CAPPIELLO and MATTHEW DALY   01/11/11 05:47 PM ET   AP

Gulf Oil Spill

WASHINGTON — Democrats in Congress pledged Tuesday to push for tougher regulation of offshore drilling and to make oil companies more financially responsible for spills – steps a presidential panel says are necessary to prevent another catastrophic blowout.

The National Oil Spill Commission unanimously endorsed 15 recommendations to the oil industry, Congress and the Obama administration for preventing another large-scale oil spill. Most require action by Congress, but some could be done independently by the Obama administration, commissioners said.

The 380-page report provides an opening for Democrats to rekindle legislative efforts that failed after last year's oil spill, the largest offshore incident in U.S. history. But they'll face an even tougher road to passage this year, with a Republican majority in the House of Representatives set on cutting spending and reducing the government's regulation of business. Adding to their burden, rising gasoline prices are prompting calls for more domestic energy production.

Congress "must take action this year to prevent another catastrophic spill through smart regulation, and by giving regulators the tools and resources they need to do their jobs effectively," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said. He endorsed raising liability caps on oil companies, which BP waived after the Gulf disaster, "to ensure that taxpayers are never again on the hook for the damages caused by BP or any other oil company's missteps."

But Rep. Fred Upton, the Michigan Republican who leads the Energy and Commerce panel, pushed back. While the panel's findings should be considered, "neither this nor any other investigation should be used as political justification.to limit affordable energy options for America," he said.

The report also sparked concern in Gulf states. Lawmakers from the region will be critical to any legislation's passage, and many have resisted calls to remove liability caps.

"I don't want the federal government to overreact and now put additional regulations that cripple the oil industry," said John Young, president of Jefferson Parish in Louisiana.

The Democratic-controlled House approved bills last year to boost safety standards for offshore drilling and remove the liability cap, but the measures were not taken up in the Senate. Those bills included many of the suggestions recommended by the commission Tuesday after a six-month investigation requested by President Barack Obama.

Rep. Edward J. Markey, the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, said the report should bring Republicans on board for greater regulation.

Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., who leads the natural resources panel, said in an interview that he is open to legislation responding to the oil spill, but said the bill passed by the House last year was overly intrusive. He said he would prefer greater focus on safety, while continuing to drill offshore.

"Jobs are important and in the economy right now we need to make sure we are less dependent on foreign oil," he said.

The report also calls for increasing budgets and training for the federal agency that regulates offshore drilling; dedicating 80 percent of fines and penalties from the BP spill to restoration of the Gulf; and lending more weight to scientific opinions by other federal scientists in drilling decisions. Obama has already endorsed two of the proposals – raising the liability cap and using water pollution penalties to restore the Gulf.

The panel's co-chair, former Florida Democratic senator Bob Graham, said the magnitude of the disaster "would override an ideological preference for less government, less government intrusion, less government cost," despite strong GOP gains in November's elections.

"This is not a typical example of government regulation of a private enterprise," Graham said. "Drilling offshore is a privilege to be earned, not a right to be exercised by private corporations."

"If the recommendations are not carried out," Graham warned, "the probability of another failure will be dramatically greater."

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar appeared receptive to some of the commission's suggestions. In a statement, he said his department already has adopted several "key reforms" proposed by the report, and that officials would consult its findings to improve oversight further.

The panel also called for an industry-led safety institute, similar to the one created by nuclear power producers after the 1979 Three Mile Island accident.

The American Petroleum Institute, which lobbies on behalf of 400 oil and gas companies, said it is already working on an industry safety program. It also praised the panel's recommendation to increase funding for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

But Erik Milito, the group's director for exploration and production, said the report went too far in casting doubt on the safety culture of the entire industry. It also failed to recognize steps already taken to make drilling safer, he said.

Last week, the commission said that management failures at three companies – BP, Transocean and Halliburton – led to the blowout and explosion that killed 11 workers and released more than 200 million gallons of oil from the damaged oil well.

In a statement Tuesday, BP said it would work with government officials, operators and contractors to strengthen industry-wide safety practices, noting that the Deepwater Horizon accident "was the result of multiple causes involving multiple parties."

__

Associated Press writers Harry R. Weber and Brian Skoloff contributed reporting from New Orleans.

___

Online:

http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Democrats in Congress pledged Tuesday to push for tougher regulation of offshore drilling and to make oil companies more financially responsible for spills – steps a president...
WASHINGTON — Democrats in Congress pledged Tuesday to push for tougher regulation of offshore drilling and to make oil companies more financially responsible for spills – steps a president...
Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 96
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorj2u
09:11 PM on 01/13/2011
Action and Congress???? What is wrong with this picture?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anarchy4hire
Don't you love your guns, god, government?
01:58 PM on 01/13/2011
this is like when they put up a stop sign at an intersection after someone is hit and killed there...
05:31 PM on 01/12/2011
It's a little late to be starting with this now, don't you think? Not to mention, leaving the foxes guarding the henhouse. Meanwhile, the complex chemical carnage created by the blowout and BP’s sacrifice of the long-term livability of the Gulf of Mexico for the prospect of keeping its precious wellhead intact has already taken place, and is lurking beneath the waves. This video from After the Press explains what is happening, and that BP knew all along that it would:
http://www.youtube.com/afterthepress#p/a/u/2/vfv34nyAWO0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Darcman
Don't B afraid of the Darc!
02:28 AM on 01/12/2011
Hmmm! I skimmed most of this article and I don't believe it mentioned the fact that another one of the commission's finds is that the Obama Administration reacted effectively. That in the words of the Panel Co-Chair William Riley this wasn't Obama's Katrina!
maxfax
Taa - dah!
11:20 PM on 01/11/2011
Whoa, Dave Vitter will hate this push, even if it means regulation and protection for the future, the future of his own constituency, the one without the lobby, the voters, the environment.
08:11 PM on 01/11/2011
""I don't want the federal government to overreact and now put additional regulations that cripple the oil industry," said John Young, president of Jefferson Parish in Louisiana."

Overreact? Really? Tell that to the wildlife drenched in crude oil. To stop overreacting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anarchy4hire
Don't you love your guns, god, government?
01:59 PM on 01/13/2011
the wildlife is fine....a pinch of dawn will wash that right off*

* (please note sarcasm)
photo
soitgoes12
Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself
07:41 PM on 01/11/2011
I don't want the federal government to overreact and now put additional regulations that cripple the oil industry," said John Young, president of Jefferson Parish in Louisiana.

What world do these people live in?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorj2u
08:05 PM on 01/11/2011
The world feeding America's insatiable desire for oil. You know, you and me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadger
06:51 PM on 01/11/2011
God it's hard not to think that they new-found Democrat's get-tough-on-oil attitude only came along once they were certain that nothing could possibly come of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barbarianatthegate
11:34 AM on 01/12/2011
"God it's hard not to think that they new-found Democrat's get-tough-­on-oil attitude only came along once they were certain that nothing could possibly come of it. "

That could be applied to just about everthing thay they propose going forward. It is amusing to see how legislatively active they have become knowing full well that nothing they propose will ever see the light of day.
06:02 PM on 01/11/2011
Only wood could be reliable source of energy in nearest future. It does not need drilling or mining.
It could be significantly better as for economy as for environment than windmills or solar cells.
Growing trees, changing our transportation system, our electricity production could make:
100% of employment (insurance);
USA, Canada, and Mexico could be energy independent:
We could fight climate change with these three countries. North America influent climate from France to Japan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KyDude
We have to stop this Keystone Congress.
08:17 PM on 01/11/2011
Don't you think that most houses belching smoke when heating their homes might have some serious effect to the air we breath?
11:07 PM on 01/11/2011
KyDude
Smoke from coal, oil is toxic for trees, smoke from wood is not.
In big power plant we are losing 80% of energy in vane.
If we will start new policy to build small power plant to use as electricity as heat, wood could provide more useful energy, than oil and coal in big power plant right now.
All smoke from oven in this case could be put in water, to watering forest surrounding power plant.
Together with ash it will be the best nutrition to grow trees.
It could be almost zero emission electricity production.
Also we could use mix of wood, coal and oil product in environmentally save proportion.
05:53 PM on 01/11/2011
This has happend 1 time. I do not see how i takes 300+ pages of new regulation to prevent it. Nothing needed to be done. The spill was a perfect storm of multiple things going wrong at the same time. Get back in the gulf and continue drilling ASAP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
05:57 PM on 01/11/2011
I don't know where you have been but this has not happened 1 time. Spills happen all the time. There is one in Alaska right now. Don't put your opinion on this blog unless you can back it up. Maybe if you watched something other than Faux No News you would have a list of occurances from around the world, not only about BP but the other big oil companies as well. They are pirates.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WIpatriot
I've seen enough to make me Progressive
06:11 PM on 01/11/2011
Perhaps you could write BigOil a letter apologizing for this, since we know not what we do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rwellsrwells
05:38 PM on 01/11/2011
Crippling the oil industry. Now that's a good one. Whatever Congress does is going to be like the Lilliputians tying Gulliver down with thread.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
05:53 PM on 01/11/2011
Good and apt analogy. Notice Republicans are already on the obstructionist bandwagon while Democrats will fold pretty quickly. There won't be much in the way of new regulation and old regulations will still not be enforced or actively waived.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
amaboss52
Jesus died for your sins...get your moneys worth!
05:32 PM on 01/11/2011
The states along the coast don't want the liability caps raised but want drilling to continue. If they want drilling they need to have the cap on liability removed. That should be the trade off.
photo
Fez
Ignorance is no excuse for the law.
05:00 PM on 01/11/2011
It's long past time to establish financial assurance requirements for the oil industry just like those used in coal and hard rock mining. Mining companies are required to post bonds to provide funding for future cleanups in the event the company goes bankrupt. As concurrent reclamation proceeds (in surface coal mining), the company is able to reduce its bond proportionally as it cleans up open pits, waste piles, haul roads and other features on the mine site. If the company declares bankruptcy, the bond is available to the state or federal regulators to hire third-party contractors to do the remedial work, thus sparing taxpayers the cost of cleanup. Something similar could be done for the oil business to guarantee that money is available to clean up spills and other problems created by oil and gas production. This approach has worked well in coal and hard rock mining and could be helpful in oil and gas development.
05:05 PM on 01/11/2011
Is coal and hard rock mining so save? Or maybe they are so environmentaly good with that funding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
05:55 PM on 01/11/2011
Coal and hard rock mining are money machines just like big oil. Violating regulations is status quo. A "few" miners lives and a slap on the wrist appear to be well worth it profit wise.
06:08 PM on 01/11/2011
I agree with you, but we need still as coal as oil. The main question how we could use something else, with the same quality of living.
Profit is always moving force for any company in the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:54 PM on 01/11/2011
why is the price of oil not talked about with bo in the white house?
04:45 PM on 01/11/2011
Again they still haven't gotten to the source of the problems.

The problems will continue until they do.

Lobbyism. If people can buy our government, then our gov. will never act according to it's peoples interests.
04:53 PM on 01/11/2011
We still have capitalistic society and could create something like google, facebook, etc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
06:01 PM on 01/11/2011
No we don't have a capitalistic society. The definition of Capitalism requires satisfaction for both the workers and the businesses. Workers are no longer part of that equation. Union busting, cutting salaries and benefits, offshoring does not make happy workers. When workers have no paycheck they have no money to spend. A true Capitalish society needs a balance between workers and business and the balance is all one sided on the corporate side right now.

We call what we have a Plutocracy. Government bought by and run by corporations.
06:16 PM on 01/11/2011
We still have capitalistic society in globalization environment.
As soon as owner of company can found cheaper workforces, it is his right to do this for profit and he will satisfy workers in other countries.
We must found engineering solutions to keep job in USA.
In my opinion, growing trees as source of wood energy, changing our transportation system, our electricity production could provide this opportunity.