More

U.S. Wants 'Real Demonstrative Commitment' From China On Economy

First Posted: 01/12/11 06:35 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Tim Geithner

WASHINGTON, Jan 12 (By Emily Kaiser and Caren Bohan) - The United States wants a "real, demonstrative commitment" from China that it is serious about shifting away from export-led economic growth, a U.S. official told Reuters on Tuesday ahead of next week's state visit by China's Hu Jintao.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will on Wednesday lay out his vision for how the world's two biggest economic powers should interact. But the official's comments indicate some impatience with China's gradual approach to allowing its currency to rise and building up domestic demand.

"It's both the pace in which they do it and the conviction with which they demonstrate they're going to do it," said the senior Obama administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

"What we still need to see in the first instance is that real, demonstrable commitment to the objective" of rebalancing the economy, the officaal said.

Washington has pressed Beijing for years to allow the yuan to rise more rapidly to cool its exports, narrow a trade gap, and shrink a $2.8 trillion pile of reserves.

But China counters that U.S. economic policies are responsible for the imbalances and has
urged the United States to get its own fiscal house in order before its mountain of debt destabilizes the global economy.

The Jan. 19 White House talks mark the first face-to-face meeting between President Barack Obama and Hu since the Group of 20 summit in Seoul in November, which was widely seen as a disappointment for Washington.

Not only did Obama get scant international support at the G20 meeting for pressuring China to speed up the yuan's rise, but he also got an earful from allies about his own country's economic policy. Topping the list of complaints was the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to buy $600 billion in government debt to try to spur a stronger economic recovery.

Eswar Prasad, a Brookings Institution economist and former International Monetary Fund official with responsibility for China, said Geithner's speech would seek to wrest back control of the economic message.

"There is a sense that at the Seoul G20 summit, China managed to take charge of the narrative, especially about the effects of (the Fed's bond-buying program) on the rest of the world, thereby deflecting attention from yuan and trade policy," Prasad said.

PRESSURE EASES

Geithner is the first of several top U.S. officials fanning out to preview Hu's visit and detail the White House'q aims. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will give what an aide called a "major" address on U.S.-China relatimns on Friday.

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON, Jan 12 (By Emily Kaiser and Caren Bohan) - The United States wants a "real, demonstrative commitment" from China that it is serious about shifting away from export-led economic growth, a ...
WASHINGTON, Jan 12 (By Emily Kaiser and Caren Bohan) - The United States wants a "real, demonstrative commitment" from China that it is serious about shifting away from export-led economic growth, a ...
Filed by Ryan McCarthy  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 77
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
11:17 PM on 01/16/2011
TIME FOR REAL EQUALIZATION!

Place Tariffs on all CHINA IMPORTS and a 35% TAX on their Currency Exchange UNLESS and UNTIL they let our Companies’ goods&services into their country without tariffs or Penalties!  We are their CONSUMERS!  End NAFTA and other damaging trade agreements with any country whose environmental and labor laws don't match or exceed ours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
11:16 PM on 01/16/2011
CHINA TRADE IMBALANCE:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnAT7FZpmg0&feature=player_embedded
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
01:27 PM on 01/14/2011
That's some pretty strong right sounding talk from a supposedly leftist nation. To be honest, GW Bush's respective Treasury secretaries seemed to me to be completely phony in their weak-kneed suggestions to China that they ought to focus on their own domestic market. I never took any of it seriously.

It is my opinion, however, that had China not been invited to take the vast majority of our manufacturing jobs from us that the housing bust, the extreme personal indebtedness, and the Great Recession might never have happened. Similarly, multi-national corporations might not have participated in dismantling the American middle class if they had had better access to a genuine, Chinese domestic marketplace.

China is disingenuous to treat this nation as if our problems emerged independently of their own contribution. In fact, they ought to recognize finally that we have good reason for pressing them to stop depending on us (and Europe) to consume whatever they can produce -- for one thing, it's absolutely nuts on so many levels.

I don't intend to express meanness toward them, but only to exhort them to attend thoughtfully to their own markets, which they do indeed seem to be beginning to do.
10:32 AM on 01/14/2011
Until the per capita income rises in China, it will always be a export-driven economy. The Nike shoes produced in China sells for ~1000 yuan, which is like the monthly income for majority of the families. Their domestic market just don't have enough purchase power.
10:44 PM on 01/13/2011
the rest of the world couldn't possibly be right, could they?....
photo
LightShadow62
The answers are not found in the extremes
09:14 PM on 01/13/2011
China is committed to building the economy, their economy.

Until the American people realize the true cost of those cheap products at WalMart our economy will continue to nose dive.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
06:44 PM on 01/13/2011
Empty threats. Tariffs are not on our agenda. Perhaps, we can compromise and promise to buy our military jets from China in exchange for China letting the US manufacture products again. This is called the precompromise position, used by our President when the other guy doesn't want to negotiate.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:48 PM on 01/13/2011
barking at the moon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jessivehadit
Philosopher, Scientist, Writer, Researcher
02:15 PM on 01/13/2011
At this point, China would be insane to back the US. We have shown ourselves to be incompetent and wildly irresponsible with both our own money and the money we have borrowed from others. America has the lowest possible credit score you can get and we should be punished. Our financial credibility has been squashed overseas and we can't simply borrow our way out of it any longer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
12:42 PM on 01/13/2011
As we travel all over the world... we view things differently from what we hear and see from media at home.

The headliner of this story applies more to us... we need to put ourselves back together. We are coming to the point... there's no more CPI rise, but CPI down. Global economic adjustment time.

Why didn't we NOT make TOP in Global Educational Contest? All catagories, number ONE, (did it happen by a chance? ) in 2010 was awarded to SHANGHAI, CHINA. Were we in top 10? No... majorities of countries in TOP 10 were in Asia.

Think what we are not doing right before barking...
11:29 AM on 01/13/2011
When we were the sick man of Asia, we were called the yellow peril.
When we are billed to be the next superpower, we are called the threat.
When we closed our doors, you smuggled drugs to open markets.
When we embrace free trade, you blame us for taking away your jobs.
When we tried to put the broken pieces back together again,
free Tibet you screamed, It was an invasion!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
munki
Global to Local now Local to Global
12:38 PM on 01/13/2011
How so?

We do not digest the other side of the world and barking...
That is more like it...
11:19 AM on 01/13/2011
Why should they? They and the Saudis lent us big $$ in the 90s, and we squandered the whole thing on wars in the Middle East. OK, there's the concern that we'll default, but it sure looks to me like China is beyond being overly concerned about that.
11:32 AM on 01/13/2011
fanned raechel . . . well said .. . America just never learns . . .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ron ray
mad as heck moderate who won't take it much longer
10:58 AM on 01/13/2011
How sweet. Timmy wants China to restructure our mortgage. And China is treating us like the big banks treat most americans with mortgages.
11:31 AM on 01/13/2011
fanned ron ray . . . excellent
photo
SamSeven
You're either with Humanity or you're not.
10:20 AM on 01/13/2011
Let's see the Chinese are making about 80% of America's goods more or less. They have 13.4 trillion dollars on their books. Here's Tiny Tim moaning about the Chinese to be more constructive. They must be laughing their collectives butts off at the Federal Reserve/Goldman Sachs.

Best bet for China is dump the dollar and tie their yuan to gold since they are stockpilling it now. China has told its citizens to invest in gold and silver I believe US and Canada better do the same. China has most of the cards unless America can 'end the Fed' otherwise it is game over for the US.
11:19 AM on 01/13/2011
India is stockpiling gold as well.
11:31 AM on 01/13/2011
10xs fanned Sam
10:10 AM on 01/13/2011
MISLEADING US AGAIN!!!
Geithner is pinpointing China's easing of its "currency manilpulation" as the way to help US economy, instead of fixing our own systemic and ineffective monetary/economic policies. (coupled with our legalized LOBBYIST-DRIVEN politics and financial/economic policy formulation mechanisms. Of course, with help from MSM.)

US, Germany, South Korea, Switzerland, Singapore, etc., all DO THEIR OWN BRAND OF CURRENCY MANIPULATION. For example, the US, with the advice from the Fed Reserve's apostles, now calls its latest currency manipulation strategy, "QUANTITATIVE EASING", which noble-winner economist thinks will NOT work specially in the long-term --
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/11/11/stiglitz-to-obama-youre-mistaken-on-quantitative-easing/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wsj%2Feconomics%2Ffeed+%28WSJ.com%3A+Real+Time+Economics+Blog%29&utm_content=Google+Reader. IOW, this strategy of "printing more dollar or creating liquidity"will just make the wall street financiers smile, as they'll have more money to play with in their forms of sophisticated SPECULATIVE strategies.

The point is, it would appear that fixing AND investing in one's local economy/business infrastructures and market mechanisms may be the better way to go.