More

Australia Floods Are A Warning: Extreme Weather Events Will Intensify Due To Climate Change, Scientists Say

Australia Flood

KARL RITTER   01/13/11 12:24 PM ET   AP

STOCKHOLM — Though you can't make a direct link between Australia's killer floods and climate change, they do hold a warning for the future: Scientists predict such extreme weather events will increase both in intensity and frequency as the planet warms.

Raging floodwaters have swamped thousands of homes and businesses in Queensland, leaving at least 25 people dead and dozens more missing since late November. Rail lines and highways have been washed away in what is shaping up to become Australia's costliest natural disaster.

The flooding follows a spate of severe natural disasters in the past year. While the most deadly was Haiti's earthquake, extreme weather also killed thousands of people across the globe, including a scorching heat wave that choked Russia in the summer and devastating floods that engulfed more than 60,000 square miles (150,000 square kilometers) in Pakistan.

"The Earth is delivering a message to us. And the message is that more extreme weather is becoming the norm rather than the exception," said John Magrath, a climate change researcher at British charity Oxfam.

He said there is a misconception that global warming only means higher temperatures. "It actually means more energy in the climatic system, which stimulates extremes and more chaotic behavior," Magrath said.

Droughts and floods are expected to become more severe as global temperatures climb. Less clear is the impact on wind patterns and ocean currents, factors that could alter climate in potentially dramatic ways not fully understood yet.

Last year tied with 2005 as the warmest on record, with combined global land and ocean surface temperatures rising 1.12 degrees Fahrenheit (0.62 degrees Celsius) above normal, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Wednesday.

In the U.S., it was the 23rd warmest year on record and the 14th year in a row with an annual temperature above the long-term average, according to NOAA's preliminary analysis.

Meanwhile, the extent of Arctic sea ice in the summer – a key indicator of global warming – was at its third lowest level, behind 2007 and 2008.

Most atmospheric scientists attribute most of the warming seen in recent decades to gases released into the air by industrial processes and gasoline-burning engines.

Australia's floods, which started in late November, have been linked to the La Nina weather phenomenon, which refers to cooler than normal surface sea temperatures in parts of the Pacific, causing disruptions in weather patterns. La Nina occurs naturally, and the link to climate change remains unclear, said Omar Baddour of the World Meteorological Organization.

"But as we know, extreme events whether their cause is due to La Nina or El Nino or other factors, will be more intense in the era of climate change," he added.

Reinsurer Munich Re counted nearly 1,000 natural disasters in 2010 – nine-tenths of them weather-related – the second highest number since 1980. The resulting economic losses totaled $130 billion, the German company said earlier this month.

"The high number of weather-related natural catastrophes and record temperatures both globally and in different regions of the world provide further indications of advancing climate change," Munich Re said.

Scientists caution against drawing conclusions about climate change from a single storm, flood, cold snap or heat wave. Natural variability is and will always be a factor when it comes to extreme weather.

Still, single events can be useful in highlighting shortcomings in our preparedness for a warmer world more prone to extremes, said Markku Rummukainen, a climate scientist at Lund University in Sweden.

"For example, that Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans does not have to have anything to do with climate change, but it revealed vulnerabilities that hadn't been considered," said Rummukainen, who is also involved in drafting the next report by the U.N.'s expert panel on climate change. "It remains to be seen what conclusions can be drawn in Australia."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

STOCKHOLM — Though you can't make a direct link between Australia's killer floods and climate change, they do hold a warning for the future: Scientists predict such extreme weather events will i...
STOCKHOLM — Though you can't make a direct link between Australia's killer floods and climate change, they do hold a warning for the future: Scientists predict such extreme weather events will i...
Filed by Zoe Triska  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 148
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JTWallace
11:57 AM on 02/10/2011
We don't know for sure how much gases contribute to global warming but, we do know weather has been a factor in the rise and fall of species over the millions of years before. We have to assume there were no jets, coal fired plumes, automobiles, or anything like today. Yet there were natural changes over time. From warm to cold and back again, the earth has gone through many changes as well as in between. Whether we're going warmer or colder depending on the season, is still no excuse for the waste we contribute to the ground and in the air with our garbage which some can be recycled and used again. You know it's bad when golf courses begin seeping dangerous gases from buried garbage dumps. We will always have changes in weathersuch as, killer waves, forest fires, colder winters, hotter summers in these changes. Still, we should be better stewards of earth regardless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
07:51 PM on 01/23/2011
"If the water had been released before the dam had reached 190 per cent capacity, some experts claim Brisbane could have avoided the worst of the floods.

But so convincing have been the expert pronouncements that we are facing a future of endless drought, the idea of releasing precious drinking water must have been anathema to Wivenhoe's managers.

Eco-catastrophists always cite the precautionary principle: if they are right and we don't reduce CO2 emissions, we face Armageddon. If they are wrong, all it costs is dollars.

But when money is allocated and attention prioritised to making contingency plans for vague hypothetical scenarios in the distant future, real priorities are neglected and real risks overlooked.

When leaders proclaim climate change as the greatest moral challenge, the entire machinery of government becomes preoccupied with the busy work of solving an imaginary problem. It is then easily blindsided by a real emergency.
..

We have been so busy fretting about carbon dioxide that we have neglected the real challenge -- how to adapt and protect ourselves from natural disasters." HeraldSun.com
04:09 PM on 01/19/2011
There seems to be a major cover up going on by the Australian government concerning these floods in Australia. Apparently the major underlying reason for these floods is due to tectonic plates not rain.Lifting of the Indo-Australian Plate which could quite possibly place the western 2/3 of Australia under water.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nellre
growth is not sustainable
10:56 AM on 01/18/2011
Yes, and the floods in Brazil and Pakistan, and China and the US Midwest.
Duh
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
11:00 AM on 01/17/2011
Recent Australian governments invested heavily in huge desalinization plants, to provide fresh water to the public, on the assumption that man-made Global Warming had forever changed the climate of Australia to a much dryer one. The alternative was to build more dams, to catch and hold whatever rain might fall and drain into the river systems. The natural water, from the skies, was less expensive, but not dependable. The water from the desalinization plants was much more expensive, but considered more reliable.

The desalinization plants are real. They were built at great expense. They are hard evidence that the governments accepted the advice from the local supporters of the man-made global warming theory, that the rains would never come again, as they had so many times before. One desalinization plant is now mothballed, as there is adequate natural water provided by the dams that exist, and the water from the dams is much cheaper.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
11:17 AM on 01/17/2011
Keep trying to find anything you can, you just look foolish. IT'S ALL A CONSPIRACYY!!! ARRRGGHHH
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
11:28 AM on 01/17/2011
This is one of the public policy issues that the Australian people face. More dams or more desalinization plants? Or more dams or no more dams?

Another one is, do we hoard all available water behind the existing dams, and risk being flooded out, and maybe losing the dam too, or do we manage water levels behind dams as originally intended, to provide adequate flood protection for the cities?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:58 AM on 01/18/2011
You're reading too much Andrew Bolt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
12:02 PM on 01/18/2011
Wish that more Aussies would contribute to this thread.
04:10 PM on 01/16/2011
It will be interesting to see what the insurance industry says about all these floods. They've got to be hurting right now.... or at the very least, scared.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
09:16 AM on 01/16/2011
Again too make the case that global warming is a hoax, someone would have to believe that environmen­talists and political liberals control businesses and industries worldwide as well as the legislativ­e bodies and scientific institutio­ns of every developed nation in the world. That would be a hard case to make.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
11:47 AM on 01/16/2011
But tragically you have described the exact beliefs of the scientifically illiterate, conspiracy theory prone personalites of those who deny global warming.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
05:09 PM on 01/16/2011
Yes, I know. :\
09:25 PM on 01/15/2011
I finally managed to track down the Brisbane river flood graph since records began in the 1840s:

http://www.bom.gov.au/hydro/flood/qld/fld_history/brisbane_history.shtml

Decide for yourself whether you think flooding here is increasing or decreasing over the historical record. (Note: The Wivenhoe dam flood mitigation project was completed in 1981 but even so, this flood is the first one of any significance since 1974).
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:31 AM on 01/16/2011
The question isn't whether or not flooding in Australia is increasing or decreasing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
04:31 PM on 01/16/2011
Thanks for all the interesting data. A good summary of the history of flooding in Australia.
11:29 PM on 01/16/2011
Lol. In the 19th Century it would rain in the hills and it would all just flow down to the floodplain. Now there are these things called dams. Maybe you've heard of them?
09:20 PM on 01/15/2011
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/strong-la-nina.html

"Although exacerbated by precipitation from a tropical cyclone, rainfalls of historic proportion in eastern Queensland, Australia have led to levels of flooding usually only seen once in a century," said David Adamec, Oceanographer at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. "The copious rainfall is a direct result of La Niña’s effect on the Pacific trade winds and has made tropical Australia particularly rainy this year."

and this:

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/13/forecaster-two-phenomena-responsible-for-worlds-bizarre-weather/?hpt=T2

"Tony Barnston, lead forecaster at Columbia University’s International Research Institute for Climate and Society, said two phenomena – La Niña and the North Atlantic Oscillation – are likely responsible for the patterns we’re seeing."

and also this:

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2011/La-Nina-impacts

"For the Australian state of Queensland, there is strong evidence to suggest that La Niña is the main reason for the ongoing widespread flooding. The current floods are also the worst since 1974 - which coincided with the strongest La Niña on record."
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:56 AM on 01/16/2011
Try your hardest. We know it is La Niña, not sure why you're trying to prove it is La Niña when no one would argue against this intensifier. It's the massively increased rain, which is making this the strongest and most devastating La Niña's to occur. Rio de Janeiro is currently having the country's worst flood disaster on record. The La Niña is intensifying the conditions.
As of early January, the areas affected by La Nina were 1.5 degrees cooler than normal, this is reported by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. If you sit there and try to only look at what you want to find, it serves no purpose.

I'm not bothering posting links because you can find this information anywhere you look on the web.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
11:48 AM on 01/16/2011
Fanned!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:27 AM on 01/16/2011
The effects of La Niña and El Niño are not in conflict with AGW science.

The overall rainfall trend for Australia is dryer.

The overall individual weather event pattern for the globe is toward more extreme examples and/or more frequent.

Climate Change science predicts these things. None of which are in conflict with what has been happening in Qld and/or Brisbane.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
11:21 AM on 01/16/2011
Good Post, fanned.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
06:53 PM on 01/15/2011
Hydrologist Aron Gingis, a Melbourne-based rainfall expert formerly of Monash University, contacted The Weekend Australian to urge a public debate about the dam's influence on the flood. According to Gingis, the dam's operators bear a heavy responsibility for their significant contribution to the flooding.

"They had no right prior to the start of the wet season - when the forecasts were all pointing strongly to exceptional rainfall - to keep so much water in the dam," said Gingis. "I tried to warn them about the coming disaster and to urge them before it was too late . . . to release much more water to give themselves more storage room for a big one.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/damned-if-they-do-damned-if-they-dont/story-e6frg6zo-1
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 PM on 01/15/2011
Read with knowledge that The Australian is strongly denier biased.
08:12 PM on 01/15/2011
Do you have evidence that Hydrologis­t Aron Gingis the Melbourne-­based rainfall expert is himself a denier? And even if he is, do you have any evidence that what he says is wrong? It is possible to believe in global warming but at the same time not attribute every thing that happens to it.
05:42 PM on 01/15/2011
Interesting how the article fails to mention that there have been at least 7 other occasions in the past where flooding occurred in excess of the recent flood (as far back as the mid 1800's). Kinda shoots down the AGW cause for the current flood.
05:48 PM on 01/15/2011
And your point?
07:26 PM on 01/15/2011
His point is that floods in the greater Brisbane area have been getting LESS frequent based on the historical record, not more frequent. This is counter to the above argument by AGW propenents tha t "such extreme weather events will increase both in intensity and frequency as the planet warms."The last major flood in Brisbane was in 1974, a good 37 years ago. In addition, both this flood and the '74 flood (at about 5 metres or so) come nowhere near the many floods of the 1800's, 4 of which topped 9 metres (e.g. 1893). There is also evidence from the geologic record in the area of floods of 10+ metres. Of course there are confounding factors to this particular flood such as the Wivenhoe dam which some suggest reduced this flood an estimated 1-2 metres.
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
06:28 PM on 01/15/2011
Last year 17 countries on 3 continents had all time record high temperatures. The last time that happened was - never! Pakistan had the biggest floods since - ever! Moscow had the hottest heatwave since - ever! Russia lost 1/3 of the wheat harvest.

When a flood occurs, well that happens sometimes. When a big flood occurs, well any particular event can't be traced to global warming. When three "100 year floods" occur in four years, that is is a certainly a sign of global warming!
06:37 PM on 01/15/2011
Well said Blackbirdhighway.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
09:10 AM on 01/16/2011
One that can understand global trends. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
10:34 AM on 01/15/2011
In this last of meeting places, we grope together, and avoid speech, gathered on this beach of the tumid river……

This is the way the world ends, Not with a bang, but a whimper…..

TS Eliot

opening quote of the Nevil Shute novel ‘On the Beach’
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
07:07 PM on 01/14/2011
... might there be another, so far overlooked, contributing factor to the floods? Might the politics of environmentalism itself – the contemporary obsession with global warming as the greatest threat to mankind – have exacerbated the impact of the flooding in Brisbane? It seems possible that Aussie politicians’ and officials’ deeply held conviction that the main problem we face today is increased heat, droughts and a lack of rainfall caused them to take their eye off the ball in Brisbane, and to be unprepared for something as relatively normal as very heavy rainfall.

It is worth looking at a document called ClimateSmart 2050, which was published in 2007 by the Queensland government. It outlines Queensland’s priorities for the next four decades (up to 2050) and promises to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emissions by 60 per cent during that timeframe. The most striking thing about the document is its assumption that the main problem facing this part of Australia, along with most of the rest of the world, is essentially dryness brought about by global warming. It argues that “the world is experiencing accelerating climate change as a result of human activities”, which is giving rise to “worse droughts, hotter temperatures and rising sea levels”. We are witnessing “a tendency for less rainfall with more droughts”, the document confidently asserted." Brendan O'Neill in the Telegraph
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:52 AM on 01/15/2011
Dryness is predicted to be the most significant problem for Australia due to Climate Change. What is your point, or are you simply a denier quote-machine?
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
08:39 AM on 01/15/2011
Yea I'm not sure has a point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
09:28 AM on 01/15/2011
"Dryness is predicted to be the most significant problem for Australia due to Climate Change."

Nature has just disproved this prediction, upon which improper decisions about water management in dams were based.

The immediate financial and human conseqences are huge, and perhaps unforgetable.
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
06:32 PM on 01/15/2011
You are saying that the Queensland government produced a document, and that caused the huge floods? Huh?

So, why didn't they write that document when they were in the middle of a severe ten year drought?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
07:31 PM on 01/15/2011
Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. The document prepared by the Queensland government ignored the well established historical record.

The document replaced the lessons of the historical record with an imagined world based on climate models and global warming ideology. Decision makers then based their decisions on the imagined world described in the document, a world that could only have draughts, not upon the world described in the long historical record, which included both long draughts and severe flood events. Those who ignore history are swept away by it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
02:26 PM on 01/14/2011
I am sitting here in Connecticut with 2 feet of snow fallen in less then 24 hours- I would say the events in sub tropical Australia and her are related. Its called too much C02 in the atmosphere.

And its going to become far worse- stay tuned, relax, make some popcorn and watch a whole scenario of disasters.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
03:48 PM on 01/14/2011
Yea, up here in Nova Scotia Canada we've had flooding and a huge amount of rain all "winter". We've had a few spots of snow here and there but it lasts for about 5 hours than it rains. It's been so warm here, and it's getting warmer by the year. We are literally walking around in sweaters and do not have to warm the car up in the morning or anything. Extremely mild winter so far. December felt like October, now January feels like November.
05:50 PM on 01/15/2011
Toronto. Knee-deep in snow. Going out to shovel.....again.
photo
Jeremyewilliams
Reality is not the GOPs cup of tea!
12:27 PM on 01/14/2011
@Martinfrosa Did you just link theregiste­r.co.uk? You just lost all credibilit­y if you had any. Here is a better, much more truthful explanatio­n of "Dr. Theon"

http://sci­enceblogs.­com/deltoi­d/2009/01/­so_who_is_­john_s_the­on.php

Again, you're cherry picking. Have you looked at the work of 99.9% of scientists? That sir, is what you need to do. You're looking for someone that shares your view on climate change and going with anything they say. Why do you choose to block out the vast majority of climatolog­ists? It's because they do not correlate with your "climate hoax" belief system.

Joseph D’Aleo's take is not strong enough and there's no proof or evidence to showcase his findings of "NASA working the data to fit the result they want". There is overwhelmi­ng evidence to the contrary. 'When you have to suffer through such bunk as pushed by D'Aleo, its better to do with a sense of humour', as below does-

http://cli­matewtf.bl­ogspot.com­/2010/01/j­oseph-dale­o-and-his-­technicall­y-flawed.h­tml

PLEASE...