iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

School Lunches To Get Healthier With New Gov't Rules

MARY CLARE JALONICK   01/13/11 03:50 PM ET   AP

School Lunches

WASHINGTON — School cafeterias would have to hold the fries – and serve kids more whole grains, fruits and vegetables – under the government's plans for the first major nutritional overhaul of students' meals in 15 years.

The Agriculture Department proposal announced Thursday applies to lunches subsidized by the federal government. The guidelines would require schools to cut sodium in those meals by more than half, use more whole grains and serve low-fat milk. They also would limit kids to only one cup of starchy vegetables a week, so schools couldn't offer french fries every day.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the new standards could affect more than 32 million children and are crucial because kids can consume as much as half of their daily calories in school.

"The United States is facing an obesity epidemic and the crisis of poor diets threatens the future of our children and our nation," Vilsack said Thursday.

While many schools are improving meals already, others are still serving children meals high in fat, salt and calories. The new guidelines are based on 2009 recommendations by the Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences.

The announcement comes just a few weeks after President Barack Obama signed into law a child nutrition bill that will help schools pay for the healthier foods, which often are more expensive.

The subsidized meals that would fall under the guidelines proposed this week are served as free and low-cost meals to low-income children and long have been subject to government nutrition standards. The new law for the first time will extend nutrition standards to other foods sold in schools that aren't subsidized by the federal government, including "a la carte" foods on the lunch line and snacks in vending machines. Those standards, while expected to be similar, will be written separately.

The announcement is a proposal, and it could be several years before the rules require schools to make changes.

The new USDA guidelines would:

_ Establish the first calorie limits for school meals.

_ Gradually reduce the amount of sodium in the meals over 10 years, with the eventual goal of reducing sodium by more than half.

_ Ban most trans fats.

_ Require more servings of fruits and vegetables.

_ Require all milk served to be low fat or nonfat, and require all flavored milks to be nonfat.

_ Incrementally increase the amount of whole grains required, eventually requiring most grains to be whole grains.

_ Improve school breakfasts by requiring schools to serve a grain and a protein, instead of one or the other.

Vilsack said the reduction in sodium will be gradual so school children can get used to less salty foods. He said the government wants the meals to be appealing so children will eat them.

"We are looking at ways these meals can be attractive and also be tasty," he said.

Some school groups have criticized efforts to make meals healthier, saying it will be hard for already-stretched schools to pay for the new requirements. Some conservatives, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, have said that telling children what to eat is a case of government overreach.

Vilsack says he understands the new standards may pose some challenges for school districts, but he believes they are necessary. He compares obesity and related diseases like diabetes to a truck barreling toward a child, and the new guidelines to a parent teaching that child to look both ways before crossing the street.

"You want your kid to be able to walk across the street without getting hit," he says.

According to the USDA, about a third of children 6 to 19 years old are overweight or obese, and the number of obese children has tripled in the past few decades.

The Agriculture Department also is planning to release new dietary guidelines for the general public, possibly as soon as this month. Those guidelines, revised every five years, are similarly expected to encourage less sodium consumption and more grains, fruits and vegetables.

___

Online:

Before and after school lunch menu: http://www.usda.gov/documents/cnr_chart.pdf

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTH

WASHINGTON — School cafeterias would have to hold the fries – and serve kids more whole grains, fruits and vegetables – under the government's plans for the first major nutritional o...
WASHINGTON — School cafeterias would have to hold the fries – and serve kids more whole grains, fruits and vegetables – under the government's plans for the first major nutritional o...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 393
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
08:08 AM on 01/19/2011
Some initiative for the school lunch program is better than none. The main point is that something has to happen. These are our kids we are feeding-we are feeding our future. Although there will always be, as Marshhen commented below, those kids that won't eat the "healthier" foods. That is why as a parent we need to complement the school lunch efforts with our own efforts at home: offering healthy, balanced food choices.
We live in France. I have 4 kids who eat at the French schools. Check out the difference in various American school lunch menus to French school lunch menus. My blog www.brightonyourhealth.com has a 30 day lunch menu comparison between the 2 countries. Gizzard salad, Veal Blanquette, etc.plus 3 course hot meals and similiar prices to American school meals. I think some of the school lunch meals in America are almost not even worth eating. Too much fried foods, not enough eating locally, eating fresh, not enough fruits and vegetables and maybe not enough education on the part of the school and parents about the importance of making good food choices and eating well at school.
Let's not complain too much-but use that effort to go to your local school and support positive changes. Support salad bars in schools, volunteer to help in the cafeteria.
It is embarrasing... one of the most richest countries in the world serving this food to our kids!
Mary Brighton, MS, RD
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Free $$ For Everyone.
10:19 PM on 01/17/2011
Anyone here that attend NYC's public schools? Lunch is fatty fat and have been this way for many years. It'll never change.
06:31 PM on 01/17/2011
They should give the kids large servings of fresh fruit and vegetables every day. They should have plenty of recess, and they should have physical education from K-12. In college, perhaps physical education could be mandatory as well. Why not make it a requirement for each semester?

Once the kids graduate from college and high school, these kids should go on to workplaces that provide them with adequate exercise, especially in the sedentary professions.

People talk ceaselessly about making America more competitive; one way to do this would be to improve the overall physical fitness of our population. People would be happier, healthier and more productive. Tourism would increase, because let's face it, good-looking, healthy, fit people are the kind of people we all want to be around. So what if there would be more sex and infidelity; do we have to castrate and reduce our fertility with the foods we eat and the sedentary lifestyle we have become accustomed to?
04:48 PM on 01/17/2011
"The announcement comes just a few weeks after President Barack Obama signed into law a child nutrition bill that will help schools pay for the healthier foods, which often are more expensive."

Why not stop subsidizing corn and subsidize naturally and organically grown foods, allowing their overall price to drop, not just for school lunches but would affect family dinners, etc. Currently, it is cheaper to hit a fast food joint than to go out and buy organic meats and produce and cook at home. Right now, in this country, income level goes towards your chances of obesity and all the fun health risks that entails. Make good food cheap, and cheap food too expensive to consider.

I think this bill is a great step in the right direction, but I find it sad that we let things get to the crisis point before doing anything real about it. When Vilsack talks about the future of our children and nation being threatened, that seems to have been a real concern in the Department of Defense. Our nation is getting to fat to defend itself.

Let's address the overall problem of obesity and health related risks throughout the country, not just the schools, though it is an excellent start.

http://tipthecook.net
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
KurtMichaelFriese
Money is not speech - merely a megaphone
02:36 PM on 01/15/2011
I remind all interested readers here of the recent study from Mission: Readiness, indicating that at least 25% of Americans age 17-24 are "too fat to fight." Read more about it at my column here in HuffPo on the study, "Why Johnny Can't March"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kurt-friese/why-johnny-cant-march-sch_b_562398.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redglitter
Cheese aficionado
07:57 PM on 01/14/2011
As long as the government continues to allow BGH (Bovine Growth Hormone) in dairy products, which is proven to cause cancer in humans and infections in cows, they have nothing to say that I need to hear. Government, stop pretending you give crap about what kids ingest into their bodies when you allow cancer causing chemicals to be used in our food.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
KurtMichaelFriese
Money is not speech - merely a megaphone
02:28 PM on 01/15/2011
Fear not, Red. BGH has gone the way of the dodo, forced out of the market by concerned eaters like you and me. yay!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
marshhen
Northern by birth, southern by choice
07:27 AM on 01/14/2011
In my experience, and I worked as a Food Service Director, kid eat what they like, parents buy when the child says they want a "hot lunch", The parent will not waste money on food the child won't eat. They pay again, because the child is starved after school because they didn't eat the lunch they didn't want in the first place. No one can force them to eat it.
Bottom line, when we offered a more healthy menu, the few kids bought lunch, making the program that much more expensive. Overhead is the same whether you feed 400 a day or 200 day.
photo
clearthinker2008
we need to respect each other
06:34 AM on 01/14/2011
"Require all milk served to be low fat or nonfat, and require all flavored milks to be nonfat."

So were still on that fat causes fat 1980's kick although that has been proven a myth? Man made trans-fats should be completely banned but they just say "most" what the heck? Funny, I didn't see anything up there about limited sugar or high fructose corn syrup. So the drumbeat continues. I also concerned about the calorie limit, different sized kids need different amount of calories. A short kid needs less calories than a tall kid, or a super active kid needs more calories than a kid with less activities.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnneV
12:28 AM on 01/16/2011
I agree that the fat elimination kick is wrong -- but the fact that most fat is not going to be organic makes me ok with it. The pesticides and other environmental poisons are stored in the fat, and schools are unlikely to get organic milk . . . so this fat elimination will knock off some cancers from developing. I thought this bill was going to minimize sugar and hfcs too . . hmmm.
08:10 PM on 01/13/2011
they didnt add better tasting to this.... the regular milk tastes like cardboard and people just take chocolate milk because it doesnt taste like cardboard.... all low fat or fat free in my school
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
08:37 PM on 01/13/2011
That is because the milk in the cartons was allowed to get warm at some point.  Really warm to taste like the cardboard the milk came in.  Who delivers the milk to your school?  Who puts it away?  You could do a little detective work.
10:43 PM on 01/13/2011
uh.... the milk is cold when u get it.... when u get apple juice or something its mostly frozen.... people end up throwing ice at each other after sucking all the juice out.... haven't eaten school lunch in a while (food got even worse) and now i eat in the library with lunch from home instead of the lunchroom
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
marshhen
Northern by birth, southern by choice
07:21 AM on 01/14/2011
The milk does not get warm unless there was a failure of the system. Health departments require temperature logs on all refrigeration units. More likely it gets frozen, rather than warm.
08:03 PM on 01/13/2011
I think that making school lunches healthier is a great idea. Majority of the worlds population is over weight. It's because of all the fast food that parents are supporting to their kids. As kids get older parents know that they are able to feed themselves and they rely on them eating fast food, then they begin to rely on it for the whole family. School lunch is expensive but it is worth doing it. Being overweight isn't good for anyone. Especially kids in school. There are kids in school that get made fun of everyday because of the way they look. That's the reason kids these days have bad self esteem because of what they hear from their peers are school. I think that every school should make changes to the food that they are serving in school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Butters
07:57 PM on 01/13/2011
I commend the effort, but this country's fear of fat is a major contributor to it's obesity epidemic. Fat doesn't make us fat, sugar and high carbohydrate foods do:

"Require all milk served to be low fat or nonfat, and require all flavored milks to be nonfat."

Children who often drink full fat milk weigh less
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/169756.php
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
08:38 PM on 01/13/2011
I hear you.  All foods in their simplest, most natural state.  That's what we should be feeding kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Butters
11:54 PM on 01/13/2011
Right. People don't realize that non fat milk is a processed, high sugar drink.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
marshhen
Northern by birth, southern by choice
07:37 AM on 01/14/2011
What they should eat and what they want to eat are 2 different things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverhair01
10:21 PM on 01/13/2011
They are cutting milk fat because a majority of fat in milk is saturated fat. Fatty milk is not healthy. Hell milk isn't healthy anyway.
05:40 PM on 01/13/2011
I hope they put in some organic fruits and veggies on the menu.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sara Power
06:31 PM on 01/15/2011
Doesn't need to be organic, just fresh.

The breakfasts are the worst. In our district the taxpayer funded free lunch gives kids pop-tarts.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
11:47 PM on 01/15/2011
And you are hereby deputized to head over to the next school board meeting, serve on the right committee, etc. There are some things that you should tell us after you have taken the corrective action. That pop tart thing shocked me so I went dictatorial full blast, sorry for the offense. I do hope that you take on the mission of doing something about it. A proactive way would be to arm yourself with these new guidelines and help them be the first in the city/coounty/state to implement it.
09:15 AM on 01/18/2011
Organic is much, much healthier. No GMO's, no pesticides and herbicides, no hormones, steroids and antibiotics, no irradating etc.. Let's give our kids fresh, healthier foods.
photo
anthonyve
An exmilitary, excorporate Aussie
05:14 PM on 01/13/2011
Interesting that there is another column on HP today pointing out that only half a Chicken Mcnugget is chicken. The rest doesn't bear, (or should that be 'bare', I can never remember), thinking about, except that much of it is corn derivatives, a major source of Omega 6 fatty acids. We in the west typically have between 20 to 50 times more Omega 6 than we should, and this results in some fairly serious diseases.
Anything that helps move the next generation towards healthy eating cannot be bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
08:40 PM on 01/13/2011
A bear is an animal and it's also what you can carry.  Bare means bare naked.  Or barely there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnneV
12:33 AM on 01/16/2011
And in many blood types corn contains lectins which cause weight gain.
photo
anthonyve
An exmilitary, excorporate Aussie
05:07 PM on 01/13/2011
Much is being made of who's paying for these meals. But as I understand it, the funding arrangements are not changing, only the food make up.
Our experience when my family decided, (make that, my wife decided, but she was right), to move from a junkie diet to a healthier one was that our food bills actually decreased. Especially when we took into account that we were no longer paying for empty (no food value) calories.
As to the freedom of choice argument, it makes no sense to give children freedom of choice over health issues. We wouldn't let them play on the roads because they want to.
Left to their own devices, I have no doubt my kids would have chosen junk food.
One of the roles of parents - and adults generally - is to make decisions for children until their brains have finished growing and they have the wherewithal to make sensible decisions for themselves.
This is just such a situation.
04:06 PM on 01/13/2011
I don't know, those guidelines look pretty weak and are coming over a long period of time. If only they could hire Chipotle to run the national program. I get the vegetables thing. The fruit thing I kind of get--but fruit should be more of a treat than considered health food. Requiring milk at all seems silly--water is sufficient. Milk has a very high carbohydrate to protein ratio and even though it is lower on the GI scale it produces a huge insulin response:

"Milk was a particularly potent insulin secretagogue; the observed insulin response was approximately 5-fold greater than would be anticipated from the glucose response."

From: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3545955

Are there any food scientists who are creating this new program? My guess is that there probably are some but they are always having to compromise between industry and health demands.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Stephen Stafford
Be the answer to somebody's prayer!
11:50 PM on 01/15/2011
Fruit is a viable part of healthy nutrition. A great tasting piece is always a treat, but it is not like a decadent desert. Fruit is among the healthiest of health foods. Please, do not muddle the categories. Healthy eating is not punishment. It is to our advantage that a food tastes good.