More

Mammoth Could Be Brought Back To Life In 4 Years

Mammoth

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/18/11 02:26 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

Researchers will attempt resurrecting the mammoth, a species believed extinct for over 5,000 years, after finally obtaining tissue last summer from a carcass preserved in a Russian mammoth research laboratory.

The team will be led by Professor Akira Iritani, professor emeritus at Kyoto University, notes Physorg.com.

Though the study began in 1997, the researchers were unable to determine how to safely extract DNA until a 2008 experiment by Dr. Teruhiko Wakayama, during which he cloned a mouse that had been in deep freeze for 16 years.

They plan on taking nuclei from the mammoth cells and inserting them into an elephant's egg cells from which the nuclei have been removed. This will create an embryo that contains the mammoth's genes. The embryo will then be inserted into the elephant's womb, and the animal will, hopefully, give birth to a mammoth. According to The Daily Tech, Iritani said:

"The success rate in the cloning of cattle was poor until recently, but now stands at about 30 percent. I think we have a reasonable chance of success and a healthy mammoth could be born in four or five years."

According to PCmag.com, the team will need a working sample of tissue of at least three square centimeters. The team has had trouble in the past because they had only been able to obtain tissue samples from mammoths found in Siberia, which were rendered unusable because of the frost.

The effort has now become a joint one, bringing together the United States (two African elephant researchers), Russia (the head of the Russian mammoth research lab), and Japan (Professors Minoru Miyashita and Akira Iritani).

If everything goes as planned, a mammoth will be born in 4 to 6 years. It will take so long because it will most likely be at least two years before they can impregnate an elephant, and then there will be a 600 day gestation period.

Iritani realizes the potential ramifications of this procedure. He notes, "If a cloned embryo can be created, we need to discuss, before transplanting it into the womb, how to breed it and whether to display it to the public. After the mammoth is born, we'll examine its ecology and genes to study why the species became extinct and other factors."

Mammoths were between 10 to 12 feet tall and weighed from 6 to 8 tons. They are estimated to have gone extinct more than 5,000 years ago, probably due to a combination of the change in climate, hunting, and disease, and remain a symbol of the last ice age.

Will the mammoth be brought back to life in the next five years?

  • Yes

  • No

Predict it!
Top Players
Beat your friends!
Connect through Facebook or Twitter and challenge your friends

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Researchers will attempt resurrecting the mammoth, a species believed extinct for over 5,000 years, after finally obtaining tissue last summer from a carcass preserved in a Russian mammoth research la...
Researchers will attempt resurrecting the mammoth, a species believed extinct for over 5,000 years, after finally obtaining tissue last summer from a carcass preserved in a Russian mammoth research la...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 847
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sara Lira
Baby Girl due Sept. 16 :)
11:59 PM on 01/20/2011
There's probably a good reason why they're extinct, you know?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Eric Shun
Pro-kids (adopted, foster, born and unborn)
04:31 PM on 01/20/2011
this is weird...

What if wooly mammoths were mean muthers, and were hunted to extiction by the ancient humans on purpose. What if it was them or us and they hunted down humans too - we just won.
02:59 PM on 01/20/2011
Cause cloning ancient creatures always works out well in sci-fi
01:22 AM on 01/22/2011
I guessed everyone involved missed Jurassic Park 1,2 and 3
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
02:11 PM on 01/20/2011
I fully expect this to happen. Unfortunately, the woolly mammoth that they clone will be an animal without a habitat, as the world has changed dramatically since the Pleistocene (just look at Alaska, where the Mammoth Steppe disappeared with the woolly mammoth). This does, however, raise hope that other, more recently extinct species can be resurrected.
06:48 PM on 01/20/2011
There is lots of places for mammoths to go; in Siberia they are already constructing a Pleistocene "re-wilding" park with other locally-extinct megafauna; besides, proboscideans tend to be ecosystem-shapers; plains elephants in Africa maintain open woodland through their destructive herbivory. Mammoths lived all over the temperate world, and they will have no shortage of possible habitats; it will just be necessary to find a large contiguous one, which is more difficult given human settlement
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:07 PM on 01/20/2011
What I dont understand is that if they can do this with an animal that has been extinct for over 5000 years, why dont they focus their time and money on saving species that are currently critically endangered????
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
02:27 PM on 01/20/2011
Or people with sicknesses....
06:49 PM on 01/20/2011
Right, because no one funds that. (???)
01:20 AM on 01/21/2011
There is no money in curing illness. The big bucks are in symptoms.
06:49 PM on 01/20/2011
I can hardly think of anything more critically endangered than something that now exists only in a few frozen carcasses.
08:35 AM on 01/20/2011
Maybe next a prehistrical hippo will be brought back, gonna need extra large bacon fo rthe extra large burger.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Eric Shun
Pro-kids (adopted, foster, born and unborn)
04:32 PM on 01/20/2011
mmmm bacon - they need to invent bacon flavored ice cream - best of both worlds
06:50 PM on 01/20/2011
1. Fry bacon.
2. Drip bacon fat into icecream; mix.
3. Put back in freezer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Eric Shun
Pro-kids (adopted, foster, born and unborn)
04:32 PM on 01/20/2011
or bacon ho-ho's
09:17 PM on 01/19/2011
This is Good News. The survivors are going to need something to hunt for food in the coming ice age, which, according to a number of climatologists, could start in the next 30-60 years, based on recent downward global temperature trends.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
02:08 PM on 01/20/2011
And those climatologists are? Obviously not the ones publishing papers in
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Journal of Climatology, International Journal of Climatology, or other major climatology journals. I'm not certain what data your climatologists are look at, as the graphs I'm staring at show an upward trend in global temperatures (i.e. http://processtrends.com/images/RClimate_GISS_trend_latest.png).
07:47 PM on 01/22/2011
Instead of burying your nose in climatology journals, how about taking a look at the weather outside? The journals can tell all the lies they want, but the plants in my garden can't read, so they only react what they experience weather- and climate-wise. The plants are saying it's getting colder.
06:50 PM on 01/20/2011
fail
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleo Creech
Atlanta writer, poet, activist.
06:30 PM on 01/19/2011
I kept hoping this sort of thing could actually bring back lost species. Mammoths, Dodos, etc. and we might see big wandering herds one day. But upon doing a little research it seems the absolute minimum number of genetically diverse individuals needed is at least 300 or so. I guess technically you could have a herd of Mammoths one day, but they'd be basically be each other's mom/dad/bro/sister - it all sounds very "Chinatown"-ish.

But it does still sound like a strategy for endangered animals. You could clone individuals in one population, and then a second, thend just switch them out in the breeding populations.

Actually it would almost seem very sad, to just clone one individual of a lost species like a mammoth or a dodo, and realize that it's the only one of a species that we've lost. I know the animal wouldn't know it, but how sad would that be. To be ressurected in a lab to be the only living example of your species from a world that doesn't really even exist any more.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
01:17 PM on 01/23/2011
How would it be? Better than not being.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
06:24 PM on 01/19/2011
To explain! It is no longer legal to export many animals species from Africa. So we take sperm, egg and embryos, put them in similar species in American zoos, and produce the animals here. This is done all the time! It works! The result is not millions of African animals running all over America. Use your heads, people!
05:46 PM on 01/19/2011
I am quick to say that not everything that can be done should be done, but in this case, I'll make an exception, IF someone will promise to try to clone a Sabretooth Tiger. I would just love to see one of those. But either way, whenever this FrankenMammoth is up and running, I'm sure he or she will need some sort of custom support harness at some point in its life, so I will definately be standing by to take that call. I might even leave headquarters to personally oversee the first fitting.
What's next- Tyrran-Iguana? Turkey-dactyl? Biso-saurus?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drkazmd65
Mom Taught me - Question Everything - Thanks Mom!
05:27 PM on 01/19/2011
Why?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
06:16 PM on 01/19/2011
Because seeking the truth is important to the future of the human race. You wouldn't be asking "why" on the Internet if we hadn't gone to the Moon.
04:42 PM on 01/19/2011
One researcher sounds very foolish in the press quote: "we'll examine its ecology." Perhaps he thinks the "ecology" will be located just under the tail, where he will be able to closely examine it with his nose.

Seriously, does he not realize that the ecosystem this critter existed has been gone for over 10,000 years? Examine it indeed.
06:51 PM on 01/20/2011
nah its still around, just waiting for its megafauna back
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dannyisme
Venceremos
01:33 PM on 01/19/2011
Aren't there enough animals on the verge of extinction today (whales, tigers, Tasmanian devils) who should get priority?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mynamesyow
Scientist, Gonzo, Champion of the Poor
02:10 PM on 01/19/2011
Yes, but if this is successful we might never have to worry about an animal going truly 'extinct' again...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
06:17 PM on 01/19/2011
Why is it either/or? The human race can do more than one thing at a time. always has!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:54 PM on 01/19/2011
seems no one is concerned about the elephant...these are not dumb animals...there will be seperation issues once the scientists decide to take the animal, should they both survive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
06:18 PM on 01/19/2011
Come on. We insert elephant embroyos into elephants all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleo Creech
Atlanta writer, poet, activist.
06:37 PM on 01/19/2011
Seems like they could still keep them together. They'd probably be social animals. No reason they can't study them in a mixed group setting. The mammoth's not going to have any mammoth herd to learn from anyhow.

I wonder if Mammoths and Elephants would breed? Don't know if they're genetically close enough to give fertile offspring. That would be a way to introduce some genetic diversity into a herd to maybe work toward a breeding population of "mostly" mammoths.

I'd guess you call those Elemoths or Mamphants.
photo
ElenaOfJersey
And all of y'all are subject to my thrall.
07:03 PM on 01/19/2011
Wouldn't it be crazy, though, if they were capable of producing fertile offspring?

I think Darwin would be thrilled, myself, either way.
12:45 PM on 01/19/2011
um, i'm especially interested in the part where iritani is talking about the "potential ramifications" and says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about the ethics of impregnating an adult elephant with the embryo of a mammoth, and forcing the elephant to carry a mammoth fetus for 600 days, and then give birth to a baby mammoth.

i guess the huffington post's liberal bent falls short of developing an understanding animal cruelty, and instead advocates for the relentless progress of fascist genetic experimentation on them - or at least perpetuates our fascination with animal cruelty as scientific progress.
11:45 AM on 01/24/2011
Papa Elephant: "Say, junior is awfully hairy you know..."
Mama Elephant: "Must be from your side of the family..."