More

Wells Fargo 4Q Profit Up, Aided By Lower Reserves

EILEEN AJ CONNELLY   01/19/11 03:15 PM ET   AP

Earns Wells Fargo

NEW YORK — Wells Fargo & Co., one of the largest lenders to consumers among U.S. banks, on Wednesday said its fourth-quarter profit shot up as its customers opened more accounts and improved their loan paying habits.

Better results from lending also meant Wells Fargo was able to lower the amount of reserves set aside to cover souring loans.

CEO John Stumpf said all the bank's business segments contributed to earnings as the economy started to gain strength.

But the bank said its net interest income, or the money earned from deposits and loans, fell 4 percent to $11.06 billion. Noninterest income, or earnings from fees and charges, fell 7 percent to $10.4 billion.

It also posted a 27 percent plunge in service charges on its deposit accounts, to $1.04 billion. That indicates that new government regulations restricting fees like overdraft charges had a big impact.

Wells Fargo stock lost 58 cents, or 1.8 percent, to $32.34 in afternoon trading.

During a conference call to discuss results, Chief Financial Officer Howard Atkins said the rule that took effect last summer requiring customers opt-in for overdraft coverage on checking accounts alone cut revenue in the fourth quarter by $270 million. Credit card regulations that took effect last year cut an additional $50 million off revenue.

One major strategy for addressing the cuts to revenue resulting from new regulations is an effort to increase the number of accounts or products sold to each customer. Wells Fargo boasted about a 7.5 percent increase in the number of consumer checking accounts and said its customers now average 5.7 accounts or products like credit cards each with the bank, up from an average of 5.47 a year ago.

Known as "cross selling," that's long been one of Wells Fargo's strengths, and a model that other banks are trying to duplicate. Wells has been able to export the tactic to its Wachovia branches.

"When we bought Wachovia two years ago, we acquired a retail customer base that was roughly the same size as the legacy Wells Fargo customer base, but the product penetration Wachovia had was not as deep or as extensive as on the Wells Fargo side," Atkins said in an interview. Adding more sales people to the former Wachovia branches has enabled the bank to employ a "very deliberate strategy" to increase those customer relationships.

While investors sent Wells' stock lower, there were significant highlights in the results, including strong mortgage origination.

Wells Fargo wrote $128 billion in new mortgages in the fourth quarter – up from $101 billion in the third quarter – with refinancing representing about 70 percent of the total, Atkins said.

Edward Jones analyst Shannon Stemm said that is an area to watch, as interest rate increases and a smaller pool of customers looking to refinance will likely mean that source of revenue will shrink in coming quarters.

But Atkins said that situation may be helped by a pickup in the housing market. "If the economy continues to recover, as it seems to be, then purchase volume should pick up as opposed to refinance volume," he said.

Wells Fargo also reported a notable improvement in collecting payments on outstanding lending, as the total loans it had to write off as uncollectable fell to $3.84 billion from $5.9 billion in the 2009 quarter.

Loans considered past due and likely to default declined for the first time since Wells Fargo bought Wachovia in late 2008, ending the quarter at $32.4 billion. Early stage delinquencies, a sign of future default, also fell.

Those positives meant Wells Fargo was able to reduce its loan-loss reserves, the money it sets aside to cover soured lending, by $850 million during the fourth quarter, boosting its profit for the period.

In all, the San Francisco-based bank said its net income attributable to common stockholders was $3.2 billion, or 61 cents per share.

Last year, the company earned $394 million, or 8 cents per share, as its results were affected by a large preferred dividend paid to the government, which was not necessary this year. In December 2009, Wells Fargo paid back the bailout money it received during the financial crisis, and the government handed back the preferred shares it held.

The latest results matched the 61 cents per share forecast by analysts polled by FactSet.

For the full year 2010, Wells Fargo's net income attributable to common stockholders soared 46 percent to $11.63 billion, or $2.21 per share, from $7.99 billion, or $1.75 per share, for 2009.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Nicole Hardesty  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MilesToGo
11:40 PM on 01/20/2011
Just check out the billions Wells Fargo got from the U.S. Treasury, and add the unknown billions they took from the Federal Reserve's window. How could these banksters not earn profits?
12:35 AM on 01/20/2011
If anyone has been paying attention to their bank over the past years, it's not a wonder they're doing well. I think I have this right: ATM fees, late fees, on time fees (if you pay by phone the day its due) a fee for paying by phone any other day, a fee to have a credit card, a fee for checking, a fee for checks, a fee for cancelled checks, a fee to apply for a loan, a fee for a copy of a statement, a fee for a payoff, a fee for paying off early...............whew........I'm sure I've missed many
11:39 PM on 01/19/2011
When i closed out my WF brokerage and IRA accounts, I was no longer considered a
prefered customer. They started charging me $30 dollars a month for checking and a credit
card. Un-fricked believeable. They posted it retroactive too.

Obviously I told them to reverse it and they did. Scam artists and thieves.
06:13 PM on 01/19/2011
What do we expect they are not allowed to fail. They should do well the tax payer bailed them out. Banks are not for "U.S.". They are not for the U.S.A. They have no allegence to "U.S." or our country. When will we get it? We missed a great chance to fixed this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
12:43 PM on 01/19/2011
And where are the JOBS? It's JOBS... stupid!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
studmoose
This Micro-Bio Intentionally Left Blank
11:31 AM on 01/19/2011
I'll never forget going to them to get a line of credit before Christmas:

I go there and get a $7500 unsecured line for 7.9% interest.
I am told it will take three days to process.
I get a call on the third day that I was approved  only for $5000, but the rate will be 14.9%.
They say, we've got the check here if you would like to pick it up. Holding it out like a carrot.
I grudgingly pick it up, annoyed that the terms changed.
Then months later, they boost the rate to 20.9%.

Nice business practice. This left a bad taste in my mouth with them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
12:46 PM on 01/19/2011
And if you don't pay they will take steps to force you into bankruptcy or, if you used your house as security, force you out of your home. You would be better off borrowing from the Maia. They just break your legs if you don't pay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BklynDame
Now on BorderlessNewsandViews
03:00 PM on 01/19/2011
I went to them to refinance my mortgage (that I hold with them); I thought I'd have no problem with a great debt to income ratio, low 800s credit score, uninterrupted work history and never a late payment with them or anyone else.

They lost the paperwork (as rates started creeping back up), demanded explanations for paid bills, got an out-of-town company to do the appraisal (and they noted the wrong neighbourhood and, therefore, inaccurate comps -- which is especially a huge deal in New York City) and a host of other problems.

I never did get the loan refinanced through them...and with the way they handled things, my big goal is to wipe out the mortgage completely in order to not have to deal with them or any other bank. Now that I know their history in other financial matters, I won't be using them again. For anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DenverLofts
alltogethernow
04:51 PM on 01/19/2011
Interesting F & F
11:13 AM on 01/19/2011
Some of the profits are coming through their mortgage refinance programs. The qualifications have increased to qualify for a refinance and through programs like HARP, which is no cost to the borrower, the bank can gain these "good" assets in new loans with old customers.
Side note- it is high qualificatins that smaller institutions (that survived 2008) already implemented years ago to keep bad assets to a minimum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scottw
11:05 AM on 01/19/2011
Even a baboon could make money on taking deposits and paying .1% interest on money market savings accounts with restrictions. Even a baboon could make money by borrowing from the Fed virtually interest free and buy treasury bonds with that same money and taking interest payments from the taxpayers. This is taxpayer subsidization of the banking industry at the same time they do nothing for their depositors. That is why for the past several years I have been moving my money to credit union accounts in Vermont. Local ownership, local lending standards, integrity, etc.
10:53 AM on 01/19/2011
"Wells Fargo said its net interest income, or the money earned from deposits and loans, fell 4 percent to $11.06 billion. Noninterest income, or earnings from fees and charges, fell 7 percent to $10.4 billion.

Notable was a 19 percent decline in noninterest income from its mortgage business, to $2.76 billion. It also posted a 27 percent plunge in service charges on its deposit accounts, to $1.04 billion. That indicates that new government regulations restricting fees like overdraft charges had a big impact."

So what exactly accounts for their new profitability? They are writing off fewer bad assets but that doesn't translate to profit by itself. What am I missing?
11:05 AM on 01/19/2011
creative accounting (fiction)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cassie reinara
11:30 AM on 01/19/2011
What accounting? These firms today no longer use accountants to create their financial statements. They hire science fiction writers and pass it on to investors as the honest truth. Wasn't there a requirement that the CEO need to certify the veracity of his earnings statements? I haven't heard a single CEO go to jail yet on falsifying his statements. Oh, right, he can just restate earnings at some future date. What a joke.
10:50 AM on 01/19/2011
Good for who?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FreeProgressLiberal
10:28 AM on 01/19/2011
Profit up, and hiring down...

The trend continues
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My micro-bio is unwritten.
10:25 AM on 01/19/2011
Lowering the reserve in a year where home foreclosures are estimated to peak? Are there any banks that make realistic plans, more than a year out?

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2011/0114/Home-foreclosures-reach-1-million
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:00 AM on 01/19/2011
I'll say about this bank what I'll say about all twenty: "I categorically do not believe you."

There are too many shells on the table; too many places to hide the smelly little balls. And, far too much proof of the intent to deceive.

After all, "Wells Fargo Bank" is only one head of a very large hydra. If masterminds want "the Bank" to look really good, why, that's easy to do. If they want it to look like it's teetering on the verge of oblivion, why, that's easy to do also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil Waste
Angry Middle Class American Citizen
09:59 AM on 01/19/2011
With all the foreclosures and bad loans and they are still declaring a large profit? Why do I smell a rat? The banks must have huge write offs which means tax payers are making up their profit.

If you still have money in these huge mega banks you are part of the problem. Move your money to a local credit union.
09:46 AM on 01/19/2011
yippee --