More

2010 Tied For Warmest Year On Record According To UN

JOHN HEILPRIN   01/20/11 09:10 AM ET   AP

2010 Warmest Year Record
Environmental activists from Greenpeace demonstrate by holding images of landmarks in the water during the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Cancun, Mexico, Wednesday Dec. 8, 2010 According to the UN weather agency, 2010 is "almost certain" to rank among the three hottest years on record, and in a report issued Tuesday experts said glaciers in southern South America and Alaska's coastal mountains have been losing mass faster and for longer than glaciers elsewhere in the world. (AP Phot

GENEVA — The warmest year on record is a three-way tie: 2010, 2005 and 1998.

So says the U.N. weather agency, providing further evidence Thursday that the planet is slowly but surely heating up.

Average temperatures globally last year were 0.95 degrees Fahrenheit (0.53 Celsius) higher than the 1961-90 mean that is used for comparison purposes, according to World Meteorological Organization.

That's a bit lower than what the U.S. National Climatic Data Center announced earlier this month, but the World Meterological Organization also uses figures based on data collected by Britain's Meteorological Office and NASA.

"The 2010 data confirm the Earth's significant long-term warming trend," said Michel Jarraud, WMO's top official. He added that the ten warmest years after records began in 1854 have all occurred since 1998.

The average worldwide temperature for the 20th century was 57.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

But rising global temperatures over the last century are causing climate experts to worry. Most atmospheric scientists attribute the change to carbon dioxide and gases released into the air by gasoline-burning engines and other industrial processes. The gases tend to trap heat in the atmosphere like a greenhouse.

The Geneva-based global weather agency noted that last year's extreme weather – notably the heat wave in Russia and monsoon flooding in Pakistan – has continued into the new year. It also cited the heavy floods in Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Brazil and Australia as examples.

The year 2010 also was the wettest on record, according to the Global Historical Climatology Network. But since rain and snowfall patterns varied greatly around the world, scientists say more research is needed to establish a link between the warmer temperatures with the unusual moisture.

Land stations, ships, buoys at sea and satellites are all use to collect temperature readings. A "La Nina" condition took effect in the tropical Pacific Ocean in the last half of 2010, marked by below-normal temperatures.

Other findings in the WMO's climate report included:

_ Arctic sea ice cover in December was the smallest since records began in 1979, with an average monthly extent of 12 million square kilometers (4.6 million square miles). The ice cover is considered a marker of climate change as global warming tends to be seen first at the poles.

_ Recent warming has been especially strong in Africa, parts of Asia, and parts of the Arctic in Greenland and Canada, the agency said. Significantly cooler weather was registered mainly toward the end of the year, especially in northern Europe, parts of Russia and in the eastern United States.

___

Online:

___

WMO: http://www.wmo.int

NOAA: http://www.noaa.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

GENEVA — The warmest year on record is a three-way tie: 2010, 2005 and 1998. So says the U.N. weather agency, providing further evidence Thursday that the planet is slowly but surely heating up...
GENEVA — The warmest year on record is a three-way tie: 2010, 2005 and 1998. So says the U.N. weather agency, providing further evidence Thursday that the planet is slowly but surely heating up...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 970
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:27 PM on 02/08/2011
Okay, 1998, 2005, and 2010, tied for warmest years on record.
That means...
1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2009 are all cooler years.
Right?
It's 3 warmer years against 9 cooler years.
So.
In other words, a consensus of years claims no global warming.
08:56 PM on 02/09/2011
Incorrect. Here's a graph of global average temperatures since 1880 from 4 different sources:
http://www.climatehq.com/2011/01/global-average-temperatures-since-1880.html

Also 12-month and 60-month global means since 1880:
http://www.climatehq.com/2010/06/12-month-and-60-month-running-mean.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 PM on 02/09/2011
What you on about?
Your sites only corroborate my statement Dude.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
09:27 AM on 01/23/2011
Where Senators are going to put thier a$$e$ at some pointless meeting is headlines, but THIS, the actual evidence of the end of the world, THIS doesn't rate headlines. Okay. We're ostriches.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BrettnCalgary
02:13 AM on 01/24/2011
When it comes to our long term survival we are no smarter than a petri dish full of bacteria.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
09:59 PM on 01/24/2011
You sound like my college biology professor. "Ve vill die een our own feeyilth, klass...ve are no bettah zen ze bacteria in ze peetree deeesh"
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:43 AM on 01/22/2011
Here is the abstract from the article:

"Climate variations have influenced the agricultural productivity, health risk, and conflict level of preindustrial societies. Discrimination between environmental and anthropogenic impacts on past civilizations, however, remains difficult because of the paucity of high-resolution palaeoclimatic evidence. Here, we present tree ring–based reconstructions of Central European summer precipitation and temperature variability over the past 2500 years. Recent warming is unprecedented, but modern hydroclimatic variations may have at times been exceeded in magnitude and duration. Wet and warm summers occurred during periods of Roman and medieval prosperity. Increased climate variability from ~AD 250 to 600 coincided with the demise of the Western Roman Empire and the turmoil of the Migration Period. Historical circumstances may challenge recent political and fiscal reluctance to mitigate projected climate change."
07:12 AM on 01/22/2011
The lies endlessly repeated by tens of thousands with their noses in government troughs is truly sickening. Their hypocrisy reeks a horrible stench. They fly and drive to thousands of conventions as they order the rest of us to stay at home and suffer a permanent worldwide depression. Pages of facts await you at http://theglobalwarmingscam.blogspot.com
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:25 AM on 01/22/2011
Before I click on the link to God-knows-what, perhaps you could back up one of your vitriolic accusations and tell us how you know them to be true? From what you've said so far one should expect that your blog is also free of any real substance.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
10:32 AM on 01/22/2011
They this. They that. They the other. You rant incoherently and you expect us to flock to your denier blog site?
11:46 PM on 01/21/2011
Is it from all the talk and no action?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcthomp
06:02 PM on 01/21/2011
HYUCK! If there's global warmin WHYZIT SO COLD OUT?! HYUCK!
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
05:56 PM on 01/21/2011
Reuters. Jan 21, 2011 "Greenland’s ice sheet melted at a record rate in 2010, and this could be a major contributor to sea level rise in coming decades.

The ice in Greenland melted so much last year that it formed rivers and lakes on top of the vast series of glaciers that covers much of the big Arctic island, with waterfalls flowing through cracks and holes toward the bottom of the ice sheet.

Summer 2010 temperatures in Greenland were up to 5.4 degrees F (3 degrees C) above average, and there was reduced snowfall, Tedesco and his co-authors noted in an article in the current edition of Environmental Research Letters. Nuuk, Greenland’s capital, had the warmest spring and summer since records began there in 1873. "

So if you are having a cold winter in the continental US, it really doesn't mean a heck of a lot because you probably don't have a glacier in your back yard and even if you do, it is probably shrinking every summer! Glacier National Park will soon be glacier free! So you can drive your dirt bikes all over it soon! No more fear of driving into a crevice!

Have a wonderful day!
05:40 PM on 01/21/2011
Now I’ve been censored four times. I’m not allowed to address your statements, defend my integrity, or argue my case, so my presence here serves no further purpose.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
06:15 PM on 01/21/2011
Most of us eventually learn how to be civil and stay on topic.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
06:43 PM on 01/21/2011
We do?
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:28 AM on 01/22/2011
"I’m not allowed to address your statements­, defend my integrity, or argue my case, so my presence here serves no further purpose."

Many, many others manage to post complete and utter nonsense. "I'm being censored" sounds like a lame excuse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
04:54 PM on 01/21/2011
Where is the science? I have yet to see anyone post relevant published data that disproves AGCC. Nothing. Nada.

All we have is inductive navel gazing and bizzare conspiracy theories, all unproven. I don't care what someone's opinion on heat exchange in gasses or the greehouse effects of CO2 and methane are because these have been demonstrably proven by theory supported through repeatable experimentation.

I don't use the Bible or my imagination to repair my car. Why on earth would we expect such hypothetical nonsense to be in any fashion useful for solving and explaining basic natural problems or phenomena in general?
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
05:07 PM on 01/21/2011
A denier canard making the rounds these days is that 'if science cannot be disproved, then it is not valid science.'

Well, wrong. AGW has withstood rigorous peer reviewed scrutiny by qualified physicists for well over a century. That they cannot disprove it means that it remains robust and valid.
04:20 PM on 01/21/2011
Hey, sweet, I’m not banned yet! So far, I’ve had three posts deleted in which I did not use foul or threatening language, but the good news is I’m still able to write short, meaningless statements! Whoo-hoo!
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
04:26 PM on 01/21/2011
The very definition of troll.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
04:43 PM on 01/21/2011
Yet you fail to respond to any of our critiques and refutations. Droll.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
03:35 PM on 01/21/2011
as the globe warms..

so too must science deniers make ever more absurd denials.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:05 PM on 01/21/2011
as the globe warms..

so too must the winters.
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
02:53 PM on 01/21/2011
Q: Why can't science deniers understand that global warming increases atmospheric water vapor, which in turn increases snowfall in areas that are below freezing?

A: Because they are science deniers, of course.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
04:10 PM on 01/21/2011
"as the globe warms..so too must the winters."

They generally do, but of course not necessarily in your backyard. Please don't confuse more snow with more cold. Notice how your denier sites and the liars on Fox use "severe winter" instead of colder? They are playing with words to deceive you.
01:17 PM on 01/21/2011
If a mere 0.53C change in the global temperature caused the polar ice to melt and all of the awful weather, what is the world going to be like when it gets to the 4-6 degrees they are predicting?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 PM on 01/21/2011
Greenland's Ice Has Secret Weapon Against Melting
09 December 2010 by Michael Marshall
Journal reference: Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature09618
Greenland's ice sheets are shrinking already as the climate warms, and some glaciologists fear that they could accelerate their own destruction. If they all melted, they would raise global sea levels by 6.5 metres – though even in a world 8 °C warmer than now this might take 1000 years.

The feared self-destruct device is water. As a glacier melts, water runs down to its base. In theory, this lubrication should accelerate the glacier's slide downhill and melt it sooner.

But this positive feedback is "limited", says Christian Schoof of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, who has built a new model of glaciers that simulates how they respond to meltwater. He says glaciers can get rid of excess water because of the way their internal structure changes.

Schoof's model could help explain what is happening to Greenland's glaciers, says glaciologist Roderik van de Wal of Utrecht University in the Netherlands, who has found no sign of the feared feedback effect. "The melt has been increasing but glacier velocities have not," he says.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19842-greenlands-ice-has-secret-weapon-against-melting.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
02:48 PM on 01/21/2011
"The melt has been increasing but glacier velocities have not"...

So, the gist of this is that MORE not LESS water is going into the oceans. A rise of one foot in sea level globally would be CATASTROPHIC. Forget 6.5 meters.

I will re-iterate. THE MELT HAS BEEN INCREASING.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
04:15 PM on 01/21/2011
"Greenland'­s ice sheets are shrinking already as the climate warms...."

Fumes, have you reversed your opinion on climate change?
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people don't taste good.
06:48 PM on 01/21/2011
So slink when it rises that much I can assure you that all living things will be long gone...
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
07:35 PM on 01/21/2011
I take it that as a tyrannosaurus you have personal experience?
11:36 AM on 01/21/2011
I don’t intend to become a blogger or activist, I’m not on any “big oil” payroll or anything like that, and I don’t plan to go into politics. I signed up here yesterday since that ridiculous image of a sinking statue (Christ the Redeemer in Brazil, which is located on a mountain that is 2,300 feet above sea level) caught my eye, and I wanted to express my opinions as an interested layman, not an expert. As I mentioned, I am a historian, not a climate scientist, but I have not heard from any climate scientists in here anyway, so my opinions are at least as valid as yours. I have no direct financial interest in disproving the AGW theory. Sure, I don’t want my taxes to increase and I’m against more government control of my life, so in that sense I have an economic interest, but I represent exactly one person, myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
12:05 PM on 01/21/2011
You're a historian? PhD?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
12:12 PM on 01/21/2011
"so my opinions are at least as valid as yours".

Specious reasoning. You assume, incorrectly, that your opinion is as valid as commonly accepted scientific fact. You've made several incomplete and outlandish claims based upon what you consider to be your "reasoned" position on an issue, but your standard of philosophical skepticism isn't even rigorous enough to mount a cogent argument in most cases.

The things you have said fly in the face of basic physics, chemistry, and a whole swath of sciences. I cannot believe that statement about scientific consensus came out of your head. It betrays a complete and utter lack of understanding of peer review, scientific method and theory, which leads me very strongly to question your credentials as a historian.

What is your area of speciality?
photo
Publicola
Facts are stubborn things
07:43 AM on 01/21/2011
Xarkonul: "The only person I know of who correctly predicted a brutally cold winter in the UK this year is not an AGW supporter... AGW supporters have consistent­ly predicted that Europe would see increasing­ly mild winters with much rain and virtually no snow."

False. For example:

http://ipy-osc.no/article/2010/1276176306.8

- and -

http://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/global-warming-could-cool-down-temperatures-in-winter

But hey don't let reality get in the way of your science denier disinformation campaign.

Xarkonul: "P.S. There are more “deniers”... "

P.S. Not amongst climate scientists, only amongst those who are confused and taken in by climate science denier disinformation such as yours.