iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Cash-Strapped States Seeking A Way To Declare Bankruptcy

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 01/21/11 01:00 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:25 PM ET

John Cornyn

States are looking for relief.

As they confront massive debts and diminished revenue, some state officials are trying to determine whether they could take a drastic and illegal step: declaring bankruptcy, the New York Times reports. Such a move, though currently out of the question, might free states from some of their most burdensome debt and allow them to rebuild their crippled finances.

After years of spending generously, and after decades of hiking pension promises to employees, states now find themselves squeezed. Diminished tax revenue is, in many cases, insufficient to cover long-term obligations, as states face a combined pension fund shortfall of $3 trillion, according to two finance professors' estimate. Bankruptcy would, in theory, allow states to rework these obligations, potentially causing pain for retirees and bondholders, and likely spreading uncertainty through financial markets.

Even holders of state bonds -- traditionally considered a rock-solid investment -- could end up taking a loss, the NYT says.

All talk of state bankruptcy is in hypothetical terms, as there remains little, if any, precedent. The most recent example of a state credit event happened during the Depression, when Arkansas defaulted on its debt. But legal bankruptcy protection, in which states would theoretically be able to restructure their obligations in court, is unconstitutional, since states are considered sovereign entities.

Even municipal bankruptcy, which is allowed under some state constitutions, is rare. The current poster child is Vallejo, Calif., which was driven into bankruptcy nearly three years ago in an attempt to escape mounting labor costs. The biggest example is Orange County, which declared bankruptcy in 1994 after the treasurer gambled on Wall Street with the public money, and lost. He was later sentenced to prison time.

Some American cities have flirted with bankruptcy. Harrisburg, Pa., has gotten legal advice on a potential filing. Hamtramck, Mich., has sought bankruptcy protection and been denied by the state of Michigan.

Perhaps the only precedent one can point to is a crisis simulation at The Economist's Buttonwood Gathering in New York City, held in October. Performing the roles of Federal government officials were, among others, former Treasury secretary Robert Rubin, former National Economic Council director Laura Tyson and former chief of staff Josh Bolten. Their task was to simulate the Federal government's response to a state's request for a bailout.

For the most part, the actors were able to stay in character -- until Tyson fumbled, accidentally referring to the fictional state New Jefferson as "California."

Analyst Christopher Whalen, for his part, says he believes California will default on its debt.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
States are looking for relief. As they confront massive debts and diminished revenue, some state officials are trying to determine whether they could take a drastic and illegal step: declaring bankru...
States are looking for relief. As they confront massive debts and diminished revenue, some state officials are trying to determine whether they could take a drastic and illegal step: declaring bankru...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,959
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (119 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
05:54 PM on 03/15/2011
There is no question about it. Even the biggest mouthed Republican "No We Can't Afford To Spend Any More Dough" Governors will be red faced when they ask for because they realize that their only way out is at least a partial Federal Bailout. It's either doing this or here come the voters carrying pitch forks and flaming torches when they begin to see the programs that benefit them begin to disappear.
06:49 AM on 03/11/2011
Wall St assumed the role of Welfare Queen, they were supported by W and Obama, but now they have that prissy attitude back, like nothing ever happened!
Oh, it happened. And not everyone forgot.
Wall St should shut up about bankruptcy, because W TARP 1 and Obama TARP 2 were emergency gifts to make the corrupt system look like it has a few breaths left.  It doesn't.
 When our NY/ Beltway lobbyists, financiers and political hacks have to reduce themselves to the state and local levels, that indicates they can't control everything from the Beltway anymore. BOO HOO - What if I have to go to a state that's not Iowa? Will there be corn dogs? Me scared!
06:13 PM on 02/09/2011
It looks like Obama is going to bail them out, so they can keep on spending.

http://www.rationalpublicradio.com/obamas-next-bailout-bankrupt-states.html
06:24 AM on 03/11/2011
Reagan started a trend of corporations and super-wealthy citizens paying less and less taxes, for 30 years.
This is going to come to an end, sooner or later. The polls say now.
No other advanced nation lets the wealthiest buy their government.
 So if our billionaires want to leave, good-bye!
Every great discovery or idea in history has been followed by the same a little later by a different person.
Isn't that the whole point of "The Social Network" movie?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
09:37 AM on 01/28/2011
State Bankruptcy = Failed State

al-Qaeda would be thrilled.
06:26 AM on 03/11/2011
America can only go bankrupt if some insiders want to make it look so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janiepants
04:36 PM on 01/26/2011
This laughable on its face. When average Joe goes to court for bankruptcy, he is stating that he doesn't have the money or the ability to raise money/capital to pay their bills. The states do have the option to RAISE taxes for revenue. They have the ability to get the money. But because of their personal belief in low taxes and smaller goverment, they seem to think that prevents them to do so. If the 50 states stopped trying to be Santa Claus to citizens by suggesting that somehow you can have all the services (yes-social services) they expect for the low, low price of fifty cents a year then they can generate the revenue. Instead every one is this mad race to the bottom. This 30 year Reagonomic experiment needs to come to an end. We need goverment. We need our social services. And we need the states to tax and manage our tax dollars appropriately and responsibly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samiiam
12:54 AM on 01/26/2011
It is always the guy with the pension that gets it in the neck. And then people ask why would good ole John blow his brains out?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thirdcloud
06:57 PM on 01/25/2011
I think that it is too obvious to say that there is a significant difference in municipal solvency and state solvency. While some similarities do exist, others do not particularly when we consider the idea of a state after state domino reaction.

An important concept that rarely seems discussed sufficiently, is the difference between public and private labor unions. They are not the same in practice. Private sector unions do not manipulate the government as do public employee unions do. When you look at California's initiative process and the attendant law enforcement lobby that plane seems destin to be flown into the side of the mountain because politicians who want to continue to be polticians will never stand up to the forces of public employee labor!
06:31 AM on 03/11/2011
Hey Hot Shot, can you write an essay about how corporate unions buy former congressmen for a million dollars a year, to influence legislation as lobbyists? Please write a short paragrph about why it is AOK for corporations to have unions, but if real people have unions, that is some really scary stuff!
 Bring it!
06:26 PM on 01/24/2011
Part 1 of my posting is missing. Maybe its still in HP's pending file.
07:23 PM on 01/24/2011
Part 1 has been posted.
06:25 PM on 01/24/2011
(continued from below)

Non rated California bonds due in 2020 which came to market at a 5.05% yield (100) in 2005, were trading at 90 cents on the dollar in December, 2010 and are now down to 75 cents on the dollar (1/24/11). Actual bond trades are reported daily at this web site:

http://www.municipalbonds.com/bonds/recent

You can check a bond's historical prices by typing in its cusip in the space provided.

Don't assume your retail broker (financial adviser) knows a lot about munis. If in doubt, buy Beverly Hills, not Compton and stick with the 15 year bond, not the 35 year maturity. The market does not pay you much to take on all that extra maturity risk.

The biggest risk in muni land may turn out to be runaway inflation. In 1982, high grade 3% munis due in 1999 were trading at under 40 cents on the dollar.
06:18 PM on 01/24/2011
To date, the biggest loser in the Vallejo, CA bankruptcy appears to be Union Bank which had issued the letter of credit backing certain Vallejo bonds (actually, certificates of participation). The next biggest loser (so far) would appear to be one or more bond insurance companies which have been required to step in to keep interest and principal flowing on a timely basis to insured bond holders. Vallejo revenue bonds backed by their own source of repayment (e.g. water revenue) appear to be current and not in default. Recent news items about the possibility of a wave of muni bond defaults will make it harder and more expensive for all muni borrowers to access the credit markets. Some issuers may be shut out entirely. During the 1990's, it was possible to pick up some defaulted assessment district bonds in California for pennies on the dollar and watch them go to par some years later when the Fed flooded the markets with cheap money and these defaulted issues were refinanced.

For California bond investors, certificates of participation with no strong pledged revenue source, issued by financially weak issuers, present a major risk. Most retail investors aren't in a position to analyze an issuer's financial statements (although Vallejo's statements are posted on its web site). Too many bond fund managers are "yield hogs", buying risky paper to increase current yields for investors.
KIampfbeobachter
Misanthropic economic and political shaman
12:59 PM on 01/24/2011
"states face a combined pension fund shortfall of $3 trillion"

"You don't need social security, we give you a far better state pension when you retire and you can retire 3 to 5 years earlier than the poor wretches on SS".
So what now? Welfare for 5 years and than nothing??
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rascalcat
Lover of liberal women and cheap wine.Or was it...
12:37 PM on 01/24/2011
Yet, when the anti-pension, union bitter, posters on here lose their savings in a bank going under, they sure expect the government to cover their loses, don't they.
 
There is no difference.  This is people's retirements they were counting on.  These pensions are why they took lower pay than they could have made in the private sector.
11:40 AM on 01/24/2011
California will start issuing IOU's in April.. until then we can use monopoly money as legal debt ridden tender.. whaaat..
06:29 PM on 01/24/2011
It will be a serious problem if California starts rationing AIDS drugs for the poor. In some states, someone has to die before your name moves up on the list.
photo
lcr999
scientist
11:32 AM on 01/24/2011
I don't understand. If states are "sovereign" they can do any damn thing they want with their debt.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rascalcat
Lover of liberal women and cheap wine.Or was it...
12:33 PM on 01/24/2011
Nope.
photo
lcr999
scientist
04:20 PM on 01/24/2011
Explain. In what court are you going to sue.
06:05 AM on 01/24/2011
conservatives are trashing Illinois for raising our income taxes, but sounds like that is the responsible thing to do, finally.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
thinklib
I will not mince words.
09:01 AM on 01/24/2011
The responsible thing to do is slash spending.

All governing entities will end up facing this reality. Greece, the UK, etc...

You can only put the burden on the people for so long until, finally, the people and the government realize that spending is the problem, not taxing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruEngineHearing
Happiness needs new pursuers...
10:07 AM on 01/24/2011
Nope. The tax we should pay is the price of the things we want. Want buses, pony up; want an opera house, cough up the millions; want no potholes, you pay and they're filled. Want retirement security and senior healthcare in your future, then price it, put it in your shopping cart and take it to checkout.

This isn't magic; it's like your Netflix bill - tell 'em how many movies you need at one time, pay the monthly bill, and watch all 23 "Narnia" sequels and "The Latest Fokkers" anytime you want.
02:28 PM on 01/24/2011
When the house is on fire, you don't start buying fire retardant building products, you put out the fire. Illinois was nowhere near tipping point on total tax load.

Then go after spending.

States that didn't learn this are considering bankruptcy, to throw the burden on the rest of us and break their contracts with their long term employees.