iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Administration Cut Funding To Promote Democracy In Egypt, Disappointing Human Rights Activists

Obama Mubarak

First Posted: 01/28/11 10:00 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 07:30 PM ET

NEW YORK -- President Obama's historic speech at Cairo University galvanized millions of people across the Arab world with its inspiring message of peace and brotherhood among Muslims. And his stirring endorsement of democracy gave hope to many Egyptians that his words would ring in a new era, helping pressure their own government to hold free and fair elections and to adhere to the rule of law.

But when it comes to backing up the president's rhetoric since that speech in June 2009, the administration has a decidedly mixed record and has disappointed many Egyptians, foreign policy experts tell The Huffington Post. Though Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has championed human rights around the world and American diplomats have quietly encouraged political and legal reforms in Egypt, when it comes to promoting democracy in the riot-torn country, efforts have generally been less aggressive than the Bush administration's. On Friday, amidst violent protests, longtime leader Hosni Mubarak announced the resignation of Egypt's government.

In its first year, the Obama administration cut funding for democracy and governance programming in Egypt by more than half, from $50 million in 2008 to $20 million in 2009 (Congress later appropriated another $5 million). The level of funding for civil society programs and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) was cut disproportionately, from $32 million to only $7 million. Though funding levels for 2010 are not yet available, they are expected to show an increase to $14 million, says Stephen McInerny, the director of advocacy at the Project on Middle East Democracy. He notes that the Bush administration slashed economic aid to Egypt in the 2009 budget but kept the funding for democracy and governance programs constant, while Obama cut funding to those programs in an effort to make the cuts more proportional and under pressure from the American embassy in Cairo.

The White House and the State Department did not return emails for comment.

In addition, the administration limited funding only to NGOs registered with the Egyptian government, oversees such groups broadly and can dissolve them for violations like receiving foreign funding. Most human rights groups are not registered with the government, according to an Egyptian academic interviewed by the U.S. Embassy. The widely-criticized change,
taken in the wake of intense pressure from Egyptian officials for the U.S. to stop funding non-registered groups, reversed a Bush-era policy of funding all NGOs and civil society programs.

"The speech in Cairo raised expectations a lot that a new era was near with sustained support for human rights and dignity" said Bruce K. Rutherford, the author of "Egypt After Mubarak: Liberalism, Islam and Democracy." "The administration chose not to follow through on that
for a variety of reasons, cutting the support for civil society programs in half, etc. There was the perception that he did the opposite of what he said he would do and there is anger and
disillusionment at the U.S. and Obama in general among almost everyone I talk to in Egypt."

The new administration limited funding to human rights groups in an effort to repair its relationship with the Egyptian government, which was damaged during the Bush years, says McInerny. "There was a real priority to improve relations in the area after the tumult of the
previous eight years."

Former U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Nicholas Veliotes agreed with that assessment, noting that the failure of Bush's public pressure campaign was most evident in a State of the Union speech during which the former president explicitly called out Mubarak. "That backfired completely -- the only thing that Mubarak could do under those circumstances was to hunker down. If he did cave and do the right thing, he'd be accused of doing it for the wrong reasons," he said.

But the new administration started off on the wrong foot, says McInerny. "One of the big mistakes was adopting this policy of USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development) funding only going to organizations that were registered," he says. "Privately, the administration realizes that but they still have that policy." McInerny feels that the administration improved its policy on such issues in its second year. "They sent some really bad signals the first year and since then they've realized their mistakes and are doing a much better job on civil society issues."

The administration emphasized establishing warmer ties with Egypt to avoid the public "name and shame" tactics of Bush, while urging political reforms in private, according to diplomatic cables posted by WikiLeaks on Friday.

American efforts to promote democracy are viewed skeptically by Mubarak, the U.S. Embassy in Cairol told Clinton in a cable shortly before the Egyptian leader's visit to Washington in May 2009.

"We have heard him lament the results of earlier U.S. efforts to encourage reform in the Islamic world," says the cable. "He can harken back to the Shah of Iran: the U.S. encouraged him to accept reforms, only to watch the country fall into the hands of revolutionary religious extremists. Wherever he has seen these U.S. efforts, he can point to the chaos and loss of stability that ensued."

Former diplomats contacted by Huffington Post felt that the current administration is doing its best under difficult circumstances. They noted that Egypt is of vital importance and has been instrumental as a U.S. ally in the region on Israel-Palestinian issues, the Iraq War and
containing Iranian ambitions. "It is the largest culturally important Arab country and our number one political ally in the region," said David Mack, the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs from 1990 to 1993. "Egyptians have always been there and they are essential to US strategic concerns -- you deal with reality and you don't necessarily have the choice of who it is that you're talking to."

As for democracy and human rights, Mack says it's a matter of tactics, since the American position has always been clear. "Bush was very public in his human rights agenda, and he embraced this with regard to Egypt, and I don't fault Obama for trying to deal with this differently," he said. Calling it a difficult balance between regional stability and promoting democracy, Mack criticized those "who say we have to be absolutely consistent from country to country -- as they say, consistency is the hobgoblin of inferior minds."

The State Department's mission is not just the promotion of human rights but in protecting American interests, says Veliotes. "One of which is democracy, but that is by no means the only one -- they're also concerned about regional stability." Veliotes emphasizes that the current turmoil in Egypt is a complicated situation, recalling that when he served as ambassador from 1983 to 1986, Mubarak represented a hopeful future, holding free parliamentary elections and freeing many prisoners (one of whom, Muslim Brotherhood leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, went on to become the number-two in al-Qaeda). At the time, he says Mubarak told him that he only wanted to serve two terms. "Obviously things have changed a lot but you can't push too hard or you'll just piss them off. I happen to believe that Clinton and Obama are handling this as well as they can."

Egyptian-American Aladdin Elaasar, who says he has not been able to contact his sister in Cairo in recent days due to phone outages and the government's Internet shutdown, was much more critical of the White House for failing to "see the writing on the wall."

The author of "The Last Pharaoh: Mubarak and the Uncertain Future of Egypt in the Obama Age," Elaasar says that Obama's policy on the country is worse than Bush's. "At least Bush talked about the whole Middle East, winning hearts and minds. When Obama came and chose to deliver that speech in Cairo, that was great, but it sent a mixed message. They saw him shaking hands with Mubarak -- he talked about democracy and all that, but nothing has happened," he said, pointing out the country's huge youth population that remains alienated and often unemployed.

The cables also reveal new details about Egypt's judicial system and their government's defensiveness when questioned by American diplomats. When an embassy staffer asked top Egyptian security official General Abdel Rahman about police brutality and prison conditions, Rahman asserted that the Interior Ministry State Security (SSIS) "has not abused prisoners 'in the past ten years' and claimed "there are no problems with prison conditions."

Elsewhere, the cables upend that claim with widespread citations of abuse, including police officers assaulting and sodomizing prisoners. One of the cables describes the arrest of a government clerk for writing poetry that insulted Mubarak -- he was sentenced to three years in prison. One human rights activist said "unrelenting pressure" on police officers led to a climate where "to conduct murder investigations, police will round up 40 to 50 suspects from a neighborhood and hang them by their arms from the ceiling for weeks until someone confesses."

Often, Egyptian officials mocked U.S. pressure on human rights. Rahman complained that "communists and extremists" dominated the NGOs and human rights organizations. One ministry official "wondered whether the U.S. was under 'external pressure' to be more 'hawkish' on human rights in Egypt or whether the U.S. intervention was 'retribution' for U.S.-Egyptian differences over procedure" during the Israeli peace process, according to a cable sent in February 2009.

In meetings with Egyptian security officials in early 2009, Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner "stressed that U.S. human rights policy is based on principled engagement, universal standards and a recognition that reform will come from internal actors." To demonstrate the new administration's commitment to human rights, Posner cited President Obama's announcement "on his second day in office to close Guantanamo."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NEW YORK -- President Obama's historic speech at Cairo University galvanized millions of people across the Arab world with its inspiring message of peace and brotherhood among Muslims. And his stirrin...
NEW YORK -- President Obama's historic speech at Cairo University galvanized millions of people across the Arab world with its inspiring message of peace and brotherhood among Muslims. And his stirrin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,584
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (36 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:38 PM on 02/03/2011
That cozy little picture kinda sums it up for me
photo
hopepad08
"Hope" and "Change" is a beautiful thing.
11:24 AM on 01/31/2011
To Debbie McPherson who said this:
hope

the people of Egypt have had it with a brutal govt that our govt has been supporting - including PBO....so, it has everythign to do with PBO - or, do you excuse him from every Bush policy he keeps in play - which is almost ALL his policy....

I guess that's why we are hearing them shout down with Obama and the US and burning the US flag. Oh wait, none of that is happening, now is it?
11:42 AM on 01/31/2011
hope
 
You miss the point completely, they are shouting down their brutal dictator and demanding a change.....
 
now, that dictator has been propped up by Obama & US Govt.... to the tune of $68Billion just last year,
they do not need to burn a US flag or shout down Obama....
 
aiming at Murabak is the same thing and at this point Obama is saying "we'll support" whoever wins...in other words, Obama doesnot care that they have a brutal dictator  --- he cares about keeping the the Suez Canal open and protecting Israel - at any price - and if it means backing  a burtal dictator and keeping the people of Egypt in perpetual poverty - fine by him....
 
 
 
photo
hopepad08
"Hope" and "Change" is a beautiful thing.
11:55 AM on 01/31/2011
I don't think I missed the point at all, This is not about PBO, GWB or any support the the US has given or will continue to give them.

It's all about the people and the last 30 years of ruling under Murabak. It's his policy they are rebelling against. It's all about them and what they are fighting for.
05:58 PM on 01/30/2011
How ironic. Obama cut funding to promote Democracy in Egypt while simultaneously increasing funding to promote totalitarianism and socialism at home.
05:48 PM on 01/30/2011
Yea well, President Obama isnt big on democracy so this is NO surprise unless you've been believing everything you hear.
11:43 AM on 01/31/2011
tb
 
F & F
 
for not drinking his koolaid...
05:26 PM on 01/30/2011
The U.S. has never spent a large amount of foreign aid dollars on democracy promotion. Obama is no exception. Despite Democratic and Republican rhetoric to the contrary, neither side of the aisle has studied democracy promotion in any great detail, and neither side has routinely placed democracy promotion in the top ten of foreign aid goals. This silly state of affairs persists despite the fact that bipartisan groups have noted over, and over, again the need to make this a foreign policy priority.
12:04 PM on 01/31/2011
Rule
 
The USA has spent vast fortunes on foreign aid to brutal dictators(68billion $$ to Murabak last year) .... that much is for sure....they care little about Democracy here in the USA  -- why should they be concerned with any other people being kept in perpetual poverty by a brutal dictator....it's kind of the USA "ruling class" ideal model for a govt....heaven knows the govt is not about "we the people" here in America ----we have a govt for the ruling class - the top 1% - why should Egypt be any different....the  thing about America is they ahve been dismantling our Democracy  slowly (until Bush & Cheney really put the gas to it)  for the last 30 years - we are ruled by corporation and bankers - they scam us, swindle us, lie to us and try to dissolve the middle class -----one one hand the US Govt spends 3.3 trillion$$$$ to bailout bankers (who then enjoy record multi million $$$ bonus plans the same year) and then when it comes to the taxpayers - working class people they threaten to cut "entitlements" because it really pisses them off that an American working class person should take one nickelfrom the system they want all for the ruling class....doesn't sound very democratic does it?? 
Maybe we Americans should insisit on focusing on Democracy for America before it's all gone for good....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepulse33
Power corrupts.
03:30 PM on 01/30/2011
I don't see anything wrong with it. Just whom exactly was being paid to promote democracy in Egypt, Mubarak?
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
01:32 PM on 02/14/2011
Well, the NED is the privitized wing of the CIA, Ray Gun's idea, and it does NOT buid democratic parties, it incites religious and ethnic strife. It operates within countries against "our enimies" and views real democracy as a threat, not to mention "socialism," or "social justice."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 PM on 01/30/2011
We need that money in America, so whatever, who cares dude. He cut funding, he should have cut funding. Don't cut education, don't cut job care, not social security. The "spread democracy to people who won't easily adopt it without violence" hobby? Yeah that. Cut that. Cut it right out.
02:56 PM on 01/30/2011
With all of our presidents past foreign policy experience, I cannot believe he made such a mistake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dojone
nada
05:35 PM on 01/30/2011
You may be right there, look at how much W's experience in the world helped!
05:10 PM on 01/31/2011
You are absolutely correct. Bush was no good at F.P either. McCain would not have been either. Maybe we need a Teddy Roosevelt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marioam
01:23 PM on 01/30/2011
So, if he does not give money to Egypt he is wrong. If he does give money to Egypt he is wrong.
Make up your minds people. You try straddling the knife edge of the American peoples thinking.
He could be like Bush and Cheney and not give a dang about what the American people think and do whatever he pleases, but this President does care. Too bad many of the Republicans are blind only to themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
12:17 PM on 01/30/2011
Prez Obie needed to keep his cousins, "Muslim Brotherhood" happy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:57 PM on 01/30/2011
Birther, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
01:24 PM on 01/30/2011
Aren't they still looking?
photo
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
12:58 PM on 01/30/2011
Your juvenile comment reveals much, much more about you than anything you're trying to suggest about the President.
 
How old are you, anyway???  Twelve?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me
01:24 PM on 01/30/2011
Distant cousins.
Sorry.
12:10 PM on 01/30/2011
The MSM (hence the govt.) is backing Baradei... Egyptians will no longer accept any foreign backed leader.
12:12 PM on 02/01/2011
Best Guest
 
Baradei is a UN guy, which means he is VERY BAD news and we better hope he does not replace Murabak...
01:35 PM on 02/01/2011
He's also very well connected to many of the usual suspects……
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:58 AM on 01/30/2011
You stop paying them bribes, what do you expect? How much US taxpayer money was wasted here? I tend to believe that as long as Egypt promoted peace in the region, especially with Israel, little else was to be expected. And again, Obama is a good speaker, but he doesn't use people that can deliver. He picks big business and international banks, and adopts their money making ideas into US policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
feyangel
11:58 AM on 01/30/2011
There is nothing Obama could do that would please everyone. Nothing. Some of us gripe about money going overseas for any reason and some of us gripe if it doesn't go overseas for reasons we support. Really-- who knows what the best and right things are to do right now-- but one thing is certain-- Obama will disappoint or enrage someone somewhere.
11:53 AM on 01/31/2011
fey
 
yeah, poor ole Obama - just doing teh Bushie thing and gettin' grief for it....maybe in 2012 the Democrats can find a democrat to run against him....meanwhile he'll stay the cozy, corporate lapdog...surrounded by Govt Sachs employees, and jeff Immelt...and all his other "sponsers", it's okay though, he doen't need to worry about the other 98% of Americans - it's the top 2% cutting the biggest bribes aka campaign contributions...
11:57 AM on 01/30/2011
In the picture, Obama is probably telling him, "They think we are discussing freedom and addressing the needs of our people, what I really want to know is how did you like the lobster we had for lunch?"