iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shark-Catching Nations Fail To Protect Threatened Species

Shark

NICOLE WINFIELD   01/27/11 03:10 PM ET   AP

ROME — Two environmental groups on Thursday accused the 20 countries that catch the most sharks of failing to fulfill promises made to the U.N. to better conserve the animals that are increasingly threatened with extinction.

In 1999, more than 100 governments adopted a plan of action at the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization to try to stem overfishing of sharks, pledging, among other things, to develop national action plans to ensure that shark catches are sustainable.

The non-governmental groups Traffic and the Pew Environment Group said Thursday that only 13 of the top 20 shark catching countries had developed national plans, and that it was unclear if such plans had done any good where they were adopted.

They issued their report ahead of a meeting next week of government members of the FAO's fisheries committee, which will discuss the state of the world's fisheries in detail.

Some 73 million sharks are killed annually, primarily to meet the high demand in Asia for fins which are used in shark fin soup.

Because sharks are slow growing, late to mature and produce few young, they are unable to replenish their populations as quickly when they are caught. As a result, some 30 percent of all shark species are now threatened or nearly threatened with extinction.

Traffic and Pew analyzed fisheries data and made a list of the top 20 shark catchers which account for nearly 80 percent of the total shark catch reported globally. In order, the top 10 are Indonesia, India, Spain, Taiwan, Argentina, Mexico, Pakistan, United States, Japan, and Malaysia. Yet according to the two groups, Indonesia has only made a draft national plan and India is developing one. Other countries have adopted them but, because reporting is voluntary, it's not clear if they've been implemented or have done any good.

The groups urged governments at the FAO meeting next week to have the U.N. agency complete a thorough review to determine what countries have and haven't done to comply with their pledges to manage their fisheries.

"The fate of the world's sharks is in the hands of the top 20 shark catchers, most of whom have failed to demonstrate what, if anything, they are doing to save these imperiled species," said Glenn Sant, Traffic's global marine program leader.

Jill Hepp, manager of shark conservation for Pew, said sharks play a critical role in the ocean environment.

"Where shark populations are healthy, marine life thrives; but where they have been overfished, ecosystems fall out of balance," she said.

The report suggests that national action plans with lofty goals that are never implemented might not be the answer to saving sharks. Rather, countries that take smaller, incremental steps toward conservation might achieve better results.

It noted that Palau had announced in 2009 it would create the world's first shark sanctuary by banning all commercial shark fishing in its territorial waters and that Honduras had announced a moratorium on shark fishing last year.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ROME — Two environmental groups on Thursday accused the 20 countries that catch the most sharks of failing to fulfill promises made to the U.N. to better conserve the animals that are increasing...
ROME — Two environmental groups on Thursday accused the 20 countries that catch the most sharks of failing to fulfill promises made to the U.N. to better conserve the animals that are increasing...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caroline gray
artist : ) animal lover
08:33 PM on 02/01/2011
what's even more maddening & stupid is the cartilage is flavourless...beef or chicken stock is used to give it a flavour.
02:08 PM on 01/31/2011
When I was working on and around Guam I would often see tuna long-liners coming in with deck loads of shark fins, sometimes piled to the hight of five so so feet. Sharks are pelagic so when they stop swimming they die. A hooked shark drowns quickly. These fish were not target catch but incidental. I can't address the problem of sharks taking a free lunch but would hate to see a resource waisted. That said, the sharks are going to have trouble for a long time if anyone expects the countries on the list to pay any attention to anything but the bottom line. Hell, the US can't even pass meaningful Wall Street reform. Votes for sale are votes for greed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevRock
03:18 PM on 01/31/2011
Sadly, you're correct. Unless a worldwide BAN is put in place with strict enforcement and stiff penalties, nothing is going to change and we'll be one step closer to wiping out the apex predator of our oceans and be a step closer to wiping ourselves off the planet - which will be a very healthy thing for Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EcoHustler
www.ecohustler.co.uk
12:14 PM on 01/31/2011
!!YO YO YO!!

quick and easy! copy and paste the email here and send it to the ambassador to those countries.

Open Letter to the Costa Rican Ambassador on Shark Finning

http://ecohustler.co.uk/2011/01/27/open-letter-to-the-costa-rican-ambassador-on-shark-finning/
11:37 PM on 01/30/2011
"Two environmental groups on Thursday accused the 20 countries that catch the most sharks of failing to fulfill promises made to the U.N"

And anyone is surprised that greed trumps all.
10:09 PM on 01/30/2011
Time to ban those nations from exporting to this country
photo
tooncesrocks
my micro bio is empty
09:48 PM on 01/30/2011
natural-gas fracking nations fail to protect humans
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scifibird
09:59 PM on 01/30/2011
Species go extinct - who causes that to happen? Humans. In the natural world, the inhabitants live in balance until humans step in. Then everything gets screwed up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:15 PM on 01/30/2011
One other thing, stay away from shark oil at the health food stores! And krill oil for that matter.
Krill is the main diet for various baleen whales. Next thing ya know, krill will be overfished causing a food shortage for ocean animals that eat them. Animals like salmon & whales.

There are plenty of other supplements to buy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
innerpuppie
The truth is an absolute defense...
06:07 PM on 01/30/2011
If you have ever watched the 'finning' of sharks you'd be shocked. These animals are hauled aboard boats ALIVE. Their fins are then sliced off their bodies and then the fin-less body is tossed overboard. The struggling animal then sinks to the bottom of the ocean and drowns. Say what you will about the sharks but what the human beings (if that is what you'd like to call them) are doing to these living beings is barbaric - and all for a bowl of soup.
05:56 PM on 01/30/2011
Limited resources of food, water, oil, phosphorous, rare earth metals meets
an ever expanding world population.

The population keeps expanding but the resources are being drawn down.
05:56 PM on 01/30/2011
This is absolutely disgusting and completely inexcusable.
The world fisheries are already on the brink of collapse, 70% of the global tuna population GONE.
We need drastic policies YESTERDAY. This should be completely illegal.
I wish more people knew about this horrible practice of towing sharks aboard, cutting off their fins and tossing them back to die slowly and horribly bleeding to death.

The only real way to stop this egregious practice is to not support it.
This goes for all types of fishing. Most of the fish killed are fed to land animals
raised for food. So unless you all want an empty polluted, dying ocean in a few years...
I suggest you find out the truth. Goveg.org
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
05:24 PM on 01/30/2011
Maybe one of the reasons for the overfishing of sharks is because sharks naturally compete with people for other stuff in the food chain, tuna fish and so forth. Perhaps the practice is akin to shooting at the coyotes to keep them away from the herd. 6.8 billion people have to eat something. Maybe concern for marine life will lead Pew and other entities to lend their brainpower to improving land-based agriculture, so less people will have to rely on aquaculture for their primary diet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:57 PM on 01/30/2011
If you're serious about the shark "theory" then it's no, no & no! Sharks may be at the top of the food chain (ocean creature-wise) but they sure as heck don't compete & eat that much. They aren't gonna wipe out various fish populations any time soon, we might though!

As for countries like Palau & Honduras, they have a lot to lose since healthy reefs are dependent on healthy shark populations. Reefs bring tourism/$$ to countries like them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
11:34 AM on 02/01/2011
sharks have been around millions of years
05:11 PM on 01/30/2011
Seventy three million sharks killed per year? The U.S. should be ashamed. I know I am, and I don't even eat shark or their fins.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
05:27 PM on 01/30/2011
I don't feel ashamed at all. I don't have shark skin boots or a shark skin wallet or anything like that, either, all I really know about sharks is from JAWS, and that they still like to snack on unwary waterborne tourists, and that just doesn't sound like a fun day at the beach, to me.

I think the real issue here is that you've got a lot of people in the world, and each one can easily put away a pound of food in a day. Maybe even 2-3. So, 6.8B*1,2, or 3? Any way you calculate it, there's a lot of pressure on ag and fisheries to produce and provide, and a lot of hungry people. 

But, what if we started promoting home gardening, as a parallel development to all this commercial strength harvesting of marine life? Discernible benefit, or feel-good gesture, or redundant to existing ag concerns?
06:01 PM on 01/30/2011
Than you obviously need to get an education because you are more likely to get kicked in the head by a donkey than even get bit by a shark. Sharks do not eat people. The only times people get bit, is when they are mistaken for a seal etc. and the chances of that are incredibly incredibly RARE. Jaws was the worst thing that ever happened to sharks, Steven Spielberg is responsible for such unwarranted fear and hatred of an undeserving creature.

You don't need to go around cutting off sharks fins then dumping them back into the ocean to die slowly to feed people. Shark fins are a delicacy or (fake) medicine.
You want to really feed people, really the only sustainable way to go forward is with a plant based diet. More meat is the worst thing for the world's population and the planet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:05 PM on 01/30/2011
The remedy for tourists is "Stay Out of the Water"! Go to the pool instead. As for eating pounds of food/day - A few places maybe, but certainly not the norm for most of the world.

Home gardening & local foods is a great idea (plant & animal) Find out were your local CSA (community supported agriculture) is at:

http://www.localharvest.org/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just4theHalibut
10:34 PM on 01/30/2011
I think that number ( 73 million) is world-wide. However, the US-alone numbers of sharks is very hard to find. They are caught by commercial and recreational fisheries, and as bycatch. If the US is serious about implementing its National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of sharks, one of the first things NOAA should do is update the numbers in its 10-year-old plan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doodlebug2
11:37 AM on 02/01/2011
fisheries, noaa, won't do S$%&&#T, as long as money can be made on sharks, they will be taken.
look at the passenger pigieon, Auk, Labrador duck as examples.